請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96540完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳瑪玲 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Maa-Ling Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 梁英琪 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Ying-Chi Liang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-19T16:25:49Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-20 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-02-19 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-02-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王仲群
2017 《植物園文化之製陶技術選擇兼論縞狀陶製作》。國立臺灣大學人類學系碩士論文。 文化部文化資產局 2018 〈丸山考古遺址〉。「國家文化資產網」，https://nchdb.boch.gov.tw/assets/overview/archaeologicalSite/20190307000001，2018年11月28日上線。 甘聿群 2021 《新石器末期的北台灣：從製陶技術的角度談起》。北京大學考古文博學院碩士論文。 甘聿群、江芝華 2023 〈虎頭山公園的史前陶胎：岩象分析與實驗考古的物質性探討〉。《考古人類學刊》99: 1-74。 江芝華 2018 《丸山考古遺址文化資產價值評估報告》，宜蘭縣政府文化局委託計畫，國立臺灣大學人類學系執行。 2019 〈蘭陽平原新石器時代晚期人地關係的糾葛: 以宜蘭縣丸山遺址為例〉。《考古人類學刊》91:43-84。 江芝華、劉益昌 2013 〈宜蘭縣丸山遺址內部空間配置初探：地理資訊系統的運用〉。《考古人類學刊》79:7-46。 2016 《宜蘭縣新石器晚期丸山文化內涵研究計畫案成果報告》，宜蘭縣政府文化局委託計畫，國立臺灣大學人類學系執行。 吳明隆、涂金堂 2006 《SPSS與統計應用分析》，臺北：五南。 余奕南 2013 《花岡山遺址出土陶片原料來源與河流沉積物之對應關係》。國立東華大學自然資源與環境學系碩士論文。 李榮哲 2023 《芝山岩文化與圓山文化的陶器技術體系：一個多角度的考古學研究》。國立臺灣大學人類學系碩士論文。 林天妍 2007 《五千多年來台灣東北部的古氣候變遷: 宜蘭梅花湖湖積物岩芯MHL5-A之磁學證據》。國立中央大學地球物理研究所碩士論文。 林淑芬 2000 〈芝山岩遺址、社子遺址、植物園遺址陶片切片分析報告〉。《台北市考古遺址調查與研究》。劉益昌、郭素秋著，附錄三。臺北: 臺北市政府民政局。 2002 〈丸山遺址出土陶片切片分析報告〉。《宜蘭縣丸山遺址搶救發掘資料整理計畫第二階段報告》。劉益昌、邱水金等人著，附錄三。宜蘭: 宜蘭縣政府民政局。 2004 《由孢粉紀錄看宜蘭平原最近4200年來的自然環境演變及其與史前文化發展之關係》。國立臺灣大學地質科學研究所博士論文。 2015 〈聚落發展與自然環境變遷——以宜蘭地區史前為例〉。刊於《臺灣史前史專論》。劉益昌編，頁319-345。新北市：中央研究院、聯經出版。 林淑芬、陳有貝、邱水金、李貞瑩 2010 〈淇武蘭史前人群與自然環境〉。刊於《探溯淇武蘭：「宜蘭研究」第九屆學術研討會論文集》。李素月、許美智編，頁31-59。宜蘭：宜蘭文獻叢刊。 林惠玲、陳正倉 2014 《基礎統計學——觀念與應用》，臺北：雙葉書廊有限公司。 郭素秋 2023 〈宜蘭丸山遺址的甕棺與人獸型玉玦——兼論玉礦產區荖山遺址的甕棺〉，《古今論衡》40：4-32。 陳文山 1997 《岩石入門》，臺北：遠流。 2000 《沈積物與沈積環境分析及地層對比研究——蘭陽平原》，經濟部中央地質調查所委託計畫，國立臺灣大學地質學系執行。 2016 《臺灣地質概論》，臺北：中華民國地質學會。 陳文山、王源 1996 《臺灣地質之七：臺灣東部海岸山脈地質》，臺北：經濟部中央地質調查所。 陳文山、宋時驊、吳樂群、徐澔德、楊小青 2004 〈末次冰期以來臺灣海岸平原區的海岸線變遷〉。《考古人類學刊》62:40-55。 陳有貝、李貞瑩 2004 〈淇武蘭遺址出土近代瓷器簡介〉，《田野考古》9(1/2)：35-52。 陳有貝、邱水金、李貞瑩 2007 《淇武蘭遺址搶救發掘報告》1-3冊，宜蘭：宜蘭縣立蘭陽博物館。 2008 《淇武蘭遺址搶救發掘報告》4-6冊，宜蘭：宜蘭縣立蘭陽博物館。 陳昱婷 2013 《圓山文化之製陶技術選擇與技術體系：以大坌坑與圓山遺址為例》。國立臺灣大學人類學系碩士論文。 陳瑪玲、陳珮瑜、林宜羚 2016 〈技術選擇取徑再探陶器製作體系：以臺北盆地幾個史前文化為例〉。《考古人類學刊》84：1-38。 庶古文創事業股份有限公司 2020〈花岡山遺址陶片岩象分析〉。《再探花蓮花岡山遺址之甕棺葬》。尤筱薇著，附錄。國立臺灣大學人類學系碩士論文。 盛清沂 1963 〈宜蘭平原邊緣史前遺址調查報告〉，《台灣文獻》14(1)：1-60。 連照美、宋文薰 1992 《台灣地區史前遺址資料檔（一）》，國立台灣史前文化博物館籌備處專刊2，台東：國立台灣史前文化博物館籌備處。 黃士強、劉益昌 1980 《全省重要史蹟探勘與整修建議：考古與舊社部分》，台北市：交通部觀光局委託研究。 黃士強、曾振名 1987 〈考古及文化篇〉，《蘇澳火力發電計畫環境美質、文化及社會經濟調查》：177-238，臺灣電力公司委託計畫，國立臺灣大學人類學系執行。 楊小青 2020 《卑南遺址出土陶器砂質摻合料之來源地分析研究》，科技部補助專題研究計畫成果報告。 劉秉玟 2017 《海岸遺址的陶罐口緣技術風格分析》。國立台灣大學人類學系碩士論文。 劉益昌 1993 《宜蘭縣大竹圍遺址初步調查報告》，宜蘭：宜蘭縣縣史館。 1995 〈宜蘭史前文化類型〉，《宜蘭研究第一屆學術研討會論文集》：38-56。 1996 《田野調查暨田野發掘實施報告》，文建會委託計畫，財團法人蘭陽文教基金會執行。 2000 〈宜蘭在台灣考古的重要性〉，《宜蘭文獻雜誌》43:3-27。 2003 〈臺灣玉器流行年代及其相關問題〉，刊於《史前與古典文明：第三屆國際漢學會議論文集》。臧振華編，頁1-44。臺北市：中央研究院歷史語言研究所。 劉益昌、江芝華、邱水金、李貞瑩 2017 《宜蘭縣丸山遺址1998年發掘整理報告》，宜蘭：宜蘭縣立蘭陽博物館。 劉益昌、邱水金、戴瑞春、李貞瑩 2001 《宜蘭縣大竹圍遺址受北宜高速公路頭城交流道匝道影響部分發掘研究報告》，宜蘭：宜蘭縣政府。 劉益昌、邱水金、戴瑞春、李貞瑩、廖正雄 2002 《宜蘭縣丸山遺址搶救發掘資料整理計畫第二階段報告》，宜蘭: 宜蘭縣政府民政局。 劉益昌、陳俊男、鍾國風、宋文增、鄭瑞德 2004 《台閩地區考古遺址普查研究計畫（第七期）——宜蘭縣、花蓮縣》，內政部委託計畫，中央研究院歷史語言研究所執行。 劉瑩三、余奕南、翁熙甯 2020 〈花岡山遺址陶片標本切片分析報告〉。《花崗國中校舍新建工程遺址搶救發掘計畫成果報告書（第四冊）》。劉益昌、趙金勇著，附錄一。花蓮縣政府文化局委託計畫，中央研究院歷史語言研究所執行。 蔡哲嫻 2023 〈青銅器時代早期愛琴海運輸罐的來源與技術研究: 以阿提卡半島的 Kontopigado 遺址為例〉。《考古人類學刊》98：89-120。 蘇清全 2011 《蘭陽平原末次冰期以來沉積環境變遷與構造作用特性》。國立臺灣大學地質科學研究所碩士論文。 Arnold, D. 1985 Ceramic Theory and Cultural Processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2008 Social Change and the Evolution of Ceramic Production and Distribution in a Maya Community. USA: University Press of Colorado. Bagwell, E. A. 2002 Ceramic Form and Skill: Attempting to Identify Child Producers at Pecos Pueblo, New Mexico. In Children in the Prehistoric Puebloan Southwest. Kamp, K. A. ed. Pp. 90-107.University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City. Binford, L. R. 1965 Archaeological Systematics and the Study of Culture Process. American Antiquity 31(2): 203-210. Bourdieu, P. 1977[1972] Outline of a Theory of Practice. Richard Nice, trans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2009[1972] 《實作理論綱要》（Esquisse d’une theeorie de la pratique. Preeceede de trois etudes d’ethnologie kabyle）。宋偉航譯。臺北：麥田出版。 Chiang, Chih-Hua 2010 Reconstructing Prehistoric Social Organization: A Case Study From the Wansan Site, Neolithic Taiwan. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley. 2015 “Houses”in the Wansan Society, Neolithic Taiwan. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 39: 151-163. 2022 Evidence for human-environment interactions as the driver for the abandonment of long-term Neolithic occupation at the Wansan site (NE Taiwan) around the 7th century BCE. Archaeological Research in Asia 30: 100365. Chiang, Chih-Hua and Liu, Yi-Chang 2012 Mapping Prehistoric Building Structures by Visualising Archaeological Data and Applying Spatial Statistics: a Case Study from Taiwan. In Revive the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Zhou, M., I. Romanowska, Z. Wu, P. Xu and P. Verhagen eds. Pp. 296-306. Pallas Publications, Amsterdam. 2014 The Sacred Houses in Neolithic Wansan Society. In Locating the Sacred: Theoretical Approaches to the Emplacement of Religion. Moser, C. and Feldman, C. eds. Pp. 128-143. Oxbow Books, Oxford. Chilton, E. S. 1997 The Cultural Origins of Technical Choice: Unraveling Algonquian Iroquoian Creamic Traditions in the Northeast. In The Archaeology of Social Boundaries. Miriam T. Stark, ed. Pp. 132-160. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press. Costin, C. L. and Hagstrum, M. B. 1995 Standardization, Labor Investment, Skill, and the Organization of Ceramic Production in Late Prehispanic Highland Peru. American Antiquity 60(4): 619-639. Cresswell, R. 1976 Techniques et culture, les bases d’un programme de travail. Techniques et Culture 1: 7-59. Dietler, M. and Herbich, I. 1998 Habitus, Techniques, Style: An Integrated Approach to the Social Understanding of Material Culture and Boundaries. In The Archaeology of Social Boundaries. Miriam T. Stark, ed. Pp. 233-263. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press. Dobres, M.-A. and Hoffman, C. R. 1994 Social Agency and the Dynamics of Prehistoric Technology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1(3): 211-258. Dobres, M.-A. 2010 Archaeologies of Technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics 34(1): 103-114. Eerkens, J. W. and Bettinger, R. L. 2001 Techniques for Assessing Standardization in Artifact Assemblages: Can We Scale Material Variability? American Antiquity 66(3): 493-504. Eerkens, J. W. and Lipo, C. P. 2005 Cultural Transmission, Copying Errors, and the Generation of Variation in Material Culture and the Archaeological Record. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 24: 316-334. Freestone, I. C. 1991 Extending Ceramic Petrology. In Recent Developments in Ceramic Petrology. Middleton A. and Freestone, I., eds. Pp. 399-410. British Museum Occasional Paper, 81. UK: British Museum Research Laboratory. 1995 Ceramic Petrography. American Journal of Archaeology 99(1): 111-117. Gosselain, O. P. 1992 Technology and Style: Potters and Pottery Among Bafia of Cameroon. Man 27 (3): 559-586. 1998 Social and Technical Identity In A Clay Crystal Ball. In The Archaeology of Social Boundaries. Miriam T. Stark, ed. Pp. 78-106. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press. 2000 Materializing Identities: An African Perspective. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7(3): 187-217. 2011a Technology. In Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Ritual and Religion. Timothy Insoll, ed. Pp. 243-260. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2011b Fine if I Do, Fine if I Don’t. Dynamics of Technical Knowledge in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Investigating Archaeological Cultures: Material Culture, Variability, and Transmission. Roberts, B. W. and Vander Linden, M., eds. Pp. 211-227. New York: Springer New York. 2018 Pottery chaînes opératoires as Historical Documents. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of African History, https://oxfordre.com/africanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.001.0001/acrefore-9780190277734-e-208, accessed December 20, 2018. Gosselain, O. P. and Smith, L. A. 2005 The Source, Clay Selection and Processing Practices in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Pottery Manufacturing Processes : Reconstruction and Interpretation. Smith, L. A., Bosquet, D. and Martineau, R., eds. Pp. 33-47. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1349, Oxford. Ho, J. W. I. and Quinn, P. S. 2021 Intentional clay-mixing in the production of traditional and ancient ceramics and its identification in thin section. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 37: 102945. Hodder, I. 2012 Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. UK: Wiley-Blackwell. 2013 Human-Thing Evolution: the Selection and Persistece of Traits at Çatalhöyük, Turkey. In Counterpoint: Essays in Archaeology and Heritage Studies in Honour of Professor Kristian Kristiansen. Sophie Bergerbrant and Serena Sabatini, eds. Pp. 583-591. BAR International Series 2508, Oxford. Jiménez, G. A. 2004 Craft Specialization in Pottery Production During the Bronze Age in South-eastern Iberia. Journal of Iberian Archaeology 6: 157-179. Khanipour, M. 2024 Organization of pottery production at the hormangan neolithic site: Archaeological evidence of craft specialization in southwestern Asia. Archaeological Research in Asia 40: 100556. Lechtman, H. 1984 Andean value systems and the development of prehistoric metallurgy. Technology and Culture 25(1): 1-36. Lemonnier, P. ed. 1993 Technological Choices: Transformation in Material Cultures Since the Neolithic, Routledge, London. Leroi-Gourhan, A. 1964 Le Geste et la Parole (Gesture and Speeh), trans. By Anna Bostock Berger (1993). Massachusetts: The MIT Press. Lin, S. F., Huang, T. C., Liew, P. M., Chen, S. H. 2007 A palynological study of environmental changes and their implication for prehistoric settlement in the Ilan Plain, northeastern Taiwan. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 16: 127-138. Loney, H. L. 2000 Society and Technological Control: A Critical Review of Models of Technological Change in Ceramic Studies. American Antiquity 65(4): 646-668. Michelaki, K., Braun, G. V. and Hancock, R. G. V. 2015 Local Clay Sources as Histories of Human-Landscape Interactions: a Ceramic Taskscape Perspective. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 22(3): 783- 827. Munsell Color (Firm). 2009 Munsell Soil Color Charts : With Genuine Munsell Color Chips. Grand Rapids, MI : Munsell Color. Okafor, M. 2022 [Re-]Creative rites: exploring the materiality of clay and its making processes. Social Dynamics 48: 85-103. Orton, C. and Hughes, M. 1993[2013] Pottery in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, New York. Parker, S. P. 2000[1984] 《地質與礦物學辭典》（McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Earth Science）。寰宇科學叢書編譯中心譯。臺北：年輪文化事業有限公司。 Peacock, D. S. P. 1969 Neolithic Pottery Production in Cornwall. Antiquity 43: 145-149. Pratt, Jo Ann F. 1999 Determining the Function of One of the New World's Earliest Pottery Assemblages: The Case of San Jacinto, Colombia. Latin American Antiquity 10(1): 71-85. Quinn, P. S. and Burton, M. 2010 Ceramic Petrography and the Reconstruction of Hunter-gatherer Craft Technology In Late Prehistoric Southern California. In Interpreting Silent Artefacts: Petrographic Approaches to Archaeological Ceramics. Quinn, P. S., ed. Pp. 267-295. Archaeopress: Oxford, England. Quinn, P. S. 2013 Ceramic Petrography: The Interpretation of Archaeological Pottery and Related Artefacts in Thin Section. Oxford: Archaeopress. Reedy, C. L. 2008 Thin-Section Petrography of Stone and Ceramic Cultural Materials. London: Archetype. Rice, P. M. 1987[2015] Pottery Analysis: A Sourcebook. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Roux, V. 2003 A Dynamic Systems Framework for Studying Technological Change: Application to the Emergence of the Potter's Wheel in the Southern Levant. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 10(1): 1-30. 2017 Ceramic Manufacture: The Chaîne Opératoire Approach. In The Oxford Handbook of Archaeology Ceramic Analysis, ed. By Alice M. W. Hunt, Pp. 101-113. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2019 Ceramics and Society: A Technological Approach to Archaeological Assemblages. Switzerland: Springer Cham. Rye, O. S. 1981 Pottery Technology: Principles and Reconstruction. Washington, D.C.: Taraxacum. Santacreu, D. A. 2014 Materiality, Techniques and Society in Pottery Production: The Technological Study of Archaeology Ceramics through Paste Analysis. Part II. Warsaw/Berlin: De Gruyter Open. Schiffer, M. B. 1990 Technological Changes in Water Storage and Cooking Pots: Some Prediction from Experiments. In The Changing Roles of Ceramics in Society: 6,000 B.P. to the Present. Kingery, W. D. ed. Pp.119-137. American Ceramic Society, Westerville, Ohio. Schiffer, M. B., Skibo, J. M., Griffitts, J. L., Hollenback, K. L. and Longacre, W. A. 2001 Behavioral Archaeology and the Study of Technology. American Antiquity 66(4): 729-737. Shepard, A. O. 1942 Rio Grande Glaze Paint Ware: A Study Illustrating the Place of Ceramic Technological Analysis In Archaeological Research. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication 528: 129-262. 1956[1974] Ceramics for the Archaeologist. Carnegie Institution of Washington Press, Washington. Sillar, B. 1996 The dead and the drying: Techniques for transforming people and things in the Andes. Journal of Material Culture 1(3): 259-289. Skibo, J. M., and Schiffer, M. B. 1989 Organic-tempered pottery: An experimental study. American Antiquity 54: 122-146. 2008 People and Things: A Behavioral Approach to Material Culture. New York: Springer. Smith, A. L. 2000 Processing Clay for Pottery in Northern Cameroon: Social and Technical Requirements. Archaeometry 42(1): 21-42. Stark, M. T. 1998 Technical Choices and Social Boundaries in Material Culture Patterning:An Introduction. In The Archaeology of Social Boundaries. Miriam T. Stark, ed. Pp. 1-11. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press. 1999 Social Dimensions of Technical Choice in Kalinga Ceramic Traditions. In Material Meanings: Critical Approaches to the Interpretation of Material Culture. Elizabeth S. Chilton, ed. Pp. 24-43. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press. Steel, L. 2020 Feats of Clay: Considering the Materiality of Late Bronze Age Cyprus. Sustainability 12(17): 6942. Stoltman, J. B. 1991 Ceramic Petrography as a Technique for Documenting Cultural Interaction: An Example from the Upper Mississippi Valley. American Antiquity 56(1): 103-120. 2001 The Role of Petrography in the Study of Archaeological Ceramics. In Earth Sciences And Archaeology, Goldberg, P., Holliday, V. T. and Ferring, C. R., eds. Pp. by Elizabeth S. Chilton, Pp. 297-326. New York: Plenum Publishers. Tite, M. S. 1999 Pottery Production, Distribution, and Consumption: The Contribution of the Physical Sciences. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 6(3): 181-233. Valdez, L. M. 1997 Ecology and Ceramic Production In An Andean Community: A Reconsideration of the Evidence. Journal of Anthropological Research 53(1): 65-85. Whitbread, I. K. 1989 A Proposal for the Systematic Description of Thin Sections Towards the Study of Ancient Ceramic Technology. In Archaeometry: Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium. Maniatis, Y. ed. Pp. 127-138. Elsevier, Amsterdam. 1995 The Collection, Processing and Interpretation of Petrographic data. In Greek Transport Amphorae: A petrological and archaeological study. Pp.365-396. British School at Athens, Fitch Laboratory. 1996 Detection and Interpretation of Preferred Orientation In Ceramic Thin Section. In Imaging the Past: Electronic Imaging and Computer Graphics in Museums and Archaeology. Higgins T., Main P., Lang J., eds. Pp.173-181. British Museum, London. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96540 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 回顧丸山遺址過去的研究，諸多類型學分析、空間分析、土地利用、自然環境及墓葬現象等面向的討論，這些研究已描繪出史前丸山社群可能的生業型態、聚落樣貌、生產組織或儀式活動，並指出社群可能存在的社會差異與文化互動關係。然而過去研究皆未針對丸山遺址出土陶器的「製作技術」進行深入的研究，相關討論多侷限於器物形制的類型學分析或陶土內含物來源的辨識。由於基礎研究資料的缺乏，目前考古學界對於史前丸山地區的製陶技術傳統、生產與交換並無太多著墨。
本研究以陶器製作「技術」作為切入角度，運用操作鍊的理論框架以及屬性分析、岩象分析的方法，提供一個有別於傳統類型學的視野檢視丸山遺址出土的陶質遺留，嘗試從技術實踐過程的視角來認識史前人群的社會文化生活。本研究首先試圖辨識丸山遺址有無本地與外來陶器之別，進而比較本地與外來各類陶器的技術差異，接著分析遺址中不同空間、層位出土陶器的技術多樣性及變遷的可能，最後將分析結果放回遺址的脈絡理解，並從生態、技術功能與社會文化的角度加以詮釋。 屬性分析及岩象分析的結果指出，丸山遺址出土的陶器可以依原料的地質來源以及陶土製備、燒製的技術分為本地與外來兩類。本地陶器可能以遺址附近的羅東溪、冬山河或蘭陽溪流域的原料製成，內含大量中、粗砂級的沉積岩與變質岩屑，其製作技術在遺址時空脈絡中的變化反映了人、物及環境在長時間的複雜互動過程中如何影響著製陶技術樣貌的形塑；外來陶器則可能來自臺灣東部海岸山脈地區兩個或以上的地質來源和製作傳統，相較於本地陶器，外來陶器以細砂級的火成岩屑為主，且在製作上可能有著更為嚴格的技術控制與標準，丸山社群很可能在很長的一段時間內持續引入品質接近且精緻的外來陶器，這些外來陶器在遺址不同空間的分布異同似乎還暗示了史前丸山社群複雜的社交網絡及社會結構。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Reviewing past research on the WanShan site, discussions have covered various aspects such as typology, spatial analysis, land use, natural environment, and burial practices. These studies have outlined the possible livelihood patterns, settlement pattern, production organization, and ritual activities of the prehistoric WanShan community, while also highlighting potential social distinction and cultural interactions within the community. However, previous research has not delved deeply into the "ceramic manufacturing technology" of WanShan community. Most related discussions have been limited to typologies or the identification of the sources of materials. Due to the lack of foundational research data, the archaeological community currently has limited knowledge about the pottery-making traditions and exchange systems in the prehistoric WanShan.
This study focused on the "technology" of pottery manufacture, employing the theoretical framework of chaîne opératoire along with attribute analysis and ceramic petrographic analysis. This approach offers a perspective distinct from traditional typological approach to examine the ceramic remains unearthed from WanShan site. By examining the process of ceramic technical practice, the study aims to gain insights into the social and cultural life of prehistoric WanShan. This thesis research first detected the origins of ceramic remains, then compared the technical differences between local and non-local pottery, then analyzed the technological diversity and changes in pottery from different spatial and stratigraphic contexts of the site. Finally, the results were interpreted within the broader context of the site, incorporating perspectives from ecology, technical function, and socio-cultural dynamics. The results of attribute analysis and petrographic analysis indicate that the pottery from WanShan site can be categorized into two types — local and non-local — based on the geological origin of raw materials as well as the techniques used in clay preparation and firing. Local pottery was made from raw materials sourced from the catchment areas of the Luodong(羅東) River, Dongshan(冬山) River, and Lanyang(蘭陽) River near the site. These materials contained a large amount of medium- and coarse-grained sedimentary and metamorphic rock fragments. Differences in the manufacturing technology of local pottery within different spatiotemporal context of the site reflect how the long-term, complex interactions among people, materials, and the environment, and this shaped the development of pottery-making techniques. In contrast, non-local pottery likely originated from two or more geological regions and production traditions of the Coastal Range region of eastern Taiwan. Compared to local pottery, non-local pottery primarily featured fine-grained volcanic rock fragments and appears to have been produced under stricter technical controls and standardized processes. WanShan community likely continued to import high-quality and refined non-local pottery over an extended period. The similarities and differences in the manufacturing technology of non-local pottery across different spatial contexts of the site further suggest the existence of a complex social network and social structure within the prehistoric WanShan had continually introduced non-local pottery community. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-02-19T16:25:49Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-02-19T16:25:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
中文摘要 iii Abstract iv 目次 vi 圖次 ix 表次 xi 第一章、緒論 1 第一節、前言 1 第二節、研究旨趣 2 第三節、章節安排 3 第二章、文獻回顧 4 第一節、考古學陶器研究中的技術討論 4 第二節、操作鍊與實踐理論 9 第三節、岩象分析在陶器研究中的應用 11 第三章、研究對象：蘭陽平原上的丸山遺址 15 第一節、蘭陽平原的自然環境 15 第二節、蘭陽平原的丸山文化 16 第三節、丸山遺址 18 3.3.1 遺址概述 18 3.3.2 出土遺構、現象及遺物概述 23 3.3.3 丸山遺址陶質遺留 25 第四章、研究方法與抽樣策略 29 第一節、研究方法 30 4.1.1 屬性分析 31 4.1.2 岩象分析 37 4.1.3 綜合分析 38 第二節、抽樣策略：空間的抽樣 38 4.2.1 坑層資訊與年代 39 4.2.2 出土文化遺留概述 43 第三節、抽樣策略：屬性分析及岩象分析樣本的抽樣 45 第五章、分析與結果：屬性分析 47 第一節、比較對象：陶類說明 48 第二節、各陶類陶器的製作特徵與比較 53 5.1.1 陶土製備：內含物粒徑、密度 53 5.1.2 塑形技術：指捏痕、厚度、厚度變異係數 59 5.1.3 表面處理：表皮或陶衣 62 5.1.4 燒製：內、外、胎心色 64 第三節、不同坑位的陶器製作技術比較 67 5.2.1 陶土製備：內含物粒徑、粒徑變異係數 68 5.2.2 塑形技術：指捏痕、厚度、厚度變異係數 73 5.2.3 表面處理：表皮或陶衣 77 5.2.4 燒製：外色、內色、胎心色 78 第四節、同一探坑不同層位的陶器製作技術比較 86 5.3.1 IA類陶在兩探坑層位上的變遷 92 5.3.2 IB類陶在T5P16層位上的變遷 94 5.3.3 IC類陶在兩探坑層位上的變遷 94 5.3.4 ID類陶在兩坑層位上的變遷 95 5.3.5 II類陶在兩探坑層位上的變遷 97 5.3.6 IV類陶在兩探坑層位上的變遷 97 第五節、統整與小結 101 5.4.1 各陶類陶器的製作特徵與比較 101 5.4.2 不同坑位的陶器製作技術比較 105 5.4.3 同一探坑不同層位的陶器製作技術比較 106 第六章、分析與結果：岩象分析 108 第一節、岩象分群結果 108 6.1.1 沉積岩-變質岩群（A） 110 6.1.2 火成岩-沉積岩群（BI） 111 6.1.3 火成岩-變質岩-沉積岩群（BII） 111 6.1.4 小結 112 第二節、地質來源討論 114 6.2.1 沉積岩-變質岩群（A）來源 114 6.2.2 火成岩群（B）來源 117 第三節、製陶技術討論 122 6.3.1 原料選擇 122 6.3.2 陶土製備 124 6.3.3 塑形技術 129 6.3.4 表面處理 130 6.3.5 燒製 134 第四節、小結 136 第五節、岩象分群與宏觀分類比較 139 第七章、綜合分析與討論 143 第一節、丸山遺址陶器製作技術 143 7.1.1 本地陶器：橙褐色灰胎夾砂陶（IA、IB、IC、ID類，岩象A群） 145 7.1.2 外來陶器：褐色黑胎夾細砂陶（II類，岩象BII群） 146 7.1.3 外來陶器：橙色(灰胎)夾細砂陶（III、IV類，岩象BI群） 147 7.1.4 陶類與出土脈絡 148 第二節、空間性的技術差異 155 7.2.1 本地陶在空間上的技術差異 155 7.2.2 外來陶在空間上的技術差異 161 第三節、縱時性的技術變遷 162 7.3.1 本地陶在時間上的技術變遷 163 7.3.2 外來陶在時間上的技術變遷 168 第四節、製陶技術與丸山社群 169 第八章、結論 174 參考文獻 179 附錄一、丸山遺址陶片岩象切片觀察報告 190 附錄二、丸山遺址陶器岩象分析礦物計數結果表（單位：％） 210 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 陶器分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 實踐理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 操作鍊 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 製陶技術 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 岩象分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 丸山遺址 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Ceramic technology | en |
| dc.subject | Ceramic petrography | en |
| dc.subject | Ceramic analysis | en |
| dc.subject | WanShan site | en |
| dc.subject | Practice theory | en |
| dc.subject | Chaîne opératoire | en |
| dc.title | 物質、技術與社群：宜蘭縣丸山遺址陶器製造技術探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Material, Technology and Community: A Technological Study of Pottery From WanShan Site, Yilan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 江芝華;林淑芬;蔡哲嫻 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chih-Hua Chiang;Shu-Fen Lin;Che-Hsien Tsai | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 丸山遺址,陶器分析,岩象分析,製陶技術,操作鍊,實踐理論, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | WanShan site,Ceramic analysis,Ceramic petrography,Ceramic technology,Chaîne opératoire,Practice theory, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 212 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202500071 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-02-06 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 人類學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-02-20 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 人類學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-1.pdf | 10.84 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。