Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 管理學院企業管理專班(Global MBA)
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17411
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陳忠仁(Chung-Jen Chen)
dc.contributor.authorChia-Ling Changen
dc.contributor.author張佳鈴zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T00:11:27Z-
dc.date.copyright2013-08-20
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.submitted2013-08-06
dc.identifier.citationHill, C., & Jones, G. (1995). Strategic management theory: an integrated approach. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Grant, R. (2010). Contemporary strategy analysis. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Son Ltd.
Osterwalder, A. & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken, NJ : Wiley.
Dixon, J., Lawton, G., & Machin, P. (2009). Vertical disintegration: a strategy for pharmaceutical business in 2009? Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 8, 435. doi:10.1038/nrd2914
PhRMA. (2007). Drug discovery and development: understanding the R&D process. http://www.innovation.org/drug_discovery/objects/pdf/RD_Brochure.pdf
PhRMA. (2013). Biopharmaceuticals in perspective (version 3.0).
PhRMA. (2013). 2013 profile.
Paul, S., Mytelka, D., Dunwiddie, C., Persinger, C., Munos, B., Lindborg, M., & Schacht, A. (2010). How to Improve R&D Productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 9, 203-214. doi:10.1038/nrd3078
林宗賢. (2009). 生技製藥產業通用鑑價模式簡介. 北美智權. http://www.naipo.com/Portals/1/web_tw/Knowledge_Center/Biotechnology/publish-3.htm
Mattke, S., Klautzer, L., & Mengistu, T. (2012). Medicines as a Service – a new commercial model for big pharma in the postblockbuster world. Rand Health.
Gilbert, J., Henske, P., & Singh, A. (2003). Rebuilding big pharma’s business model. In Vivo – the business & medicine report, 21, No. 10.
IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics. (2012). The global use of medicines: Outlook through 2016.
EvaluatePharma. (2012). World preview 2018: Embracing the patent cliff.
PriceWaterhouseCoopers. (2009). The new science of personalized medicine: Translating the promise into practice.
PriceWaterhouseCoopers. (2008). Pharma 2020: Virtual R&D. Which Path Will You Take?
IMS Health. (2013). The changing face of the top 10 pharmaceutical companies – the beginning of the end for innovative dominance.
Accenture. (2009). Achieving high performance in pharmaceuticals through sustainable cost reduction.
許舜喨. (2013). 淺論生技新藥產業發展條例對我國生醫產業發展之影響與建議. Retrieved from 國家生技醫療產業策進會: http://www.ibmi.org.tw/client/ReportDetail.php?REFDOCTYPID=0lgfj8ve17pfj9w5&REFDOCID=0mju0zluvz4odtyg
Business Monitor International. (2012). Taiwan pharmaceuticals & healthcare report, Q4 2012.
董珮真. (2008, Feb 01). 生技醫療產業商機龐大,取得國際舞台競技權. 貿易雜誌電子報. http://www.ieatpe.org.tw/magazine/200-1.htm
湯谷清. (2012). 我國明星產業競爭優勢及市場利基研究-生技及國際醫療. 台北市:行政院經濟建設委員會.
朱兆文. (2010). 生技/製藥廠商聯盟及授權標竿案例與價值分析. 台北縣汐止市: 生物技術開發中心.
商業周刊. (2012, Aug 27). 十七人小製藥公司 拚出百億市值. http://www.businessweekly.com.tw/article.php?id=47655
Burrill & Company. (2013, Feb). The Burrill Report.
Pharmaengine, Inc. http://www.pharmaengine.com
Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc. http://www.merrimackpharma.com/solutions/pipeline/mm-398
Nanobiotix. http://www.nanobiotix.com/
Medigen Biotechnology Corp. http://www.medigen.com.tw
Progen Pharmaceuticals. http://www.progen-pharma.com/
Oncolys BioPharma Inc. http://www.oncolys.com/en/index.html
TaiGen Biotechnology Co., Ltd. http://www.taigenbiotech.com.tw/
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/17411-
dc.description.abstractThis study will focus on pharmaceutical / biotechnology companies with innovative new medicines. The main goal of this study is to discuss how Taiwanese biotechnology industry can become successful by conducting three different analyses. First, we will investigate whether Taiwanese biotechnology industry should adopt the full vertical integration or vertical disintegration business model by listing the key criteria for full vertical integration and vertical disintegration separately and examining whether Taiwanese companies can match each criterion. Second, we will determine the key success factors (KSFs) of No-Research-Development-Only (NRDO) biotechnology companies from the business model canvas of the NRDO business model. The third analysis will determine whether Taiwanese NRDO companies have the KSFs by inspecting the factors and resources of three example Taiwanese NRDO biotechnology companies.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T00:11:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-102-R00749071-1.pdf: 3123637 bytes, checksum: 3d60d8ef6ebb52d97f7754ade1a53784 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2013
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsAbstract………………………………………………………………i
Table of Contents………………………………………………………………ii
List of Figures and Tables………………………………………iv
Chapter 1. Introduction……………………………1
1.1 Research Motives…………………………………………………1
1.2 Research Questions………………………………………………2
Chapter 2. Literature Review………………………………………3
2.1 Vertical Integration vs. Vertical Disintegration………3
2.2 Business Model Canvas…………………………………………5
2.3 Key Success Factors……………………………………………6
Chapter 3. Methodology……………………………………………7
3.1 Measures…………………………………………………………7
3.2 Data Collection………………………………………………8
Chapter 4. Discussion…………………………………………………………9
4.1 Introduction of the Pharmaceutical Industry………9
4.2 The Traditional Business Model – Full Vertical Integration……………15
4.3 The New Business Model - Vertical Disintegration………………17
4.3.1 Causes of Disintegration…………………………………17
4.3.2 Vertical Disintegration Business Model………………22
4.4 Should Taiwanese Biotechnology Industry adopt VI or VD?…………………………24
4.5 The NRDO Business Model……………………………………31
4.6 Key Success Factors of NRDO Biotechnology Companies…………36
4.6.1 Determine Key Success Factors of NRDO from Business Model Canvas…36
4.6.2 KSF Analysis of NRDO Taiwanese Biotechnology Companies……………41
Chapter 5. Conclusion & Prospects………………………………54
5.1 Conclusion………………………………………………………54
5.2 Prospects………………………………………………………54
References………………………………………………………55
dc.language.isoen
dc.title台灣生技產業的NRDO商業模式zh_TW
dc.titleThe NRDO Business Model in Taiwanese Biotechnology Industryen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear101-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee洪世章,林博文
dc.subject.keyword生技,垂直分工,NRDO,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordbiotechnology,vertical disintegration,NRDO,en
dc.relation.page57
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2013-08-06
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept企業管理碩士專班zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:管理學院企業管理專班(Global MBA)

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-102-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
3.05 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved