請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9730完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 李培芬(Pei-Fen Lee) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Jyun Kuo | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 郭昱君 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T20:38:03Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2008-07-30 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T20:38:03Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2008-07-30 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-25 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中華綜合發展硏究院應用史學硏究所，1999。滿州鄉志。屏東縣政府滿州鄉公所，屏東縣。
內政部營建署墾丁國家公園管理處，1983。墾丁國家公園計畫書。內政部，臺北市。 王巧萍、吳立心、蘇德忠，2007。銀合歡物候與食種子昆蟲族群的動態。林業研究專訊。14: 30-33。 王翠華，2007。基隆河中上游流域聚落變遷型態之分析。國立臺灣大學地理環境資源研究所碩士論文。 余忠翰，2007。高速公路路邊植群之研究以國道三號為例。國立臺灣大學生態學與演化生物學研究所碩士論文。 呂明倫、鍾玉龍，2007。墾丁國家公園銀合歡空間分布特徵之研究。特有生物研究。9: 7-18。 呂福原、陳安民，2002。墾丁國家公園外來種植物對原生植群之影響：以銀合歡為例。保育研究報告第112號，墾丁國家公園管理處。 李昭宗，2003。恆春地區銀合歡入侵及擴散之研究。國立屏東科技大學森林學研究所碩士論文。 李培芬，1993。遙測和地理資訊系統在生態學研究之應用。生物科學。36: 101-111。 李培芬、廖倩瑜、李玉琪、潘彥宏、傅維馨、陳宣汶，1997。臺灣地區生態與環境因子地理資訊資料庫。行政院農業委員會，臺北市。 宗亦臣、鄭勇奇、張川紅、段福文、王志和，2007。元謀乾熱河谷地區新銀合歡天然更新的初步調查。生態學雜誌。26: 135-138。 林瓊瑤，2003。半島今昔：恆春半島歷史影像回顧。墾丁國家公園管理處，屏東縣。 陳俊賓，2005。資料挖掘技術應用於外來植物研究（以恆春地區銀合歡為例），國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。 陳朝圳、范貴珠，1989。恆春地區巨型銀合歡生長與收穫之研究。屏東農專學報。30: 66-83。 陳德順、胡大維，1976。臺灣外來觀賞植物名錄。川流出版社，臺北市。 黃書禮，1988。墾丁國家公園瓊麻工業歷史示區之規劃研究報告。保育研究報告第39號，墾丁國家公園管理處。 謝長富、陳尊賢、孫義方、謝宗欣、鄭育斌、王國維、鄭夢淮、江斐瑜，1992。墾丁國家公園亞熱帶雨林永久樣區之調查研究。研究報告第85號，墾丁國家公園管理處。 謝長富、廖啟政、賴宜鈴，1996。墾丁國家公園南仁山熱帶雨林永久樣區之調查研究。保育研究報告第94號，墾丁國家公園管理處。 謝啟賢、蔡博文、張康聰，2007。養殖土地利用變遷預測模式之建立：個體施為取徑。地理學報。47: 1-18。 鍾玉龍、呂明倫，2006。SPOT衛星影像於墾丁國家公園銀合歡入侵分布之繪製。臺灣林業科學。21: 167-77。 Allouche, O., A. Tsoar, and R. Kadmon. 2006. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). Journal of Applied Ecology 43: 1223-1232. Angelsen, A. and D. Kaimowitz. 1999. Rethinking the causes of deforestation: lessons from economic models. The World Bank Research Observer 14: 73-98. Anthofer, J., J. Hanson, and S. C. Jultzi. 1997. Nitrogen mineralization pattern of agroforestry tree leaves under tropical highland conditions. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 179: 139-147. Baker, H.G. 1974 . The evolution of weeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5: 1-25. Baskent, E. Z. 1999. Controlling spatial structure of forested landscapes: a case study towards landscape management. Landscape Ecology 14: 83-97. Baudry, J. 1991. Ecological consequences of grazing, extensification and land abandonment: Role of interactions between environment, society and techniques. P. 13-19. In: Baudry, J and R. G. H. Bunce. (eds.) Land Abandonment and its Role in Conservation. CIHEAM, Paris, France. Beerling, D. J. and J. M. Perrins. 1993. Impatiens glandulifera Royle (Impatiens roylei Walp). Journal of Ecology 81: 367-382. de Blois, S., G. Domon, and A. Bouchard. 2001. Environmental, historical, and contextual determinants of vegetation cover: a landscape perspective. Landscape Ecology 16: 421-436. Chang, C. R., P. F. Lee, M. L. Bai, and T. T. Lin. 2004. Predicting the geographical distribution of plant communities in complex terrain – a case study in Fushian Experimental Forest, northeastern Taiwan. Ecography 27: 577-578. Cherrill, A., and C. McClean. 1995. An Investigation of uncertainty in field habitat mapping and the implications for detecting land cover change. Landscape Ecology 10: 5-21. Coffin, A. W. 2007. From roadkill to road ecology: a review of the ecological effects of roads. Journal of Transport Geography 15: 396-406. Collingham, Y. C., R. A. Wadsworth, B. Huntley, and P. E. Hulme. 2000. Predicting the spatial distribution of non-indigenous riparian weeds: issues of spatial scale and extent. Journal of Applied Ecology 37 (Suppl. 1): 13-27. Colón, S. M. and A. E. Lugo. 2006. Recovery of a subtropical dry forest after abandonment of different land uses. Biotropica 38: 354-364. Cramer, V. A., R. J. Hobbs, and R. J. Standish. 2008. What's new about old fileds? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23: 104-112. Ding, S. C. 1986. Current condition and economic analysis of special agricultural crops in Hengchung area, Taiwan. Kengting National Park Administration Office, Pingtung, Taiwan. (In Chinese) Fielding, A. H. and J. F. Bell. 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation 24: 38-49. Flory, S. L. and K. Clay. 2006. Invasive shrub distribution varies with distance to roads and stand age in eastern deciduous forests in Indiana, USA. Plant Ecology 184: 131-141. Forman, R. T. T. 1999. Horizontal process, roads, suburbs, societal objectives, and landscape ecology. p. 35-53. In: Klopatek, J. M. and R. H. Gardner. (eds.) Landscape Ecological Analysis: Issues and Applications. Springer, New York, USA. Forman, R. T. T. and R. D. Deblinger. 2000. The ecological road-effect zone of a Massachusetts (U.S.A.) suburban highway. Conservation Biology 14: 36-46. Foster, D. R., G. Motzkin, and B. Slater. 1998. Land-use history as long-term broad-scale disturbance – regional forest dynamics in central New England. Ecosystems 1: 96-119. Franklin, J. 1995. Predictive vegetation mapping: Geographic modelling of biospatial patterns in relation to environmental gradients. Progress in Physical Geography 19: 474-499. Gelbard, J. L. and J. Belnap. 2003. Roads as conduits for exotic plant invasions in a semiarid landscape. Conservation Biology 17: 420-432. González-Iturbe, J. A., I. Olmsted, and F. Tun-Dzul. 2002. Tropical dry forest recovery after long term Henequen (sisal, Agave fourcroydes Lem.) plantation in northern Yucatan, Mexico. Forest Ecology and Management 167: 67-82. Higgins, S. I. and D. M. Richardson. 1996. A review of models of alien plant spread. Ecological Modelling 87: 249-265. Hobbs R. J. and L. F. Huenneke. 1992. Disturbance, diversity and invasion: implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 6: 324-337. Hobbs, R. J. 2000. Land use changes and invasions. P. 385-421. In: Mooney, H. A. and R. J. Hobbs. (eds.) Invasive Species in a Changing World. Island Press, Washington, DC. Hu, C. Y. 2002. History, transformation, and impact of the sisal industry in Hengchun area, Taiwan. Journal of Ping-Tung History 6: 16-46. (In Chinese) Huang, T. C. and Editorial Committee of the Flora of Taiwan. (eds.) 1994. Flora of Taiwan, Volume Three. 2nd ed. Editorial Committee of the Flora of Taiwan, Department of Botany, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. Kanmegne, J., L. A. Bayomock, B. Duguma, and D. O. Ladipo. 2000. Screening of 18 agroforestry species for highly acid and aluminum toxic soils of the humid tropics. Agroforestry Systems 49: 31-39. Kuo, Y. L. 2003. Ecological characteristics of three invasive plants (Leucaena leucocephala, Mikania micrantha, and Stachytarpheta urticaefolia) in southern Taiwan. Food and Fertilizer Technology Center Extension Bulletin 541: 1-11. Lee, P.F., K. Y. Lue, and S. H. Wu. 2006. Predictive distribution of hynobiid salamanders in Taiwan. Zoological studies 45: 244-254. Lonsdale, W. M. 1993. Rates of spread of an invading species – Mimosa pigra in northern Australia. Journal of Ecology 81: 513-521. Lowe, S., M. Browne, S. Boudjelas, and M. De Poorter. 2004. 100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Species. ISSG, Auckland, New Zealand. Lunt, I. D. and P. G. Spooner. 2005. Using historical ecology to understand patterns of biodiversity in fragmented agricultural landscapes. Journal of Biogeography 32: 1859-1873. Mack, R. 2000. Cultivation fosters plant naturalization by reducing environmental stochasticity. Biological Invasions 2: 111-122. Miller, J. R. and R. Hobbs. 2002. Conservation where people live and work. Conservation Biology 16:330-337. Nielsen, C., P. Hartvig, and J. Kollmann. 2008. Predicting the distribution of the invasive alien Heracleum mantegazzianum at two different spatial scales. Diversity and Distributions 14: 307-317. Ormerod, S. J. and A. R. Watkinson. 2000. Large-scale ecology and hydrology: an introductory perspective from the editors of the Journal of Applied Ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology 37: 1-5. Pauchard, A. and K. Shea. 2006. Integrating the study of non-native plant invasions across spatial scales. Biological Invasions 8: 399-413. Perrins, J., A. Fitter, and M. Williamson. 1993. Population biology and rates of invasion of three introduced impatiens species in the British Isles. Journal of Biogeography 20: 33-44. Prentice, I. C., W. Cramer, S. P. Harrison, R. Leemans, R. A. Monserud, and A. M. Solomon. 1992. A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate. Journal of Biogeography 19: 117-134. Pueyo, Y., C. L. Alados, and O. Barrantes. 2006. Determinants of land degradation and fragmentation in semiarid vegetation at landscape scale. Biodiversity and Conservation 15: 939-956. Pyšek, P. and K. Prach. 1993. Plant invasions and the role of riparian habitats: a comparison of four species alien to Central Europe. Journal of Biogeography 20: 413-420. Pyšek, P. and P. E. Hulme. 2005. Spatio-temporal dynamics of plant invasions: linking pattern to process. Ecoscience 12: 302-315. Ries, L., R. J. Fletcher, J. Battin, and T. D. Sisk. 2004. Ecological responses to habitat edges: Mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35: 491-522. Ross, K. A., B. J. Fox, and M. D. Fox. 2002. Changes to plant species richness in forest fragments: fragment age, disturbance and fire history may be as important as area. Journal of Biogeography 29: 749-765. Rubino, D. L., C. E. Williams, and W. J. Moriarity. 2002. Herbaceous layer contrast and alien plant occurrence in utility corridors and riparian forests of the Allegheny High Plateau. Torrey Botanical Society 129: 125-135. Sharma, G. P., J. S. Singh, and A. S. Raghubanshi. 2005. Plant invasions: emerging trends and future implications. Current Science 88: 726-734. Sluiter, R. and S. de Jong. 2007. Spatial patterns of Mediterranean land abandonment and related land cover transitions. Landscape Ecology 22: 559-576. Su, H. J. 1985. Studies on the climate and vegetation types of the natural forest in Taiwan (III). A scheme of geographical climatic regions. Quatery Journal of Chinese Forest 18: 33-44. Swetnam, T. W., C. D. Allen, and J. L. Betancourt. 1999. Applied historical ecology: using the past to manage for the future. Ecology Applications 9: 1189-1206. Theoharides, K. A. and J. S. Dukes. 2007. Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. New Phytologist 176: 256-273. Tiley, G. E. D., F. S. Dodd, and P. M. Wade. 1996. Heracleum mantegazzianum Sommier and Levier. Journal of Ecology 84: 297-319. Trombulak, S. C. and C. A. Frissell. 2000. Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conservation Biology 14: 18-30. Tsai, F. A. and M. J. Chou. 2006. Texture augmented analysis of high resolution satellite imagery in detecting invasive plant species. Journal of Chinese Institute of Engineers 29: 581-592. Turner, M. G., D. N. Wear, and R. O. Flamm. 1996. Land ownership and land-cover change in the southern Appalachian highlands and the Olympic peninsula. Ecological Applications 6: 1150-1172. Tyser, R. W. and C. A. Worley. 1992. Alien flora in grasslands adjacent to road and trail corridors in Glacier National Park, Montana (U.S.A). Conservation Biology 6: 253-262. Vilà, M. and J. Pujadas. 2001. Land-use and socio-economic correlates of plant invasions in European and North African countries. Biological Conservation 100: 397-401. Waldner, L. S. 2008. The kudzu connection: Exploring the link between land use and invasive species. Land Use Policy 25: 399-409. Weber, E. 2003. Invasive Plant Species of the World: a Reference Guide to Environment Weeds. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK. Wiens, J. A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology 3: 385-397. Willard, T. R., D. W. Hall, D. G. Shilling, J. A. Lewis, and W. L. Currey. 1990. Cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) distribution on Florida highway rights-of-way. Weed Technology 4: 658-660. Willis, K. J. and R. J. Whittaker. 2002. Species diversity – scale matters. Science 295: 1245-1248. Wu, S. H., C. H. Hsieh, and M. Rejmánek. 2004. Catalogue of the naturalized flora of Taiwan. Taiwania 49: 16-31. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9730 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 土地利用會改變原有地景，對環境、物種組成及生態系造成極大衝擊，增加生態系受到外來物種入侵的機會，使得生物多樣性受到威脅。本研究以墾丁國家公園的外來入侵植物銀合歡 (Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit) 為題材，利用1976-2007 年間土地利用與土地覆蓋的改變，探討入侵物種分布的時空變遷，並驗證土地利用型態的改變與環境限制對其分布的影響。應用遙測技術，以GIS 為平台，製作1976、1986、1996 與2007 年之銀合歡分布、1976 年之瓊麻栽植，以及道路影響、土地經營管理類型和地形因子的分布圖 層，並以解析度20 m × 20 m 的網格系統，進行判別分析 (discriminant functional analysis)以綜合各項因子建立棲地分類模式。結果發現1976 至2007 年間，銀合歡多分布於西半部，且入侵面積呈指數增長；銀合歡新入侵及持續入侵的面積隨時間增加，而恢復原生植被或轉為其他用途的區域面積相對稀少。過去瓊麻的栽植以及道路開發、土地經營管理類型導致的人為干擾，對於現今銀合歡的分布有顯著影響。銀合歡棲地分類模式選入所有的土地利用及地形因子 (Wilks’s λ=0.52, df=9, p<0.001)，整體正確率為72.2%。但以蘇鴻傑生態分區劃分研究區域為東西區，東區模式中標準化典型判別係數之數值較大者與西區及全區模式有所差異，且東區模式準確度較高，整體正確率為83.6%。本研究顯示影響墾丁國家公園銀合歡分布的主要因子為過去瓊麻栽植、道路距離、國家公園管理嚴格度及海拔。本研究支持「土地利用型態的改變導致棲地受到干擾，進而增加外來物種的入侵機會」。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Land-use plays an important role in causing landscape and ecosystem changes. This impact alters abiotic conditions and species composition which increases the opportunities for species invasion and threatens biodiversity. I studied the land-use and land-cover change over the past 30 years to test the hypothesis that previous land-use has strongly influence on the invasion of Leucaena leucocephala in Kenting National Park, southern Taiwan. Using remote sensing and GIS datasets, I generated distribution maps of Leucaena in 1976, 1986, 1996, and 2007, sisal plantation in 1976, road-effect factors, land management types, and topographic factors. Data were analyzed by discriminant function analysis (DFA). The distribution maps from 1976 to 2007 suggested that Leucaena widespreaded in the western part of Kenting National Park and the invaded area increased exponentially. Previous sisal plantation and disturbance due to road development were strongly correlated with current Leucaena occurrence. The whole-region DFA model had 72.2% classification accuracy (Wilks’s λ=0.52, df=9, p<0.001). The eastern-region DFA model performed better than the western-region or the whole-region ones. Previous sisal plantation, proximity to roads, land management types, and elevation were the major factors in determining the distribution of Leucaena. This study supports the hypothesis that previous land-use has strong influence on the distribution of invasive species. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T20:38:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R95b44010-1.pdf: 22957341 bytes, checksum: 439f66c76316e3e3f0419381dc540603 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要...............................................................................................................................i
Abstract.......................................................................................................................ii 前言..............................................................................................................................1 材料與方法................................................................................................................4 研究區域................................................................................................................4 研究物種................................................................................................................4 網格系統................................................................................................................5 資料分析................................................................................................................9 結果............................................................................................................................13 銀合歡時空變遷..................................................................................................13 檢定影響銀合歡分布因子..................................................................................13 棲地分類..............................................................................................................14 比較東西區與全區..............................................................................................15 尺度放大效應......................................................................................................16 討論............................................................................................................................18 銀合歡時空變遷..................................................................................................18 人為干擾與地形因子對銀合歡分布的影響......................................................19 模式準確度的評估..............................................................................................24 東西區與全區之比較..........................................................................................24 尺度放大的適用性..............................................................................................25 結論............................................................................................................................26 參考文獻...................................................................................................................28 圖................................................................................................................................35 表................................................................................................................................66 附錄............................................................................................................................81 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 土地利用變遷對入侵植物分布之影響ー以墾丁國家公園銀合歡為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Impact of Land-use Change on Distribution of Invasive Leucaena leucocephala in Kenting National Park, Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳水吉,蔡博文,陳繼藩 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 空間分布,入侵植物,銀合歡,地理資訊系統,遙測,地景變遷,土地利用,判別分析,尺度效應, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | spatial distribution,invasive plant,Leucaena leucocephala,GIS,remote sensing,landscape change,land-use history,discriminant analysis,scale effect, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 33 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-28 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生命科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-97-1.pdf | 22.42 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。