請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8328
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳彥元(Yen-Yuan Chen) | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsin-Yu Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳信佑 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T00:52:10Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-26 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T00:52:10Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-08-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-08-04 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Tyler, RW. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2. 朱宗信 (2009)。ACGME六大核心能力於一般醫學教育。醫療品質雜誌,3(3),75-78。 3. Greiner, AC. and Knebel, E. (2003). Health Professions Education: A Bridge to Quality. Institute of Medicine. Washington: National Academies Press. 4. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. (1999). Outcome project: General competencies. 5. Vivian Obeso, et al. (2014) Core entrustable professional activities for entering residency: curriculum developers’ guide. AAMC iCollaborative, Washington, DC. 6. Boet, S., Pigford, AA. and Naik, VN. (2016). Program director and resident perspectives of a competency-based medical education anesthesia residency program in Canada: a needs assessment. Korean J Med Educ, 28(2),157-168. 7. Tannenbaum, E., et al. (2020). Exploring Faculty Perceptions of Competency-Based Medical Education and Assessing Needs for Implementation in Obstetrics and Gynaecology Residency. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 42(6), 707-717. 8. Hanley, M., Shearer, C. and Livingston, P. (2019). Faculty perspectives on the transition to competency-based medical education in anesthesia. Can J Anaesth, 66(11), 1320-1327. 9. Thomas, P.A., Kern, D.E., Hughes, M.T. and Chen, B.Y. (2015). Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach, Third Edition. Johns Hopkins University Press. 10. Ralph, W. Tyler. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction, First Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 11. Spady, WG. (1977). Competency-based education: A bandwagon in search of a definition. Educ Res, 6(1), 9–14. 12. Spady, W.G. (1988). Organizing for Results: The Basis of Authentic Restructuring and Reform. Educational Leadership, 46(2), 4-8. 13. R. M. Harden. (1999). AMEE Guide No. 14: Outcome-based education: Part 1-An introduction to outcome-based education. Medical Teacher, 21(1), 7-14. 14. Frank, JR., et al. (2010). Competency-based medical education: theory to practice. Med Teach, 32(8), 638-645. 15. McGaghie, WC., et al. (1978). Competency-based curriculum development in medical education - an introduction. World Health Organization. 16. Soanes, C. and Stevenson, A. (2005). The Concise Oxford English Dictionary. 'Competence' (noun). 'Competent.'. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 17. Frank, JR., Snell, LS. and Sherbino, J. (2014). The Draft CanMEDS 2015 Physician Competency Framework - Series II. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, Royal College. 18. Swing, SR. (2007). The ACGME outcome project: retrospective and prospective. Med Teach, 29(7), 648-654. 19. Ten Cate, O. (2005). Entrustability of professional activities and competency-based training. Med Educ, 39(12), 1176–1177. 20. Ten Cate, O. and Scheele, F. (2007). Competency-based postgraduate training: can we bridge the gap between theory and clinical practice?. Acad Med, 82(6), 542-547. 21. Glass, JM. (2014). Competency based training is a framework for incompetence. BMJ, 25, 348, g2909. 22. Brightwell, A. and Grant, J. (2013). Competency-based training: who benefits?. Postgrad Med J, 89(1048), 107-110. 23. Ten Cate, O., et al. (2016). Entrustment Decision Making in Clinical Training. Acad Med, 91(2), 191-198. 24. Ten Cate, O., et al. (2015). Curriculum development for the workplace using Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs): AMEE Guide No. 99. Med Teach, 37(11), 983-1002. 25. Nasca, TJ., Philibert, I., Brigham, T. and Flynn, TC. (2012). The next GME accreditation system--rationale and benefits. N Engl J Med, 366(11), 1051-1056. 26. Green, ML., et al. (2009). Charting the road to competence: developmental milestones for internal medicine residency training. J Grad Med Educ, 1(1), 5-20. 27. Dreyfus, S.E. and Dreyfus, H.L. (1980). A Five-Stage Model of the Mental Activities Involved in Directed Skill Acquisition. Operations Research Center, University of California, Berkeley. 28. Meier, AH., Gruessner, A. and Cooney, RN. (2016). Using the ACGME Milestones for Resident Self-Evaluation and Faculty Engagement. J Surg Educ, 73(6), e150-e157. 29. Riesenberg, LA., et al. (2014). Resident and attending physician perception of maladaptive response to stress in residents. Med Educ Online, 17, 19, 25041. 30. LaDonna, KA., Hatala, R., Lingard, L., Voyer, S. and Watling, C. (2017). Staging a performance: learners' perceptions about direct observation during residency. Med Educ, 51(5), 498-510. 31. Watling, C., LaDonna, KA., Lingard, L., Voyer, S. and Hatala, R. (2016). 'Sometimes the work just needs to be done': socio-cultural influences on direct observation in medical training. Med Educ, 50(10), 1054-1064. 32. Madan, R., Conn, D., Dubo, E., Voore, P. and Wiesenfeld, L. (2012). The enablers and barriers to the use of direct observation of trainee clinical skills by supervising faculty in a psychiatry residency program. Can J Psychiatry, 57(4), 269-272. 33. Hunter, A.R., Baird, E.J. and Reed, M.R. (2015). Procedure-based assessments in trauma and orthopaedic training--The trainees' perspective. Medical teacher, 37(5), 444-449. 34. Gaunt, A., et al. (2017) 'Playing the game': How do surgical trainees seek feedback using workplace-based assessment?. Med Educ, 51(9), 953-962. 35. Bindal, T., Wall, D. and Goodyear, HM. (2011). Trainee doctors' views on workplace-based assessments: Are they just a tick box exercise?. Med Teach, 33(11), 919-927. 36. Ross, S., et al. (2012). Involving users in the refinement of the competency-based achievement system: an innovative approach to competency-based assessment. Med Teach, 34(2), e143-7. 37. Benjamin, F, Crabtree. and William, L, Miller. (2002). Doing Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications, Inc. 38. 萬文隆 (2004)。深度訪談在質性研究中的應用。生活科技教育,37(4), 17-23。 39. 鈕文英 (2012)。質性研究方法與論文寫作。台北市,雙葉書廊。 40. Carter, N., Bryant Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J. and Neville ,AJ. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncol Nurs Forum, 41(5), 545-547. 41. Van der Vleuten. (1996). The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ, 1, 41–67. 42. Norcini, JJ., Blank, LL., Duffy, FD. and Fortna, G. (2003). The mini-CEX: A method for assessing clinical skills. Ann Inter Med, 138, 476–481. 43. Kogan, JR., Holmboe, ES. and Hauer, KE. (2009). Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees: a systematic review. JAMA, 302(12), 1316-1326. 44. Day, SC. (1990). Residents’ perceptions of evaluation procedures used by their training program. J Gen Inter Med, 5, 421–426. 45. Holmboe, ES., Fiebach, NH., Galaty, LA. and Huot, S. (2001). Effectiveness of a focused educational intervention on resident evaluations from faculty: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med, 16, 427–434. 46. Daelmans, HE. (2004). Effectiveness of clinical rotations as a learning environment for achieving competences. Med Teach, 26, 305–312. 47. Knowles, M., Holton, EI. and Swanson, R. (2005). The adult learner:the definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. Burlington, MA: Elsevier. 48. Kolb, D. (1984). Experiental learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 49. Scho¨n, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith. 50. Land, R., Meyer, JHF. and Smith, J. (2008). Threshold concepts within the disciplines. Rotterdam and Taipei: Sense Publishers. 51. Pangaro, L. and ten Cate, O. (2013). Frameworks for learner assessment in medicine: AMEE Guide No. 78. Med Teach, 35(6), e1197-1210. 52. Atherton, JS. (2011). Learning and teaching; Bloom’s taxonomy [Online]. Retrieved May 5, 2020, from http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/bloomtax.htm. 53. Ryan, RM. and Deci, EL. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitations of intrinsic motivation social development and well-being. Am Psychol, 55(1), 68–78. 54. Ryan, RM. and Deci, EL. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In: Deci EL, Ryan RM, editors. Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press. 55. Williams, G., Saizow, RB. and Ryan, RM. (1999). The importance of self-determination theory for medical education. Acad Med, 74, 992–995. 56. Williams, GC., et al. (2006). Testing a self-determination theory intervention for motivating tobacco cessation: Supporting autonomy and competence in a clinical trial. Health Psychol, 25(1), 91–101. 57. Ten Cate, TJ. and Kusurkar, RA. (2011). Williams GC. How self-determination theory can assist our understanding of the teaching and learning processes in medical education. AMEE guide No. 59. Med Teach, 33(12), 961-73. 58. Reeve, J. (2002). Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. In: Deci EL, Ryan RM, editors. Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press. 59. Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2). 60. Earl, LM. (2003). Assessment as learning. Thousand Oaks (CA): Corwin. 61. Fuentealba, C. (2011). The role of assessment in the student learning process. J Vet Med Educ, 38(2), 157-162. 62. Peters, Harm., Holzhausen, Ylva., Boscardin, Christy., ten Cate, Olle. and Chen, H. Carrie. (2017). Twelve tips for the implementation of EPAs for assessment and entrustment decisions. Medical Teacher, 39, 802-807. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8328 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 核心能力導向醫學教育(Competency-based Medical Education,CBME)是近年來醫學教育改革趨勢,主要根據社會及醫療需求定義住院醫師所需之核心能力,再依核心能力去進行課程設計,強調課程結束後之成果,而非過程面的課程內容或評量。目前許多醫學教育學者及機構提出落實CBME的具體做法,其中較知名的方法就是可信賴之專業活動(Entrustable Professional Activities,EPAs)及里程碑計畫(Milestones Project)。國泰綜合醫院於2019年開始規劃將全院之教學課程設計導入可信賴的專業活動概念,並首先於一般醫學內科示範病房全面執行。 本研究之目的是以住院醫師的觀點出發,探討導入可信賴專業活動的訓練模式後住院醫師的學習經驗變化。本研究為質性研究,使用針對住院醫師的深度訪談做為資料收集的方式,透過逐字稿分析了解住院醫師對於可信賴專業活動的觀點。我們發現可信賴專業活動透過聚焦專業任務,加深核心能力與臨床工作的串聯,有助於住院醫師創造核心能力相關的學習目標。可信賴專業活動,不只做為一個評估工具,更可以協助教師指導核心能力教學與聚焦臨床回饋。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Competency-based Medical Education (CBME) is the trend of medical education in recent years. It mainly designs courses according to the core competencies of the trainees, and emphasizes the outcomes after training, other than focusing on the process such as course content or assessment. Many scholars and institutions in the field of medical education have proposed the methods implement CBME. The most famous tools are Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) and Milestones Project. Cathay General Hospital started out medical education program under the setting of Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) since 2019. First we started the pilot program in the general internal medicine training center. Our study aimed to collect the qualitative data from postgraduate residents' about their learning experience after entrustable professional activities implementation. We used depth interviews to the residents for data collection. Through transcripts analysis, we understood the postgraduate residents' perceptions about entrustable professional activities. We found that entrustable professional activities can enhance the connection of core competencies and clinical works by focusing on professional tasks. It could also assist the residents to create learning target relating to core competencies. Entrustable professional activities are not only assessment tools, they can guide clinical teaching and create focused feedback. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T00:52:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0408202011110000.pdf: 6003683 bytes, checksum: a927561627cda408c24ab058350ca30a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 碩士學位論文口試委員審定書 1 致謝 2 中文摘要 3 英文摘要 4 目 錄 5 圖目錄 7 表目錄 8 第一章 緒論 9 1.1 研究背景與重要性 9 1.2 研究動機 11 1.3 研究問題與目的 12 第二章 文獻探討 15 2.1 核心能力與成果為導向教育模式的演進史 15 2.2 核心能力導向醫學教育的概念與架構 16 2.3 可信任專業活動的發展 17 2.4 里程碑計畫的發展 19 2.5 核心能力導向醫學教育臨床評估與教學 – 住院醫師觀點之探討 20 第三章 研究方法 29 3.1 研究架構 29 3.2 研究流程 30 3.3 研究方法 31 3.4 研究工具 32 3.5 研究受訪者 39 3.6 資料處理與分析 40 3.7 研究嚴謹度 41 3.8 研究倫理 42 第四章 研究結果與分析 42 4.1 受訪者基本背景描述 42 4.2 研究結果 44 4.3 主題一、可信賴專業活動加強臨床工作與核心能力串聯 46 4.4 主題二、可信賴專業活動於核心能力教學之表現 52 4.5 主題三、可信賴專業活動對於住院醫師之影響 59 4.6 反思日誌(一) 65 4.7 反思日誌(二) 68 4.8 反思日誌(三) 69 第五章 討論 70 5.1 可信賴專業活動協助聚焦臨床任務與核心能力學習 70 5.2 可信賴專業活動架構透過學習經驗構築核心能力 71 5.3 可信賴專業活動架構透過自主協助創造內在動機 73 5.4 可信賴專業活動:評估即學習與評估的責任 74 5.5 研究之重要性與應用價值 75 5.6 研究限制 75 第六章 結論與建議 76 6.1 研究結論 76 6.2 後續研究建議 77 參考文獻 78 附 錄 84 附錄一 ACGME規範化培訓認證書 84 附錄二 國泰綜合醫院研究倫理審查委員會審查證明 85 附錄三 訪談同意書 86 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 畢業後一般醫學訓練住院醫師對於施行可信賴專業活動之觀點探討: 質性研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Postgraduate residents' perceptions of entrustable professional activities implementation: A qualitative study | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃天祥(Tien-Shang Huang),邱國力(Guo-Li Chiou),邱晏麟(Yen-Lin Chiu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 核心能力導向醫學教育,可信賴專業活動,直接臨床觀察,住院醫師觀點,質性研究, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Competency-based Medical Education (CBME),Entrustable professional activities (EPAs),Direct observation,Residents’ perceptions,Qualitative study, | en |
dc.relation.page | 90 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202002350 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-08-05 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 醫學教育暨生醫倫理研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 醫學教育暨生醫倫理學科所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-0408202011110000.pdf | 5.86 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。