Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54681
Title: | 追蹤革命脈絡:裴宜理論當代中國的國家與社會 Tracking Revolutionary Legacy: Contemporary China's State and Society in Elizabeth Perry's Writing |
Authors: | Wang-Ting Huang 黃宛婷 |
Advisor: | 石之瑜(Chih-Yu Shih) |
Co-Advisor: | 周嘉辰(Chia-Chen Chou) |
Keyword: | 中國學知識社群,激進年代,裴宜理,國家與社會關係研究,革命威權理論, China Studies Community,radical era,Elizabeth Perry,state-society relation,Revolutionary Authoritarianism, |
Publication Year : | 2015 |
Degree: | 碩士 |
Abstract: | 研究者本身的學術經歷、文化背景、所處時代國際情勢與學術社群潛在氛圍,為陶養西方中國學知識社群中國觀的重要養分。本篇碩士論文將研究對象鎖定美國1960激進年代左翼學者-Elizabeth Perry(裴宜理),透過深度訪談與
分析她諸篇受人關注的「群眾抗爭」研究,來探索她中國革命觀點的起、承、轉、合,如何展現在她群眾抗爭研究的獨特性以及中國研究的延續與變遷。 研究結果發現,早期Perry以抗爭者為中心研究中共革命與基層抗爭,乃係起源於美國國內反越戰、反美帝思想;自80年代鄧小平經濟改革後,她的研究視角雖歷經社會中心到國家中心的轉變,但以研究者為出發的堅持,使她不同於同時期學者高度抨擊中共已不再具備革命色彩,反而主張中共革命遺跡仍遺留在今日中國,並以「將革命帶回來」的觀點頗析當代中國政治、經濟與社會發展,進而發展出「革命威權理論」(Revolutionary Authoritarianism)。正因為對中共革命框架的堅持,她的群眾抗爭研究以及國家與社會關係研究,呈現與現有國家中心、社會中心、統合主義觀點、鑲嵌共生觀點不同的「歷史中心視野」,而她的研究雖脫離政治學主流理論框架,卻更保有中國原本色彩。 The epistemology of western China studies communities were embedded in individual research experience, cultural background, international relations and metaphysical pathos of research. This dissertation focuses on Elizabeth J. Perry, a left-wing scholar of the 1960s American radical era, and explores her image of the Chinese Revolution, the unique assertion of grass-root protest research and the continuity and transition of her work, through in-depth interviews and comparative analysis of her famous works on grass-root protests. This dissertation suggests that, the research approach of protester-center in Perry’s China studies, were greatly influenced by the ideology of anti-war and anti- American Imperialism in the late 1960s. In the Economics Reform Era of the 1980s, Perry still asserts that Chinese Revolution legacy exits in contemporary China’s politic, economy and society when the Chinese Revolution attracted few admirers in the American academia even among those who initially argued for its positive contribution,. Moreover, the perspective of “ Bringing the Revolution back in” evolves into “ Revolutionary Authoritarianism”, and makes her arguments of Chinese state-society relation differ from the state-centered, society-centered approach, Corporatism and Embedded Theory. Finally, even though Perry’s research perspective has changed from society to state, her history-centered framework helps her studies retain more Chinese feature comparing with other mainstream paradigm. |
URI: | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54681 |
Fulltext Rights: | 有償授權 |
Appears in Collections: | 國家發展研究所 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf Restricted Access | 7.76 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.