請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96421
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 堯里昂 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Leon Van Jaarsveldt | en |
dc.contributor.author | Ninon Galladrielle Dorleans | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Ninon Galladrielle Dorleans | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-13T16:23:45Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-02-14 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2025-02-13 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2025-02-05 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Batat, W., & Peter, P. (2020). The healthy and sustainable bugs appetite: factors affecting entomophagy acceptance and adoption in Western food cultures. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37(3), 291-303. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-10-2018-2906
Białek-Dratwa, A., Szczepańska, E., Szymańska, D., Grajek, M., Krupa-Kotara, K., &Kowalski, O. (2022). Neophobia-A Natural Developmental Stage or Feeding Difficulties for Children? Nutrients, 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14071521 Comission, E. (2021). Petits insectes — Grande utilité. L’UE autorise l’utilisation des insectes comme denrées alimentaires. https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/sante/items/712990/fr#:~:text=insectes%20%E2%80%94%20Grande%20utilit%C3%A9.-,L'UE%20autorise%20l'utilisation%20des%20insectes%20comme%20denr%C3%A9es%20alimentaires,b%C3%A9n%C3%A9ficier%20d'une%20telle%20autorisation Collective, C. N. d. l. R. (2021). Plan pluriannuel de diversification des sources de protéines. Comission, E. (2021). Petits insectes — Grande utilité. L’UE autorise l’utilisation des insectes comme denrées alimentaires. https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/sante/items/712990/fr#:~:text=insectes%20%E2%80%94%20Grande%20utilit%C3%A9.-,L'UE%20autorise%20l'utilisation%20des%20insectes%20comme%20denr%C3%A9es%20alimentaires,b%C3%A9n%C3%A9ficier%20d'une%20telle%20autorisation Delgado, L., Garino, C., Moreno, F. J., Zagon, J., & Broll, H. (2022). Sustainable Food Systems: EU Regulatory Framework and Contribution of Insects to the Farm-To-Fork Strategy. Food Reviews International, 2022, № 9, p. 6955-6976. Deroy, O., Reade, B., & Spence, C. (2015). The insectivore’s dilemma, and how to take the West out of it. Food Quality and Preference, 44, 44-55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.02.007 Erhard, A. L., Águas Silva, M., Damsbo-Svendsen, M., Menadeva Karpantschof, B.-E., Sørensen, H., & Bom Frøst, M. (2023). Acceptance of insect foods among Danish children: Effects of information provision, food neophobia, disgust sensitivity, and species on willingness to try. Food Quality and Preference, 104, 104713. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104713 Evanschitzky, H., Eisend, M., Calantone, R. J., & Jiang, Y. (2012). Success factors of product innovation: An updated meta-analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(S1), 21-37. Fondation Nestlé France et, I. (2023). En 2023, les femmes continuent de porter la charge de l’alimentation au sein des familles. https://www.nestle.fr/media/femmes-charge-alimentation-familles Food Data Central. (2019). U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,. https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/171450/nutrients Gallen, C., Pantin-Sohier, G., & Peyrat-Guillard, D. (2018). Cognitive acceptance mechanisms of discontinuous food innovations: The case of insects in France. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition), 34, 205157071879178. https://doi.org/10.1177/2051570718791785 Gallen, C., Pantin-Sohier, G., & Peyrat-Guillard, D. (2021). Familiarisation et diffusion de l’entomophagie en France Innovations. Guillén, M. J. Y., & Rubio, N. (2019). Customer Loyalty and Brand Management. Mdpi AG. https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=KyWxDwAAQBAJ Hartmann, Christina, & Siegrist. (2016). Becoming an insectivore: Results of an experiment. Food Quality and Preference, 51, 118-122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.03.003 Ho, I., Gere, A., Chy, C., & Lammert, A. (2022). Use of Preference Analysis to Identify Early Adopter Mind-Sets of Insect-Based Food Products. Sustainability, 14(3), 1435. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1435 Holt, V. M. (1885). Why Not Eat Insects? London: Field & Tuer, Leadenhall Press. House, J. (2016). Consumer acceptance of insect-based foods in the Netherlands: Academic and commercial implications. Appetite, 107, 47-58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.07.023 Intelligence, M. (2024). Analyse de la taille et de la part du marché des insectes comestibles – Tendances de croissance et prévisions (2024-2029) https://www.mordorintelligence.com/fr/industry-reports/edible-insects-market IPIFF. (2018). The European Insect Sector Today: Challenges, Opportunities and Regulatory Landscape. IPIFF Vision Paper on the Future of the Insect Sector towards 2030. Kauppi. (2016). Insect economy and marketing: How much and in what way could insects be shown in packaging? Aalto University]. Laureati, M. (2021). Associations between food neophobia and responsiveness to “warning” chemosensory sensations in 2 food products in a large population sample Looy, H., Dunkel, F. V., & Wood, J. R. (2014). How then shall we eat? Insect-eating attitudes and sustainable foodways. Agriculture and Human Values, 31(1), 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-013-9450-x Mahajan, V., Muller, E., & Bass, F. M. (1995). Diffusion of New Products: Empirical Generalizations and Managerial Uses. Marketing Science, 14, 79-88. Megido, R., Gierts, C., Blecker, C., Brostaux, Y., Haubruge, É., Alabi, T., & Francis, F. (2016). Consumer acceptance of insect-based alternative meat products in Western countries. Food Quality and Preference, 52, 237-243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.05.004 Meticulous Research. (2023). Europe Edible Insects Market. Meticulous Research. https://www.meticulousresearch.com/pressrelease/795/europe-edible-insects-market-2030#:~:text=According%20to%20this%20latest%20publication,29%25%20from%202023%20to%202030. Mina, G., Peira, G., & Bonadonna, A. (2023). The Potential Future of Insects in the European Food System: A Systematic Review Based on the Consumer Point of View. Foods, 12(3), 646. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12030646 Moore, G. A., & McKenna, R. (1999). Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling High-tech Products to Mainstream Customers. HarperBusiness. https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=cj7EQgAACAAJ Moutinho, A., & Meneses, R. (2023). FOOD NEOPHOBIA AND INTERCULTURAL SENSITIVITY. In (pp. 294-303). Varazdin: Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency (VADEA). Nicklaus, S. (2019). Children’s eating habits. INRAE. https://www.inrae.fr/en/news/sophie-nicklaus-childrens-eating-habits ODOXA. (2017). Communique_Danone_alimentation_infantile. https://www.odoxa.fr/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Communique_Danone_alimentation_infantile.pdf Ruby, & Rozin. (2019). Disgust, sushi consumption, and other predictors of acceptance of insects as food by Americans and Indians. Food Quality and Preference, 74, 155-162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.01.013 Remongin, X. (2019). Découvrir l'alimentation par les cinq sens : les classes du goût. agriculture.gouv.fr: Ministère de l'Agriculture et de la Souveraineté Alimentaire Retrieved from https://agriculture.gouv.fr/decouvrir-lalimentation-par-les-cinq-sens-les-classes-du-gout Remongin, X. (2021). La cantine pour apprendre à bien manger. Ministère de l'agriculture et de la souveraineté alimentaire. https://agriculture.gouv.fr/la-cantine-pour-apprendre-bien-manger Robert, & Veryzer. (2003). Discontinuous Innovation and the New Product Development Process. Journal of Product Innovation Management. Robertson. (1971). Innovative Behavior and Communication. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=3q3xAAAAMAAJ Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovation (Vol. 5th). https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=9U1K5LjUOwEC&lpg=PP1&hl=fr&pg=PR2#v=onepage&q&f=false Rowe, A. (2020). Insects Farmed for Food and Feed - Global Scale, Practices, and Policy. Rozin, P., Fallon, A., & Augustoni-Ziskind, M. (1985). The Child's Conception of Food. The Development of Contamination Sensitivity to "Disgusting" Substances. Developmental Psychology, 21, 1075-1079. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.21.6.1075 Ruby, & Rozin. (2019). Disgust, sushi consumption, and other predictors of acceptance of insects as food by Americans and Indians. Food Quality and Preference, 74, 155-162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.01.013 Sabbagh, M., Gutierrez, L., Lai, R., & Nocella, G. (2023). Consumer Intention towards Buying Edible Beef Offal and the Relevance of Food Neophobia. Foods, 12(12), 2340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12122340 Saidou, C. (2022). Restauration collective : accompagnement pour la mise en œuvre des mesures EGalim agriculture.gouv.fr Retrieved from https://agriculture.gouv.fr/restauration-collective-accompagnement-pour-la-mise-en-oeuvre-des-mesures-egalim Schouteten, J. J., De Steur, H., De Pelsmaeker, S., Lagast, S., Juvinal, J. G., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Verbeke, W., & Gellynck, X. (2016). Emotional and sensory profiling of insect-, plant- and meat-based burgers under blind, expected and informed conditions. Food Quality and Preference, 52, 27-31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.03.011 Schouteten, J. J., De Steur, H., De Pelsmaeker, S., Lagast, S., Juvinal, J. G., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Verbeke, W., & Gellynck, X. (2016). Emotional and sensory profiling of insect-, plant- and meat-based burgers under blind, expected and informed conditions. Food Quality and Preference, 52, 27-31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.03.011 Shelomi, M. (2015). Why we still don't eat insects: Assessing entomophagy promotion through a diffusion of innovations framework. Trends in Food Science & Technology. Siddiqui, S. A., Zannou, O., Ikawati, K., Kasmiati, Awad, N. M. H., Gołaszewski, J., Heinz, V., & Smetana, S. (2022). Avoiding Food Neophobia and Increasing Consumer Acceptance of New Food Trends—A Decade of Research. Sustainability, 14(16), 10391. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610391 Van Huis, Van Itterbeeck, Klunder, Mertens, Halloran, Muir, & Vantomme. (2013). EDIBLE INSECTS future prospects fo food and feed security. Food And Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Forestry Paper 171. Wang, O., Perez-Cueto, F. J. A., Scarpa, R., & Scrimgeour, F. (2024). The influence of innovation-adoption characteristics on consumers' trust and purchase intentions of innovative alternative proteins: A comparison between plant-based food, cultured food, and insect-based food. Food Quality and Preference, 113, 105072. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105072 Ynsect. (2023). https://www.ynsect.com/ Zhao, X., Vázquez-Gutiérrez, J. L., Johansson, D. P., Landberg, R., & Langton, M. (2016). Yellow Mealworm Protein for Food Purposes - Extraction and Functional Properties. PLoS One, 11(2), e0147791. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147791 Zugravu, C., Tarcea, M., Nedelescu, M., Nuţă, D., Guiné, R. P. F., & Constantin, C. (2023). Knowledge: A Factor for Acceptance of Insects as Food. Sustainability, 15(6), 4820. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064820 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96421 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 自 2021 年起,歐盟已將昆蟲基食品的生產、銷售與消費合法化。本質性研究透過深入訪談,探討影響法國家庭嘗試及採納此類產品的因素。性別扮演關鍵角色:男性普遍抗拒昆蟲食品,更偏好傳統肉類飲食,且對環境關注較低;相較之下,女性的生態意識較高,並對家庭環境影響承擔較大責任,因此展現出更開放的態度。教育程度亦是影響因素之一。受過較高教育的父母更重視飲食多樣性,較可能向子女介紹新型食品(包括昆蟲);反之,教育程度較低的父母更注重便利性及子女的飲食偏好,並通常預期孩子會抗拒陌生食物。有機產品消費者對昆蟲食品持謹慎開放態度,而對有機標籤及加工食品持懷疑態度者則表現出不信任。偏好植物性蛋白的家庭較易接受昆蟲食品,而肉類攝取量較高的家庭則接受度較低。產品的呈現方式至關重要:若昆蟲成分被掩蓋,並類似於傳統食品,接受度較高。然而,人們對加工食品普遍存有強烈排斥心理,擔憂未知成分及潛在健康風險。口味與價格仍然是主要考量因素,特別是在通膨及有機產品價格較高的背景下。雖然生態與營養益處能夠提升接受度,但仍次於即時的飲食考量。部分家長從長遠角度出發,認為未來可能需要依賴昆蟲食品。強調本地生產、透明性及永續發展做法有助於提升信任感。有效的推廣策略應針對不同消費者類型,強調熟悉感,並減少對加工食品的疑慮,以促進永續飲食的推廣。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Insect-based products legalized for production, sale, and consumption in the European Union since 2021. Through in-depth interviews, this qualitative study aims to understand the factors influencing the willingness to try and adopt these products among French families. Gender plays a significant role: men generally resist insect-based foods, favor traditional meat diets, and show lower environmental concern, while women exhibit higher ecological awareness and feel a greater responsibility for their household’s environmental impact, fostering more openness. Education level also matters, with higher-educated parents valuing dietary diversity and being more likely to introduce their children to new foods, including insects. In contrast, those with lower education levels prioritize convenience and children’s preferences, often anticipating resistance to unfamiliar foods. Organic product consumers are cautiously open to insect-based foods, whereas skeptics of organic labels and processed foods express distrust. Families favoring plant-based proteins are more open to insect-based products, while high meat consumption negatively affects acceptance. Presentation is crucial: products that mask the insect origin and resemble familiar food categories are more accepted. However, there is a strong aversion to processed foods, with participants fearing unknown ingredients and potential health risks. Taste and price remain the primary considerations, heightened by inflation and the high cost of organic products. While ecological and nutritional benefits positively influence acceptance, they are secondary to immediate concerns. Parents' forward-looking perspectives highlight the potential future necessity of insect consumption. Emphasizing local production, transparency, and sustainable practices can enhance trust. Effective promotion must address these factors, tailoring strategies to diverse consumer profiles and emphasizing familiarity while mitigating fears of processed foods. sustainability. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-02-13T16:23:45Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-02-13T16:23:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | ACKNOWLEDGMENT ............................................................................................................................ I
ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................... II TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................... IV LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES ........................................................................................................ VI CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 RESEARCH TOPIC AND GOAL ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 RESEARCH SCOPE ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 RESEARCH PROBLEM .......................................................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW .................................................................................................. 5 2.1 INSECTS AND THEIR BENEFITS ............................................................................................................. 5 2.2 INSECT FOOD ACCEPTANCE BARRIERS ................................................................................................. 7 2.3 INSECT-FOOD ADOPTION POSITIVE FACTORS ..................................................................................... 10 2.4 SCHOOL CAFETERIA AND COLLECTIVE CATERING: A POTENTIAL ENTRY POINT FOR INSECT-BASED FOOD ...................................................................................................................................................... 11 CHAPTER 3. METHOD ......................................................................................................................... 13 3.1 PRE-INTERVIEW QUESTIONS .............................................................................................................. 14 CHAPTER 4. STUDY RESULTS .......................................................................................................... 16 4.1 RESULTS PRESENTATION ................................................................................................................... 16 4.1.1 Pre-interview survey results ..................................................................................................... 16 4.1.2 Participants General Attitude Evaluation Grid Results ........................................................... 18 4.1.3 Online One on One interview results ....................................................................................... 19 4.1.4 Dietary habits .......................................................................................................................... 19 4.1.5 Opinion on insect-based products ............................................................................................ 23 4.2 STUDY FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................... 26 4.2.1 General observations ............................................................................................................... 26 4.2.2 Characteristics of the profile Influencing the willingness to try insect-based products ........... 27 4.2.3 Characteristics of the products Influencing the willingness to try ........................................... 30 CHAPTER 5. DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................... 33 5.1 KEY FINDINGS AND CONTRIBUTIONS ................................................................................................ 33 5.1.1 A Better Understanding Of The Customer Target .................................................................... 33 5.1.2 An Insight Of Product Characteristics Influencing The Adoption ........................................... 34 5.1.3 A Clearer Vision of Distribution Strategy ................................................................................ 35 5.1.4 Addressing Pricing Challenges ................................................................................................ 35 CHAPTER 6. CONCLUSION................................................................................................................. 36 6.1 RESEARCH CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................. 36 6.2 LIMITATIONS ..................................................................................................................................... 39 6.2.1 Unequal Distribution of Participants by Gender and Occupation .......................................... 39 6.2.2 Volunteering Bias ..................................................................................................................... 39 6.2.3 Confirmation Bias and “People Pleasing” Behavior .............................................................. 40 6.2.4 Sensory Not Fully Explored ..................................................................................................... 40 6.2.5 Lack of Longitudinal Data ....................................................................................................... 40 6.2.6 Potential Influence of Media and Public Perception ............................................................... 41 6.3 FUTURE RESEARCH ........................................................................................................................... 41 6.3.1 Expanded Sample Size and Contextual Settings ...................................................................... 41 6.3.2 Longitudinal Studies on Adoption and Consumption Patterns ................................................ 42 6.3.3 Sensory and Culinary Exploration ........................................................................................... 42 6.3.4 Broader Demographic Studies ................................................................................................. 43 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................................... 44 APPENDIX ............................................................................................................................................... 49 APPENDIX A. PRE-INTERVIEW SURVEY: .................................................................................................. 49 APPENDIX B. INTERVIEW QUESTIONS ..................................................................................................... 50 APPENDIX C. CURRENT EXISTING INSECT-BASED PRODUCT .................................................................... 53 LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES TABLE 1: PARTICIPANT GENERAL ATTITUDE EVALUATION GRID ................................................................... 15 TABLE 2: PRE-INTERVIEW SURVEY RESULTS: AGE, GENDER, LEVEL OF IMPORTANCE GIVEN TO ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION .............................................................................................................. 17 TABLE 3: PRE-INTERVIEW SURVEY RESULTS: LEVEL OF EDUCATION, PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITY, WORKING FIELD ................................................................................................................................................. 17 TABLE 4: PRE-INTERVIEW SURVEY RESULTS: NUMBER OF CHILDREN, AGE OF THE YOUNGEST CHILD, AGE OF THE OLDEST CHILD ............................................................................................................................. 18 TABLE 5: MONTHLY GROCERY BUDGET ....................................................................................................... 19 TABLE 6: MOST CONSUMED PROTEINS ........................................................................................................ 20 TABLE 7: FOOD PURCHASE CRITERIA .......................................................................................................... 21 TABLE 8: PARTICIPANTS CARED ABOUT FACTORS ........................................................................................ 22 TABLE 9: DISCOURAGING FACTORS TO INSECTS-BASED PRODUCT CONSUMPTION ....................................... 25 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.title | 研究影響法國都會家庭採行以昆蟲為未來糧食的因素 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Study Of The Factors Influencing The Adoption Of Entomophagy In Families’ Diet In Metropolitan France | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 113-1 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉心才;張佳欽 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Hsin Tsai Liu;Jia-King Chang | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 食用昆蟲,飲食習慣,顛覆性創新擴散,法國,永續性,新食品, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Entomophagy,Eating habits,Disruptive Innovation Diffusion,France,Sustainability,New food, | en |
dc.relation.page | 53 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202500407 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2025-02-06 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 企業管理碩士專班 | - |
dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-02-14 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 管理學院企業管理專班(Global MBA) |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-113-1.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務) | 679.97 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。