Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 商學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96505
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor戚樹誠zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorShu-Cheng Chien
dc.contributor.author顏邑軒zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorYi-Hsuan Yenen
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-19T16:16:26Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-20-
dc.date.copyright2025-02-19-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.date.submitted2025-02-04-
dc.identifier.citation商業周刊. (2024). 被AI取代?軟體工程師薪資首降 Coding職缺驟減. https://www.businessweekly.com.tw/focus/blog/3015035
經濟日報. (2024). AI衝擊高階白領就業. https://money.udn.com/money/story/5599/7767718
聯合新聞網. (2023). ChatGPT滿周歲了! 全球造訪量衝到17億次「接下來呢?」. https://udn.com/news/story/6811/7611581
Abbass, H. A. (2019). Social integration of artificial intelligence: functions, automation allocation logic and human-autonomy trust. Cognitive Computation, 11(2), 159-171.
Agrawal, A., Gans, J. S., & Goldfarb, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence: the ambiguous labor market impact of automating prediction. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 31-50.
Andriessen, J. E. (2006). To share or not to share, that is the question. Conditions for the willingness to share knowledge. IS-2006-02 Delft Innovation System Papers.
Bacharach, S. B., & Lawler, E. J. (1980). Power and politics in organizations. (No Title).
Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 24(1), 45-68.
Bartol, K. M., & Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. Journal of leadership & organizational studies, 9(1), 64-76.
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of consumer research, 15(2), 139-168.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Justice in social exchange. Sociological inquiry, 34(2).
Bolisani, E., Bratianu, C., Bolisani, E., & Bratianu, C. (2018). The elusive definition of knowledge. Emergent knowledge strategies: Strategic thinking in knowledge management, 1-22.
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
Brougham, D., & Haar, J. (2018). Smart technology, artificial intelligence, robotics, and algorithms (STARA): Employees’ perceptions of our future workplace. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(2), 239-257.
Brown, G., Crossley, C., & Robinson, S. L. (2014). Psychological ownership, territorial behavior, and being perceived as a team contributor: The critical role of trust in the work environment. Personnel psychology, 67(2), 463-485.
Brown, G., Lawrence, T. B., & Robinson, S. L. (2005). Territoriality in organizations. Academy of management review, 30(3), 577-594.
Butner, K., & Ho, G. (2019). How the human-machine interchange will transform business operations. Strategy & Leadership, 47(2), 25-33.
Carmeli, A., & Gittell, J. H. (2009). High‐quality relationships, psychological safety, and learning from failures in work organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 30(6), 709-729.
Černe, M., Hernaus, T., Dysvik, A., & Škerlavaj, M. (2017). The role of multilevel synergistic interplay among team mastery climate, knowledge hiding, and job characteristics in stimulating innovative work behavior. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(2), 281-299.
Clegg, S. R. (1989). Circuits of power: A framework for analysis. In (pp. 187-240): London: Sage Publications.
Connelly, C. E., Zweig, D., Webster, J., & Trougakos, J. P. (2012). Knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of organizational behavior, 33(1), 64-88.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management journal, 50(4), 869-884.
Dombrowski, E., Rotenberg, L., & Bick, M. (2014). Oxford IB Diploma Programme: Theory of Knowledge Course Companion. Oxford University Press-Children.
Drucker, P. F. (1993). The rise of the knowledge society. The Wilson Quarterly, 17(2), 52-72.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative science quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
Edmondson, A. C. (1996). Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. The journal of applied behavioral science, 32(1), 5-28.
Edmondson, A. C. (2002). The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organization science, 13(2), 128-146.
Edmondson, A. C. (2003). Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of management studies, 40(6), 1419-1452.
Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 1(1), 23-43.
Ehrhart, M. G. (2004). Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit‐level organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel psychology, 57(1), 61-94.
Erikson, P. (1979). The role of secrecy in complex organizations: from norms of rationality to norms of distrust. Cornell Journal of Social Relations Ithaca, NY, 14(2), 121-138.
Ford, D. P., & Sandy Staples, D. (2006). Perceived value of knowledge: the potential informer's perception. Knowledge management research & practice, 4, 3-16.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigo, J. M., & Popa, S. (2018). Twenty years of the Journal of Knowledge Management: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of knowledge management, 22(8), 1655-1687.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (1999). SPSS for windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. Contemporary Psychology, 44, 100-100.
Gong, Y., Cheung, S.-Y., Wang, M., & Huang, J.-C. (2012). Unfolding the proactive process for creativity: Integration of the employee proactivity, information exchange, and psychological safety perspectives. Journal of management, 38(5), 1611-1633.
Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. In: University of Kansas, KS.
Hislop, D. (2002). Mission impossible? Communicating and sharing knowledge via information technology. Journal of information Technology, 17, 165-177.
Iheukwumere-Esotu, L. O., & Yunusa-Kaltungo, A. (2021). Knowledge management and experience transfer in major maintenance activities: A practitioner’s perspective. Sustainability, 14(1), 52.
Jahanzeb, S., De Clercq, D., & Fatima, T. (2021). Organizational injustice and knowledge hiding: the roles of organizational dis-identification and benevolence. Management Decision, 59(2), 446-462.
Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. Journal of marketing, 57(3), 53-70.
Jelenic, D. (2011). The importance of knowledge management in Organizations–with emphasis on the balanced scorecard learning and growth Perspective. Management, Knowledge and Learning, International Conference,
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management journal, 33(4), 692-724.
Kahoot! (2022). New Survey – Is “Quiet Constraint” Quiet Quitting’s New Rival? https://kahoot.com/press/2022/10/26/new-work-survey-quiet-constraint-2022/
Kelloway, E. K., & Barling, J. (2000). Knowledge work as organizational behavior. International journal of management reviews, 2(3), 287-304.
Ladan, S., Nordin, N. B., & Belal, H. (2017). Does knowledge based psychological ownership matter? Transformational leadership and knowledge hiding: A proposed framework. Journal of business and retail management research, 11(4), 60-67.
Li, J., Yuan, L., Ning, L., & Li-Ying, J. (2015). Knowledge sharing and affective commitment: the mediating role of psychological ownership. Journal of knowledge management, 19(6), 1146-1166.
Li, J. J., Bonn, M. A., & Ye, B. H. (2019). Hotel employee's artificial intelligence and robotics awareness and its impact on turnover intention: The moderating roles of perceived organizational support and competitive psychological climate. Tourism Management, 73, 172-181.
Liang, J., Farh, C. I., & Farh, J.-L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management journal, 55(1), 71-92.
Lingmont, D. N., & Alexiou, A. (2020). The contingent effect of job automating technology awareness on perceived job insecurity: Exploring the moderating role of organizational culture. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120302.
Liu, W., Zhang, P., Liao, J., Hao, P., & Mao, J. (2016). Abusive supervision and employee creativity: The mediating role of psychological safety and organizational identification. Management Decision, 54(1), 130-147.
Loureiro, S. M. C., Guerreiro, J., & Tussyadiah, I. (2021). Artificial intelligence in business: State of the art and future research agenda. Journal of business research, 129, 911-926.
Lozada, N., Arias-Pérez, J., & Perdomo-Charry, G. (2019). Big data analytics capability and co-innovation: An empirical study. Heliyon, 5(10).
Lu, V. N., Wirtz, J., Kunz, W. H., Paluch, S., Gruber, T., Martins, A., & Patterson, P. G. (2020). Service robots, customers and service employees: what can we learn from the academic literature and where are the gaps? Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 30(3), 361-391.
Mitrović, V., Maksimović, R., & Tešić, Z. (2008). The application of Balanced Scorecard methodology in small business. International Journal-Total Quality Management & Excellence, 36(1-2), 339-346.
Neta, R., & Pritchard, D. (2009). Arguing about knowledge. Routledge London.
Panichayakorn, T., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2019). Mobilizing organizational performance through robotic and artificial intelligence awareness in mediating role of supply chain agility. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(5), 757-768.
Peng, H. (2013). Why and when do people hide knowledge? Journal of knowledge management, 17(3), 398-415.
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of management review, 26(2), 298-310.
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of general psychology, 7(1), 84-107.
Post, N. Y. (2022). Forget ‘quiet quitting’: Workers now stressing out colleagues with ‘quiet constraint’. https://nypost.com/2022/11/02/forget-quiet-quitting-workers-now-stressing-out-colleagues-with-quiet-constraint/
Review, H. B. (2023). How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity. https://hbr.org/2023/07/how-generative-ai-can-augment-human-creativity
Schein, E., & Bennis, W. G. (1965). Personal and organizational change through group methods: The laboratory approach. New York: JohnWiley and Sons. Inc. Search in.
Schein, E. H. (1992). How can organizations learn faster?: the problem of entering the Green Room.
Siemsen, E., Roth, A. V., Balasubramanian, S., & Anand, G. (2009). The influence of psychological safety and confidence in knowledge on employee knowledge sharing. Manufacturing & service operations management, 11(3), 429-447.
Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic management journal, 17(S2), 27-43.
Tisen, R., Andriessen, D., & Lekan Deprez, F. (2006). The Knowledge Dividend: Creating high-performance companies through value-based knowledge management. Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(4), 439-459.
Walumbwa, F. O., & Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of applied psychology, 94(5), 1275.
Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human resource management review, 20(2), 115-131.
Webster, J., Brown, G., Zweig, D., Connelly, C. E., Brodt, S., & Sitkin, S. (2008). Beyond knowledge sharing: Withholding knowledge at work. In Research in personnel and human resources management (pp. 1-37). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Zhang, Y., Fang, Y., Wei, K.-K., & Chen, H. (2010). Exploring the role of psychological safety in promoting the intention to continue sharing knowledge in virtual communities. International Journal of Information Management, 30(5), 425-436.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96505-
dc.description.abstract本研究採用便利抽樣法對職場工作者進行問卷調查,探討知識心理所有權、心理安全感及知覺科技取代性分別與知識藏私行為之間的關係。研究結果顯示,知識心理所有權對於裝傻藏私有顯著的正相關,亦即當員工對知識產生所有權時,會造成裝傻藏私的行為。而心理安全感對知識藏私行為有顯著的負相關,也就是當員工有高度的心理安全感時,較不會做出知識藏私的行為。另外,在事後分析中發現知覺科技取代性對於規避性藏私及裝傻藏私行為皆有顯著正相關,亦即知覺科技取代工作的程度越高者,越有可能做出規避性藏私及裝傻藏私的行為。同時,事後分析發現知覺科技取代性對於心理安全感及知識藏私間的關係有中介效果,亦即當員工越感到心理安全,他將越知覺到科技無法取代他的工作,以致於他的規避性藏私的程度較低。根據本研究結果,建議管理者應該增進員工的心理安全感,並正視知識心理所有權及知覺科技取代性的重要性,採取適當的作法以降低知識藏私行為。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study used convenience sampling to survey workplace employees, exploring the relationships between knowledge-based psychological ownership of knowledge, psychological safety, perceived technological replaceability, and knowledge hiding behaviors. The results showed that psychological ownership of knowledge was significantly positively correlated with evasive knowledge hiding, meaning that when employees felt ownership of their knowledge, they were more likely to engage in evasive hiding behaviors. Psychological safety was significantly negatively correlated with knowledge hiding behaviors, indicating that employees with a high sense of psychological safety were less likely to hide their knowledge. Additionally, post hoc analyses revealed that perceived technological replaceability was significantly positively correlated with both evasive and evasive hiding behaviors, meaning that the higher the perceived replaceability by technology, the more likely employees were to engage in these knowledge hiding behaviors. Furthermore, the analyses showed that perceived technological replaceability mediated the relationship between psychological safety and knowledge hiding, meaning that the more psychologically safe employees felt, the less they perceived technology as a threat to their job, and consequently, the lower their tendency to engage in evasive knowledge hiding. Based on the results of this study, it is recommended that managers enhance employees' psychological safety, recognize the importance of psychological ownership of knowledge and perceived technological replaceability, and adopt appropriate measures to reduce knowledge hiding behaviors.en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-02-19T16:16:26Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2025-02-19T16:16:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 I
致謝 II
中文摘要 III
英文摘要 IV
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 4
第三節 研究目的 5
第四節 研究流程 6
第二章 文獻回顧 8
第一節 知識藏私 8
第二節 知識心理所有權 11
第三節 心理安全感 13
第四節 知覺科技取代性 15
第三章 研究方法 18
第一節 研究架構 18
第二節 操作型定義及變項衡量方式 19
第三節 問卷發放及回收 24
第四節 資料分析方法 25
第四章 研究結果 26
第一節 量表信度與效度分析 26
第二節 敘述性統計分析 27
第三節 相關分析 33
第四節 迴歸分析 35
第五節 調節效果檢驗 39
第六節 事後分析 45
第五章 結論與建議 48
第一節 研究結果與討論 49
第二節 實務管理意涵及建議 52
第三節 研究限制及後續研究建議 54
參考文獻 57
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.title員工知識藏私行為的前因 —— 探討知識心理所有權、心理安全感及知覺科技取代性的影響效果zh_TW
dc.titleAntecedents of Employees’ Knowledge Hiding Behavior – Examining the Effects by Knowledge-Based Psychological Ownership, Psychological Safety, and Perceived Technological Replaceabilityen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear113-1-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee羅新興;陳淑貞zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeShin-Shing Lou;Shu-Jen Chenen
dc.subject.keyword心理安全感,知識心理所有權,知識藏私,知覺科技取代性,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordKnowledge Hiding,Knowledge-Based Psychological Ownership,Psychological safety,Perceived Technological Replaceability,en
dc.relation.page61-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202500322-
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)-
dc.date.accepted2025-02-04-
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept商學研究所-
dc.date.embargo-lift2025-02-20-
顯示於系所單位:商學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-113-1.pdf
授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務)
1.46 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved