Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42747Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張小虹 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shang-yu Sheng | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 沈尚玉 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T01:21:48Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2009-07-29 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2009-07-29 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2009-07-24 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Addison, Joseph. Spectator. Vol. III. Ed. Danald F. Bond. Oxford: Clarendon P, 1965.
Bohls, Elizabeth. Women Travel Writers and the Language of Aesthetics, 1719-1818. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1995. Bromwich, David. “Wollstonecraft as a Critic of Burke.” Political Theory 23.4 (1995): 617-34. Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. 1757. Ed. Adam Philips. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1990. Conniff, James. “Edmund Burke and his Critics: the Case of Mary Wollstonecraft.” Journal of the History of Ideas 60.2 (1999): 299-318. Dart, Gregory. Rousseau, Robespierre and English Romanticism. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999. Dennis, John. “The Grounds of Criticism in Poetry” (1704). The Sublime: A Reader in British Eighteenth-century Aesthetic Theory. Ed. Andrew Ashfield and Peter de Bolla. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996. 35-39. Derrida, Jacques. The Truth in Painting. Trans. Geoffrey Bennington and Ian McLeod. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1987. Dreyfus, Hubert L., and Paul Rabinow. Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Sussex: The Harvester P, 1982. Eagleton, Terry. The Ideology of the Aesthetic. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1990. Ferry, Luc. Homo Aestheticus: The Invention of Taste in the Democratic Age. Trans. Robert de Loaiza. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1993. Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Routledge, 2002. ---. “Govermentality.” The Foucault Effect. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1991. 87-104. Furguson, Frances. Solitude and the Sublime: Romanticism and the Aesthetics of Individuation. New York: Routledge, 1992. Furniss, Tom. “Gender in Revolution: Edmund Burke and Mary Wollstonecraft.” Revolution in Writing: British Literary Responses to the French Revolution. Ed. Kelvin Everest. Buckingham: Open UP, 1991. 65-100. Gordon, Colin. “Governmental Rationality: An Introduction.” The Foucault Effect. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1991. 1-52. Hertz, Neil. The End of the Line: Essays on Psychoanalysis and the Sublime. New York: Columbia UP, 1985. Holmes, Richard. “Introduction.” Mary Wollstonecraft: A Short Residence in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark, and William Godwin, Memoirs of the Author of “The Rights of Woman.” Ed. Richard Holmes. London: Penguin, 1987. 9-55. Hope Nicolson, Marjorie. Mountain Gloom and Mountain Glory: The Development of the Aesthetics of the Infinite. Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 1959. Hust, Karen. “Facing the Maternal Sublime: Mary Wollstonecraft in Sweden.” Mary Wollstonecraft’s Journey to Scandinavia: Essays. Ed. Anka Ryall and Catherine Sanbach-Dahlström. Stockholm: Amqvist and Wiksell International, 2003. 139-63. Jay, Martin. Songs of Experience. Berkeley: U of California P, 2005. Johnson, Claudia J. “Introduction.” The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft. Ed. Claudia J. Johnson. Cambridge, Cambridge UP, 2002. 1-6. Jones, Angela D. “Romantic Women Travel Writers and the Representation of Everyday Experience.” Women’s Studies 26 (1997): 497-521. Jones, Robert W. Gender and the Formation of Taste in Eighteenth-Century Britain: the Analysis of Beauty. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998. Longinus. “On Sublimity.” Classical Literary Criticism. Ed. D.A. Russell and M. Winterbottom. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1989. 143-87. Lovejoy, Arthur O. The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1948. Lyotard, Jean-François. “Answering the Question: What is Postmodernism?” The Postmodern Condition. Trans. Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. U of Minnesota Press, 1984. 71-82. Mellor, Anne K. Romanticism and Gender. New York: Routledge, 1993. Mills, Sara. “Written on the Landscape: Mary Wollstonecraft’s Letters Written during a Short Residence in Sweden, Norway and Denmark.” Romantic Geographies: Discourse of Travel, 1775-1844. Ed. Amanda Gilroy. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2000. 19-34. Monk, Samuel H. The Sublime: A Study of Critical Theories in XVIII-Century England. 1935. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1960. Moskal, Jeanne. “The Picturesque and the Affectionate in Wollstonecraft’s Letters from Norway.” Modern Language Quarterly 52.3 (1991): 263-94. Paulson, Ronald. “Burke, Paine, and Wollstonecraft: the Sublime and the Beautiful.” Representations of Revolution, 1789-1820. New Haven: Yale UP, 1983. 57-87. Poovey, Mary. The Proper Lady and the Woman Writer: Ideology as Style in the Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Shelley, and Jane Austen. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1984. Porter, Roy. Enlightenment: Britain and the Creation of the Modern World. London: Penguin Books, 2000. Ray, William. The Logic of Culture: Authority and Identity in the Modern Era. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2001. Ryall, Anka, and Catherine Sanbach-Dahlström, eds. Mary Wollstonecraft’s Journey to Scandinavia: Essays. “Introduction.” Stockholm: Amqvist and Wiksell International, 2003. Sapiro, Virginia. A Vindication of Political Virtue: the Political Theory of Mary Wollstonecraft. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1992. Schiller, Friedrich. Essays. Ed. Walter Hinderer and Daniel Dahlstrom. New York: Continuum, 1988. Shaw, Philip. The Sublime. London: Routledge, 2006. Strauss, Leo. Natural Right and History. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1953. Swaab, Peter. “Romantic Self-Representation: The Example of Mary Wollstonecraft’s Letters in Sweden.” Mortal Pages, Literary Lives: Studies in Nineteenth-Century Autobiography. Ed. Vincent Newey and Philip Shaw. Brookfield, VT: Scolar P, 1996. 13-30. Taylor, Charles. Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham: Duke UP, 2004. Tester, Keith. Civil Society. London: Routledge, 1992. Weiskel, Thomas. The Romantic Sublime: Studies in the Structure and Psychology of Transcendence. 1976. Baltimore: John Hopkins UP, 1986. Williams, Raymond. Keywords. London: Fontana P, 1988. Wollstonecraft, Mary. The Works of Mary Wollstonecraft. Ed. Janet Todd and Marilyn Butler. 7 vols. New York: New York UP, 1989. Wood, Neil. “The Aesthetic Dimension of Burke’s Political Thought.” The Journal of British Studies 4.1 (1964): 41-64. Yaeger, Patricia. “Toward a Female Sublime.” Gender and Theory: Dialogues on Feminist Criticism. Ed. Linda Kauffman. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989. 191-212. Zaw, Susan Khin. “‘Appealing to the head and heart’: Wollstonecraft and Burke on taste, morals and human nature.” Femininity and Masculinity in Eighteenth-Century Art and Culture. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1994. 123-41. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42747 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本論文探究Mary Wollstonecraft如何使用「崇高」(the sublime) 與「美」(the beautiful) 此兩種美學詞彙，並分析其社會指涉及意涵，特別強調現代性 (modernity) 誕生於十八世紀歐洲的歷史脈絡，以及於此之際美學 (aesthetics) 作為一種現代論述的發展。本論文主要所處理的文本是《寫自瑞典、挪威、與丹麥的書信》，認為「崇高」代表的是個人化的力量，而「美」所代表的則是整合化的力量。本論文同時也分析比較Wollstonecraft與Edmund Burke兩者對於相同美學詞彙之不同運用，尤其是此間差異與兩人不同之社會政治觀念的關係。本論文另外關注《寫自瑞典、挪威、與丹麥的書信》文本中焦慮不安、遲疑不決的氛圍，最後認定其在情感上的濃度和修辭上的遲疑，乃是現代個體 (modern individual) 在面對一個理性化的現代世界時，為了在情感和感知上自我調節而產生。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Through foregrounding the emergence of modernity in the eighteenth century as well as the rise of aesthetics as a specifically modern form of discourse, this thesis aims to elucidate the social significance of Mary Wollstonecraft's use of the aesthetic terms 'the sublime' and 'the beautiful' in her _Letters Written during a Short Residence in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark_ (_Letters_). It argues that the sublime aesthetic represents a propensity to individuation, while the beautiful aesthetic represents a propensity to integration. It further examines the differentiation between Wollstonecraft and Edmund Burke's use of the same aesthetic terms, especially with regard to the two writers' respective socio-political visions. Lastly, it addresses the circuitous and equivocal use of aesthetic language in _Letters_, taking the text's emotional intensity and rhetorical hesitancy as exempla of a modern individual’s struggle towards self-attunement in the face of a rationalized modernity. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T01:21:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R94122008-1.pdf: 462492 bytes, checksum: 67ce4deacfd59334eb21e50c0d2738ae (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgments Abstract in Chinese
Abstract in English 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Between the 'Feminist' and the 'Aesthetician' 5 1.2 The Traditional/Egoistic Sublime vs. the Feminist Sublime 9 1.3 The Rise of Aesthetics as a Modern Form of Discourse 14 1.4 Methodology and Structure 18 2 The Sublime Aesthetic: A Propensity to Individuation 21 2.1 Power and the Sublime: A Brief History History 24 2.2 The Sublime and Political Modernity 35 2.3 The Sublime as Extra-ordinary Experience: a Propensity to Individuation 41 3 Complementing the Sublime: the Beautiful Aesthetic 47 3.1 Sexual Politics and Beyond 52 3.2 The Sublime and the Beautiful in Cooperation: Burke as Example 58 3.3 The Beautiful Aesthetic as a Propensity to Integration 67 4 Conclusion 82 Works Cited 89 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 現代性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 美 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 崇高 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 柏克 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 沃爾斯考夫特 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 美學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 法國大革命在英國之辯論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | aesthetics | en |
| dc.subject | modernity | en |
| dc.subject | the beautiful | en |
| dc.subject | the sublime | en |
| dc.subject | Edmund Burke | en |
| dc.subject | Mary Wollstonecraft | en |
| dc.subject | the French Revolution debate in Britain | en |
| dc.title | 美學與現代性：Mary Wollstonecraft《寫自瑞典、挪威、與丹麥的書信》 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Aesthetics and Modernity: Reading Mary Wollstonecraft’s _Letters Written during a Short Residence in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark_ | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳雅鳳,田偉文 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 沃爾斯考夫特,柏克,崇高,美,現代性,美學,法國大革命在英國之辯論, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Mary Wollstonecraft,Edmund Burke,the sublime,the beautiful,modernity,aesthetics,the French Revolution debate in Britain, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 93 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2009-07-24 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 外國語文學研究所 | zh_TW |
| Appears in Collections: | 外國語文學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-98-1.pdf Restricted Access | 451.65 kB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.