Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48079
Title: | 論行政訴訟中之「公法上權利」-從德國法與歐盟法影響下觀察 Subjective Public Right in the Administrative Court Procedure: An Observation of German Law and EU Law |
Authors: | Bo-Lin Chen 陳柏霖 |
Advisor: | 林明昕 |
Keyword: | 公法上權利,主觀公權利,訴訟權能,原告適格,保護規範理論,釋字第469號解釋,歐盟法, Subjective Public Right,Locus Standi,Theory of Protective Norms,J. Y. Interpretation No. 469,EU Law, |
Publication Year : | 2011 |
Degree: | 碩士 |
Abstract: | 在公法領域中,公法上權利(或稱主觀公權利)係一相當重要之議題,特別是其涉及行政訴訟上原告適格等相關問題。因此,本論文以行政訴訟中之「公法上權利」進行研究,期能有助於國內對此議題之深化。
在釋字第469號解釋作成後,國內通說實務開始明確地以「保護規範理論」作為判斷系爭案件原告是否具有公法上權利之標準。然而,綜觀國內相關實務判決及學說論文,其對於保護規範理論或公法上權利似仍存有若干爭議或誤會。對此,由於我國保護規範理論或公法上權利等理論概念,通說實務均承認我國實乃師法德國而來。因此,本論文欲重新回溯觀察德國法上之相關討論,期能有助於釐清相關爭議或誤會。此外,有鑒於晚近德國法深受歐盟法之影響,故本論文亦一併介紹歐盟法之相關問題,並藉由比較分析歐盟法與德國法之異同,俾一方面擴大比較法上之觀察視野,另一方面亦使吾人對於德國晚近發展能知其然且更知其所以然。正所謂:他山之石,可以為錯。因此,本論文最後基於前述章節對於德國法與歐盟法之相關研究,進而分析我國法上對於「行政訴訟中之公法上權利」相關問題,盼能一方面澄清我國法對於相關概念與理論之誤解,另一方面亦提供若干或可供學說實務參考之建議。此外,本論文也藉由釋字第499號及第613號解釋之分析,透過權力分立的角度證立保護規範理論在我國法上之妥當性與正當性。 In Taiwan, the concept of Subjective Public Right (subjektives öffentliches Recht) is one of the most important issues in public law. Thus, this thesis discusses the issue of subjective public rights and particularly focuses on the administrative court procedure. After Interpretation No. 469 of Justices (J. Y. Interpretation No. 469), administra- tive courts in Taiwan have clearly started to apply the Theory of Protective Norms (Schutznormtheorie) to judge whether any subjective public right exists in a case. Howerver, there could be some misunderstandings in applying this theory. Therefore, this thesis firstly raises some relevant issues in Taiwan. In fact, the concept of subjective public right and the theory of protective norms are derived from German law. For this reason, this thesis further observes relevant conceptions and theories in German law. In addition, European Union law (EU law) has a particularly strong influence on German law, so this thesis also introduces some relevant parts of EU law, and tries to compare it with German law. Based on the observation of German law and EU law, this thesis analyzes and examines relevant theories and judgements in Taiwan. In conclusion, this thesis makes some related suggestions based on the previous observation, and proves that the concept of subjective public right and the theory of protective norms suit the purpose of the principle of separation of powers by analyzing of J. Y. Interpretations No. 499 and No. 613. |
URI: | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48079 |
Fulltext Rights: | 有償授權 |
Appears in Collections: | 法律學系 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf Restricted Access | 1.18 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.