請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99801完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳忠仁 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chung-Jen Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 游明德 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Ming-Te Yu | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-17T16:43:28Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-18 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-09-17 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-07-04 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. 大世科官網,https://www.etatung.com/Home/ShowProductionInfoIdea?ID=6b23fb46-d8ed-42d2-be9e-209f973a1952。
2. 余朝權(1991),產業分析構面之探討,臺北市銀月刊,22(7):9-19。 3. 吳宛霖(2018),資訊系統整合商之商業模式與未來發展-以F公司為例,國立高雄大學國際高階經營管理之碩士論文。 4. 吳雨純(2022),資訊服務系統整合商的經營模式與財務報表特性研究,國立政治大學商學院經營管理碩士學程之碩士論文。 5. 李裔武(1998),台灣資訊服務業經營策略與組織系統流程,國立政治大學企業管理系之碩士論文。 6. 沈柏延(2002),資訊硬體產品代理事業組織能耐的形成與累積之研究,國立政治大學科技管理研究所之碩士論文。 7. 周國凱(2020),資訊服務系統整合業者之轉型策略-以S公司為個案研究,國立政治大學商學院經營管理碩士學程高階經營班之碩士論文。 8. 林孟宏(2024),台灣資訊服務產業經營策略之探索性研究,中華科技大學企業資訊與管理系經營管理碩士班之碩士論文。 9. 張芝青(2023),資訊服務業之公司策略-以W公司為例,國立中興大學高階經理人碩士在職專班之碩士論文。 10. 許人崇(2022),資訊服務業之經營策略研究-以K公司為例,國立暨南國際大學高階經營管理碩士學位學程之碩士論文。 11. 許嘉雄(2019),系統整合商的困境與轉型-以H公司為例,天主教輔仁大學科技管理碩士學位學程在職專班之碩士論文。 12. 郭敏華(2009),企業分析與評價。台北,華泰文化。 13. 陳宗勳(2024),運用人工智能提升資訊服務業產業市場競爭力之研究-以N公司為例,國立台北科技大學管理學院工業與科技管理系EMBA專班之碩士論文。 14. 資策會產業情報研究所經濟部ITIS研究團隊(2023),2023資訊服務暨軟體年鑑。 15. 劉毅(2023),大資料時代人工智能在電腦網路技術中應用分析,網路安全技術與應用,12:167-169。 16. Amit, R. and Zott, C. (2001). Value Creation in e-Business. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 493-520. 17. Amit, R. & Zott, C. (2012). Creating value through business model innovation. Sloan Management Review, 53(3), 41-49. 18. Afuah, A. and Tucci, C.L. (2001). Internet Business Model &; Strategies: Text and Cases. MC Graw-Hill. New York. 19. Afuah, A. (2003). Business models: A strategic management approach. New York: McGraw-Hill. 20. Applegate, L. M. (2000). E-business models: Making sense of the internet business landscape. In G. Dickson & G. DeSanctis (Eds.), Information technology and the future enterprise: New models for managers, 49-101.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 21. Applegate, L. M. (2001). Emerging e-Business Model, Harvard Business Review. 79(1), 79-87. 22. Barney, J. B. 1995. Looking inside for competitive advantage. The Academy of Management Executive, 9(4), 49-62. 23. Brousseau, E. & Penard, T. (2006). The economics of digital business models: A framework for analyzing the economics of platforms. Review of Network Economics, 6(2): 81-110. 24. Brenner, S. N. (1995). Stakeholder theory of the firm: Its consistency with current management techniques. In Nasi, J. (Ed.), Understanding Stakeholder Thinking:75-96. 25. Chesbrough, H. & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002).The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation:evidence from xerox corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529-555. 26. Crimp, D. (1988). AIDS: Cultural Analysis, Cultural Activism (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 27. Doganova, L. & Eyquem-Renault, M. (2009). What do Business Models do? Innovation Devices in Technology Entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 38(10), 1559-1570. 28. George, G. & Bock, A. J. (2011). The Business Model in Practice and its Implications for Entrepreneurship Research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 83-111. 29. Hatten, K J and Haten M.L. (1987). Strategic Groups, Asymmetrical Mobility Barriers and Contestability. Strategic Management Journal, 8, 329-342. 30. Hill, C. W. L. & Jones, G. R. (2007). Strategy Management Theory - An Integrated Approach Seventh Edition. 31. Kotler, P. (1976). Marketing management, analysis, planning and controls(3rd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. 32. Laws, E. (1996), Health Tourism : A business Opportunity Approach. Health and International Tourist, 199-214. 33. Linder, J. C. and Cantrell, S. (2000), Changing Business Models: Surveying the Landscape, Institute for Strategic Change, Accenture. 34. Morris, M., Schindehutte, M. & Allen, J. (2005). The entrepreneur's business model: Toward a unified perspec perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 726-735. 35. Manatosh, Sadhu and Tushar, Kanta Pany. (2015). Medical Tourism And International Healthcare Options. Anusandhanika. 2015, Vol. 7, 1, pp. 25-32. 36. Mahadevan, B. (2000), Business Models for Internet-Based E-Commerce: An Anatomy. California Management Review, 42(4), 55-68. 37. Medhekar, Anita and Ali, Mahboob Muhammad. (2012). A Cross-Border Trade in Healthcare Services: Bangladesh to India. The Business & Management Review, Vol. 2, 1, pp. 1-13. 38. Magretta, J. (2002). Why Business Models Matter. Harvard Business Review, 80( 5), 86-92. 39. Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69 (6): 96-104. 40. Osterwalder, A. and Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. 41. Porter, M. E. 1981. The contributions of industrial organization to strategic management. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 609-20. 42. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: The Free Press. 43. Ross, K. (2001), Health Tourism : An Overview, Hospital Net. 1-5. Retrieved March 19, 2008, from http://www.hospitalitynet.org/news/401521.html. 44. Reddy, S.G., York, V.K., & Brannon, L.A. (2010). Travel for treatment: Students. perspective on medical tourism. International Journal of Tourism Research, 12, 510–522. 45. Robert, G. M. (2002). Contemporary strategy analysis. Concepts, Techniques, applications, 4. 46. Shepherd, W. G. (1979). The Economics of Industial Organization. London: Prentice-Hall International Inc. 47. Rappa, M.(2000) .Business Models on the Web. Managing the digital enterprise,73,94-102. 48. York, Diane. (2008). Medical Tourism: The Trend Toward Outsourcing Medical Procedures to Foreign Countries. JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, Vol. 28, 2, pp. 99-102. 49. Zott, C. & Amit, R. (2010). Business Model Design: An Activity System Perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 216-26. 50. Zott, C., Amit, R. & Massa, L. (2011). The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019-1043. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99801 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 隨著科技的迅速發展,企業在資訊應用上的範圍也日益擴大,為了加速創新或保持市場領先地位,對資訊技術的投資逐年增加,資訊服務市場因而持續的成長,近年軟體服務與人工智慧應用快速演進,硬體網路資安的技術發展也因應各種政策與駭客攻擊不斷的產生新的需求,資訊服務由原本從數位化,數位優化,數位轉型到AI應用成為企業永續發展之要角,除了提供公司營運決策關鍵因素資訊之外,亦可能是企業創新獲利之來源。
本研究選擇個案公司並與同是上市或上櫃資訊服務業者進行研討,透過產業成長趨勢及資訊服務業上中下游銷售與供應價值鏈關係,比較競爭公司的營運主要項目及未來發展狀況,進一步選擇相對銷售比例最高產品包含電腦周邊硬體,通訊網路資安與軟體應用與服務進行分析,透過波特五力分析(Porter’s Five Forces),系統性評估產業內的競爭強度、替代性威脅、供應商與顧客議價能力,以及新進入者的潛在壓力,進一步掌握市場結構與機會風險。其次,本研究運用策略活動系統圖(Strategic Activity System)解析代表性資訊服務企業的關鍵策略佈局與價值鏈整合方式,說明其如何透過差異化與資源配置建構競爭優勢。 藉由事業組合分析工具(BCG矩陣)探討個案公司的事業組合分析之市場成長性與相對競爭地位及採用成長策略分析個案公司發展是採用哪種成長模式(如本業有機成長、多角化經營、價值鏈整合及國際市場拓展)來取得所需資源與能力,最後依據主要產品項目個別進行目標市場範疇與競爭優勢分析,歸納出綜合事業競爭策略與作法提出對應政策與企業經營建議。 本研究期望透過上述多元理論架構整合,提供企業發展策略與投資決策提供具體方向同時為政府在推動數位政策時之參考依據,資訊服務業若能有效整合內部資源、聚焦高附加價值領域,並掌握國際市場需求變化,將有機會成為台灣另一座跨國發展及經濟成長的關鍵產業。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | With the rapid advancement of technology, the scope of information applications within enterprises has continuously expanded. To accelerate innovation or maintain a leading position in the market, companies have steadily increased their investments in information technology, resulting in continuous growth in the information services market. In recent years, software services and artificial intelligence applications—such as ChatGPT and large language models—have evolved rapidly. Meanwhile, hardware, networking, and cybersecurity technologies are also advancing in response to emerging policies and increasingly sophisticated cyberattacks, generating new demands. Information services have thus progressed from digitalization and digital optimization to digital transformation and AI application, becoming a cornerstone of corporate sustainability. Beyond supporting key decision-making, information services may also serve as a source of business innovation and profit generation.
This study selected a case company and conducted comparative research with listed or OTC (Over-the-Counter) companies. By examining industry growth trends and the upstream, midstream, and downstream value chains of the information services sector, the study compares the primary business operations and future development directions of competing firms. It further identifies the product categories with the highest relative sales—namely, computer peripheral hardware, communication network security, and software applications and services—for in-depth analysis. Using Porter’s Five Forces framework, the research systematically evaluates the intensity of industry competition, threat of substitution, bargaining power of suppliers and customers, and the pressure of potential new entrants, thereby providing insights into market structure, opportunities, and risks. In addition, this study applies the Strategic Activity System to analyze the key strategic configurations and value chain integration methods of representative information service companies, illustrating how they build competitive advantages through differentiation and resource allocation. Using the BCG Matrix as a business portfolio analysis tool, the study investigates the case company’s market growth potential and relative competitive position. It also analyzes which growth strategies—such as organic growth, diversification, value chain integration, or international market expansion—the company adopts to acquire necessary resources and capabilities. Finally, the study conducts an analysis of the target market scope and competitive advantage for each major product line, summarizing integrated business strategies and corresponding policies and managerial recommendations. By integrating these diverse theoretical frameworks, this research aims to offer concrete guidance for corporate strategy development and investment decision-making, while also serving as a reference for government digital policy initiatives. If the information services industry in Taiwan can effectively integrate internal resources, focus on high value-added areas, and respond to international market dynamics, it holds the potential to become another pillar of Taiwan’s global competitiveness and economic growth. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-09-17T16:43:28Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-09-17T16:43:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次
口試委員會審定書 I 致謝 II 中文摘要 III THESIS ABSTRACT IV 目次 VI 圖次 VIII 表次 IX 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究動機 1 1.2 研究問題與目的 3 1.3 研究流程 3 第二章 文獻探討 5 2.1 管理觀念與架構模型 5 2.2 資訊服務產業相關文獻 14 第三章 產業分析 19 3.1 產業概況 19 3.2 產業價值鏈 21 3.3 產業技術與市場趨勢分析 23 3.4 主要競爭者分析 32 3.5 五力分析與產業價值分析 44 第四章 個案公司分析 57 4.1 公司介紹 57 4.2 資源能力與活動 64 4.3 策略活動系統 71 4.4 事業組合分析 73 4.5 成長策略與作法 76 4.6 事業策略與作法 86 第五章 結論與建議 91 5.1 研究結論 91 5.2 研究建議 94 5.3 研究限制 97 參考文獻 98 圖次 圖1-1:台灣資訊服務業營收 2 圖1-2:研究流程圖 4 圖2-1:五力分析圖 7 圖2-2:策略活動系統 8 圖2-3:BCG矩陣圖 10 圖2-4:一般性事業競爭策略 14 圖3-1:台灣資訊服務產業結構 22 圖3-2:台灣資訊軟體暨服務產業產值 24 圖3-3:台灣系統整合業產值 26 圖3-4:台灣系統整合次產業分析 27 圖3-5:台灣軟體產業產值 31 圖4-1:大世科組織架構圖 62 圖4-2:大世科解決方案說明圖 68 圖4-3:OneService服務能量說明圖 69 圖4-4:大世科ESG永續治理活動圖 70 圖4-5:大世科策略活動圖 72 圖4-6:大世科BCG矩陣分析 74 圖4-7:大世科主要事業發展關聯圖 76 圖4-8:大世科2010年至2023年營收與主要營業項目與成長策略 78 圖4-9:大世科2006年至2024年營收毛利與毛利率分析 79 圖4-10:大世科2010年至2015年營收毛利與毛利率分析 81 圖4-11:大世科2016年至2020年營收毛利與毛利率分析 82 圖4-12:大世科2021年至2024年營收毛利與毛利率分析 84 表次 表3-1:資訊服務與資訊軟體區隔說明 25 表3-2:台灣系統整合產業次區隔說明 27 表3-3:系統整合次產業電腦周邊硬體產值及產品分類 29 表3-4:系統整合業次產業通訊網路資安產值及產品分類 30 表3-5:資訊軟體設計產值及產品分類 31 表3-6:大世科歷年主要產品營收占比與近5年營收複合年均成長率 32 表3-7:系統整合服務公司上市櫃公司清單 33 表3-8:競爭公司比較表 34 表3-9:大綜電腦歷年主要產品營收與占比 36 表3-10:晉泰科技歷年主要產品營收與占比 40 表3-11:敦陽科技歷年主要產品營收與占比 43 表3-12:2023年各公司營收與預估獲利分析 46 表3-13:資訊服務產業上下游價值鏈獲利分析 47 表3-14:電腦周邊硬體產品之五力分析結果49 表3-15:通訊網路資安產品之五力分析結果51 表3-16:軟體應用及服務產品之五力分析結果53 表4-1:大世科近5年歷年營收 57 表4-2:近五年財務資料合併財務報表 61 表4-3:大世科各部門主要業務內容 63 表4-4:員工人數與學歷分析 65 表4-5:大世科與各簽訂之重要契約 67 表4-6:大世科的資源與能力相對於大綜電腦、敦陽科、晉泰比較說明 71 表4-7:大世科發展階段與關鍵事件列表 77 表4-8:大世科2006年主要產品與服務 80 表4-9:大世科2010年主要產品與服務 81 表5-1:事業組合與關聯性說明 93 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 資訊服務產業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 系統整合服務 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 五力分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 成長策略 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | BCG矩陣 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | BCG Matrix factors | en |
| dc.subject | information services industry | en |
| dc.subject | system integration services | en |
| dc.subject | Five Forces Analysis | en |
| dc.subject | growth strategy | en |
| dc.title | 創新佈局、轉型致勝-資訊服務廠商之經營發展策略分析 —以大同世界科技公司為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Corporate Strategy Analysis of Information Services Industry-A Case Study of Tatung System Technologies Inc. | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 柯冠州 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | Kuan-Chou Ko | en |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳建錦;丘宏昌 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chien-Chin Chen;Hung-Chang Chiu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 資訊服務產業,系統整合服務,五力分析,成長策略,BCG矩陣, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | information services industry,system integration services,Five Forces Analysis,growth strategy,BCG Matrix factors, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 102 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202501183 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-07-07 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 碩士在職專班商學組 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2030-06-11 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 商學組 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 5.39 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
