請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66772完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 王榮麟(Rong-Li Wang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yong-Ren Su | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蘇雍仁 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T01:08:15Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-02-22 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-02-22 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-02-03 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文翻譯書 彭意梅（譯）（2018）。為什麼我們不欠父母?（原作者：Bleisch, B.）。台北市：商周出版。（原著出版年：2018） Book Bartlett, R. C., Collins, S. D. (2011). Aristotle's Nicomachean ethics: University of Chicago Press. Blustein, J. (1982). Parents and children: The ethics of the family. Cooper, J. M. (2002). Plato: Five dialogues: euthyphro, apology, crito, meno, phaedo. In: Hackett Publishing. Hegel, G. W. F. (2015). The philosophy of right: Hackett Publishing. Kant, I. (1999). Practical philosophy: Cambridge University Press. Korsgaard, C. M., Korsgaard, C. M., Korsgaard, C. M. K., Cohen, G. A., Geuss, R., Nagel, T., Williams, B. (1996). The sources of normativity: Cambridge University Press. Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical explanations: Harvard University Press. Nussbaum, M. C. (2016). Anger and forgiveness: Resentment, generosity, justice: Oxford University Press. Rawls, J. (2005). Political liberalism: Columbia University Press. Rawls, J. (2009). A theory of justice: Harvard university press. Sandel, M. J. (1998). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (second ed.): Cambridge University Press. Selby-Bigge, L. A., David, H. (1964). A Treatise of Human Nature by David Hume: Рипол Классик. Sidgwick, H. (2010). The Methods of Ethics. Simmons, A. J. (1981). Moral principles and political obligations: Princeton University Press. Wallace, R. J. (2019). The moral nexus (Vol. 9): Princeton University Press. Book Section Archard, D. (2010). The obligations and responsibilities of parenthood. In D. A. a. D. Benatar (Ed.), Procreation and Parenthood: The Ethics of Bearing and Rearing Children. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Brake, E. (2010). Willing Parents: A Voluntarist Account of Parental Role Obligations. In D. A. a. D. Benatar (Ed.), Procreation and Parenthood: The Ethics of Bearing and Rearing Children. Oxford: Oxford University Press. English, J. (1979). What do grown children owe their parents? In O. O'neill W. Ruddick (Eds.), Having children: philosophical and legal reflections on parenthood: Oxford University Press. Journal Articles Arneson, R. J. (2003). Consequentialism vs. special-ties partiality. The Monist, 86(3), 382-401. Bayne, T. (2003). Gamete donation and parental responsibility. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 20(1), 77-87. Belliotti, R. A. (1986). Honor thy father and thy mother and to thine own self be true. The Southern journal of philosophy, 24(2), 149-162. Brink, D. O. (2001). Impartiality and associative duties. Utilitas, 13(2), 152-172. Dixon, N. (1995). The friendship model of filial obligations. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 12(1), 77-87. English, J. A. (1992). What Do Grown Children Owe Their Parents. Hardimon, M. O. (1994). Role obligations. The journal of philosophy, 91(7), 333-363. Jecker, N. S. (1989). Are filial duties unfounded? American Philosophical Quarterly, 26(1), 73-80. Jeske, D. (1998). Families, friends, and special obligations. Canadian journal of philosophy, 28(4), 527-555. Keller, S. (2006). Four theories of filial duty. The Philosophical Quarterly, 56(223), 254-274. Kupfer, J. (1990). Can parents and children be friends? American Philosophical Quarterly, 27(1), 15-26. Owens, D. (2020). The Moral Nexus, by R. Jay Wallace. Mind. Prusak, B. G. (2011). The costs of procreation. Journal of Social Philosophy, 42(1), 61-75. Scheffler, S. (1997). Relationships and Responsibilities. Sommers, C. H. (1986). Filial morality. The journal of philosophy, 83(8), 439-456. Stuifbergen, M. C., Van Delden, J. J. (2011). Filial obligations to elderly parents: a duty to care? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 14(1), 63-71. Veevers, J. E., O'Neill, O., Ruddick, W. (1981). Having Children: Philosophical and Legal Reflections on Parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 43, 752. Velleman, J. D. (2005). Family history. Philosophical Papers, 34(3), 357-378. Wicclair, M. R. (1990). Caring for frail elderly parents: Past parental sacrifices and the obligations of adult children. Social Theory and Practice, 16(2), 163-189. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66772 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本篇旨在處理親子間特殊義務的證成問題。首先第一章討論特殊義務的理論問題，而本文將指出在證成上特殊義務之餘一般義務的優先性，以回應對特殊義務的可能質疑；接著第二章釐清特殊義務的普遍證成主張，說明目前學界中諸多觀點的合理和侷限之處，並提出「能動性條件的差異關聯」作為本文的普遍證成主張；然後在第三、四章中分別澄清家長義務和子女義務的證成，討論過往學界對此各自提出之諸多觀點的合理和侷限之處，接著分別論證「建立養育的意願不對稱關係」作為家長義務的證成，以及「親子關係晚期的意願不對稱關係」作為子女義務的證成；最後的結論則解釋本文和常識道德的差異，並試著回應德性論的質疑而同時初步批評之。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This thesis aims to deal with the justification of special obligations in parent-child relationship. In the beginning, the first chapter discusses the theoretical issues of special obligations, and this article will point out that special obligations have priority over general obligations in justification, in response to possible doubts about special obligations. Then the second chapter clarifies the universal justification claims of special obligations, explains the reasonableness and limitations of many views in the current academic circle, and proposes “The differential correlation of agential conditions” as the universal justification claims of this thesis. And then, the third and fourth chapter respectively clarify the justification of parental obligations and children’s obligations, discussing the reasonableness and limitations of the various opinions put forward by the academic circles in the past, and then respectively argue “The establishment of the asymmetric correlation of parenting willingness” as the justification of parental obligations and “The asymmetric correlation of willingness in the late parent-child relationship” as the justification of children’s obligations. Finally, the conclusion explains the difference between this article and common sense morality, and tries to respond to doubts from virtue ethics while initially criticizing it. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T01:08:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0202202111333800.pdf: 1995440 bytes, checksum: ac644fea11b1ab306756fcc4b57c646f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書………………………………………………...……….i 誌謝…………………………………………………………………....…...ii 中文摘要……………………………………………………..………..…..iii 英文摘要………………...………………….…………………………......iv 導論 一般義務與特殊義務……………..…………...…………….….......1 第一章 不只一般：從道德義務的證成看道德吸引力……..……..…...6 第一節 關係性的道德理解………………...…….......…………...….7 第二節 一般義務和特殊義務的關聯性…………..……………...….9 第三節 小結：有分別之道德吸引力的道德直覺與實質對等........15 第二章 淺談特殊義務的證成基礎……………….…..………………..17 第一節 有特殊關係就有特殊義務？…..……..…………….……...17 第二節 不只是特殊關係：從行動概念到道德義務的證成考量…19 第三節 其他特殊義務的證成主張和另一種證成的新詮釋..……..25 第四節 小結：個別特殊義務的證成獨特性………..…….….........32 第三章 家長義務的證成…………………………….………………....34 第一節 Brake的論證.………………….………………………........34 第二節 Brake的論證缺失……………...….….…………………….36 第三節 Prusak的論證……………………..……………...……...…38 第四節 Prusak的論證缺失………………………….…………...…39 第五節 一種證成家長義務的新詮釋…………….…………….......42 第六節 小結：初探家長義務的要求內容…………..……………..49 第四章 子女義務的證成………………………….………………........53 第一節 回應債務理論的模型……………..……….……...………..53 第二節 回應感激理論的模型…………….……..…………….........55 第三節 回應友誼理論的模型…………………...……...…………..62 第四節 其他證成子女義務的說法和另一種證成的新詮釋…........64 第五節 小結：初探子女義務的要求內容…….…..………….........72 結論……………………………..…………………...………………........75 參考文獻…………………………………..…………………...……........78 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 親子間的特殊義務 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The special obligations in parent-child relationship | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 109-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳豐維(Feng-Wei Wu),吳秀瑾(Shiu-Ching Wu) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 義務,特殊義務,證成,能動性,能動性條件的差異關聯, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | obligations,special obligations,justification,agency,the differential correlation of agential conditions, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 80 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202100366 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-02-04 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 哲學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 哲學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0202202111333800.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.95 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。