請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/95641完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 姜皇池 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Huang-chih Chiang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 羅翔 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Julian Hsiang Luo | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-15T16:16:04Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-09-16 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-09-14 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-08-07 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | REFERENCES
Books 2 OPPENHEIM, L. (1955), OPPENHEIM’S INTERNATIONAL LAW (8th ed.). BUNDESMINISTERIUM DER VERTEIDIGUNG [FEDERAL MINISTRY OF DEFENSE] (2013), JOINT SERVICE REGULATION (ZDV) 15/2, LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT – MANUAL. CANCIAN, MARK F., MATTHEW CANCIAN & ERIC HEGINBOTHAM (2023), CTR. STRATEGIC & INT’L STUD., THE FIRST BATTLE OF THE NEXT WAR: WARGAMING A CHINESE INVASION OF Taiwan. CHIANG, HUANG-CHIH (姜皇池) ET AL. (2020), HAISHANG WUZHUANG CHONGTU FA ZHI HAISHANG FENGSUO: GUOQU FAZHAN YU DANGDAI FALU YIYI (海上武裝衝突法之海上封鎖：過去發展與當代法律意義) [MARITIME BLOCKADE IN THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT: PAST DEVELOPMENTS AND CONTEMPORARY LEGAL SIGNIFICANCE]. COLOMBOS, C. JOHN (1959), THE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE SEA (4th rev. ed.). CUNNINGHAM, DAVID T. (2012), THE NAVAL BLOCKADE: A STUDY OF FACTORS NECESSARY FOR EFFECTIVE UTILIZATION. DOHA INTERNATIONAL FAMILY INSTITUTION (2019), THE IMPACT OF THE BLOCKADE ON FAMILIES IN QATAR. DREW, PHILLIP (2017), THE LAW OF MARITIME BLOCKADE: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE (Paola Gaeta & Salvatore Zappala eds.). HUANG, CHI-MING (黃啟銘) (2001), GUOJI FA SHANG FENGSUO ZHIDU JIANLUN ZHONGGONG DUEITAI FENGSUO ZHI SHIYONG WENTI (國際法上封鎖制度兼論中共對台封鎖之適用問題) [BLOCKADE IN INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE QUESTION OF APPLICABILITY ON CHINESE COMMUNIST BLOCKADE OF TAIWAN]. INT’L CRISIS GROUP (2023), PREVENTING WAR IN THE TAIWAN STRAIT, https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/north-east-asia/taiwan-strait-china/333-preventing-war-taiwan-strait. INT’L INST. HUMANITARIAN L. (1995), SAN REMO MANUAL ON INTERNATIONAL LAW APPLICABLE TO ARMED CONFLICTS AT SEA (Louise Doswald-Beck ed.). JESTRAB, MAREK (2023), ATLANTIC COUNCIL, A MARITIME BLOCKADE OF TAIWAN BY THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: A STRATEGY TO DEFEAT FEAR AND COERCION. JOINT DOCTRINE AND CONCEPTS CENTRE (2004), JOINT SERVICE MANUAL OF THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT. KRASKA, JAMES ET AL. (2023), THE NEWPORT MANUAL ON THE LAW OF NAVAL WARFARE. LAUTERPACHT, SIR HERSCH (1948), RECOGNITION IN INTERNATIONAL LAW. LIN, HUNG I (林宏一) (2009), FENGSUO DALU YANHAI ── ZHONGHUA MINGUO ZHENGFU DE “GUANBI ZHENGCE”, 1949-1960 (封鎖大陸沿海──中華民國政府的「關閉政策」，1949-1960) [BLOCKADING THE CHINA COAST: THE “PORT-CLOSURE POLICY” OF ROC GOVERNMENT, 1949-1960]. MARIAMI KAKABADZE, THE BLACK SEA GRAIN INITIATIVE: ANALYSING THE EMERGING, IMPLEMENTATION AND CHALLENGES (2023). NAT’L DEF. (2024), LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT AT THE OPERATIONAL AND TACTICAL LEVELS. OFF. OF GENERAL COUNSEL DEP. OF DEF. (2015), DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE LAW OF WAR MANUAL. PALMER, SIR GEOFFREY ET AL. (2011), REPORT OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL’S PANEL OF INQUIRY ON THE 31 MAY 2010 FLOTILLA INCIDENT. PAPASTAVRIDIS, EFTHYMIOS (2013), THE INTERCEPTION OF VESSELS ON THE HIGH SEAS: CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES TO THE LEGAL ORDER OF THE OCEANS. PROGRAM ON HUMANITARIAN POLICY AND CONFLICT RESEARCH AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY (2013), MANUAL ON INTERNATIONAL LAW APPLICABLE TO AIR AND MISSILE WARFARE. SCHMITT, MICHAEL N. (2013), TALLINN MANUAL ON THE INTERNATIONAL LAW APPLICABLE TO CYBER WARFARE. SUBSIDIARY ORGANS OF THE U.N. SEC. COUNCIL, FACT SHEET (2023), https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/sanctions/information. THE TURKEL COMMISSION (2010), THE PUBLIC COMMISSION TO EXAMINE THE MARITIME INCIDENT OF 31 MAY 2010. TURKISH NATIONAL COMMISSION OF INQUIRY (2011), REPORT ON THE ISRAELI ATTACK ON THE HUMANITARIAN AID CONVOY TO GAZA ON 31 MAY 2010. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (2023), MILITARY AND SECURITY DEVELOPMENTS INVOLVING THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA. U.S. NAVY, U.S. MARINE CORPS & U.S. COAST GUARD (2022), THE COMMANDER’S HANDBOOK ON THE LAW OF NAVAL OPERATIONS. WILLIAMSON, ROSS (2013), A FRIENDLY DEMONSTRATION OF FORCE: PACIFIC BLOCKADE, INTERNATIONAL LAW AND STATE IDENTITY, 1827 TO 1921. Articles Alexander, Amanda (2015), A Short History of International Humanitarian Law, 26(1) EUR. J. INT’L L. 109. Barlow, Jeffrey G. (2006), The Cuban Missile Crisis, in NAVAL BLOCKADES AND SEAPOWER: STRATEGIES AND COUNTER-STRATEGIES 1805-2005, at 157 (Bruce Elleman & S. C. M. Paine eds.). Barnett, Roger W. (2005), Technology and Naval Blockade: Past Impact and Future Prospects, 58(3) NAVAL WAR COLL. REV. 87. Benoliel, Daniel (2011), Israel, Turkey, and the Gaza Blockade, 33(2) U. PA. J. INT’L L. 615. Biggs, Adam et al. (2021), Theories of Naval Blockades and Their Application in the Twenty-First Century, 74(1) NAVAL WAR COLL. REV. 79. Boothby, William H. (2009), Weapons in Sea Warfare, in WEAPONS AND THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT 280. Buchan, Russell (2012), The Palmer Report and the Legality of Israel’s Naval Blockade of Gaza, 61(1) INT’L & COMPAR. L. Q. 264. Chamberlain, Joseph P. (1933), Embargo as a Sanction of International Law, in Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at Its Annual Meeting 66 (April 27-29). Chan, Steve & A. Cooper Drury (2000), Sanctions as Economic Statecraft: An Overview, in SANCTIONS AS ECONOMIC STATECRAFT: THEORY AND PRACTICE 1 (Steve Chan & A. Cooper Drury eds.). Chang, I-Ching (張怡菁) (2007), Taihai Weiji Zhong ZhongguoDui Tai Jun Jing Fengsuo zhi Guoji Fali Yanjiu (臺海危機中中共對臺軍經封鎖之國際法理研究) [The PRC’s Naval Blockade Against during the Taiwan Straits Crises: A Theoretical Analysis of International Law], 5(2) ZHANWANG YU TANSUO 40 (展望與探索) [OUTLOOK & EXPLORATION]. Chen, Chen-Ju (2019), Lun Haishang Junshi Huodong zhi Guoji Fa Gueifan (論海上軍事活動之國際法規範) [International Legal Norms Governing Naval Military Activities], 160 NCCU L. REV. 83. Chetail, Vincent (2002), Humanitarian Values for the 21st Century, 21(3) REFUGEE SURVEY Q. 199. Christol, Carl Q. & Charles E. Davis (1963), Maritime Quarantine: The Naval Interdiction of Offensive Weapons and Associated Matériel to Cuba, 1962, 57(3) AM. J. INT’L L. 525. Colby, Elbridge (2023), A Strategy of Denial for the Western Pacific, 149(3) PROCEEDINGS 1441, https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2023/march/ strategy-denial-western-pacific. Dickinson, Edwin D. (1930), The Closure of Ports in Control of Insurgents, 24(1) AM. J. INT’L L. 69. Drew, Phillip J. (2018), Blockade? A Legal Assessment of the Maritime Interdiction of Yemen’s Ports, ANU COLL. L. RSCH. PAPER No. 18.18, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3266213. Drezner, Daniel W. (2011), Sanctions Sometimes Smart: Targeted Sanctions in Theory and Practice, 13(1) INT’L STUD. REV. 96. Droege, Cordula & Eirini Giorgou (2022), How International Humanitarian Law Develops, 104 INT’L REV. RED CROSS 1798. Elleman, Bruce A. & S. C. M. Paine (2006), Introduction to NAVAL BLOCKADES AND SEAPOWER: STRATEGIES AND COUNTER-STRATEGIES 1805-2005, at 3 (Bruce Elleman & S. C. M. Paine eds.). Elleman, Bruce A. (2006), The Nationalist’ Blockade of the PRC, in NAVAL BLOCKADES AND SEAPOWER: STRATEGIES AND COUNTER-STRATEGIES 1805-2005, at 131 (Bruce Elleman & S. C. M. Paine eds.). Elleman, Bruce A. (2019), The Taiwan Strait Crises (1954–55 and 1958), in THE MAKING OF THE MODERN CHINESE NAVY 51. Epkenhans, Michael (2022), German Naval Strategy in the World War I and World War II, in SHARING EXPERIENCES IN THE 20TH CENTURY: JOINT RESEARCH ON MILITARY HISTORY 25 (Tomoyuki Ishizu & Frank Reichherzer eds.). Erakat, Noura (2012), It’s Not Wrong, It’s Illegal: Situating the Gaza Blockade between International Law and the UN Response, 11 UCLA J. ISLAMIC & NEAR E. L. 37. Fenrick, W. J. (1986), The Exclusion Zone Device in the Law of Naval Warfare, 24 CAN. Y.B. INT’L L. 91. Finck, François (2016), The State Between Fact and Law: The Role of Recognition and the Conditions under Which It Is Granted in the Creation of New States, 36 POLISH YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 51. Fink, Martin D. (2017), Naval Blockade and the Humanitarian Crisis in Yemen, 65(2) NETH. INT’L L. REV. 291. Fisher, Jr., Richard D. (1997), China’s Missiles Over the Taiwan Strait: A Political and Military Assessment, in CRISIS IN THE TAIWAN STRAIT 167 (James R. Lilley & Chuck Downs eds.). Forsberg, Tuomas (1996), Explaining Territorial Disputes: From Power Politics to Normative Reasons, 33(4) J. PEACE RSCH. 433. Fraunces, Michael G. (1992), The International Law of Blockade: New Guiding Principles in Contemporary State Practices, 101(4) YALE L.J. 893. Frostad, Magne (2018), Naval Blockade, 9 ARCTIC REV. L. & POL. 195. Gretton, Peter (1975), The Nyon Conference - The Naval Aspect, 90 ENG. HISTORICAL REV. 103. Guilfoyle, Douglas (2011), The Mavi Marmara Incident and Blockade in Armed Conflict, 81(1) BRIT. Y.B. INT’L L. 171. Gunness, Kristen & Phillip C. Saunders (2022), Averting Escalation and Avoiding War: Lessons from the 1995–1996 Taiwan Strait Crisis, 17 CHINA STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 1. Heath, Timothy R. (2016), China’s Evolving Approach to Economic Diplomacy, 22 ASIA POL’Y 157. Hofer, Alexandra (2023), The EU’s “Massive and Targeted” Sanctions in Response to Russian Aggression, a Contradiction in Terms, in CAMBRIDGE YEARBOOK OF EUROPEAN LEGAL STUDIES 1. Ichimasa, Sukeyuki (2017), Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Economic Sanctions: Can Non-Military Sanctions Stop Nuclear Proliferation?, 19(2) NIDS SEC. STUD. 59. Islam, Mohammad Saidul (2018), The Historical Evolution of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) from Earliest Societies to Modern Age, 9 BEIJING L. REV. 294. Kennedy, Greg (2007), Intelligence and the Blockade, 1914–17: A Study in Administration, Friction and Command, 22(3) INTEL. & NAT’L SEC. 699. Kraska, James (2010), Rule Selection in the Case of Israel’s Naval Blockade of Gaza: Law of Naval Warfare or Law of the Sea?, 13 Y.B. INT’L HUMANITARIAN LAW 367. Leckow, Ross (1988), The Iran-Iraq Conflict in the Gulf: The Law of War Zones, 37(3) INT’L & COMP. L.Q. 629. Levie, Howard (1985), The Falklands Crisis and the Laws of War, 70 INT’L L. STUD. 203. Mantilla, Giovanni (2024), From Treaty to Custom: Shifting Paths in the Recent Development of International Humanitarian Law, 37 LEIDEN J. INT’L L. 1. Markowitz, Jonathan N. & Christopher J. Fariss (2018), Power, Proximity, and Democracy: Geopolitical Competition in the International System, 55 J. PEACE RSCH. 78. Mayama, Akira (2023), Chūgoku ni Yoru Tai Taiwan Kaijō Kōtsū Bōgai no Kokusai Hōteki Kentō - Chūgoku no Kokoromiru Zonal Measure [International Law Review of China’s Obstruction of Maritime Traffic to Taiwan – China’s Attempt at Zonal Measure], 986 KŌRYŪ 9. Meeker, Leonard C. (1963), Defensive Quarantine and the Law, 57(3) AM. J. INT’L L. 515. Meilinger, Colonel Phillip S. (1995), Whoever Controls the Air Generally Controls the Surface, in TEN PROPOSITIONS REGARDING AIRPOWER 1. Michaelsen, Christopher (2003), Maritime Exclusion Zones in Times of Armed Conflict at Sea: Legal Controversies still Unresolved, 8(2) J. CONFLICT & SEC. L. 363. Mijalković, Saša & Dušan Blagojević (2014), The Basis of National Security in International Law, 19(1) MEĐUNARONOPRAVNI OSNOVI NACIONALNE BEZBEDNOSTI 49. Moos, Malcolm (1944), The Navicert in World War II, 38(1) AM. J. INT’L L. 115. Muller, Commander David G. (1984), A Chinese Blockade of Taiwan, 110(9) U.S. NAVAL INST. 979, https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/1984/september/ chinese-blockade-taiwan. Nahlik, Stanislaw E. (1984), A Brief Outline of International Humanitarian Law, 24 INT’L REV. RED CROSS 187. O’Rourke, Vernon A. (1937), Recognition of Belligerency and the Spanish War, 31(3) AM. J. INT’L L. 398. Onorato, Michael P. (1968), The Opening of Japan 1849-1854: America Finds the “Key”, 6(3) ASIAN STUD. J. 286. Özdamar, Özgür & Evgeniia Shahin (2021), Consequences of Economic Sanctions: The State of the Art and Paths Forward, 23 INT’L STUD. REV. 1646. Pedrozo, Raul (Pete) (2022), Maritime Exclusion Zones in Armed Conflicts, 99 INT’L L. STUD. 526. Pictet, Jean (1966), The Principles of International Humanitarian Law, 6 INT’L REV. RED CROSS 455. Rahman, Chris (2006), Ballistic Missiles in China’s Anti-Taiwan Blockade Strategy, in NAVAL BLOCKADES AND SEAPOWER: STRATEGIES AND COUNTER-STRATEGIES 1805-2005, at 214 (Bruce Elleman & S. C. M. Paine eds.). Roach, J. Ashley (2000), The Law of Naval Warfare at the Turn of Two Centuries, 94(1) AM. J. INT’L L. 64. Robertson, William Spence (1944), French Intervention in Mexico in 1838, 24(3) HISPANIC AM. HISTORICAL REV. 222. Schachter, Oscar (1984), The Right of States to Use Armed Force, 82 MICH. L. REV. 1620. Schmitt, Michael N. (2014), Rewired Warfare: Rethinking the Law of Cyber Attack, 96 INT’L REV. RED CROSS 189. Schmitt, Michael N. (2020), International Humanitarian Law and the Targeting of Non-State Intelligence Personnel and Objects, 30 DUKE J. COMPAR. & INT’L L. 309. Scott, James Brown (1914), The Declaration of London of February 26, 1909, 8(2) AM. J. INT’L L. 274. Sergeant, Gary (2023), Slicing Away at the Status Quo: Beijing’s Cross-Strait Strategy, No. GPP06 COUNCIL ON GEOSTRATEGY (December). Seybolt, Taylor B. (2008), Controversies about Humanitarian Military Intervention, in HUMANITARIAN MILITARY INTERVENTION: THE CONDITIONS FOR SUCCESS AND FAILURE 1. Shanker, P. R. (2022), The Strait Too Wide and the Island Too Far, 11(2) INST. NAT’L DEF. SEC. RSCH. 9, https://indsr.org.tw/en/respublicationcon?uid=15&resid=1929 &pid=3608&typeid=3. Sivakumaran, Sandesh (2016), Exclusion Zones in the Law of Armed Conflict at Sea: Evolution in Law and Practice, 92 INT’L L. STUD. 153. Stampfl, Billy (2024), Diversifying Trade: Where Taiwan Stands Today, and Where It Should Go Tomorrow, 9(3) GLOB. TAIWAN BRIEF (February 7), https://global taiwan.org/2024/02/diversifying-trade-where-taiwan-stands-today-and-where-it-sh ould-go-tomorrow/. Steinbach, Armin et al. (2023), Economic Sanctions and Human Rights: Quantifying the Legal Proportionality Principle, 36 HARV. HUMAN RIGHTS J. 1. Still Jr., William N. (1983), A Naval Sieve: The Union Blockade in the Civil War, 36(3) NAVAL WAR COLL. REV. 38. Tsipis, Kosta (1975), The Accuracy of Strategic Missiles, 233(1) SCI. AM. 14. Tsou, Jing-Wen & Ming-Tong Chen (鄒景雯, 陳明通) (2015), Guojia Anchuan Weiji Chuli Jizhi: Yi 1996 Nian Taihai Weiji Gean Weili (國家安全危機處理機制：以1996年臺海危機個案為例) [National Security Crisis Management Mechanism: Take the 1996 Taiwan Strait Crisis as an Example], 33(4) SOOCHOW J. POLI. SCI. 133. Tung, Chen-Yuan et al. (2024), Taiwan and the Global Semiconductor Supply Chain, MONTHLY REPORT OF TAIPEI REPRESENTATIVE OFFICE IN SINGAPORE. Vadapalli, Amulya (2023), Justice Without Power: Yemen and the Global Legal System, 121(5) U. MICH. L. SCH. 811. von Heinegg, Wolff Heintschel (2000), Naval Blockade, 75 INT’L L. STUD. 203. von Heinegg, Wolff Heintschel (2006), Naval Blockade and International Law, in NAVAL BLOCKADES AND SEAPOWER: STRATEGIES AND COUNTER-STRATEGIES 1805-2005, at 10 (Bruce Elleman & S. C. M. Paine eds.). Warshauer, Connor (2020), The Key Factors Driving CCP Opposition to Taiwanese Independence, 3288 INDEP. STUDY PROJECT COLLECTION 1, https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/3288. Washburn, Albert H. (1921), The Legality of the Pacific Blockade I, 21(1) COLUM. L. REV. 55. Wilson, Robert R. (1937), Recognition of Insurgency and Belligerency, in Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at Its Annual Meeting (1921-1969), at 136. Wright, Quincy (1963), The Cuban Quarantine, 57(3) AM. J. INT’L L. 546. Wright, Quincy (1967), International Law and the American Civil War, 61 PROCEEDINGS AM. SOC’Y INT’L L. ANN. MEETING 50. Yang, Tsong-Hsin (楊宗新) (2023), Gongjun Dui Tai Junyan Zhanxian zhi Fengsuo Yitu Yanxi (共軍對臺軍演展現之封鎖意圖研析) [An Analysis of the Blockade Intent Demonstrated by the PLA against Taiwan in Military Exercises], 692 AIR FORCE BIMONTHLY JOURNAL 55. Treaties and International Frameworks Convention (XIII) concerning the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers in Naval War, 1907, INT’L COMM. RED CROSS, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/hague-conv-xiii-1907. Convention on the Law of the Sea, December 10, 1982, 1833 U.N.T.S. 397. Declaration concerning the Laws of Naval War, Feb. 26, 1909, 15 INT’L L. STUD. 97. Declaration Respecting Maritime Law, April 16, 1856, https://ihl-databases.icrc. org/en/ihl-treaties/paris-decl-1856/declaration?activeTab=undefined. Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, August 12, 1949, 75 U.N.T.S. 287. Initiative on the Safe Transportation of Grain and Foodstuffs from Ukrainian Ports, Rus.-Turk.-Ukr.-U.N., July 22, 2022, https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/ black_sea_grain_initiative_full_text.pdf. Inter-American Treaty of Reciprocal Assistance and Final Act of the Inter-American Conference of the Maintenance of Continental Peace and Security, September 2, 1947, 21 U.N.T.S. 93. Manual of the Laws of Naval War, Oxford, August 9, 1913, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/pt/ihl-treaties/oxford-manual-1913?activeTab=historical. Memorandum of Understanding between the Russian Federation and the Secretariat of the United Nations on Promoting Russian food Products and Fertilizers to the World Markets, Rus.-U.N., July 22, 2022, https://news.un.org/pages/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/MOU_21_July_UN-Secretariat86.pdf. U.N. Charter. U.N. Documents Human Rights Council, Report of the International Fact-Finding Mission to Investigate Violations of International Law, including International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law, resulting from the Israeli Attacks on the Flotilla of Ships Carrying Humanitarian Assistance, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/15/21 (October 6, 2010). Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons - Advisory Opinion, 1996 I.C.J. 226 (July 8). Letter dated 23 October 1962 from the Secretary-General of the Organization of American States addressed to the Acting Secretary-General of the United Nations, U.N. Doc. S/5193 (October 25, 1962). Permanent Representative of Argentina to the U.N., Letter Dated 30 April 1982 from the Permanent Representative of Argentina to the United Nations Addressed to the President of the Security Council, U.N. Doc. S/15018 (April 30, 1982). Permanent Representative of Argentina to the U.N., Letter Dated 9 April 1982 from the Permanent Representative of Argentina to the United Nations Addressed to the President of the Security Council, U.N. Doc. S/14961 (April 9, 1982). Permanent Representative of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the U.N., Letter Dated 24 April 1982 from the Permanent Representative of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the United Nations Addressed to the President of the Security Council, U.N. Doc. S/14997 (April 24, 1982). Permanent Representative of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the U.N., Letter Dated 28 April 1982 from the Permanent Representative of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the United Nations Addressed to the President of the Security Council, U.N. Doc. S/15006 (April 28, 1982). S.C. Res. 2201 (February 15, 2015). S.C. Res. 2216 (April 14, 2015). United States of America: Draft Resolution, U.N. Doc. S/5182 (October 22, 1962). U.S. Documents Proclamation 3504—Interdiction of the Delivery of Offensive Weapons to Cuba, UC SANTA BARBARA (October 23, 1962), https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ documents/proclamation-3504-interdiction-the-delivery-offensive-weapons-cuba. Taiwan Relations Act of 1979, 22 U.S.C. 3301. EU Document 2015 O.J. (C265) 93. PRC Documents Dongbu Zhanqu Fabu “Lianhe Lijian – 2024A” Yanxi Quyu Shiyitu (东部战区发布”联合利剑—2024A”演习区域示意图) [The Eastern Theater Command released an illustrative map of the ‘Joint Sword-2024A’ exercise area], TAIWAN AFFAIRS OFF. OF THE STATE COUNCIL (国务院台办) (May 23, 2024), http://www.gwytb. gov.cn/bmst/202405/t20240523_12622327.htm. Li Keqiang, Report on the Work of the Government: Delivered at the First Session of the 14th National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China, STATE COUNCIL OF CHINA. Li Qiang, Report on the Work of the Government: Delivered at the Second Session of the 14th National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China, STATE COUNCIL OF CHINA. The One-China Principle and the Taiwan Issue, LAWINFOCHINA (February 1, 2000), http://www.lawinfochina.com/display.aspx?lib =dbref&id=21. The Taiwan Question and China’s Reunification in the New Era, LAWINFOCHINA (August 1, 2022), https://www.lawinfochina.com/display.aspx?id=346&lib=dbref &SearchKeyword=&SearchCKeyword=. The Taiwan Question and Reunification of China, CHINA, http://www.china. org.cn/english/taiwan/7953. Xinhua She Shochuan Gonggao (新华社受权公告) [Xinhua News Agency Authorized Announcement], XINHUA NET (新华网) (August 2, 2022), http://www. news.cn/politics/2022-08/02/c_1128885591.htm. Russian Document Communication from the Government of the Russian Federation, May 30, 2022, IMO Circular Letter No. 4577. Internet Sources 2023 Fact Sheet, U.N. SEC. COUNCIL (September 7, 2023), https://www.un.org/ securitycouncil/content/committees-working-groups-and-ad-hoc-bodies. 2024 Military Strength Ranking, GLOBAL FIRE POWER, https://www.global firepower.com/countries-listing.php. About the Institute, INSTITUT DE DROIT INT’L, https://www.idi-iil.org/en/a-propos/. Angel, Maytaal, Explainer: Have Western Sanctions on Russia Impacted its Fertiliser Exports?, REUTERS (May 11, 2023), https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/have-western-sanctions-russia-impacted-its-fertiliser-exports-2023-05-11/. Baron, James, The Glorious Contradictions of Lee Teng-hui, THE DIPLOMAT (August 18, 2020), https://thediplomat.com/2020/08/the-glorious-contradictions-of-lee-teng-hui/. Black Sea Grain Initiative Offers Hope, Shows Power of Trade, UNCTAD (October 20, 2022), https://unctad.org/news/black-sea-grain-initiative-offers-hope-shows-power-trade. Blanchard, Ben, China’s Xi Says ‘Reunification’ with Taiwan Is Inevitable, REUTERS (January 1, 2024), https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/china-calls-taiwan-president-frontrunner-destroyer-peace-2023-12-31/. Blanchette, Jude, What is Beijing’s Timeline for “Reunification” with Taiwan?, CSIS (May 26, 2023), https://interpret.csis.org/what-is-beijings-timeline-for-reunifica tion-with-taiwan/. Blumenthal, Dan & Frederick W. Kagan, China’s Three Roads to Controlling Taiwan, CRITICAL THREATS (March 13, 2023), https://www.criticalthreats.org/analysis/ chinas-three-roads-to-controlling-taiwan. Brands, Hal, How Would China Take Over Taiwan? One of These 5 Strategies, AM. ENTER. INST. (November 5, 2023), https://www.aei.org/op-eds/how-would-china-take-over-taiwan-one-of-these-5-strategies/. BRITANNICA, Anaconda Plan, https://www.britannica.com/event/Anaconda-plan. BRITANNICA, Blockade, https://www.britannica.com/topic/blockade-warfare (last visited March 14, 2024). BRITANNICA, Contraband (International Law), https://www.britannica.com/topic/ contraband. BRITANNICA, Cuban Missile Crisis, https://www.britannica.com/event/Cuban-missile-crisis. Burgers, Tobias & Scott Romaniuk, Is China Done With Salami Slicing?, THEDIPLOMAT (May 1, 2021), https://thediplomat.com/2021/04/is-china-done-with-salami-slicing/. Canada’s Human Rights Commitments, CAN. GOV’T, (September 14, 2022), https://www.international.gc.ca/world-monde/issues_development-enjeux_develo ppement/human_rights-droits_homme/commitments-engagements.aspx?lang=eng. CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, Toward a Fourth Taiwan Strait Crisis?, https://www.csis.org/analysis/toward-fourth-taiwan-strait-crisis. Chinese-Fired Ballistic Missiles Fall into Japan’s EEZ: Gov’t, KYODO NEWS (August 5, 2022), https://english.kyodonews.net/news/2022/08/a901e23a7695-urgent-chine se-fired-ballistic-missiles-fall-into-japans-eez-govt.html. Chung, Yu-Chen & Frances Huang, China’s Large Military Drills Around Taiwan Could Become Regular: Experts, FOCUS TAIWAN (May 25, 2024), https://focustaiwan.tw/politics/202405250006. Culver, John K. & Sarah Kirchberger, US-China lessons from Ukraine: Fueling more dangerous Taiwan Tensions, ATLANTIC COUNCIL (June 15, 2023), https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/us-china-lessons-from-ukraine/. Cunningham, Michael, The American Case for Taiwan, HERITAGE (March 27, 2024), https://www.heritage.org/asia/report/the-american-case-taiwan. Dans, Enrique, Taiwan, China, and the Geopolitics of the Semiconductor Industry, MEDIUM (June 23, 2023), https://medium.com/enrique-dans/taiwan-china-and-the-geopolitics-of-the-semiconductor-industry-6e1311546191. David Lague & Maryanne Murray, T-Day: The Battle for Taiwan, REUTERS (November 5, 2021), https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/taiwan-china-wargames/. Dong, Li-wen (董立文), Disitsi Taihai Weiji Chubu Fenxi: Taiwan Meiyo Tuirang Kongjian, Guoji Shehui de Fanying Rang Zhongguo Shiliao Weiji (第四次台海危機初步分析：台灣沒有退讓空間，國際社會的反應讓中國始料未及) [Preliminary Analysis of the Fourth Taiwan Strait Crisis: Taiwan Has No Room For Concessions, and the International Community’s Response Caught China By Surprise], THE NEWS LENS (August 14, 2022), https://www.thenewslens. com/article/171577. Everington, Keoni, Chinese Invasion of Taiwan would Cost World Economy NT$311 Trillion, TAIWAN NEWS (January 10, 2024), https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/ en/news/5075352. Feldman, Ilana et al., Governing Gaza After the War: The International Perspectives, CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT (February 26, 2024), https://carnegieendowment.o rg/posts/2024/02/governing-gaza-after-the-war-the-international-perspectives?lang =en. Fulco, Matthew, Taiwan Missile Delivery Seen Hitting New High of More Than 1,000 In ‘24, AVIATION WEEK (June 28, 2023), https://aviationweek.com/defense-space/missile-defense-weapons/taiwan-missile-delivery-seen-hitting-new-high-mo re-1000-24. Gaza Strip: A Beginner’s Guide to an Enclave Under Blockade, ALJAZEERA (March 14, 2021), https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/3/14/a-guide-to-the-gaza-strip. Gebrekidan, Selam & Jonathan Saul, In Blocking Arms to Yemen, Saudi Arabia Squeezes a Starving Population, REUTERS (October 11, 2017), https://www. reuters.com/investigates/special-report/yemen-saudi-blockade/. Gershaneck, Kerry, To Win without Fighting: Defining China’s Political Warfare, MARINE CORPS U. PRESS (June 17, 2020), https://www.usmcu.edu/Outreach/ Marine-Corps-university-Press/Expeditions-with-MCUP-digital-journal/To-Win-without-Fighting/. Glauber, Joseph et al, Russia terminates the Black Sea Grain Initiative: What’s Next for Ukraine and the World?, INT’L FOOD POL’Y RSCH. INST. (July 20, 2023), https://www.ifpri.org/blog/russia-terminates-black-sea-grain-initiative-whats-next-ukraine-and-world/. Global Naval Powers Ranking (2024), WDMMW, https://www.wdmmw.org/ ranking.php. GUIDE HUMANITARIAN L., Belligerent, https://guide-humanitarian-law.org/content/ article/3/belligerent/. GUIDE HUMANITARIAN L., Embargo, https://guide-humanitarian-law.org/content/ article/3/embargo-1/. Hale, Erin, How Beijing Uses Economic Coercion to Try and Sway Taiwan’s Elections, ALJAZEERA (January 9, 2024), https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/ 1/9/how-beijing-uses-economic-coercion-to-try-and-sway-taiwans-elections. Heim, Jacob et al., Denial is the Worst Except for All the Others: Getting the U.S. Theory of Victory Right for a War with China, WAR ON THE ROCKS (June 11, 2024), https://warontherocks.com/2024/06/denial-is-the-worst-except-for-all-the-others-getting-the-u-s-theory-of-victory-right-for-a-war-with-china/. Heyns, Christof et al., The Definition of an “Attack” Under the Law of Armed Conflict, WEST POINT (November 3, 2020), https://lieber.westpoint.edu/definition-attack-law-of-armed-conflict-protection/. Hioe, Brian, China Dials up Military, Economic Pressure Campaign Against Taiwan’s New President, THEDIPLOMAT (June 4, 2024), https://thediplomat.com/2024/06/ china-dials-up-military-economic-pressure-campaign-against-taiwans-new-president/. Ho, Bo-Jun (何柏均) et al., (1996年台海危機擴大版：共軍軍演範圍包圍台灣、侵入領海，認知作戰同步展開) [Expanded version of the Taiwan Strait Crisis in 1996: The Communist military exercises surrounded Taiwan and invaded territorial waters, and cognitive operations were launched simultaneously], THE REPORTER (August 3, 2022), https://www.twreporter.org/a/us-house-speaker-nancy-pelosi-asia-tour-china-military-exercises. International Sanctions, MINISTERIO DE ASUNTOS EXTERIORES, https://www.exteriores.gob.es/en/PoliticaExterior/Paginas/SancionesInternacionales.aspx. Jensen, Benjamin et al., Shadow Risk: What Crisis Simulations Reveal about the Dangers of Deferring U.S. Responses to China’s Gray Zone Campaign against Taiwan, CSIS (February 16, 2022), https://www.csis.org/analysis/shadow-risk-what-crisis-simulations-reveal-about-dangers-deferring-us-responses-chinas. Johnstone, Christopher B. & Bonny Lin, Responding to a More Coercive Chinese Coast Guard and a Potential PRC Quarantine of Taiwan, CSIS (June 7, 2024), https://www.csis.org/analysis/responding-more-coercive-chinese-coast-guard-and-potential-prc-quarantine-taiwan. Kelly Ng, Nauru Cuts Diplomatic Ties with Taiwan in Favour of China, BBC (January 15, 2024), https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-67978185. Kennedy, Adrian, Pelosi Tells Tsai Visit Shows US Won’t Abandon Taiwan, BLOOMBERG (August 3, 2022), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/live-blog/2022-08-02/china-briefs-as-pelosi-likely-to-visit-taiwan. Kramer, Alan, Naval Blockade (of Germany), 1914-1918-ONLINE.NET (January 22, 2020), https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/naval-blockade-of-germany/. LaGrone, Sam, 11 Chinese Ballistic Missiles Fired Near Taiwan, U.S. Embarks USS America From Japan, U.S. NAVAL INST. NEWS (August 4, 2022), https://news.usni.org/2022/08/04/11-chinese-ballistic-missiles-fired-near-taiwan-u-s-embarks-uss-america-from-japan. LaGrone, Sam, Russia Lays Mines in Black Sea to Block Ukrainian Ports, NSC Says, U.S. NAVAL INST. NEWS (July 19, 2023), https://news.usni.org/2023/07/19/russia-says-all-ships-in-the-black-sea-heading-to-ukraine-are-potential-carriers-of-military-cargo. Lendon, Brad & Ivan Watson, China Has the Power to Take Taiwan, But It Would Cost an Extremely Bloody Price, CNN WORLD (June 1, 2022), https://edition.cnn. com/2022/05/31/asia/china-taiwan-invasion-scenarios-analysis-intl-hnk-ml/index.html. Li, Chi-rei (李奇叡) et al., Gongjun Lianhe Lijian Junyan Fuzhi Danbian Tiaoxin (共軍聯合利劍軍演 府指單邊挑釁) [The Chinese’s Joint-Sword Exercise, President Office: Unilateral Provocation], China Times (中時新聞網) (May 24, 2024), https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20240524000489-260118?chdtv. Lin, Bonny & Brian Hart, How Is China Responding to the Inauguration of Taiwan’s President William Lai?, CHINA POWER (May 24, 2024), https://chinapower.csis.org/china-respond-inauguration-taiwan-william-lai-joint-sword-2024a-military-exercise/. Lin, Bonny et al., How China Could Quarantine Taiwan: Mapping Out Two Possible Scenarios, CSIS (June 5, 2024), https://www.csis.org/analysis/how-china-could-quarantine-taiwan-mapping-out-two-possible-scenarios. Lin, Min-Jen (林閔榛) et al., Gongjun Weitai Zuijin 24 Li, Junjijian Junwei Fashe Shidan (共軍圍台最近24浬，軍機艦均未發射實彈) [The Chinese Military has encircled Taiwan as Close as 24 Nautical Miles, With Neither Aircraft Nor Warships Firing Live Ammunition], TVBS (May 24, 2024), https://news.tvbs.com.tw/politics/2496161. Maguire, Dannielle, Why Does China want Taiwan When It’s Already So Big and Rich? The Answer Is About More Than Land and Money, ADB.NET (August 12, 2022), https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-08-12/why-does-china-want-taiwan-military-strategic-location/101321856. Mason, Jeff & Michael Martina, White House: U.S. Will Not Be Intimidated By China; Pelosi Has Right to Visit Taiwan, REUTERS (August 2, 2022), https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/white-house-says-pelosi-has-right-visit-taiwan-2022-08-01/. Montgomery, Marcus, A Timeline of the Yemen Crisis, from the 1990s to the Present, ARAB CEN. WASH. D.C. (February 19, 2021), https://arabcenterdc.org/resource/a-timeline-of-the-yemen-crisis-from-the-1990s-to-the-present/. Nancy Pelosi Has Left Taiwan. The Real Crisis May Be Just Beginning, THE ECONOMIST (August 3, 2022), https://www.economist.com/asia/2022/08/03/ nancy-pelosi-has-left-taiwan-the-real-crisis-may-be-just-beginning. NATO-Ukraine Council Addresses Serious Security Situation in the Black Sea, NATO (July 26, 2023), https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_217835.htm. No. 1/2009 Blockade of Gaza Strip, ISRAELI NAVY, https://www.gov.il/ en/pages/mariners-1-2009. One Year of the Black Sea Initiative: Key Facts and Figures, U.N. (July 10, 2023), https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/07/1138532. Palmer, Alexander et al., Unpacking China’s Naval Buildup, CSIS (June 5, 2024), https://www.csis.org/analysis/unpacking-chinas-naval-buildup. Plummer, Robert, Taiwan Braces as China Drills Follow Pelosi Visit, BBC NEWS (August 4, 2022), https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-62416363. Ridgway, Jr., Charles P. (Chuck), A Russian Lake: Has the West Ceded the Black Sea to Russia?, CTR. FOR INT’L MARITIME SEC. (Mar. 6, 2024), https://cimsec.org/a-russian-lake-has-the-west-ceded-the-black-sea-to-russia/. Ritter Jr., Mario, What is the Median Line Between China and Taiwan?, VOICE OF AM. (October 28, 2020), https://learningenglish.voanews.com/a/what-is-the-median-line-between-china-and-taiwan/5637905.html. Royal Navy History, ROYAL NAVY, https://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/news-and-latest-activity/features/history-timeline (last visited July 13, 2024); see also The Royal Navy’s Size Throughout History, HISTORIC UK, https://www.historic-uk.com/Blog/British-Navy-Size-Over-Time/. Russia: Two Years After the Full-Scale Invasion and War of Aggression against Ukraine, EU Adopts 13th Package of Individual and Economic Sanctions, EUR. COUNCIL (February 23, 2024), https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/02/23/russia-two-years-after-the-full-scale-invasion-and-war-of-aggression-against-ukraine-eu-adopts-13th-package-of-individual-and-economic-sanctions/. Russia’s Suspension of Participation in the Black Sea Grain Initiative, U.S. DEP. OF STATE (July 17, 2023), https://www.state.gov/russias-suspension-of-participation-in-the-black-sea-grain-initiative/. Russia-Ukraine Black Sea grain deal: All You Need to Know, ALJAZEERA (July 17, 2023), https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/7/17/russia-ukraine-black-sea-grain-deal-all-you-need-to-know. Russia Warns That Ships Heading to Ukraine are Now a Military Target, LLOYD’S LIST (July 20, 2023), https://www.lloydslist.com/LL1145965/Russia-warns-that-ships-heading-to-Ukraine-are-now-a-military-target. S&P Global Market Intelligence & S&P Global Commodity Insights, Sanctions Against Russia – A Timeline, S&P GLOB. (July 5, 2024), https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/sanctions-against-russia-8211-a-timeline-69602559. Sacks, David, Why Is Taiwan Important to the United States?, COUNCIL ON FOREIGN REL. (June 20, 2023), https://www.cfr.org/blog/why-taiwan-important-united-states. Sanctions against Russia and the Role of the United Nations, GLOB. CHALLENGES (November 2022), https://globalchallenges.ch/issue/12/sanctions-against-russia-and-the-role-of-the-united-nations/. Schrepferman, Will, Hypocri-sea: The United States’ Failure to Join the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, HARV. INT’L REV. (October 31, 2019), https://hir.harvard.edu/hypocri-sea-the-united-states-failure-to-join-the-un-convention-on-the-law-of-the-sea-2/. Sciutto, Jim, Military Exercises Suggest China is Getting ‘Ready to Launch a War Against Taiwan,’ Island’s Foreign Minister Tells CNN, CNN POLITICS (April 11, 2023), https://edition.cnn.com/2023/04/11/politics/taiwan-foreign-minister-interv iew/index.html. Shih, Silva (史書華) et al., Zueixin Tujie: Zhongguo 72 Xiaoshi “Feng Tai” Junyan (最新圖解: 中國 72 小時「封台」軍演) [Latest Illustrated: China’s 72-Hour “Blockade of Taiwan” Military Exercise], COMMONWEALTH MAGAZINE (天下雜誌) (August 8, 2022), https://www.cw.com.tw/graphics/pelosi-visits-taiwan/. Stewart, Phil & Idrees Ali, How the US is Preparing for a Chinese Invasion of Taiwan, REUTERS (February 1, 2024), https://www.reuters.com/world/china/ logistics-war-how-washington-is-preparing-chinese-invasion-taiwan-2024-01-31/. Strong, Matthew, US Expert: China Might Prefer Coercion Over War to Take Taiwan, TAIWAN NEWS (October 18, 2023), https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/ news/5029056. Teng, Pei-Ju, Beijing to Continue Pressure on Taiwan Until Mid-June: Scholars, FOCUSTAIWAN (June 1, 2024), https://focustaiwan.tw/cross-strait/202406010010. The Declaration of London Volume 7: debated on Thursday 9 March 1911, PARLIAMENT.UK, https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/1911-03-09/debates/c353821 9-e7b1-45fc-9e6f-773f54ddc937/TheDeclarationOfLondon. The Naval Race Between Britain and Germany Before the First World War, IWM, https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/the-naval-race-between-britain-and-germany-before-the-first-world-war. The Newport Manual on the Law of Naval Warfare, US NAVAL WAR COLLEGE, https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/ils/vol101/iss1/1/. Twomey, Christopher P., The Fourth Taiwan Strait Crisis is Just Starting, WAR ON THE ROCKS (August 22, 2022), https://warontherocks.com/2022/08/the-fourth-taiwan-strait-crisis-is-just-starting/. Ukraine Agricultural Production and Trade, U.S. DEP. AGRI. (April 2022), https://fas.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-04/Ukraine-Factsheet-April2022.pdf. UNITED NATIONS INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN’S FUND, The Gaza Strip: The humanitarian impact of 15 years of blockade - June 2022, https://www. unicef.org/mena/documents/gaza-strip-humanitarian-impact-15-years-blockade-june-2022. Varner, Joe, Salami Slicing in the Himalayas, MODERN WAR INST. (December 17, 2020), https://mwi.westpoint.edu/salami-slicing-in-the-himalayas/. Welch, Jennifer et al., Xi, Biden and the $10 Trillion Cost of War Over Taiwan, BLOOMBERG (January 9, 2024), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2024-01-09/if-china-invades-taiwan-it-would-cost-world-econo my-10-trillion What You Need to Know About the British Naval Blockade of the First World War, IWM, https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-british-naval-blockade-of-the-first-worl d-war. Wintour, Patrick, What was the Black Sea Grain Deal and Why Did it Collapse?, THE GUARDIAN (July 20, 2023), https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/20/what-was-the-black-sea-grain-deal-and-why-did-it-collapse. Wu, Jaushieh Joseph, Defending Taiwan by Defending Ukraine: The Interconnected Fates of the World’s Democracies, FOREIGN AFF. (May 9, 2024), https://www.foreignaffairs.com/china/defending-taiwan-ukraine-jaushieh-joseph-wu. Yeager, Holly, Target-Rich Environment, COLUM. J. REV. (February 2, 2010), https://www.cjr.org/the_audit/targetrich_environment.php. Yeh, Joseph, Military Aid Act ‘Tangible Demonstration’ of U.S. Support for Taiwan: Lawmakers, FOCUSTAIWAN (April 23, 2024), https://focustaiwan.tw/politics/ 202404230025. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/95641 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 為貫徹《臺灣關係法》中「美國對臺灣民主的承諾」，美國眾議院院長裴洛西於2022年的亞洲之行率團訪台。然此舉對中華人民共和國（下稱中國）而言顯然是對其統一大業之嚴重挑釁，故接連展開了一系列圍繞台灣的軍事演習，導致兩岸關係再度緊張。自第三次台灣海峽危機以來，中華人民共和國在經濟和軍事實力上顯著增長，使得台灣面臨更大的威脅。從中國的軍事規模來看，外界普遍認為中國對於台灣發起攻勢勢在必行，我國的軍事研究也多以中國發動全面戰爭作為基礎假設。然而，就中國的立場而言，相較於直接宣戰，中國或許會更傾向透過實施封鎖措施以達成其戰略目的。
不過，由於海上封鎖仍可能構成武力使用，為了降低國際社會的反彈並減輕其遵守國際人道法義務的壓力，本文認為中國更有可能透過防禦性隔離或建立海上水域等替代術語或措施以達成其目的。此外，封鎖在傳統意義上係屬交戰行為，原則上應適用國際武裝衝突之規範；考慮到中國對一中原則的一貫堅持，避免使用「封鎖」一詞可能更符合其目標。 就此，本文先就中國封鎖台灣可能採取的措施進行介紹，並透過現有國際法律框架評估這些措施的合法性及可行性，以期透過此等分析釐清中國對台封鎖措施的可能思路。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | After Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan in 2022, the PRC has launched a series of military exercises around Taiwan, causing the tension between both sides of the Taiwan Strait to rise once again. Since the end of the Third Taiwan Strait Crisis, the PRC has grown significantly in economic and military power, which placed Taiwan under a higher threat of coercion. However, instead of a full-out warfare, many believe that the PRC may be more inclined to impose a blockade to slowly strangle Taiwan into surrender due to Taiwan’s reliance on maritime trade.
Nevertheless, a maritime blockade may still constitute a use of force; to alleviate itself from the compliance of jus in bello obligations, the PRC is more likely to use an alternative term or measure such as a quarantine or a maritime exclusion zone to achieve its military objective. Furthermore, in a conventional sense, a blockade is an act carried out against a belligerent party, if not an enemy state; considering the PRC’s assertion of One-China Policy, avoiding the term “blockade” may be more consistent to its objectives. This paper undertakes a comprehensive examination of potential measures that China might employ to blockade Taiwan, evaluating the legality of such measures within the framework of existing international legal instruments. By delving into the nuances of these alternative measures, the analysis aims to provide insights into the potential consequences of such actions on the international stage. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-09-15T16:16:04Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-09-15T16:16:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | TABLE OF CONTENTS
口試委員會審定書 i 致謝詞 ii Abstract iv 中文摘要 v Table of Contents vi Chapter I. Introduction 1 A. The Imminent and Inevitable Danger of a PLA Attack 1 B. Blockade as an Effective Strategy Against Taiwan 5 C. Challenges of the Application of the “Law of Blockade” 10 D. Research Method, Scope, and Structure 13 Chapter II. Blockades and Similar Actions 17 A. Blockades in the Traditional Sense 17 B. Similar Actions 21 1. Other Maritime Interception Measures 21 2. Distant Blockade 27 3. Maritime Zone 30 4. Enclosure of Ports 35 5. Defensive Quarantine 37 Chapter III. Rules of Law of Maritime Blockade 43 A. International Law Framework 43 1. London Declaration, 1909 43 2. The Oxford Manual, 1913 45 3. San Remo Manual, 1995 47 4. The HPCR Manual 52 5. The Newport Manual on the Law of Naval Warfare, 2023 58 6. International Humanitarian Law 63 7. Conclusion 69 B. State Practices 71 1. Law of Armed Conflict at the Operational and Tactical Levels 71 2. U.K. Manual 74 3. German Manual 77 4. U.S. Manuals 80 5. Conclusion 84 C. Case Studies 85 1. The Blockade of Yemen, since 2015 86 2. The Blockade of Gaza, since 2007 95 3. The Blockade of Ukrainian Ports in the Black Sea, since 2022 104 D. Conclusion 108 Chapter IV. Legality Discussion on Past Tactical Measures in the Vicinity of Taiwan 110 A. The Nationalists’ Blockade of the PRC, 1949-58 110 1. Background 110 2. Legal Analysis 111 B. The Taiwan Strait Crises 113 1. Background 113 2. Legal Analysis 118 Chapter V. Comprehensive Analysis on Alternative Blockading Measures of China 123 A. Alternative Measure 1: Sanctions and Embargoes 123 B. Alternative Measure 2: Distant (Missile) Blockade 125 C. Alternative Measure 3: Exclusion Zone/War Zone 126 D. Alternative Measure 4: Enclosure of Ports 126 E. Alternative Measure 5: Quarantine 127 Chapter VI. Conclusion 129 References 131 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.title | 中國對台封鎖措施之法律分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Legal Analysis on Alternative Measures for a Chinese Blockade of Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳貞如;蔡季廷 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chen-Ju Chen;Chi-Ting Tsai | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 海上封鎖,海上攔截,兩岸關係,國際法,武裝衝突法, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Maritime Blockade,Maritime Interception,Cross-Strait Relations,International Law,Law of Armed Conflict, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 150 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202403568 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-08-11 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 法律學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 法律學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 法律學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf | 1.8 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。