親子間的特殊義務

Abstract

本篇旨在處理親子間特殊義務的證成問題。首先第一章討論特殊義務的理論問題，而本文將指出在證成上特殊義務之餘一般義務的優先性，以回應對特殊義務的可能質疑；接著第二章釐清特殊義務的普遍證成主張，說明目前學界中諸多觀點的合理和侷限之處，並提出「能動性條件的差異關聯」作為本文的普遍證成主張；然後在第三、四章中分別澄清家長義務和子女義務的證成，討論過往學界對此各自提出之諸多觀點的合理和侷限之處，接著分別論證「建立養育的意願不對稱關係」作為家長義務的證成，以及「親子關係晚期的意願不對稱關係」作為子女義務的證成；最後的結論則解釋本文和常識道德的差異，並試著回應德性論的質疑而同時初步批評之。

This thesis aims to deal with the justification of special obligations in parent-child relationship. In the beginning, the first chapter discusses the theoretical issues of special obligations, and this article will point out that special obligations have priority over general obligations in justification, in response to possible doubts about special obligations. Then the second chapter clarifies the universal justification claims of special obligations, explains the reasonableness and limitations of many views in the current academic circle, and proposes “The differential correlation of agential conditions” as the universal justification claims of this thesis. And then, the third and fourth chapter respectively clarify the justification of parental obligations and children’s obligations, discussing the reasonableness and limitations of the various opinions put forward by the academic circles in the past, and then respectively argue “The establishment of the asymmetric correlation of parenting willingness” as the justification of parental obligations and “The asymmetric correlation of willingness in the late parent-child relationship” as the justification of children’s obligations. Finally, the conclusion explains the difference between this article and common sense morality, and tries to respond to doubts from virtue ethics while initially criticizing it.