請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9708完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林修葳 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chun-Chung Chien | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 簡重宗 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T20:36:47Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2009-08-08 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T20:36:47Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2008-08-08 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-26 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
于卓民(譯)(2002),國際企業—管理導向,智勝文化,台北。 王明德、廖紀勳 (1997) ,「營建管理新制度:合作管理(Partnering)之應用」,營建管理季刊,第31 期,第12至24頁。 內政部營建署(2007),我國營造業經濟概況深入研析計畫,研究報告,台北。 中國對外承包工程商會(2007),「國際工程承包實用手冊」,北京,中國。 古秋雄(2000),台灣大型營造業經營策略之研究─以個案公司為例,碩士論文,國立政治大學企業管理研究所,台北。 司徒達賢(1997),策略管理,遠流出版,台北。 吳青松(1999),國際企業管理理論與實務,智勝文化,台北。 吳思華(1998),策略九說,二版,臉譜文化,台北。 余文德(1998),「如何實施『施工性改善計劃』」,營造天下,第46期,第29至36頁。 余振銘(2000),提升國內營造業競爭力關鍵性因子之研究,碩士論文,國立成功大學建築研究所,台南。 沈恆夙(2005),營造業利潤中心關鍵成功因素之研究-以南部某營造廠商為例,碩士論文,國立中山大學企業管理學研究所,高雄 林宗輝(2006),營造業經營模式關鍵成功因素之研究--以台灣綜合營造業為例,碩士論文國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班,台南。 林瑞陽(2001),台灣營建產業不同發展階段經營策略分析之研究,碩士論文,國立雲林科技大學企業管理研究所,雲林。 國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心(2008),「SWOT分析與策略擬定(上)(中)(下)」,產業策略評析(http://cdnet.stpi.org.tw/techroom/analysis/main_analysis.htm)。 黃怡菁(2000),台商赴大陸投資關鍵成功因素與績效之研究-以資訊電子業為例,碩士論文,中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所,台北。 雷勝強(1999),國際工程風險管理與保險,淑馨出版社,台北。 趙郁文(2000),國際企業管理-系統化理論與分析,華泰文化,台北。 蔡忠成(2004),台灣地區中型營造廠經營現況與策略之研究,碩士論文,國立高雄第一科技大學營建工程研究所,高雄。 鄧啟彬(2005),企業國際化關鍵因素之探討,碩士論文,國立中興大學企業管理學研究所,台中。 謝致德(2007),「設計施工同步,確立統包原則」,營建知訊,第289期,第44至54頁。 第二節 英文文獻 Anthony, R., Dearden, J., Vancil, R.F. (1972), 'Key economic variables,' Management Control Systems, Irwin, Homewood, IL, pp 138-143. Arditi, D. and Mochtar. K. (2000) “Trends in productivity improvement in the US construction industry,” Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 18, Iss. 1, pp 15-27. Boynton, A.C., and Zmud, R.W. (1984) “An assessment of critical success factors,” Sloan Management Review, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp 17-27. Boseman, G., Phatak, A., and Schellenberger, R. E. (1986) Strategic Management: Text and Case, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. , USA. Crosthwaite, D. (1998) “The internationalization of British construction companies 1990-96: an empirical analysis,” Construction Management and Economics, Vol.16, Iss. 4, pp 389-395. Dunning, J. H. (1993) The Globalization of Business: The Challenge of the 1990s, Routledge, London, UK. ENR (2007a) “The top International contractors,” Engineering News Records, Vol. 259, Issue 7, p. 27. ENR (2007b) “The top global contractors,” Engineering News Records, Vol. 259, Issue 7, p. 29. ENR (2007c) “Expansion of market spurs firms to adopt coherent global approach,” The Global Sourcebook 2007, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA. Ferguson, C.R., and Dickinson, R. (1982) “Critical success factor for directors in the eighties,” Business Horizons, May-June 1982, pp 14-18. Franiran, O., Oluwoye, J., and Lenard, D. (1998) “Interactions between construction planning and influence factors,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 124, No.4, pp 245-56. Global Insight Institute (2006) Global Construction Study 2006, Global Insight Institute, Inc., USA. Grant, R. M. (1991) “The Resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for S formulation,” California Management Review, Vol.33, Iss. 3, pp 114-135. Gungan, S., and Arditi, D. (2005) “Factors affecting international construction,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 131, No. 3, pp 273-282. Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C. K. (1990) The Core Competence of the Corporation, Harvard Business Review, Boston, USA. Johanson, J., and Mattsson, G. (1987) “Internationalization in industrial system - a network approach,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.9, pp 31-41. Johanson, J., and Vahlne, J. E. (1977) “Internationalization process of firm – model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments,” Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp 23-32. Johanson, J., and Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1975) “The internationalization of the firm – four Swedish cases,” Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 12, Iss. 3, pp 305-323. Jauch, L., and Glueck, W. (1985) Business Policy and Strategic Management, 4th edition, MCGRaw-Hill, Singapore. Leidecker, J. K. and Bruno, A. V. (1984) “Identifying and using critical success factors,” Long Range Planning, Vol. 17, Spring, pp 23-32. Makino, S., Lau, C., and Yeh, R. S. (2002) “Asset exploitation versus asset seeking: Implications for location choice of foreign direct investment,” Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 33, Iss. 3,pp 403-421. Male, S. (1991) “Competitive advantage in the international construction industry,” in: Competitive Advantage in Construction, S. Male and R. Stocks (eds), Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK. Maloney, W., and Hancher, D. (1997) “Strategic Positioning for ASCE,” Proceedings of the Construction Congress V, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Miles, R. E., and Snow, C. C. (1978) Organization Strategy, Structure and Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA. Mohamed, S. (2003) “Performance in international construction joint ventures: modeling perspective,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol.129, No. 6, pp 619-626. Moran, R. T., and Riesenberger, J.R. (1994) The Global Challenge - Building the Worldwide Enterprise, McGraw-Hill (UK) Ltd, London, UK. Orr, R. J. (2006) 'The Privatisation Paradigm: Jumping onto the Infrastructure Bandwagon,' Infrastructure Journal, Sep/Oct. 2006, pp 16-18. Orr, R. J. (2007) 'The Rise of Infra Funds,' Project Finance International - Global Infrastructure Report 2007, Supplement, June 2007, pp 2-12. Oviatt, B. M., and McDougall, P. P. (1994) “Toward a theory of international new ventures,” Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 25, Iss. 1, pp 45-64. Robock, S. H., and Simmonds, K. (1983) International Business and Multinational Enterprises, Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, IL, USA. Rockart, J.F. (1979) “Chief executives define their own data needs,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp.238-241. Vernon, R. (1966) “International investment and international trade in the product cycle,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.80, pp 190-207. Wang, S., Tiong, R., Ting, S., and Ashley, D. (1999) “Political risks: analysis of key contract clauses in China’s BOT project,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 125, No. 3, pp 190-197. Welch, L. S., and Loustarinen, R. (1988) “Internationalization: evolution of a concept,” Journal of General Management, Vol.14, No. 2, pp 34-55. Zook, C. (2007) “Finding your next core business,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 85, No. 4, pp.66-75. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9708 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 台灣早期的營造業,因市場小、公營公司(榮工、中華、唐榮)可以議價、政府營建政策不明等因素,使私人廠商不願投資技術研發、人才培訓以及引用新進資訊作業系統,以致每逢小型工程就低價搶標,大型工程必須與國外廠商聯合承攬,至今仍無國際級之營造公司能在世界舞台上與日韓爭一席之地,殊為可惜。
最近,政府的公共建設支出逐年減少,加入WTO後營造市場的開放,營造業經營更加困難;面對如此內外在環境,營造業應立即轉型、提升競爭力,邁向國際化。 營造業因無法創造業務來源,經營範疇受到相當限制,轉型方向可朝垂直整合、多角化及國際化發展,本研究將僅侷限在國際化之關鍵因素上探討台灣營造業之發展。 提升競爭力也受限於營造產業特性。提升技術能力及營運績效是區隔惡性競爭的有效策略;營造競爭力分析,可先從台灣傳統營造業價值鏈切入,再探討企業如何轉型、擴大價值鏈範圍、積極研發、培養高附加價值人才,區隔市場減少惡性競爭、改善營運績效、提高獲利,最後進入跨國管理。 本論文以國內知名營造廠DL工程公司為對象,以台北捷運CD550標及台灣高鐵土木興建計畫兩項個案分析,依據價值鏈、競爭力、執行力、企業轉型、企業總體策略、工程統包、國際化等理論基礎,探討該公司在過去年60年來的艱苦轉型歷程,如今雖已實際進入國際工程市場競爭,卻面臨比工程技術更艱難的國際企業管理問題。 從案例公司的研究結果顯示,營造業國際化的成功策略,應採因地制宜的垂直整合及專業營造的策略聯盟,延攬高附加價值之國際工程業務管理人才帶動台灣外派台幹,提升合約管理層次,融合當地文化之管理模式,嚴格控管風險,參考日韓國際化經驗,是台灣營造業國際化之成功關鍵因素。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Taiwan’s private construction companies did not invest much in developing new technology, the human resource and information systems during 1950~1990, in response to the fact that the governments lack of solid strategy and regulationns to cultivate Taiwanese construction capability and capacity, as well as the fact that the major firms such as RSEA, BES and Tang Eng Corporation leveraged their state-run advantages in business negotiation. As a result, private companies survived at low-price and small scale business sector, whereas partnership with world-class company for large scale business, appears to be rarely observed opportunity to penetrate international market.
The decreased budget of national infrastructure development year by year, and the domestic market fully opened after Taiwan’s joining WTO, Taiwan’s construction industry had experienced more challenges than before, therefore it may be essential for the firms to engage themselves for business transformation and capability re-engineering to reinforce core competition through the synergy of vertical integration, diversification and internationalizatuon. However, the continued technical capability upgrade and operational improvement are the business differentiators in competitive environment. The first step analysis of construction business of competitiveness is to understand the value chain of traditional construction industry in Taiwan, and then move to study what new business enterprises can enter, how to maximize the scope of value chain, what to do in R &D, talent development, the differentiators in vicious competition, so as to increase profitability through operational excellence, and eventually qualified by international market. This study explores the efforts and strategies DL Corp., one of the major construction firms, has taken in the past 60 years, on the basis of various management theories ,despite that DL Corp. is successfully doing global business, it encountered the management challenges of multi-national business which is more complicated than engineering difficulties. This study also indicates that effective strategies and factors of internationalization in construction industry include the leverage of local infrastructure for vertical integration, joint venture with local professionals, utilize overseas talents for business development, employ expats program to train Taiwan management capability in overseas business and execution, adoption to local management method and culture, risks management with discipline, also bench marking to Japanese and Korean peers. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T20:36:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-P94746001-1.pdf: 1901760 bytes, checksum: 72be7682d6f5cc1ff914f01b8e46c915 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝.......................Ⅲ
摘要.......................Ⅳ Abstract...................Ⅴ 目錄.......................Ⅵ 圖目錄.....................Ⅷ 表目錄.....................Ⅸ 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 6 第三節 研究方法與流程 6 第四節 研究限制與範圍 8 第二章 文獻回顧 9 第一節 國際化 10 第二節 關鍵成功因素 13 第三節 營造業特質 17 第四節 營造業國際化之關鍵成功因素 21 第三章 DL公司之經營管理與發展 27 第一節 歷史沿革 28 第二節 經營理念 30 第三節 組織結構 30 第四節 技術創新 31 第五節 經營管理 33 第六節 工程業績 36 第七節 轉型挑戰 39 第四章 DL公司之國際化歷程 42 第一節 台北捷運系統CD550標工程個案 43 第二節 台灣高速鐵路土木工程興建計畫個案 49 第三節 國際化轉型與策略規劃 62 第四節 DL公司的國際化歷程 66 第五節 小結 71 第五章 國際化之關鍵成功因素 73 第一節 關鍵成功因素摘要 73 第二節 營造業國際化之成功關鍵因素 74 第三節 台灣營造業國際化之競爭利基 79 第六章 結論與建議 81 第一節 研究結論 81 第二節 促進營造業國際化之建議 85 第三節 後續研究建議 86 第七章 參考文獻 87 第一節 中文文獻 87 第二節 英文文獻 88 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 台灣營造業國際化成功關鍵因素之研究以DL公司為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Key Success Factors on Internationalization of Construction Industry:
Taking DL Engineering Corporation as an Example | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳思寬,王明德 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 營造業,價值鏈,國際化,關鍵成功因素, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | value chain,internationalization of construction industry,key success factors, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 88 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-29 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業管理組 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業管理組 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-97-1.pdf | 1.86 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
