請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9742完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 莊正民(Cheng-Min Chuang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chung-Ling Lu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陸中玲 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T20:38:44Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2008-07-30 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T20:38:44Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2008-07-30 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-25 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
一、中文部分 1. 司徒達賢，「台灣中小企業發展之經營策略」，第一屆中小企業發展 學術研討會論文集，1994 2. 洪德芳、黃文輝、楊雅嵐, IT IS,專業測試及驗證研究，2003 3. 拓僕產業研究所,2006, 2006 年面板市場新佈局暨新興技術的竄起, P255-P275 4. ITIS,微機電構裝製程與設備市場發展,P3-1--3-84 5. ITIS,全球資通訊產業聚落暨大廠研發策略研究, 6. ITIS,數位家電產業與市場之趨勢,P91-115 7. ITIS,資訊用光電產品關鍵技術發展藍圖,P91-113 8. ITIS,我國高科技設備產業經營策略研究, 9. ITIS,顯示器產業產銷及新興產品趨勢分析,P75-112 10. ITIS,電子零組件關鍵材料市場供需現狀及我國發展策略研 究,P4-1—4-8 二、英文部分 1. A.W. Joshi, and R.L. Stump (1999), “Determinants of Commitment and Opportunism: Integrating and Extending Insights from Transaction Cost Analysis and Relational Exchange Theory,” Canadian Journal of Administrative Science, 16(4), pp. 334-52. 2. A. W. Joshi, and R. L. Stump (1999), “The Contingent Effect of Specific Asset Investments on Joint Action in Manufacturer-Supplier Relationships: An Empirical Test of the Moderating Role of Reciprocal Asset Investments, Uncertainty, and Trust”, Journal ofthe Academy of Marketing Science, 27 129 (3): 291-305 3. B. Arruñada, L. Garicano, and L. Vázquez (2004),'Completing Contracts Ex Post: How Car Manufacturers Manage Car Dealers' Economics and Business 4. B. Klein, and K.B. Leffler (1981), “The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance,” Journal of Political Economy, 89, pp. 615-41. 5. B. Klein, and K.B. Leffler (1981), “The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance,” Journal of Political Economy, 89, pp. 615-41. 6. Calamari and Perillo, The Law of Contracts, 3rd. ed. 1987. 7. E. Anderson, and B. Weitz (1992), “The Use of Pledges to Build and Sustain Commitment in Distribution Channels,” Journal of Marketing Research, XXIX, pp. 18-34. 8. F. R. Dwyer, and S. Oh (1987), 'Output Sector Munificence Effects on the Internal Political Economy of Marketing Channel,' Journal of Marketing Research, 24, Nov. , 347-358. 9. G. Gundlach and P. Murphy (1993), “Ethcal and legal foundations of relational marketing exchanges”, Journal of Marketing, vol. 57, Oct., 35-46. 10. Grandori, A. (1997), “An organizational assessment of interfirm coordination modes”, Organization Studies, 18, 897-925. 11. G.T. Gundlach, R.S. Achrol, and J.T. Mentzer (1995), “The Structure of Commitment in Exchange,” Journal of Marketing, 59, pp. 78-92. 12. Hadfield, and K. Gillian (1990), “Problematic Relations: Franchising and the Law of Incomplete Contracts,” Stanford Law Review, Vol.42 (2), pp.927-992. 13. H. Beale, and T. Dugdale (1975), 'Contract Between Businessmen: Planning and the Use of Contractual Remedies,' British Journal of Law and 130 Society, 2 (1), 45-60. 14. Helm, Roland, Kloyer, and Martin (2004) “Controlling contractual exchange risks in R&D interfirm cooperation: an empirical study”, Research Policy, p1103-1122 15. J.B. Heide, and G. John (1992), “Do Norms Matter in Marketing Relationships?” Journal of Marketing, 56(2), pp. 32-44 16. J. Barthélemy, and B. V. Quélin (2006), “Complexity of OutsourcingContracts and Ex Post Transaction Costs: An Empirical Investigation”, Journal of Management Studies, 43(8), 1775-1797 17. J. H. Dyer, and H. Singh (1998), “The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of inter-organizational competitive advantage”, Academy of Management Review, 23: 660-679.. 18. Kalnins and Kyle Mayer (2004), Relationships and Hybrid Contracts: An Analysis of Contract Choice in Information Technology, Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 20(1): 207-229 19. M. Granovetter (1985), “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness,” American Journal of Sociology, 91, pp. 481-510. 20. Macneil, R. Ian (1978) “Contracts: Adjustment of Long–Term Economic Relations under Classical, Neoclassical and Relational Contract Law.” Northwestern University Law Review 72, p854–902. 21. M. Furlotti (2007) “There is more to contracts than incompleteness: a review and assessment of empirical research on inter-firm contract design” Journal of Management & Governance, 11, p61-99 22. M. White, and L. Summers, Uniform Commercial Code, 155,168 (3rd ed. 1988). 131 23. P. Kaufmann and L. Stern (1988), “Relational exchange norms, perceptions of unfairness, and retaned hostility in commercial litigation”, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 32(3), 54-552. 24. P. L. Joskow (1987). “Contract Duration and Relationship-specific Investment: Empirical Evidence from Coal Markets”, American Economic Review, 77(1): 168-185. 25. R. Axelrod (1984), “The Evolution of Cooperation”, Basic Books, New York 26. R. Palmatier et al. (2007), “A comparative longitudinal analysis of theoretical perspectives of interorganizational relationship performance”, Journal of Marketing, Oct. 172-194. 27. R. Srinivasan, and T. H. Brush (2006), “Supplier Performance in Vertical Alliances: The Effects of Self-Enforceable Contracts”, Organization Science, 17(4), 436-452. 28. S. Anderson, and H. Dekker (2005), “Management Control for Market Transactions: The Relation Between Transaction Characteristics, Incomplete Contract Design, and Subsequent Performance”, Management Science, Vol. 51 29. S.Baiman, and P.E. Fischer, and M.V. Rajan (2001), 'Performance measurement and design in supply chains', Management Science, Vol. 47 No.1, pp.173-88. 30. S. Lindenberg (1988), “Contractual Relations and Weak Solidarity: The Behavioral Basis of Restraints on Gain-Maximization,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 144, pp. 39-58. 31. S. Macaulay (1963). Non-contractual relations in business: A preliminary study: American Sociological Review, 28: 55-69. 132 32. S. Todd Lowry (1976) “Bargain and Contract Theory in Law and Economics”, 10 J. Econ. Issues 1, p12. 33. S. Wuyts, and I. Geyskens (2005), ”The Formation of Buyer-Supplier Relationships: Detailed Contract Drafting and Close Partner Selection” , Journal of Marketing, Oct., 103-117 34. T. Gregory, Gundlach and P. E. Murphy (1993) “Ethical and Legal Foundations of Relational Marketing Exchanges”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, Oct., No. 4, pp. 35-46 35. Williamson (1971), “The Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure Considerations, American Economic Review, 61, pp112-123. 36. Williamson, and Wachter, Michael (1978), “Obligational Markets and the Mechanics of Inflation,” Bell Journal of Economics, Vol.9 (Autumn), pp.549-571. 37. Williamson (1979) 'Transaction Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations,' Journal of Law and Economics, p.233-61. 38. Williamson (1983), “Credible Commitments: Using Hostages to Support Exchange,” American Economic Review, 73, pp. 519-40. 39. Williamson (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: The Free Press 40. Williamson (1991): “Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, pp269-296. 三、網站部分 1. 公開資訊觀測站，網址：http://newmops.tse.com.tw/ 2. IT IS 智網 http://www.itis.org.tw/ 3. 旭硝子公司網站 http://www.aft.com.tw/news1.html 133 4. 亞洲光學公司網站 http://www.asia-optical.com/ 5. 明碁公司網站 http://www.benq.com.tw/ 6. 精碟科技公司網站 http://www.chem121.com.tw/Corp/382/ 7. 康寧台灣 http://www.corning.com/tw/tc/ 8. 中強光電公司網站 http://www.coretronic.com/home/default.aspx 9. 佳能公司網站 http://cmtw.canon.com.tw/ 10. 台達電公司網站 www.delta.com.tw 11. 奧圖碼公司網站 http://www.optoma.com.tw/home/default.aspx? 12. 揚明光學公司網站 http://www.youngoptics.com/about-us/profile.php 13. 穎磐股份有限公司網站 http://www.pcfan.com.tw/ 14. 先進光電股份有限公司網站 http://www.toplens.com.tw/ 15. 光洋應材公司網站 http://www.solartech.com.tw/ 16. 鑫科公司網站 www.e-ttmc.com.tw/ | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9742 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 高科技產業在台灣一直是備受矚目的明星產業，然而在明星的光環之下往往藏著不為人知的辛苦。例如關鍵技術以及關鍵零組件受控於先進國家、產品汰換速度快、競爭強度高以及降價壓力龐大等等。然而台灣的業者藉由特有的彈性的交易模式、長期經營夥伴關係以及高度產業內整合來創造出獨特的競爭優勢。在交易時如何能夠兼顧雙方利益以及效率性、在交易的過程中如何取捨交易治理結
構以及如何藉由交易治理結構來維護自身的競爭優勢都是重要的議題。在研究的過程當中，我們發現產業鏈內不同位置的廠商，由於面對的環境和需要處理的狀況不同，對於交易治理結構以及適用的契約理論法則有所不同，所以將產業鏈分為上、中、下游來分別探討並且研究其行為模式。 本篇研究旨在建立台灣高科技產業的不同產業鏈位置的交易治理結構以及適用的契約理論法則之間關聯性的模型。整合了契約法則理論以及交易治理結構的文獻來建立理論的基礎，參考收集之產業資料來建構模型後，以實際業界訪談來探討及修正模型。本篇研究以DLP 投影產業作為研究標的，實際訪談14 家產業鏈內廠商，經由訪談結果來修正模型。根據本篇研究歸納出以下結論: 產業鏈內不同位置，依照採購特性的不同，具有不同的治理結構以及適用的契約法則範疇，並且歸納出具有一定的趨勢。DLP 投影產業鏈在設備投資的部分，越接近上游的業者具有設備投資專屬化、設備投資偏向統一治理結構以及偏向關係契約法則的特色；中游業者則具有設備從專屬化轉移到標準化、設備投資偏向三邊治理結構以及由關係契約偏向新古典契約法則的特色；而下游業者則有投資設備偏向標準化、設備投資由三邊治理結構轉移到雙邊對等治理結構以及偏向新古典契約法則的特色。 而在原料物料的投資部分，上游廠商偏向採購標準化的原物料，偏向三邊治理結構並且較符合新古典契約理論；中游廠商採購的原料物料由標準化原物料轉移到專屬化原物料，並且從三邊治理結構轉移到雙邊對等治理結構，而且由新古典契約理論的範疇轉移到關係契約法則；而下游廠商則偏向採購專屬化的原物料，並且由雙邊對等治理結構偏向統一治理結構，並且偏向關係契約法則。其中 由於部分的關鍵材料以及關鍵零組件為寡佔供應市場，產業鏈在原料物料的管理機制選擇偏向關係契約法則以換取來料的穩定供貨。而台灣高科技產業的特，如業界內部人才流動頻繁、注重長期合作關係以及產品更新週期短等等，也對台灣廠商在處理交易的種種行為產生了重要的影響。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This thesis tries to build the relationships between industry chain, transactional governance structures, and contracting laws, and it targets the DLP projection industry to be the study case. And we have conclusions as followed; different purchasing types apply different governance structures and different contracting laws.
In the purchasing of equipment of DLP projection industry, upstream investments are more customized and are applying relational contracting law and unified governance；the midstream investments are more standardized, and are applying trilateral governance and neoclassical contracting law； the downstream are most standardized and are applying neoclassical contracting law and bilateral governance. In the purchasing of material of DLP projection industry, upstream investments are more standardized, and are applying trilateral governance and neoclassical contracting law；the midstream investments are more customized, and are applying bilateral governance and relational contracting law； the downstream are most customized and are applying relational contracting law and unified governance. Because of lacking of controlling the key material and key components, companies keep the relationship in order to ensure the material supply. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T20:38:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R95724027-1.pdf: 2875331 bytes, checksum: f182b001abc51207bdfde3240ff631c8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 研究背景與動機..... ................9
第一節、研究背景................... 9 第二節、研究動機及目的.............11 第二章 文獻探討.......................... 13 第一節、契約法則.................. 13 第二節、商業契約與其治理結構...... 20 第三節、交換關係.................. 29 第四節、程序要素.................. 33 第五節、合約利益.................. 37 第三章 研究架構與流程.................... 38 第一節、研究架構.................. 38 第二節、變數分析.................. 39 第三節、研究流程.................. 40 第四章 實證研究-以DLP 產業為例........... 42 第一節、DLP 產業概論.............. 42 第二節、DLP 上游廠商.............. 45 第三節、中上游 零組件廠商分析..... 58 第四節、中下游廠商分析............ 74 第五節、下游廠商.................. 77 第五章 研究命題及在DLP 產業的驗證和討論.. 89 第一節、研究命題...................89 第二節、產業訪談.................. 95 第三節、訪談結果.... .............100 第六章、研究討論與建議...................117 第一節、研究發現..................117 第二節、研究討論...... ...........124 第三節、研究限制及建議........... 127 參考文獻................................ 128 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 產業價值鏈、交易治理結構與契約法則關係之研究 –
以台灣 DLP 產業為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Relationships Between Industry Chain, Governance Structures, and Contracting Laws:
A Case of DLP Industry in Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 柯承恩,方世杰 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 契,約法則,治理,結構,關係,產業鏈,DLP,設備,原物料, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Industry Chain,Governance structures,Contracting Laws,DLP, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 124 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-28 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 國際企業學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-97-1.pdf | 2.81 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。