請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96541完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 邱力璟 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Li-Ching Chiu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 文譯瑱 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yi Tian Wen | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-19T16:26:06Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-20 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-02-19 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-02-04 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Arbini, R. (1969). Tag questions and tag imperatives in English. Journal of Linguistics, 5(2), 205-214.
Bouton, L. F. (1990). The imperative tag—a thing apart. World Englishes, 9(1), 37-51. Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca. (1994). The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Cao, X.-L. (2000). On Asymmetry of Chinese “zhe” and “na” in Contexts. Chinese Language Learning, 4, 7-11. Chao, Y.-R. (1968). A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press. Chang, C.-L. (2006). Application of Politeness Theory to Tag Questions Translated from English to Chinese. Providence University, Taiwan: MA Thesis. Chen, P. (1988). Lun Xiandai Hanyu Shijian Xitong de Sanyuan Jiegou [On the ternary structure of the temporal system in contemporary Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language], 6, 401-422. Chen, Z., & Wang, M. (2021). The cognitive modal of expectation models and its types: On a series of phenomena related to jingran/pianpian. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies, 211, 48-63. Chiu, L.-C. (2011). The Phrasal Empty Categories in Mandarin Chinese. National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan: PhD dissertation. Chiu, L.-C. (2021). The interaction between modals and SFPs in Mandarin Chinese: A Cartographic Approach. Studies in Chinese Linguistics, 42(2), 183-204. Chiu, L.-C. (2023). Chinese tag questions: the CP/DP pro-form analysis. The Linguistic Review, 40(4), 499-525. Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. US: The MIT Press. Chung, S., Ladusaw, W., & and McCloskey, J. (1995). Sluicing and Logical Form. Natural Language Semantics, 3, 239-282. Cinque, G., & Rizzi, L. (2015). The cartography of syntactic structures. In H. Brend & N. Heiko (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis (pp. 51-65). USA: Oxford University Press. Coates, J. (1983). The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm. Cook, W. A. (1978). Semantic Structure of the English Modals. TESOL Quarterly, 12(1), 5-15. Culivocer, P. (1992). English tag questions in Universal Grammar. Lingua, 88,193-226. Chang, C., & Huang, Y.-Z. (2018). Multi-Functions of the Modal Expression YAO and Learners’ Written Errors in Chinese: A Corpus-based Study. Journal of Applied Language, 7, 19-34. Chen, Y.-H. (2000). The Pedagogical Grammar of the Chinese Modal Verb "Keyi". National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan: MA thesis. Chen, C.-Y. (2007). A Study of Question Types in the CSL Textbooks. Journal of Chinese Language Teaching, 4(1), 77-97. Ernst, T. (1994). Conditions on Chinese A-not-A questions. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 3, 241-264. Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory (2ed edition). USA: Blackwell. Hofmann, Th. R. (1993). Reals of Meaning: An Introduction to Semantics. London & New York: Longman. Hsieh, C.-L. (2002). Modal Verbs in Chinese. National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan: PhD Dissertation. Hsieh, C. L. (2005). Modal verbs and modal adverbs in Chinese: an investigation into the semantic source. UST Working Papers in Linguistics, 1, 31-58. Hsieh, C.-L. (2006a). Hanyu Qingtaici de Yuyi Jieding: Yuliauku wei Ben de Yianjiu (The Semantic Definition of Chinese Modals: A Study Based on Corpus). Zhongguo Yuwen Yianjiu 21: 45-63. Hsieh, C. L. (2006b). A semantic study on Chinese modal expressions. Journal of Chinese Language Teaching, 3(1), 1-25. Hsin, A.-L. (2000). Huayu Qingtai Dongci de Yuyi Yu Jufa Chengfen Zhi Hudong [The Interaction between the Syntax and Semantics of Modal Verbs in Mandarin Chinese]. In Shijie Huayuwen Jiaoyu Xuehui [World Chinese Language Association] (ed.), Diliujie Shijie Huayuwen Jiaoxue Yantaohui Lunwenji: Yuwen Fenxi Zu [Proceedings for the Sixth World Conference on Chinese Language Teaching], 258-279. Taipei: Shijie Huawen Chubanshe [World Chinese press]. Hsin, A.-L. (2016). An analysis of Chinese Tag questions with a cross-linguistic comparison to English tags. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 14(1), 69-119. Huang, Y.-C. (1999). A Semantic Study of Modal Verbs in Chinese. National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan: MA Thesis. Huang, C.-T. J. (1987). A modular theory of A-not-A questions in Chinese (Hanyu zhengfan wenju de mozu yufa). Zhongguo Yuwen, 204, 247-264. Huang, C.-T. J. (1988). On ‘be’ and ‘have’ in Chinese. The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica. Vol. LIX, Part I. Taipei, Taiwan. Huang, C.T. J. (1989). Pro-Drop in Chinese: A Generalized Control Theory. In O. A. Jaeggli, K. J. Safir (Eds.). The Null Subject Parameter. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 15, pp. 185-214. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Huang, C. T. J., Li, Y.-H. A., & Li, Y. (2009). The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Huang, X. Y. (2009a). Multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese: A cartographic approach and MP perspective. National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan: MA thesis. Huang, X. Y. (2009b). Multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese: A cartographic approach and MP perspective. In Yun Xiao (Ed.). Proceedings of the 21th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-21), volume 2, , 524-540. Huang, C.-T. James. (2010). Modularity and Chinese A-not-A Questions. In By Huang, C. T. (Ed.). Between Syntax and Semantics, pp.106-130. New York: Routledge. Huddleston, R. D. (1976) Some theoretical issues in the description of the English verb. Lingua, 40, 331-383. Huddleston, R. (1970). Two approaches to the analysis of tags. Journal of Linguistics, 6(2), 215-222. Hu, C. (2001). Question Tags in Taiwan Mandarin: Discourse Functions and Grammaticalization. National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan: MA Thesis. Huang, Y.-Z. (2018). Error Types and Pedagogical Suggestions of Modal Verbs Xiang, Yao, and Xiangyao in Mandarin: A Corpus-Based Analysis. National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan: MA thesis. Hsu, Y.-F. (2019). The Error Analysis on Omission of Mandarin Modal Verb HUI and its Pedagogical Implications. National Cheng Chi University, Taiwan: MA thesis. Huang, Y.-H. (2023). The Error Analysis of Modal Verb “Keyi” with Pedagogical Applications. Journal of Chinese Language Teaching, 20(2), 1-43. Hung, H.-S. (2024). A Gender-based Study of the Pragmatic Functions of Mandarin A-not-A Tag Questions in Podcast Conversation and its Pedagogical Suggestions. National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan: MA Thesis. Kay, P. (2002). English subjectless tagged sentences. Language, 78(3), 453-481. Kimps, D. (2007). Declarative constant polarity tag questions: A data-driven analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(2), 270-291. Kimps, D., & Davidse, K. (2008). Illocutionary force and conduciveness in imperative constant polarity tag questions: A typology. Text& Talk, 28(6), 699-722. Li. C., & Thompson, S. (2009). Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Lin, J.-W., & Tang, C.-C. (1995). Modals as verbs in Chinese: a GB perspective. The Bulletin of Institute of History and Philology, 66, 53-105. Lin, T. H. (2012). Multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese and their finiteness properties. Journal of Linguistics, 48(1), 151-186. Liu, Y.-H. (1996). Modern Chinese grammar. Taipei: Shida bookstore. Lobeck, A. (1995). Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing, and Identification. Oxford University Press, New York. Lu, S. (1985). Jindai Hanyu Zhidaici [The Deictic Expressions in Contemporary Chinese]. Shanghai: Xuelin Press. Lu, S.-H. (2003). Xiangdai Hanyu Babai Ci [800 words in Contemporary Chinese]. Beijing: The Commercial Press. Lu, F. (2014). On the nature, features, and categories of counter-expectation markers. Journal of Yunan Normal University (Teaching and Research on Chinese as A Foreign Language Edition), 11(6), 53-59. Lu, F., & Zeng, J. (2019). The Forms and Function of Counter-Expectation Marker. Linguistic Sciences, 18(1), 40-49. Lu, M. (2021). Hanyu “zhuanzhe” gainian dingyi ji fenlei de zai tantao—jian lun yihexing zhuanzhe de shengcheng ji panding jizhi [Revisiting the definition and classification of “transition” concepts in Chinese—addressing both the mechanism of generation and judgement of conceptual transition]. Qilailunheng: Donghua wenzhe yanjiu jikan [Journal of Donghua on the Research of Chinese Literature and Philosophy], 9, 83-113. Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Li, Y.-C. (2024). An Error Analysis of the Uses of Mandarin Chinese Modal Verb Yinggai Produced by English-Speaking and Japanese-Speaking Learners of Chinese and its Pedagogical Suggestions—Based on TOCFL Learner Corpus. National Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan: MA thesis. McCrawley, D. J. (1994). Remarks on the syntax of Mandarin yes-no questions. Journal of East Asian Linguistics,3, 179-194. Mandarin Training Center National Taiwan Normal University. (2015a). A Course in Contemporary Chinese (Volume 1). Taipei: Linking Publishing Company. Mandarin Training Center National Taiwan Normal University. (2015b). A Course in Contemporary Chinese (Volume 2). Taipei: Linking Publishing Company. Mandarin Training Center National Taiwan Normal University. (2016a). A Course in Contemporary Chinese (Volume 3). Taipei: Linking Publishing Company. Mandarin Training Center National Taiwan Normal University. (2016b). A Course in Contemporary Chinese (Volume 4). Taipei: Linking Publishing Company. Mandarin Training Center National Taiwan Normal University. (2018a). A Course in Contemporary Chinese (Volume 5). Taipei: Linking Publishing Company. Mandarin Training Center National Taiwan Normal University. (2018b). A Course in Contemporary Chinese (Volume 6). Taipei: Linking Publishing Company. Mao, S.-T. (2017). A Study on Grammar and Pedagogical Suggestions of Mandarin Modality “Néng” “Huì” “Kěyǐ”. National Taichung University of Education, Taiwan: MA thesis. Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and modality (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Palmer, F. R. (1988). The English verb (2nd edition). London: Longman. Palmer, F. R. (1990). Modality and the English modals (2nd edition). London: Longman. Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L., Haegeman (Ed.). Elements of Grammar, pp. 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Rizzi, L., & Cinque, G. (2016). Functional categories and syntactic theories. The Annual Review of Linguistics, 2, 139-163. Rizzi, L. (2017). Locality and the functional sequence in the left periphery. In E. Aboh, E. Haeberli, G. Puskás, and M. Schönenberger (Eds.). Elements of Comparative Syntax (pp. 319-348). US: Walter de Gruyter. Rizzi, L., & Bucci, G. (2017). Left Periphery of the Clause: Primarily Illustrated for Italian. In M. Everaert, & Riemsdijk, H. v. (Eds.). The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition (pp. 1-30). Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Shan, W. (2016). Fanyuqi biaoji “jingran” [The counter-expectation marker “jingran”]. Language and Literature Learning, 12, 1-2. Shen, J. (2004). Buduicheng he Biaojilun [Asymmetry and the Markedness Theory]. Jiangxi: Jiangxi Education Publishing House. Smith, C. S. (1997). The Parameter of Aspect (2nd edition). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Sun, S.-H. (2010). A Study on the Acquisition of Chinese Modal Verbs “Hui, Keyi, Neng” of English Native Speakers of Beginner Chinese Classes -A Case Study of Remedial Teaching Practice in the U.S.A.. Chung Yuan Christian University, Taiwan: MA thesis. Tallerman, M. (2011). Understanding Syntax (3rd edition). UK: Hodder Education. Tang, T.-C. (1981). A study of interrogative sentences in Chinese. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University, 26, 219-277. Tang, T.-C. (1984). A further study of interrogative sentences in Chinese. Journal of National Taiwan University, 29, 381-437. Tang, T.-C. (1988). Papers on Chinese Morphology and Syntax. Taipei: Student Book Co. Tang, T.-C. & Tang, C.-C. J. (1997). Huayu qingtaici xulun [Introduction to Chinese modal auxiliaries]. In Shijie Huayuwen Jiaoyu Xuehui [World Chinese Language Association] (ed.), Diwu Jie Shijie Huayuwen Jiaoxue Yantaohui Lunwenji: Yuwen Fenxi Zu [Proceedings for the Fifth World Conference on Chinese Language Teaching], 175–197. Taipei: Shijie Huawen Chubanshe [World Chinese press]. Tang, T.-C. (2006). Studies on Chinese Morphology and Syntax. Taipei: Student Book Co., Ltd. Tang, S.-W. (2016). A syntactic analysis of tag questions in English and Chinese. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 48(1), 29-35. Tang, S.-W. (2018). A syntactic analysis of incremental sentences. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies, 191, 48-57. Teng, S.-H. (1975). A Semantic Study of Transitivity Relations in Chinese. Taiwan: Student Book Co. Ltd. Tottie, G., & Hoffman, S. (2006). Tag questions in British and American English. Journal of English Linguistics, 34(4),283-311. Tsai, W. T. D. (2010). On the syntax-semantics correspondences of Chinese modals. Studies of the Chinese Language, 3, 208-221. Tsai, W.-T. D. (2015). On the topography of Chinese modals. In Ur Shlonsky (Ed.). Beyond Functional Sequence, pp. 275-294. New York: Oxford University Press. Tsai, W.-T. D. (2020). Cartographic approach, head movement and flip-flop sentences. Foreign Language Teaching and Research (bimonthly), 52(2), 176-187. Tseng, W.-H. (2010). Generalized Post-syntactic Movement in Mandarin Chinese. National Tsing Hua University: MA Thesis. Takahiro, W. (2021). An Error Analysis of Mandarin Chinese Modal Verbs Neng, Keyi and Hui by Japanese Learners Based on TOCFL Learner Corpus and Pedagogical Suggestions. National Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan: MA thesis. Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistic in Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Wu, P.-H. (2009). Interlanguage Analysis of “Hui”: The case of Japanese learners. National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan: MA thesis. Xu, M.-F. (2001). Reviews on the Research of “Zhe” and “Na”. Chinese Language Learning, 5, 47-54. Yang, Y.-L. (2006). A study on the asymmetry of individual zhe and individual na in contexts. Chinese Teaching in the World, 4, 33-41. Yang, Y.-L. (2011). Kejixing lilun ji zhe na pianzhang buduicheng yanjiu [On the asymmetry of zhe and na in contexts and the accessibility theory]. Henan Social Sciences, 19(2), 201-204. Yu, X.-X. (2014). The Similarity and Difference between Evidential Yinggai and Epistemic Keneng. Monumenta Taiwanica, 10, 61-97. Zhu, D.-X. (2007). Yufa Jian Yi. Beijing: The Commercial Press. Zhang, Y.-A. (2019). A Study on the Function of Mandarin Modal Verb “Yinggai”: A Corpus-based Analysis with String Matching Algorithm. National Taichung University of Education, Taiwan: MA thesis. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96541 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 至今已有諸多研究探討含有詞組性空範疇的刪略結構於不同詞組的刪略現象，如名詞組、動詞組、屈折詞組以及補語詞組（如：附加問句）。然而，現存文獻多以英語為主要分析的語言，而目前僅有少數的近期研究探析此句法結構於漢語中的體現。承繼前述學者對漢語刪略結構的關注，本論文的目標即為詳盡地深究漢語情態詞於附加問句中所表現的句法行為。
根據自省語料的測試結果，本研究發現判定情態詞能否出現於漢語附加問句的條件取決於情態詞與無生性空代詞共現的可能性。由於動力性的情態詞對其主語具備有生性的選擇限制，因此僅有認知性和義務性的情態詞得以出現於漢語的附加問句。再者，前行句與附加問句之中的情態詞並不具備嚴格的對應關係，故附加問句得以與不具情態詞、具有相異情態詞、具多重情態詞的前行句共現。同時，附加問句與多元句型結構之共現，如並列複句、從屬複句、包孕句亦獲證實。 此外，本研究對漢語附加問句句法生成結構的重新闡述支持原則和參數理論，亦即前行句應同屬漢語與英語附加問句中的其一成分。漢語的疑問助詞與英語的[+疑問]徵性更反映跨語言中附加問句的疑問本質。 至於教學建議，本研究主張漢語附加問句應被列為教材中獨立的語法結構。除了常見的篇章動詞如「對」、「是」和「好」，情態詞亦為可出現於漢語附加問句中之動詞類別。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Much research has analyzed ellipsis constructions at different phrasal categories, such as NP, VP, IP, and CP (e.g., tag questions). Nevertheless, studies on these phenomena mainly focus on English, with only recent efforts examining their syntactic manifestations in Mandarin Chinese. Following the past scholars’ explorations in Mandarin Chinese, the goal of this thesis is to thoroughly investigate the syntactic behavior of modal verbs across different modalities in Chinese tag questions.
The results from the introspective corpus testing show that the criteria responsible for the legitimacy of modal verbs in Chinese tag questions are determined by the modal verbs’ eligibility to co-occur with the inanimate pro. Since dynamic modal verbs impose restrictions on subject animacy, only epistemic and deontic modal verbs can form Chinese tag questions. Moreover, the modal verbs in the antecedent clause and the tag question do not need to correspond strictly, as tag questions can co-occur with antecedent clauses without modal verbs, with different modal verbs, or even multiple modal verbs. At the same time, the compatibility with various clausal constructions, i.e., coordinated sentences, subordinated sentences, and embedded sentences is also confirmed. Moreover, the reformulation of the syntactic derivation mechanism of Chinese tag questions supports the principles and parameters framework that the antecedent clause should be an element within both Chinese and English tag questions. The existence of the Q particle and the [+Q] feature reflects the interrogative nature of tag questions cross-linguistically. With respect to pedagogical implications, this thesis proposes that Chinese tag questions be recognized as an independent grammatical construction. Aside from common discourse verbs such as dui, shi, and hao, modal verbs represent another category of verbs that frequently appears in Chinese tag questions. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-02-19T16:26:06Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-02-19T16:26:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii Table of Contents v List of Figures viii List of Tables x Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 General Background 1 1.2 Research Questions 8 1.3 Organization of the Thesis 8 Chapter 2 Literature Review 9 2.1 General Classifications of Modality 9 2.2 Classification of Chinese Modality 21 2.3 Classification of Chinese Modal Verbs 57 Chapter 3 Modal Verbs in Chinese Tag Questions 69 3.1 Overview 69 3.2 Classifications of Chinese Tag Questions 71 3.3 Restrictions to License Chinese Tag Questions 80 3.3.1 The Epistemic Restriction to License Chinese Tag Questions—Chiu (2011, 2023) 80 3.3.2 The Deontic Restriction to License Chinese Tag Questions—Hsin (2016) 82 3.4 Data Pattern 83 3.4.1 Legitimate Modal Verbs in Chinese Tag Questions 84 3.4.2 Antecedent Clauses without Modal Verbs 93 3.4.3 The Phenomenon of Modal Verb Disharmony 105 3.4.4 Multiple Modal Verbs in the Antecedent Clause 122 3.4.5 Various Clausal Constructions of the Antecedent Clause 136 Chapter 4 The derivation of Tag questions 149 4.1 Overview 149 4.2 Responses to Past Scholars 166 4.3 The Derivation of Chinese Tag Questions 181 4.4 The Derivation of English Tag Questions 206 Chapter 5 Pedagogical Implications 216 5.1 Overview 216 5.2 Current Practices in Chinese Textbooks: A Course in Contemporary Chinese 217 5.2.1 Chinese Modal Verbs 217 5.2.2 Chinese Tag Questions 220 5.3 Suggestions on the Current Practices in A Course in Contemporary Chinese 236 5.4 The Recommended Teaching Methods 242 Chapter 6 Conclusion 252 References 256 Appendix A 268 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 附加問句 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 情態詞 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 華語教學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 教材分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 教學建議 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 當代中文課程 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 句法生成 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Teaching Chinese as a Second Language | en |
| dc.subject | A Course in Contemporary Chinese | en |
| dc.subject | Modal verbs | en |
| dc.subject | Pedagogical Implications | en |
| dc.subject | Syntactic Derivation | en |
| dc.subject | Textbook Analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Tag questions | en |
| dc.title | 漢語含情態詞之附加問句 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Chinese Tag Questions with Modal Verbs | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 謝佳玲;楊中玉 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chia-Ling Hsieh;Chung-Yu Yang | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 句法生成,附加問句,情態詞,華語教學,教材分析,教學建議,當代中文課程, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | A Course in Contemporary Chinese,Modal verbs,Pedagogical Implications,Syntactic Derivation,Textbook Analysis,Tag questions,Teaching Chinese as a Second Language, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 271 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202500377 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-02-04 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 華語教學碩士學位學程 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-02-20 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 華語教學碩士學位學程 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-1.pdf | 2.76 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。