請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97959完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 蔡宜妮 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | I-Ni Tsai | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林鈺萍 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu Ping Lin | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-23T16:15:04Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-24 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-07-23 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-07-15 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Allen, T. J., & Liu, X. (2024). Progressivity of initial service encounters: Accounts from a Japanese izakaya. East Asian Pragmatics, 9(3), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.24509
Antonopoulou, E. (2001). Brief service encounters: Gender and politeness. In A. Bayraktaroglu & M. Sifianou (Eds.), Linguistic politeness across boundaries: the case of Greek and Turkish (pp. 241–269). John Benjamins. Aston, G. (1995). In reference to the role of openings to service encounters. Cahiers de Linguistique Française, 16(1), 89-111. Bailey, B. (1997). Communication of respect in interethnic service encounters. Language in Society, 26(3), 327-356. Bartlett, N. J. D. (2005). A double shot 2% mocha latte, please, with whip: Service encounters in two coffee shops and at a coffee cart. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis (pp. 305–343). Cambridge University Press. Barton, E. (2001) Sanctioned and non-sanctioned narratives in institutional discourse. Narrative Inquiry, 10(2), 341-375 Benson, D., & Hughes, J. (1991). Method: evidence and inference-evidence and inference for ethnomethodology. Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences, 109-136. Chan, M. Y., & Chandra-Sagaran, U. (2019). Scripted communication for service standardisation? What analysis of conversation can tell us about the fast-food service encounter. Discourse and Communication, 13(1), 3-25.doi:10.1177/1750481318801625 Chao, Y. R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. University of California Press. Drew, P. (2012). Turn design. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 131–149). Wiley-Blackwell. Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (Eds), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 3-65). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press Drew, P., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (Eds.). (1997). Institutional dialogue. Sage Publications. Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2015). The language of service encounters. Cambridge University Press. Félix-Brasdefer, J. C., & Márquez Reiter, R. (2021). Service encounter discourse. In M. Haugh, D. Z. Kádár, & M. Terkourafi (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of sociopragmatics (pp. 496-519). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Fink, L. N., & Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2015). Pragmalinguistic variation and barista perceptions in US café service encounters. In K. P. Schneider & E. Ifantidou (Eds.), Researching sociopragmatic variability: Perspectives from variational, interlanguage and contrastive pragmatics (pp. 19–48). Springer. Fox, B., & Heinemann, T. (2016). Rethinking format: An examination of requests. Language in Society, 45(4), 499-531. Fox, B. A., Benjamin, T., & Mazeland, H. (2013). Conversation analysis and repair organization: Overview. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–3). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0172 Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and developments (pp. 337–366). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19(1), 283-307. Hasan, R. (1978). Text in the systemic-functional model. In Dressier WU (Eds), Current trends in textlinguistics, 2, 229-245. Heritage, J. (1984a). A change of state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665868.020 Heritage, J. (1984b). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. Heritage, J. (2005). Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 103-147). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Heritage, J., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (1994). Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design. Language in Society, 23(1), 1-29. Hutchby, I. (2017). Conversation analysis. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The Wiley‐Blackwell encyclopedia of social theory (pp. 1–9). Wiley‐Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118430873.est0732 Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis (2nd ed.). Polity Press. Isaacs, C. K. (2006). How do you like your cereal? A linguistic analysis of a service encounter. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 21(2), 87–102. Jefferson, G. (1988). On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, 35(4), 418-441. Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. Pragmatics and Beyond New Series, 125, 13-34. Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters (Vol. 7). CUP Archive. Kidwell, M. (2000). Common ground in cross-cultural communication: Sequential and institutional contexts in front desk service encounters. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 17-37. Kitano, K., Yamauchi, Y., & Hiramoto, T. (2016). The ordering of fast food using menu. In Serviceology for designing the future: Selected and edited papers of the 2nd International Conference on Serviceology (pp. 51-65). Springer Japan. Kitzinger, C. C. (2012). Repair. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 229–256). John Wiley & Sons. Kuiper, K., & Flindall, M. (2014). Social rituals, formulaic speech and small talk at the supermarket checkout. In J. Coupland (Ed.), Small talk (pp. 183–207). Routledge. Kuroshima, S. (2010). Another look at the service encounter: Progressivity, intersubjectivity, and trust in a Japanese sushi restaurant. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(3), 856-869. Lamoureux, E. L. (1985). An analysis of conversation in service encounters [Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Laurier, E. (2016). Encounters at the counter: The relationship between regulars and staff. In P. Tolmie & M. Rouncefield (Eds.), Ethnomethodology at play (pp. 287–308). Routledge. Leidner, R. (1993). Fast food, fast talk: Service work and the routinization of everyday life. University of California Press. Levinson, S. (1979). Activity types and language. Linguistics, 17(5-6), 365-400. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1979.17.5-6.365 Levinson, S. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. University of California Press. Lind, M., & Salomonson, N. (2013). Using pragmatic concepts for exploring interactivity in service encounters. Systems, Signs & Actions. An International Journal on Information Technology, Action, Communication and Workpractices, 7(2), 205-226. Martin, J. (1979). Conjunction and conversational structure. Department of Linguistics, University of Sydney. Merritt, M. (1976). On questions following questions in service encounters. Language in Society, 5(3), 315-357. Merritt, M. (1978). On the use of "O.K." in service encounters (Working Papers in Sociolinguistics, No. 42). Southwest Educational Development Laboratory McCarthy, M. (2014). Mutually captive audiences: Small talk and the genre of close-contact service encounters. In J. Coupland (Ed.), Small talk (pp. 84-109). England: Longman. Miller, G. (1994). Toward ethnographies of institutional discourse: Proposal and suggestions. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 23(3), 280-306. Mitchell, T. F. (1957). The language of buying and selling in Cyrenaica: a situational statement. Emile Larose. Psathas, G. (1994). Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction: Sage publications. Reiter, R. M., & Cantarutti, M. N. (2021). The value of vale: negotiating the progressivity of service in a market restaurant. Contrastive Pragmatics, 3(1), 59-88 Richardson, E. (2014). The order of ordering: Analysing customer–bartender service encounters in public bars [Doctoral dissertation, Loughborough University]. Loughborough University Repository. Ritzer, G. (2011). The McDonaldization of society 6. Pine Forge Press. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation: Volume I. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell. Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289-327. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1978). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 7–55). Academic Press. Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings 1. American Anthropologist, 70(6), 1075-1095. Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 28–52). Cambridge University Press. Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1295-1345. https://doi.org/10.1086/229903 Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. Schegloff, E. A. (2013). Ten operations in self-initiated, same-turn repair. Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, 30, 41-70. Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.2307/413107 Seo, M.-S., & Koshik, I. (2010). A conversation analytic study of gestures that engender repair in ESL conversational tutoring. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(8), 2219-2239. Sifianou, M., & Tzanne, A. (2018). The impact of globalisation on brief Greek service encounters. Journal of Pragmatics, 134, 163-172. Shively, R. L. (2011). L2 pragmatic development in study abroad: A longitudinal study of Spanish service encounters. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(6), 1818-1835. Stivers, T., & Robinson, J. D. (2006). A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society, 35(3), 367-392. Taylor, J. (2015). I Need a Coffee: Pragmalinguistic Variation of Requests in Starbucks Service Encounters. IULC Working Papers, 15(1). Terasaki, A. K. (1976). Pre-announcement sequences in conversation (Social Science Working Paper No. 99). School of Social Science, University of California, Irvine. thi Nguyen, H., & Ishitobi, N. (2012). Ordering fast food: Service encounters in real-life interaction and in textbook dialogs. JALT journal: The Research Journal of the Japan Association for Language Teaching, 34(2), 151-185. Traverso, V. (2001a). Syrian service encounters: A case of shifting strategies within verbal exchange. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 11(4), 421-444. Traverso, V. (2001b). Interactions ordinaires dans les petits commerces: éléments pour une comparaison interculturelle. Langage & Société(1), 5-31. Ventola, E. (1983). Contrasting schematic structures in service encounters. Applied Linguistics, 4(3), 242-258. Ventola, E. (2005). Revisiting service encounter genre – Some reflections. In M. Gotti & D. S. Giannoni (Eds.), New trends in specialized discourse analysis (pp. 19-43). Peter Lang. Wang, W. (2025). Response particles in Mandarin conversation: Interplay of function and prosody. Chinese Language and Discourse, 16(1), 81-110. Wang, Y.-F., & Tsai, P.-H. (2005). Hao in spoken Chinese discourse: Relevance and coherence. Language Sciences, 27(2), 215-243. Wang, Y.-F., Tsai, P.-H., Goodman, D., & Lin, M.-Y. (2010). Agreement, acknowledgment, and alignment: The discourse-pragmatic functions of hao and dui in Taiwan Mandarin conversation. Discourse Studies, 12(2), 241-267. Wu, R.-J. R., & Heritage, J. (2017). Particles and epistemics: Convergences and divergences between English and Mandarin. In Enabling human conduct: Studies of talk-in-interaction in honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff (pp. 273-297): John Benjamins Publishing Company. Yakin, A., & Sriwahyuni, E. (2021). The use of adjacency pairs on food and beverage service (F&B) operations by the staff and guest in restaurant and café within Special Economic Zone (KEK) Mandalika Central Lombok 2020. Media Bina Ilmiah, 15(12), 5867–5876. https://doi.org/10.33758/mbi.v15i12.1157 Zimmerman, D. H. (1984). Talk and its occasion: The case of calling the police. In D. Schiffrin (Ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications (pp. 210–228). Georgetown University Press. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97959 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 隨著人們生活型態的改變，到餐廳用餐已成為我們日常生活的一部分，相關會話分析研究也日益受到重視。過去研究指出，此類互動因其單一互動目標，與高度工作任務導向的性質，通常具有可預測、標準化的會話形式。同時，有些研究也觀察到，真實互動可能會偏離標準化的會話形式。然而，這些彈性的互動實踐在過去研究中常被視為例外，較少作為研究重點深入探討。
本研究以臺灣一家家庭式餐廳的點餐互動為研究對象，自行採集20筆點餐互動語料，並採用會話分析方法，以真實語料探討點餐互動的會話形式，特別聚焦於整體結構（overall structural organization）與序列組織（sequence organization）兩面向。本研究首先將歸納出餐廳點餐的常見互動形式，接著進一步分析不同於此常見形式的互動序列。同時，也將透過互動的微觀分析，建構出此家庭式餐廳的具體情境，補足服務接觸研究領域中關於餐廳點餐互動研究的不足。 在整體結構方面，本研究依據Heritage（2005）的定義，根據語料整理出整體結構的五個活動階段。而在序列組織部分，則以Kuroshima（2010）的研究架構，以及Schegloff（2007）對序列組織的分析為依據，首先歸納出點餐互動的常見序列推進形式，接著以擴展序列（expansion sequence）的分析視角，進一步討論不同於常見序列推進形式的協商互動如何回應進程性（progressivity）與互為主體性（intersubjectivity）兩大互動原則。 研究發現，「店員詢問─顧客回覆─店員確認」已形成臺灣餐廳點餐互動最常見的序列推進之一。其中，第三話輪「店員確認」在點餐互動中不僅能將序列往下推進，同時也具有確認點餐內容正確傳遞的互動功能。而擴展序列的語料則顯示，當互動發生問題時，店員和顧客都可能以序列組織作為會話資源，彼此協商以處理互動問題，在點餐互動的進程性之中，確保點餐內容的正確傳遞。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | With changes in modern lifestyles, dining out has become a part of our everyday life, and related studies has received increasing attention in the field of Conversation Analysis. Previous studies have pointed out that food-ordering interactions, due to their interactional goal and task-oriented nature, often follow routinized and predictable interactional patterns. At the same time, some studies have observed that real-life interactions may show diverse patterns of practice beyond these routinized interaction patterns. However, such flexible interactional practices are often regarded as exceptions and have rarely been the central focus of systematic investigation.
This study adopts a conversation analytic approach to examine food-ordering interactions at a family-style restaurant in Taiwan. 20 instances of food-ordering interactions were collected and transcribed by the researcher. The analysis focuses on two key dimensions: overall structural organization and sequence organization. The study first identifies the commonly recurring interactional formats in the data, then further analyzes interactional sequences that deviate from these formats. Through micro-level analysis, the study also aims to uncover how participants collaboratively construct the local context of interaction. In doing so, this study seeks to contribute to the understanding of restaurant service encounters, particularly addressing the underexplored area of flexibility and sequential variation in food-ordering interactions. In terms of overall structural organization, this study follows Heritage’s (2005) framework and identifies five activity stages across the data. Regarding sequence organization, the analysis is based on Kuroshima’s (2010) analytic framework and Schegloff’s (2007) model of sequence. First, a set of commonly recurring sequences is identified, followed by an investigation of how expansion sequences reflect the interactional principles of progressivity and intersubjectivity. The findings show that the sequence of “server question–customer response–server confirmation” constitutes one of the most common interaction patterns in food-ordering interactions in Taiwanese restaurants. In particular, the third turn (server confirmation) not only facilitates the progressivity of the sequence but also plays a crucial role in confirming the accurate transmission of order content. Furthermore, the analysis of expansion sequences reveals that when interactional problems occur, both servers and customers mobilize sequence organization as a conversational resource to collaboratively negotiate and resolve issues, thereby maintaining progressivity while securing mutual understanding. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-07-23T16:15:04Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-07-23T16:15:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 I
摘要 III Abstract V 目次 VII 圖次 IX 表次 XI 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究動機與背景 1 1.2 研究目的與問題 4 1.3 研究架構 5 1.4 名詞釋義 6 第二章 文獻回顧 9 2.1 會話分析與機構性會話互動 9 2.1.1會話分析 9 2.1.2機構性互動 13 2.2 服務接觸 16 2.2.1服務接觸的定義與特性 16 2.2.2服務接觸的整體結構與序列組織 18 2.3 點餐互動的序列組織 28 第三章 研究方法 37 3.1 會話分析方法論 37 3.2 本研究語料採集的餐廳 40 3.3 語料採集與轉寫 41 3.4 研究流程 43 第四章 餐廳點餐互動的整體結構與序列組織 47 4.1 點餐互動的整體結構 47 4.1.1預服務階段 53 4.1.2點餐/服務階段 55 4.1.3預結尾階段 58 4.1.4結帳和結尾階段 60 4.1.5小結 65 4.2 點餐互動的序列組織與語對構成 68 4.2.1 點餐互動的基本序列 68 4.2.2三話輪語對組織中的第三話輪 83 4.2.3 小結 102 4.3 討論：店員透過詢問引導互動推進 104 第五章 擴展序列與互動問題的處理 109 5.1 語對後擴展 110 5.1.1 由顧客開啟的語對後擴展 113 5.1.2 由店員開啟的語對後擴展 121 5.1.3 小結與討論 137 5.2 語對中插擴展 141 5.2.1 第一部分後語對中插擴展 144 5.2.2 第二部分前語對中插擴展 151 5.2.3 小結與討論 163 第六章 結論 167 6.1 研究結果 168 6.2 研究限制與未來研究方向 174 參考文獻 177 附錄一 研究簡介 185 附錄二 顧客同意書與背景問卷調查 187 附錄三 語對標註符號 （參考Schegloff，2007） 189 附錄四 本研究所列之語料相關資訊 191 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 序列組織 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 整體結構 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 擴展序列 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 點餐互動 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 會話分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 序列組織 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 整體結構 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 會話分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 點餐互動 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 擴展序列 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Expansion sequence | en |
| dc.subject | Food-ordering | en |
| dc.subject | Conversation analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Overall structural organization | en |
| dc.subject | Sequence organization | en |
| dc.subject | Expansion sequence | en |
| dc.subject | Food-ordering | en |
| dc.subject | Conversation analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Overall structural organization | en |
| dc.subject | Sequence organization | en |
| dc.title | 餐廳點餐的整體結構與序列組織——以臺灣家庭式餐廳為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Overall Structure and Sequence Organization of Restaurant Ordering─ A Case Study of Taiwanese Family-Style Restaurants | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 謝佳玲;盧欣宜 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chia-Ling Hsieh ;Hsin-Yi Lu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 點餐互動,會話分析,整體結構,序列組織,擴展序列, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Food-ordering,Conversation analysis,Overall structural organization,Sequence organization,Expansion sequence, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 193 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202501682 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-07-16 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 華語教學碩士學位學程 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-07-24 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 華語教學碩士學位學程 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf | 13.87 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。