性�感地誌： 公娼館文萌樓的保存與大稻埕性�產業地景

Abstract

從「大稻埕江山樓」的產業聚集到「江山樓妓女區」的成形，再進展到廢娼抗爭後妓權古蹟的出現，歸綏街文萌樓的指定是整個台北市情欲消費產業空間政治的縮影。本文試圖藉由歷時性的書寫，圍繞著1）情欲消費地景的形構、再現與想像；2）性產業鑲嵌的地景：認同與厭棄；3）從主體出發的認同轉化，等三個中心進行對大稻埕情欲消費地景進一步的理解。而關於性與性產業的「污名」則是潛藏在所有層次之中的母題，它以各種變奏的形式出現，透過大眾論述催動，在空間中具體化，並且滲透到每一個環節，包括主體行動、應變的策略使用上、國家管制的意識形態等。結論如下： 一、遭劃界的邊緣地景是污名政治運作的空間表徵。 二、地景中邊緣的主體政治具備解構污名的能力。 三、異質地方的形成，除了單點古蹟的營造，更有賴大尺度地景具反思性的詮釋。

From the commercial cluster of a broadly defined sex-work industry, Jia-Shan Lo in Dwa-Due-Dia, to the institutionalization of Jia-Shan Lo red-light district, after 10 years of untiring protests against rude abolishment, the historic preservation of the licensed brothel, Wen-Mon lo, epitomize the space politics of the sex industry in Taipei city. Here I was trying to discuss three major parts chronically in order to have a further understanding of the sex-work landscape in Dwa-Due-Dia: 1) the formation, representation, and imagination of the sex industry; 2) identification or disgust of the landscape where the sex industry embedded; 3) the transformation of the subject’s identification. But the stigma of sex and sex industry was the underlying theme in every part. It was driven by conventional discourse, embodied in space, and showed as the form of all kinds of variations. It also penetrated into every field, including how subjects acted, what strategies they took, and the ideology of state intervened institutionalization. I conclude as such: 1. Restricted marginal landscape is representational space of the stigma politics. 2. The action and politics of the marginal subjects can destruct the stigma. 3. Besides the conservation of a single historic site, the formation of heterotopias depends on reflexively re-read/re-write in a larger scale as landscapes.