Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 文學院
  3. 華語教學碩士學位學程
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98045
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor蔡宜妮zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorI-Ni Tsaien
dc.contributor.author孫慶容zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorCing-Rong Sunen
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-23T16:34:43Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-24-
dc.date.copyright2025-07-23-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.date.submitted2025-07-09-
dc.identifier.citation于國棟、梁紅艷(2018)。選擇疑問句 「X 還是(Y)」中對於 X 的結構優先。Journal of Foreign Languages,41(1)。
余光武、姚瑤(2009)。「好不好」 的表達功能及其形成的語用解釋。語言科學,(6),625-632。
李先銀、劉明萱(2024)。口語交際中「就是」的填充用法。漢語學習(05),24-35。doi:CNKI:SUN:HYXX.0.2024-05-003。
高麗君(2010)。中文「其實」與「事實上」在口語與書面語的語用功能探究及其教學啟示。(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。
畢唯樂(2022)。西方古典哲學中的「笑」:一種話語分析。天府新論(05),67-77。doi:CNKI:SUN:TFXL.0.2022-05-008。
張雅雯(2016)。「我覺得」和「我想」之語用功能:以語料庫為本。(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。
陳麗君(2011)。當代口語「然後」的篇章銜接、言談標識功能和語法化。語文學報,(17),229-251。https://doi.org/10.6760/YWHP.201112.0229。
劉虹(2004)。會話結構分析。北京大學出版社。
鄧曼琳(2015)。成為「文青」——生命歷程與文化實做。(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。
Adelswärd V. Laughter and Dialogue: The Social Significance of Laughter in Institutional Discourse. Nordic Journal of Linguistics. 1989;12(2):107-136. doi:10.1017/S0332586500002018
Abbas, N. F. (2019). Humor in TV talk shows. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(3), 136.
Alberts, J. K. (1992). An inferential/strategic explanation for the social organisation of teases. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 11(3), 153-177.
Bänninger-Huber, E. (1992). Prototypical affective microsequences in psychotherapeutic interaction. Psychotherapy Research, 2(4), 291-306.
Bellieni, C. V. (2023). Laughter: A signal of ceased alarm toward a perceived incongruity between life and stiffness. New Ideas in Psychology, 68, 100977.
Bi, X., & Ren, W. (2023). Metapragmatic comments deconstructing the concept of self-mockery in Chinese on social media. Language & Communication, 92, 91-104.
Bouyer, J., Seck, M. T., & Sall, B. (2013). Misleading guidance for decision making on tsetse eradication: Response to Shaw et al. (2013). Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 112(3-4), 443-446.
Boxer, D., & Cortés-Conde, F. (1997). From bonding to biting: Conversational joking and identity display. Journal of pragmatics, 27(3), 275-294.
Brown, P. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge university press.
Burke, P. (2013). The art of conversation. John Wiley & Sons.
Buxton, R. A. (1987). The late‐night talk show: Humor in fringe television. Southern Journal of Communication, 52(4), 377-389.
Cancino, M. (2015). Assessing Learning Opportunities in EFL classroom interaction: What can conversation analysis tell us?. RELC Journal, 46(2), 115-129.
Chang, W. & Haugh, M. (2011). Evaluations of im/politeness of an intercultural apology. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(3), 411-442. https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2011.019
Chevalier, F. H., & Clift, R. (2008). Unfinished turns in French conversation: Projectability, syntax and action. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(10), 1731-1752.
Clayman, S. E. (1992). Caveat orator: Audience disaffiliation in the 1988 presidential debates. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 78(1), 33-60.
Clifton, J. (2006). A conversation analytical approach to business communication: The case of leadership. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 43(3), 202-219.
Clift, R. (2016). Don’t make me laugh: Responsive laughter in (dis) affiliation. Journal of Pragmatics, 100, 73-88.
Du, P. (2022). Shared laughter as relational strategy at intercultural conflictual workplace interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 188, 39-55.
Heritage, J., & Paul, D. R. E. W. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: an introduction [Extras]. Cambridge University Press.
Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (Vol. 8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Drew, P., & Sorjonen, M. L. (1997). Institutional dialogue. Discourse as social interaction, 2,92-118.
DREW, P. (1987). Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics, 25(1), 219-253. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.219
Dynel, M. (2008). No aggression, only teasing: The pragmatics of teasing and banter. Lodz papers in pragmatics, 4(2), 241-261.
Eriksson, G. (2009). The management of applause and laughter in live political interviews. Media, Culture & Society, 31(6), 901-920.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse (pp. 9-14). London: Edward Arnold.
Ford, C. E., & Thompson, S. A. (1996). Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. Studies in interactional sociolinguistics, 13, 134-184.
Freed, A. F. (1994). The form and function of questions in informal dyadic conversation. Journal of pragmatics, 21(6), 621-644.
Freud, S. (1960). Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. WW Norton & Company.
Gardner, R. (2012). Conversation analysis in the classroom. The handbook of conversation analysis, 593-611.
Glenn, P. J. (1995). Laughing at and laughing with: Negotiations of participant alignments through conversational laughter. Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities, 43-56.
Glenn, P. J. (1989). Initiating shared laughter in multi‐party conversations. Western Journal of Communication (includes Communication Reports), 53(2), 127-149.
Glenn, P. (2010). Interviewer laughs: Shared laughter and asymmetries in employment interviews. Journal of pragmatics, 42(6), 1485-1498.
Goffman, E. (1956). Embarrassment and Social Organization. American Journal of Sociology, 62(3), 264–271. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2772920
Greer, T., Usui, Y., Kato, T., Taniguchi, H., & Bussinguer, V. (2005). Suppressing laughter in the display of (dis) affiliation. Kobe Daigakui Kokusai Komyunikeeshon Sentaa Ronshuu (Kobe University International Communication Centre Bulletin), 2, 27-42.
Haakana, M. (2010). Laughter and smiling: Notes on co-occurrences. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6), 1499-1512.
Harris, S. (2001). Being politically impolite: Extending politeness theory to adversarial political discourse. Discourse & society, 12(4), 451-472.
Haugh, M. (2010). Jocular mockery, (dis) affiliation, and face. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(8), 2106-2119.
Haugh, M. (2014). Jocular mockery as interactional practice in everyday Anglo-Australian conversation. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 34(1), 76-99.
Hayashi, M. (2005). Joint turn construction through language and the body: Notes on embodiment in coordinated participation in situated activities.
Heritage, J. (1984). 13. A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement.
Heritage, J. (2004). Conversation analysis and institutional talk Analyzing data John Heritage. Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice, 222.
Heritage, J. (2004). 5 Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk. In Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 103-147). Psychology Press.
Heritage, J. (2007). Intersubjectivity and progressivity in references to persons (and places). Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural and social perspectives, 7, 255-280.
Hobbes, T. (1985). Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes; Edited with an Introduction by CB Macpherson. Penguin Books.
Holmes, J. (2000). Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace. Discourse studies, 2(2), 159-185.
Holt, E. (2010). The last laugh: Shared laughter and topic termination. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6), 1513-1525.
Hutchby, I. (2005). Media talk: Conversation analysis and the study of broadcasting: Conversation analysis and the study of broadcasting. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Ilie, C. (2001). Semi-institutional discourse: The case of talk shows. Journal of pragmatics, 33(2), 209-254.
Itakura, H. (2022). Self-praise in Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 202, 80-92.
Jefferson, G. (1974). Error correction as an interactional resource1. Language in society, 3(2), 181-199.
Jefferson, G., Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. (1977). Preliminary notes on the sequential organization of laughter. Pragmatics Microfiche, 1, A2-D9.
Jefferson, G. (1979). A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance/declination. Everyday Language: Studies In Ethnomethodology/Irvington Publishers.
Jefferson, G. (1984). 14. On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles.
Jefferson, G., Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. (1987). Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. Talk and social organization, 152-205.
Jefferson, G. (2008). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-31). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Kant, I. (1987). Critique of judgment. 1790. Trans. Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett, 987.
Kendrick, K. H., & Holler, J. (2017). Gaze direction signals response preference in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(1), 12-32.
Kendrick, K. H., Brown, P., Dingemanse, M., Floyd, S., Gipper, S., Hayano, K., ... & Levinson, S. C. (2020). Sequence organization: A universal infrastructure for social action. Journal of Pragmatics, 168, 119-138.
Kimura, D., Malabarba, T., & Kelly Hall, J. (2018). Data collection considerations for classroom interaction research: A conversation analytic perspective. Classroom Discourse, 9(3), 185-204.
Lauerbach, G. E. (2007). Argumentation in political talk show interviews. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(8), 1388–1419.
Lee, C. L., Chen, Y., & Tan, G. L. (2013). Silence and face-work in two Chinese TV talk shows. Discourse, Context & Media, 2(1), 52-74.
Leech, G. N. (1966). English in advertising: A linguistic study of advertising in Great Britain. (No Title).
Leech, G. N. (1983). Pragmatics, discourse analysis, stylistics and “The Celebrated Letter”.
Levinson, S.C. (2013). Recursion in Pragmatics. Language 89(1), 149-162. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lan.2013.0005.
Lippitt, J. (1991). Philosophical perspectives on humour and laughter (Doctoral dissertation, Durham University).
Loeb, L. (2015). The celebrity talk show: Norms and practices. Discourse, Context & Media, 10, 27-35.
Loeb, L. (2017). Politicians on celebrity talk shows. Discourse, context & media, 20, 146-156.
Martínez, E. R. (2003). Accomplishing closings in talk show interviews: A comparison with news interviews. Discourse Studies, 5(3), 283-302.
Mio, J. S., & Graesser, A. C. (1991). Humor, language, and metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 6(2), 87-102.
Miracle, W. C. (1991). Discourse markers in mandarin Chinese. The Ohio State University.
Mondada, L. (2016). Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of sociolinguistics, 20(3), 336-366.
Monro, D. H. (1963). Argument of Laughter. 1951. Reprint. Notre Dame, IN
Morizumi, F. (1997). Managing Distances: Discourse Strategies of a TV Talk Show Host. Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 8, 63-75.
Morreall, J. (1982). A new theory of laughter. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 42(2), 243-254.
Morreall, J. (1987). Funny ha-ha, funny strange, and other reactions to incongruity. The philosophy of laughter and humor, 189.
Nielsen, M. F. (2009). Interpretative management in business meetings: Understanding managers' interactional strategies through conversation analysis. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 46(1), 23-56.
O'Donnell‐Trujillo, N., & Adams, K. (1983). Heheh in conversation: Some coordinating accomplishments of laughter. Western Journal of Communication (includes Communication Reports), 47(2), 175-191
Okazawa, R., & Zhang, T. (2025). Humor production through breaches of a pre-allocated turn-taking organization in television talk shows involving interpreters. Journal of Pragmatics, 237, 82-96.
Overstreet, M., & Yule, G. (2001). Formulaic disclaimers. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(1), 45-60.
Pappas, Y., & Seale, C. (2010). The physical examination in telecardiology and televascular consultations: a study using conversation analysis. Patient education and counseling, 81(1), 113-118.
Pawluk, C. J. (1989). Social construction of teasing. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 19(2), 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1989.tb00142.x
Peräkylä, A., & Sorjonen, M. L. (2012). Emotion in interaction. Oxford University Press.
Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. E. (2012). Facial expression and interactional regulation of emotion. In Emotion in interaction (pp. 64-91). Oxford University Press.
Petitjean, C., & Morel, E. (2017). “Hahaha”: Laughter as a resource to manage WhatsApp conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 110, 1-19.
Ridout, C. F. (1993). News coverage and talk shows in the 1992 presidential campaign. PS: Political Science & Politics, 26(4), 712-716.
Pomerantz, A. (1978). Compliment responses: Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints. In Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 79-112). Academic Press. perred/dispreferred turn shaped.
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of pref Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human studies, 9, 219-229.
Qiu, J., Chen, X., & Haugh, M. (2021). Jocular flattery in Chinese multi-party instant messaging interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 178, 225-241.
Ren, W., & Guo, Y. (2020). Self-praise on Chinese social networking sites. Journal of Pragmatics, 169, 179-189.
Renkema, J. (2004). Introduction to Discourse Studies (2. basım). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Robinson, J. D. (2004). The sequential organization of" explicit" apologies in naturally occurring English. Research on language and social Interaction, 37(3), 291-330.
Sacks, H. (1992). Laughing together; Expressions of sorrow and joy. Lectures on conversation, 2(Part VIII), 570-571.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. language, 50(4), 696-735.
Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for specific purposes, 13(2), 149-170.
Sanders, R. E. (2005). Introduction: LSI as subject matter and as multidisciplinary confederation. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 1–14). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
SCHEGLOFF, E. & SACKS, H. (1973). Opening up Closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289-327. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Turn organization: one intersection of grammar and interaction/Emanuel A. Schegloff. Interaction and grammar.–Cambridge University Press, 52-133.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis I (Vol. 1). Cambridge university press.
Schopenhauer, A. (1966). The World as Will and Representation: In 2 Volumes. Dover Publications.
Seedhouse, P. (2005). Conversation analysis as research methodology. Applying conversation analysis, 251-266.
Seuren, L. M., Wherton, J., Greenhalgh, T., Cameron, D., A'Court, C., & Shaw, S. E. (2020). Physical examinations via video for patients with heart failure: qualitative study using conversation analysis. Journal of medical Internet research, 22(2), e16694.
Sheikhan, A., & Haugh, M. (2022). Non-serious answers to (improper) questions in talk shows. Journal of Pragmatics, 191, 32-45.
Shen, Q., & Yao, S. (2022). Syntactically incomplete turns as delicate actions—A way to manage interpersonal relationships. Journal of Pragmatics, 197, 27-42.
Sidnell, J. (2011). Conversation analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Spencer, H. (1875). The physiology of laughter. In H. Spencer, Illustrations of universal progress: A series of discussions (pp. 194–209). D Appleton & Company. https://doi.org/10.1037/12203-004
STENSTRÖM, A. (1988). 15. Questioning in Conversation. In M. Meyer (Ed.), Questions and Questioning (pp. 304-326). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110864205.304
Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on language and social interaction, 41(1), 31-57.
Ten Have, P. (1990). Methodological issues in conversation analysis1. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 27(1), 23-51.
Ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208895
Thonus, T. (2008). Acquaintanceship, familiarity, and coordinated laughter in writing tutorials. Linguistics and Education, 19(4), 333-350.
Tolson, A., & Scannell, P. (1991). Televised chat and the synthetic personality (pp. 178-201). London.
Tolson, A. (Ed.). (2001). Television talk shows: Discourse, performance, spectacle. Routledge.
Vraga, E. K., Edgerly, S., Bode, L., Carr, D. J., Bard, M., Johnson, C. N., ... & Shah, D. V. (2012). The correspondent, the comic, and the combatant: The consequences of host style in political talk shows. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(1), 5-22.
Wang, Y. F. (2008). Beyond Negation—The Discourse‑Pragmatic Functions of Meiyou and Bushi. Language Sciences, 30(6), 679-713.
Wu, R. J. R. (2011). A conversation analysis of self-praising in everyday Mandarin interaction. Journal of pragmatics, 43(13), 3152-3176.
Zdrojkowski, M. R. T. (2007). Laughter in interaction: The discourse function of laughter in writing tutorials. Michigan State University. Department of English.
Zhao, L. (2020). Mock impoliteness and co-construction of hudui rituals in Chinese online interaction. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 43(1), 45-63.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98045-
dc.description.abstract近年來,台灣脫口秀節目蓬勃發展,主持人與嘉賓間的互動性對節目效果產生顯著影響。觀眾笑聲作為現場回應的一種形式,影響著節目節奏與氛圍。然而相關研究對於半機構脫口秀節目中的笑聲探討仍相對有限。本研究探討台灣脫口秀節目中,主持人與嘉賓如何透過互動有效引發現場觀眾笑聲,進一步分析觀眾笑聲的序列位置及功能,旨在補足現有研究對半機構性台灣脫口秀節目中笑聲研究的空缺。研究語料取自2018年至2025年間播出的《博恩夜夜秀》與《賀瓏夜夜秀》,分析對象為節目中現場觀眾的笑聲片段。研究方法採質化分析,運用會話分析(Conversation Analysis)理論,並參考Jefferson(2004)的轉錄系統,聚焦於單向與共享笑聲的引發方式與回應及延續策略。
研究結果指出,單向觀眾笑聲大多數分布於第二部分獨立位置單邊笑聲,發生於主持人或嘉賓進行戲弄、自我表揚、自我貶低與陳述好笑內容時,此類笑聲多為對語言內容的即時反應,具備緩和氣氛、標示語境變化及增進說話者與觀眾關係等功能。於共享觀眾笑聲方面,則出現相對複雜的序列位置。共享笑聲(shared laughter)反映出觀眾與說話者間建立的積極立場(display of affiliation),具有減緩面子威脅、建立立場關係與增加互動流暢性等作用。此外,於共享笑聲的序列延續策略方面,發現主要三種形式:(一)擴展原有的笑聲成分;(二)再次調用先前好笑內容;(三)於主題或結構上參照前述內容,進一步生成好笑內容。此三種策略顯示出笑聲的回溯性及擴展性。本研究將上述結果運用於教學設計中,並提出相關應用建議。透過對脫口秀節目中觀眾笑聲的系統性分析,不僅補足過去對華語脫口秀節目中笑聲研究的空缺,也為多模態語言互動與非語言資源的研究提供新的視角。最後,研究結果有助於深化對華語脫口秀節目中語言與非語言互動關係的理解,亦可為第二語言教學與語用學研究提供理論依據與應用啟示。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, Taiwanese talk shows have flourished, with host–guest interactions playing a crucial role in shaping program dynamics. Audience laughter, as a form of real-time response, influences both the rhythm and atmosphere of these programs. However, limited research has examined laughter in semi-institutional talk show settings. This study investigates how hosts and guests elicit laughter from live audiences and analyzes the sequential structures and interactional functions of such laughter, aiming to address gaps in prior research on Taiwan Mandarin talk shows. Data were drawn from The Night Night Show with Brian Tseng and The Night Night Show with HELLO (2018–2025). Employing a qualitative approach grounded in Conversation Analysis (CA) and Jefferson’s (2004) transcription system, this study focuses on the initiation and response of both unilateral and shared laughter, as well as the continuation of shared laughter.
Findings reveal that unilateral audience laughter primarily occurs as second pair part laughter, triggered by teasing, self-praise, self-deprecation, or other laughables. These responses serve to ease interactional tension, mark contextual shifts, and foster speaker–audience rapport. In contrast, shared laughter displays more complex sequential structures, indicating affiliation, mitigating face threats, and enhancing interactional fluency. Three continuation strategies were identified: (1) expanding prior laughables, (2) re-invoking previously laughable content, and (3) offering a subsequent laughable in the series to create new laughables, thereby demonstrating the retrospective and expansive nature of laughter. This study contributes to the understanding of audience laughter in Mandarin talk shows and offers insights into multimodal interaction, with implications for both pragmatic theory and second language pedagogy.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-07-23T16:34:43Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2025-07-23T16:34:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents謝辭... ii
摘要... iii
Abstract...iv
目次... v
圖次... vii
表次... ix
第一章 緒論... 1
第一節 研究動機與目的... 1
第二節 研究問題...2
第三節 研究架構...4
第二章 文獻回顧 ...5
第一節 關於笑聲的三個相關理論...5
第二節 會話分析...6
第三節 機構性語言...8
第四節 訪談性脫口秀節目的特性與形式...9
1. 脫口秀的角色結構...11
第五節 會話分析中對於笑的相關研究...12
1. 日常對話中笑的結構功能研究...12
2. 機構性對話中笑的結構功能研究...14
3. 笑聲的共鳴性研究...16
第三章 研究方法...19
第一節 語料來源及收集...19
第二節 語料分析流程...21
第三節 語料轉寫說明...22
第四章 單向觀眾笑聲的位置與功能...25
第一節 單向觀眾笑聲的序列位置及引發...25
4.1.1 戲弄...26
4.1.2 自我表揚...36
4.1.3 自我貶低...40
4.1.4 好笑的內容...43
第二節 單向觀眾笑聲的序列與回應... 48
4.2.1 後擴展序列(post-expansion)...48
4.2.2 未完成的話輪序列中(incompletion of a turn)...51
第五章 共享中觀眾笑聲的位置與功能...55
第一節 共享笑聲在序列中的位置...56
第二節 共享笑聲的序列與引發...57
5.2.1 FPP回合最後位置笑聲:主持人引發...58
5.2.2 SPP回合最後位置笑聲:嘉賓引發...61
5.2.3 SPP回合獨立位置:副主持人引發...65
第三節 共享觀眾笑聲的序列延續策略...69
5.3.1 延長笑聲 (extension of laughter without more laughables)...70
5.3.2 重新引入先前的好笑內容(re-invoking a first laughable)...73
5.3.3 提供好笑的下一個系列(offering a next in a series of laughables)...75
5.3.4 小結...78
第四節 相關教學建議...79
第六章 結論... 87
第一節 研究結果與討論...87
第二節 研究結果與貢獻...88
第三節 研究限制與展望...91
參考文獻...93
附錄...103
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject會話分析zh_TW
dc.subject語用功能zh_TW
dc.subject序列結構zh_TW
dc.subject脫口秀節目zh_TW
dc.subject笑zh_TW
dc.subjectpragmatic functionsen
dc.subjectlaughteren
dc.subjecttalk showen
dc.subjectsequential organizationen
dc.subjectconversation analysisen
dc.title初探台灣脫口秀節目中觀眾笑聲的序列結構及功能分析zh_TW
dc.titleA Preliminary Analysis of the Sequential Organization and Functions of Audience Laughter in Taiwanese Talk Showsen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear113-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee張妙霞;呂佳蓉zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeMiao-Hsia Chang;Chia-Rung Luen
dc.subject.keyword笑,脫口秀節目,序列結構,會話分析,語用功能,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordlaughter,talk show,sequential organization,conversation analysis,pragmatic functions,en
dc.relation.page109-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202501642-
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)-
dc.date.accepted2025-07-10-
dc.contributor.author-college文學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept華語教學碩士學位學程-
dc.date.embargo-lift2025-07-24-
顯示於系所單位:華語教學碩士學位學程

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-113-2.pdf2.78 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved