請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27120
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 古佳艷(Chia-Yen Ku) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ling Wang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 王翎 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-12T17:55:50Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2008-02-18 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-02-18 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-01-31 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Works Cited
Baumeister, Roy F. The Cultural Animal: Human Nature, Meaning, and Social Life. New York: Oxford UP, 2005. Bird, Anne-Marie. “Circumventing the Grand Narrative: Dust as an Alternative Theological Vision in Pullman’s His Dark Materials.” Lenz and Scott 188-98. ---. “‘Without Contraries is no Progression’: Dust as an All-Inclusive, Multifunctional Metaphor in Philip Pullman’s ‘His Dark Materials.’” Children’s Literature in Education 32.2 (2001): 111-23. Boas, George. The Cult of Childhood. Dallas: Spring, 1990. Bulliet, Richard W. Hunters, Herders, and Hamburgers: The Past and Future of Human-Animal Relationships. New York: Columbia UP, 2005. Castañeda, Claudia. “Developmentalism and the Child in Nineteenth-Century Science.” Science as Culture 10.3 (2001): 376-409. Colás, Santiago. “Telling True Stories, or The Immanent Ethics of Material Spirit (and Spiritual Matter) in Philip Pullman’s His Dark Materials.” Discourse 27.1 (2005): 34-66. Cone, Marla. Silent Snow: The Slow Poisoning of the Arctic. New York: Grove, 2005. Cosslett, Tess. Talking Animals in British Children’s Fiction, 1786-1914. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2006. Cox, Roger. Shaping Childhood: Themes of Uncertainty in the History of Adult-Child Relationships. London: Routledge, 1996. Cunningham, Hugh. Children and Childhood in Western Society Since 1500. London: Longman, 1995. ---. The Children of the Poor: Representations of Childhood Since the Seventeenth Century. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991. Darwin, Charles. “A Biographical Sketch of an Infant.” Mind 2.7 (1877): 285-94. “Demon.” The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. Vol. IV (Creel-Duzepere). Oxford: Clarendon P, 1989. “East of the Sun and West of the Moon.” Folklore and Mythology: Electronic Texts. Ed. D. L. Ashliman. 5 Mar. 2001. U of Pittsburgh. 29 Dec. 2007 <http://www.pitt.edu/~dash/norway034.html>. Eisenberg, Evan. The Ecology of Eden. 1998. New York: Vintage, 1999. Eisler, Riane. The Chalice and the Blade: Our History, Our Future. 1988. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1995. ---. “The Gaia Tradition and the Partnership Future: An Ecofeminist Manifesto.” Reweaving the World: The Emergence of Ecofeminism. Ed. Irene Diamond and Gloria Feman Orenstein. San Francisco: Sierra Club, 1990. 23-34. Fairchild, Hoxie Neale. The Noble Savage: A Study in Romantic Naturalism. New York: Russell, 1955. Flick, Jane. Lecture. Course of Children’s Literature. UBC, Vancouver. Nov. 2005. Gaard, Greta. “Living Interconnections with Animals and Nature.” Ecofeminism: Women, Animals, and Nature. Ed. Greta Gaard. Philadelphia: Temple UP, 1993. 1-12. Gillis, John R. “The Birth of the Virtual Child: A Victorian Progeny.” Beyond the Century of the Child: Cultural History and Developmental Psychology. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 2003. 82-95. Gribbin, Mary, and John Gribbin. The Science of Philip Pullman’s His Dark Materials. 2003. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2005. Ham, Jennifer, and Matthew Senior, eds. Animal Acts: Configuring the Human in Western History. New York: Routledge, 1997. Hatlen, Burton. “Pullman’s His Dark Materials, a Challenge to the Fantasies of J. R. R. Tolkien and C. S. Lewis, with an Epilogue on Pullman’s Neo-Romantic Reading of Paradise Lost.” Lenz and Scott 75-94. Hines, Maude. “Second Nature: Daemons and Ideology in The Golden Compass.” Lenz and Scott 37-47. Hopkins, Lisa. “Dyads or Triads? His Dark Materials and the Structure of the Human.” Lenz and Scott 48-56. King, Shelley. “‘Without Lyra We Would Understand Neither the New Nor the Old Testament’: Exegesis, Allegory, and Reading The Golden Compass.” Lenz and Scott 106-24. von Kleist, Heinrich. “On the Marionette Theatre.” Trans. Idris Parry. Southern Cross Review. 1 Jun 2007 <http://www.southerncrossreview.org/9/kleist.htm>. Lassén-Seger, Maria. Adventures into Otherness: Child Metamorphs in Late Twentieth-Century Children’s Literature. Diss. Åbo Akademi University, 2006. Åbo: Åbo Akademi UP, 2006. Le Guin, Ursula K. “Cheek by Jowl: Animals in Children’s Literature.” Children & Libraries: The Journal of the Association for Library Service to Children 2.2 (2004): 20-30. Leet, Andrew. “Rediscovering Faith through Science Fiction: Pullman’s His Dark Materials.” Lenz and Scott 174-87. Lenz, Millicent. “Philip Pullman.” Alternative Worlds in Fantasy Fiction. Ed. Peter Hunt and Millicent Lenz. London: Continuum, 2001. 122-69. ---, and Carole Scott, eds. His Dark Materials Illuminated: Critical Essays on Philip Pullman’s Trilogy. Detroit: Wayne State UP, 2005. Lopez, Barry. Arctic Dreams: Imagination and Desire in a Northern Landscape. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1986. Lovejoy, Arthur O. The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1964. Marcus, Leonard S. “Picture Book Animals: How Natural a History?” The Lion and the Unicorn 7/8 (1983-84): 127-39. Matthews, Susan. “Rouzing the Faculties to Act: Pullman’s Blake for Children.” Lenz and Scott 125-34. Merchant, Carolyn. Reinventing Eden: The Fate of Nature in Western Culture. New York: Routledge, 2004. Midgley, Mary. Beast and Man: The Roots of Human Nature. 1979. London: Routledge, 1995. Moruzi, Kristine. “Missed Opportunities: The Subordination of Children in Philip Pullman’s His Dark Materials.” Children’s Literature in Education 36.1 (2005): 55-68. Oelschlaeger, Max. The Idea of Wilderness: From Prehistory to the Age of Ecology. New Haven: Yale UP, 1991. Oswald, Lori Jo. “Heroes and Victims: The Stereotyping of Animal Characters in Children’s Realistic Animal Fiction.” Children’s Literature in Education 26.2 (1995): 135-49. Pincent, Pat. “Unexpected Allies? Pullman and the Feminist Theologians.” Lenz and Scott 199-211. Preece, Rod. Brute Souls, Happy Beasts, and Evolution: The Historical Status of Animals. Vancouver: UBC P, 2005. Pullman, Philip. The Amber Spyglass. 2000. New York: Yearling, 2003. ---. The Golden Compass. 1995. New York: Dell Yearling, 1995. ---. The Subtle Knife. 1997. New York: Dell Yearling, 2001. ---.“Talking to Philip Pullman: An Interview.” The Lion and the Unicorn 23.1 (1999): 116-34. Reznikova, Zhanna. Animal Intelligence: From Individual to Social Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2007. Rowland, Beryl. Animals with Human Faces: A Guide to Animal Symbolism. Knoxville: U of Tennessee P, 1973. Russell, Mary Harris. “‘Eve, Again! Mother Eve!’: Pullman’s Eve Variations.” Lenz and Scott 212-22. Sale, Kirkpatrick. After Eden: The Evolution of Human Domination. Durham: Duke UP, 2006. Salisbury, Joyce E. The Beast Within: Animal in the Middle Ages. New York: Routledge, 1994. ---. “Human Beasts and Bestial Humans in the Middle Ages.” Animal Acts: Configuring the Human in Western History. Ed. Jennifer Ham and Matthew Senior. New York: Routledge, 1997. 9-21. Schweizer, Bernard. “‘And He’s A-Going to Destory Him’: Religious Subversion in Pullman’s His Dark Materials.” Lenz and Scott 160-73. Scott, Carole. “Pullman’s Enigmatic Ontology: Revamping Old Traditions in His Dark Materials.” Lenz and Scott 95-105. Serpell, James A. “Guardian Spirits or Demonic Pets: The Concept of the Witch’s Familiar in Early Modern England, 1530-1712.” The Animal/Human Boundary: Historical Perspectives. Ed. Angela N. H. Creager and William Chester Jordan. Rochester: U of Rochester P, 2002. 157-90. Shohet, Lauren. “Reading Dark Materials.” Lenz and Scott 22-36. Smith, Karen Patricia. “Tradition, Transformation, and the Bold Emergence: Fantastic Legacy and His Dark Materials.” Lenz and Scott 135-51. Straley, Jessica L. How the Child Lost Its Tail. Diss. Stanford U, 2005. Swinfen, Ann. “Talking Beasts.” In Defense of Fantasy: A Study of the Genre in English and American Literature since 1943. London: Routledge, 1984. 12-43. Taine, Hippolite. “The Acquisition of Language by Children.” Mind 2.6 (1877): 252-59. Thomson, Stephen. “The Child, The Family, The Relationship. Familiar Stories: Family, Storytelling, and Ideology in Philip Pullman’s His Dark Materials.” Children’s Literature: New Approaches. Ed. Karín Lesnik-Oberstein. Houndmills: Palgrave, 2004. 144-67. Twain, Mark. The Diary of Adam and Eve and Other Adamic Stories. London: Hesperus, 2002. Warner, Marina. From the Beast to the Blonde: On Fairy Tales and Their Tellers. 1994. London: Vintage, 1995. ---. Six Myths of Our Time: Little Angels, Little Monsters, Beautiful Beasts, and More. New York: Vintage, 1995. Watkins, Tony. Dark Matter: Shedding Light on Philip Pullman’s Trilogy His Dark Materials. Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 2004. Wood, Naomi. “(Em)bracing Icy Mothers: Ideology, Identity, and Environment in Children’s Fantasy.” Wild Things: Children’s Culture and Ecocriticism. Ed. Sidney I. Dobrin and Kenneth B. Kidd. Detroit: Wayne State UP, 2004. 198-214. ---. “Paradise Lost and Found: Obedience, Disobedience, and Storytelling in C. S. Lewis and Philip Pullman.” Children’s Literature in Education 32.4 (2001): 237-59. Yeffeth, Glenn. Navigating the Golden Compass: Religion, Science, and Daemonology in “His Dark Materials.” Dallas: Benbella, 2005. Young-Eisendrath, Polly, and Terence Dawson, eds. The Cambridge Companion to Jung. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1997. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27120 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本論文探討菲力普.普曼《黑暗元素三部曲》中之動物形象及動物與人的關係,分章細論人類及其守護精靈(daemon)、武裝熊族(armored bears)及謬爾發族(mulefa)的世界。研究結果顯示,《黑暗元素三部曲》小說中動物與人的關係不僅以多面向呈現,更兼具前瞻性,超越「畜養時代」的想像框架,展現「後畜養時代」想像的特點。
論文第一章以娥蘇拉.勒瑰恩(Ursula K. Le Guin)對兒童文學中動物故事的觀察為基礎,以理查.布利耶(Richard W. Bulliet)對動物與人關係的四階段歷史論述為主體,提出一參考框架,用以檢視普曼的小說中對人類守護精靈及各個奇幻種族的描寫,如何呈現不同階段的特點。 布利耶認為,動物與人的關係在歷史上的演變可概分為四個時期:「分離」(separation)、「前畜養時代」(predomesticity)、「畜養時代」(domesticity)及「後畜養時代」(postdomesticity)。在「分離」之前,人類只是眾多動物種族中的一種。在「分離」這個過渡性時期,人類開始認為自己和動物是不同的。在「分離」之後的「前畜養時代」,人類相信動物具有神祕或象徵性的力量。當人類逐漸開始「畜養」並以各種方式利用動物,動物在人類想像中不僅神祕性盡失,更慢慢被汙名化及邊緣化。布利耶提出對於動物與人關係的新想像——屬於「後畜養時代」的願景,在「後畜養時代」中,前畜養時代對於動物神祕力量的想像被重新召喚,動物與人之間的界線也被重新考量。 第二章探討人類與守護精靈間的牽繫和相伴。此三部曲對守護精靈的描寫融合了「動物變形」(animal metamorphosis)及「野孩子」(bestial child)等兒童文學中的常見主題。在過往兒文作品中,「動物變形」及「野孩子」的描寫多半仍限於「畜養時代」的想像範疇,而普曼對此二主題的呈現則超脫舊有框架,不僅認可了「心中的野獸」(beast within),更強調人與動物共存且不可分離的重要性。 第三章討論首部曲中如何先建立人類與動物不同之處在於有守護精靈的概念,而此概念卻又在接下來第二、三部曲中,因為沒有守護精靈的人類和其他同樣有智識及文化的種族陸續出現而遭到挑戰。當人與動物間的界線趨於模糊,而人類只是武裝熊、謬爾發族、天使及平行宇宙中眾多種族中的一種,屬於「後畜養時代」的種族觀也由此浮現。 第四章中引用生態批評中關於「生態伊甸園」(ecological Eden)的論述,討論如何將謬爾發族所居住的世界視為一生態伊甸園。謬爾發族和人類有相似的部份,也有相異的部份,而兩個種族相異之處恰可以解釋為何人類註定會被逐出伊甸園,而謬爾發族卻可以長久居住在伊甸園般的世界,和其他動植物和平共生,並維繫此世界的生態平衡。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis studies the portrayal of animal characters and animal-human relationships in Philip Pullman's His Dark Materials trilogy. The daemon-human pairing, the species of armored bears, and the world of mulefa are examined respectively. The animal-human relationships in the trilogy are manifested as multi-faceted and visionary, going beyond the imaginary scope of the domestic era and stepping into that of the postdomestic era.
In the first chapter, a framework taken from Ursula K. Le Guin's observation of animals in children’s fiction is modified by adopting Richard W. Bulliet's historical study of animal-human relationships. This referential framework is used for examining features related to phases of separation, predomesticity, domesticity, and postdomesticity as displayed in the portrayal of daemon-human pairing and fantastic species in Pullman's trilogy. Bulliet conceives the history of animal-human relationship as starting with the phase of “separation.” Before the “separation,” human beings were “among” rather than “above” other species. After the “separation” is the predomestic era, in which humans still believed in the mythical powers of animals. As humans proceeded further into the domestic era, animals were gradually stigmatized and marginalized in human imagination. Bulliet proposes a new way for imagining animal-human relationship: a postdomestic vision in which prehistoric feelings about animals are recalled and animal-human boundary is reconsidered. In the second chapter, I argue that by incorporating the traditional themes of “animal metamorphosis” and “bestial child” that belong to the realm of domestic imagination, the daemon-human pairing not only recognizes the “beast within” but also asserts the co-existence of and the inseparability between human and animal. In the third chapter, I argue that the differentia for human as daemon is established and then challenged as humans with/out daemons and other species are juxtaposed. A postdomestic vision of species emerges as the boundary between human and animal blurs, and humans are placed among bears, mulefa, angels, and other beings in multiple universes. The fourth chapter provides a reading of the world of mulefa as an ecological Eden. The differences between human beings and mulefa explain why human beings are doomed to be expelled from the Garden of Eden whereas the mulefa live in an Edenic state. In a prehistoric, tribal society, the mulefa, seedpod trees, and other neighboring species live in a balanced, symbiotic state. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-12T17:55:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R93122001-1.pdf: 445277 bytes, checksum: b661cee18ab3bf1caeed8d3883c5dcf8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Table of Contents
Certificate of Approval.....................................i Acknowledgments ...........................................ii Chinese Abstract..........................................iii English Abstract............................................v Introduction................................................1 Chapter One: A Referential Framework........................8 Chapter Two: Animal Daemon.................................17 Chapter Three: Bears as Humans, Mulefa as People...........37 Chapter Four: Mulefa in Ecological Eden....................64 Conclusion.................................................85 Works Cited................................................87 Appendix A: Lyra and Pantalaimon...........................93 Appendix B: Other Characters and Their Daemons.............96 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 守護精靈、武裝熊、生態伊甸園:菲力普.普曼《黑暗元素三部曲》中動物與人的關係 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Animal Daemon, Armored Bear, and Ecological Eden: Animal-Human Relationships in Philip Pullman's His Dark Materials | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉鳳芯(Feng-Hsin Liu),盧莉茹(Li-Ru Lu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 菲力普.普曼,《黑暗元素三部曲》,動物與人的關係,兒童文學,奇幻文學,娥蘇拉.勒瑰恩,理查.布利耶,後畜養時代,動物變形,野孩子,生態伊甸園, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Philip Pullman,_His Dark Materials_,animal-human relationship,fantasy,Ursula K. Le Guin,Richard W. Bulliet,postdomesticity,animal metamorphosis,bestial child,ecological Eden, | en |
dc.relation.page | 98 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-02-02 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 外國語文學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 外國語文學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 434.84 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。