Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8526
Title: | 串流影音內容服務跨境可攜性與著作授權地域限制 Cross-border Portability of Audiovisual Content Streaming Services and Geographical Restriction Clause in Copyright Licensing |
Authors: | Yi-Yan Wu 吳奕言 |
Advisor: | 謝銘洋(Ming-Yan Hsieh) |
Keyword: | 串流,著作授權,視聽著作,市場區隔,跨境近用,跨境可攜性,授權地域限制,影音內容, Copyright Licensing,Cross-border portability,online streaming service,Audiovisual content,Geographical restriction,cross-border access,territorial restriction, |
Publication Year : | 2021 |
Degree: | 碩士 |
Abstract: | 線上串流影音內容服務現在已經成為多數消費者在近用視聽著作時的主要管道,加上個人便攜性裝置以及無線網路的普及,使得消費者可以隨時隨地的依其需求觀看著作內容。而線上串流影音內容服務雖然皆是以隨選視訊的方式供消費者在其選定之時間、地點觀看影音內容,但實際上消費者在地點的選擇上其實並沒有那麼自由,當消費者因故離開其訂閱串流影音服務之住所國到他國暫時居住時,影音平台有可能禁止消費者從該他國跨境近用消費者原先所訂閱之服務,或是在該他國向消費者提供的,並非其在訂閱國內原先所可近用之內容,使得消費者在境外時可能無法順利近用串流影音內容服務。而本文係在探討這樣的現況是如何發生的,以及是否能夠解決的問題。本文認為消費者不能跨境近用的原因來自服務提供者與著作權人所簽訂之授權契約中的授權地域限制約款,該約款限制了被授權人,也就是服務提供者,得提供著作的地理區域,服務提供者為了遵守契約限制,便無法向消費者跨境提供著作。至於授權地域限制約款存在的原因多樣,包含了法律上與經濟上原因,其中主要之目的為市場區隔。而本文之立場為消費者之暫時性跨境近用著作需求長期存在但不受重視,因此希望能夠說服著作權人,使其願意主動開放消費者暫時性的跨境近用著作的權限,或是說服國家透過立法的方式,來課予著作權人與服務提供者跨境可攜性之義務。 Online audio-visual content streaming services has now become the most popular ways for consumers to access audiovisual content. Coupled with the popularity of personal portable devices and wireless networks, consumers can watch content anytime and anywhere according to their needs. Online audio-visual content services are all on-demand video for consumers to watch. However, consumers that are temporarily present in a country other than their country of residence often cannot continue to access and use the online content services that they have lawfully acquired the right to access and use in their country of residence. This article is exploring how this situation happened and whether it can be solved. The reason why consumers are not allow to cross-border access is geographical (or territorial) restriction clause in copyright licensing. The licensing contract restricts the geographic area where the service provider can provide the content. In order to comply with the contractual restriction, the service provider cannot provide the content to consumers across the border. As for the geographical restriction clause in licensing, there are various reasons for existence of such clause, including legal and economic reasons, the main purpose of which is market segmentation. In Author’s opinion, consumers’ demand for temporarily cross-border access has long existed but been neglected. Therefore, it is hoped that copyright owners can be persuaded to allow consumers to take the initiative to open up consumers’ temporary cross-border access to content, or to persuade the country to impose obligations on cross-border portability of copyright owners and service providers through legislation. . |
URI: | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8526 |
DOI: | 10.6342/NTU202100300 |
Fulltext Rights: | 同意授權(全球公開) |
Appears in Collections: | 科際整合法律學研究所 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-3101202119575200.pdf | 2.58 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.