Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 文學院
  3. 華語教學碩士學位學程
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/95625
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor張莉萍zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorLi-Ping Changen
dc.contributor.author葉欣柔zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHsin-Jou Yehen
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-15T16:10:34Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-16-
dc.date.copyright2024-09-14-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.date.submitted2024-08-14-
dc.identifier.citation王炳勻、許展嘉、龍水水、丁曉穎(2020)。語料驅動學習融入華語課堂之教學設計[Designing data-driven learning activities for the Chinese as a second language classroom]。《華語文教學研究》, 17(3), 103-137。
李紹林(2010)。對外漢語教學詞義辨析的對象和原則。《世界漢語教學》,3,406-414.
竺靜華(2006)。華語教學實務概論。文史哲出版社。
洪煒(2013)。漢語作爲第二語言的近義詞教學實驗研究。《世界漢語教學》,3,424-432.
許柚鎵(2023)。易混淆動作動詞的辨析與教學設計。國立臺灣大學碩士學位論文。
張莉萍(2022)。在職華語教師語料庫素養培訓初探。《華語文教學研究》,19(4),83-124.
張莉萍、曾鈺婷(2023)。語料驅動學習的華語實驗課程與成效分析。科技與中文教學(Journal of Technology and Chinese Language Teaching),14(1),1-25。
曾鈺婷(2023)。語料驅動學習的教學設計與成效初探—以易混淆詞為例。國立臺灣大學碩士學位論文。
楊寄洲(2004)。課堂教學中怎麼進行近義詞語用法對比。《世界漢語教學》,3,96-104.
鄧守信主編(2018)。當代中文課程第五冊。聯經出版社。
鄧守信主編(2018)。當代中文課程第六冊。聯經出版社。
魏新紅(2010)。初級漢語綜合課詞語教學策略。對外漢語綜合課課堂教學研究 (pp.155-165)。北京: 北京大學出版社。
Aston, G. (ed.) (2001). Learning with corpora. Houston, TX: Athelstan.
Biber, D., & Reppen, R. (2002). WHAT DOES FREQUENCY HAVE TO DO WITH GRAMMAR TEACHING? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 199-208. doi:10.1017/S0272263102002048
Boontam, Punyapa.(2022). The Effect of Teaching English Synonyms through Data- Driven Learning (DDL) on Thai EFL Students’ Vocabulary Learning. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 10(2), pp. 80–91.
Boulton, A. (2009a). Corpora for all? Learning styles and data-driven learning. In M. Mahlberg, V. Gonza lez-Dı az, & C. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th corpus linguistics conference.
Boulton, A. (2009b).Testing the limits of data-driven learning: Language proficiency and training. ReCALL, 21(1): 37–54. doi:10.1017/S0958344009000068
Boulton, A. (2010). Data-driven learning: Taking the computer out of the equation, Language Learning, 60, 534–72.
Boulton, A. ( 2012). Hands-on/hands-off: Alternative approaches to data-driven learning. Input, Process and Product: Developments in Teaching and Language Corpora, eds. by James Thomas, and Alex Boulton, 152-168. Brno: Masaryk University Press.
Boulton, A. & Cobb, T. (2017). Corpus use in language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 67(2), 348-393.
Chan, T., & Liou, H.-C. (2005). Effects of web-based concordancing instruction on EFL students' learning of verbenoun collocations. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18, 231-251.
Chou, Chun-Ting & Chang, Li-ping. (2021). A Preliminary Study of Confusable Words in L2 Chinese Textbooks. In: Liu, M., Kit, C., & Su, Q. (Eds) Chinese Lexical Semantics (pp. 796-809). Springer, Cham.
Chujo, K. (2008). Corpus-based syllabus design and its implementation. In J. Nakamura & S. Hotta (Eds.), Intersection between corpus and English language education (pp. 65–88). Tokyo, Japan: Shohakusha.
Chujo, K., Anthony, L., & Oghigian, K. (2009). DDL for the EFL classroom: Effective uses of a Japanese-English parallel corpus and the development of a learner- friendly, online parallel concordancer. In M. Mahlberg, V. González-Díaz, & C. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of 5th Corpus Linguistics Conference 2009, University of Liverpool, UK.
Chujo, K., Anthony, L., Oghigian, K., & Uchibori, A. (2012). Paper-based, computer-based, and combined data-driven learning using a web-based concordancer. Language Education in Asia, 3, 132–145. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5746/LEiA/12/V3/I2/A02/Chujo_Anthony_Oghigian_Uchibori
Chujo, K., Anthony, L., Utiyama, M., & Nishigaki, C. (2014b). Using the freeware WebParaNews online concordancer in the EFL classroom. Journal of the College of Industrial Technology, Nihon University, 47, 49–63.
Chujo, K., Mizumoto, A., Oghigian, K., Anthony, L., & Nishigaki, C. (2014a, September). Comparing DDL and non-DDL for different student learning styles. Poster presentation given at American Association for Corpus Linguistics (AACL) 2014, Flagstaff, Arizona.
Chujo, K., Nishigaki, C., Uchibori, A., & Oghigian, K. (2008). An effective way to teach grammar to EFL beginners using data-driven learning. Journal of the College of Industrial Technology, Nihon University, 41, 15–33.
Chujo, K., & Oghigian, K. (2007). Discovering grammar basics with parallel concordancing in the beginner-level EFL classroom. Proceedings of The 2007 Asia TEFL International Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1–14.
Chujo, K., & Oghigian, K. (2012). DDL for EFL beginners: A report on student gains and student views on the paper-based concordancing and the role of L1. In J. Thomas & A. Boulton (Eds.), Input, Process and Product: Developments in Teaching and Language Corpora (pp. 169–182). Brno, Czech Republic: Masaryk University Press.
Chujo, K., Oghigian, K., & Nishigaki, C. (2012). Beginner level EFL DDL using a parallel web-based concordancer. Proceedings of the FEELTA 2012, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostock, Russia (pp. 1–5).
Chujo, K., Oghigian, K., & Uchibori, A. (2013). Comparing computer-based and paper-based DDL in the beginner level L2 classroom. Journal of the College of IndustrialTechnology, Nihon University, 46, 1–11.
Dudai, Y. (2004). The neurobiology of consolidations, or, how stable is the engram? Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 51-86. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142050
Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Ü ber das Gedächtnis: Untersuchungen zur xperimentellen Psychologie [On Memory: Investigations in Experimental Psychology]. Leipzig:
Duncker & Humblot. Forti, L. (2019). Developing phraseological competence in Italian L2: a study on the effects of data-driven learning. Unpublished PhD thesis. Università per Stranieri di Perugia.
Frankenberg-Garcia, A. (2012). Learners’ use of corpus examples, International Journal of Lexicography, 25, 273–96.
Frankenberg-Garcia, A. (2014a). How language learners can benefit from corpora, or not. Recherches en didactique des langues et des cultures [Online], 11-1 | 2014, Online since 07 January 2014, connection on 02 May 2019. https://doi.org/10.4000/rdlc.1702
Frankenberg-Garcia, A. (2014b). The use of corpus examples for language comprehension and production, ReCALL, 26, 128–46.
Gilquin, G. and Granger, S. (2010). How can DDL be used in language teaching? In: O’Keeffe, and McCarthy, M. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics. London, England: Routledge, 359–369.
Henriksen, B. (1999). Three dimensions of vocabulary development, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 303–17.
Johns, T. (1990). From printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of data-driven learning. CALL Austria Newsletter (July 1990) (pp. 14-34).
Johns, T. (1991a). Should you be persuaded: Two examples of data-driven learning. English Language Research Journal, 4, 1-16.
Kilgarriff, A., Keng, N., Smith, S. (2015). Learning Chinese with the Sketch Engine. In: Zou B., Smith S., Hoey M. (eds) Corpus Linguistics in Chinese Contexts. New Language Learning and Teaching Environments. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Kilgarriff, A., Rychlý, P., Smrz, P. & Tugwell, D. (2004). ITRI-04- 08 the sketch engine. Information Technology. 105-116.
Lee, H., Warschauer, M., & Lee, J.H. (2017). The effects of concordance-based electronic glosses on L2 vocabulary learning, Language Learning & Technology, 21, 32–51.
Lee, H., Warschauer, M., & Lee, J.H. (2019). The Effects of Corpus Use on Second Language Vocabulary Learning: A Multilevel Meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 40, 721-753.
Little, D. (1991). Learner Autonomy: Definitions, Issues and Problems. Dublin: Authentik.
Little, E. B. (1960). Pre-test and re-test scores in retention calculation. Journal of Educational Research, 29(2), 161-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1960.11010680
Liu, D., & Jiang, P. (2009). Using a Corpus-Based Lexicogrammatical Approach to Grammar Instruction in EFL and ESL Contexts. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 61-78.
Mizumoto, A., & Chujo, K. (2016). Who is data-driven learning for? Challenging the monolithic view of its relationship with learning styles. System, 61, 55-64.
Mizumoto, A., Chujo, K., & Yokota, K. (2016). Development of a scale to measure learners’perceived preferences and benefits of data-driven learning. ReCALL, 28, 227–246.
Mizumoto, A., & Chujo, K. (2015). A meta-analysis of data-driven learning approach in the Japanese EFL classroom. English Corpus Studies, 22, 1-17.
Smith, S. (2011). Corpus-based tasks for learning Chinese: a data-driven approach. The Asian Conference on Technology in the Classroom Official Conference Proceedings 2011.
Tomasello, M. (2000). First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(1-2), 61-82. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2001.012
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
Yoon, H. and Hirvela, A. (2004).ESL student attitudes toward corpus use in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4): 257–283. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2004.06.002
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/95625-
dc.description.abstract語料驅動學習法(Data-Driven Learning, DDL)目的是讓學習者從被動地接受知識轉變為積極地進行研究,通過大量具有語境的語料輸入來推動自下而上的學習。雖然 DDL 已在英語教學中廣泛應用,但在華語教學中仍較少見。因此,本研究旨在探討 DDL 在中文近義詞教學中的應用效果。
研究選取台灣華語教材《當代中文課程》中的九組近義詞作為研究對象,並以十七名來自不同國家和年齡層的華語二語學習者為實驗對象。教學實驗採用DDL 間接教學法及直接教學法並行,每次課程的第一課時使用間接法,第二課時使用直接法,共計十個課時,每課時 50 分鐘,總共進行了兩週的教學實驗。使用的語料庫為中文簡單語料庫及 COCT 2019 書面語語料庫。間接法由教師預先準備語料,直接法則由學生自行使用語料庫進行探索。
實驗結果顯示,DDL 教學法在近義詞的辨識和使用上對學生有顯著的提升效果。後測成績相比前測平均提升了 8%,表明 DDL 教學法能夠有效促進近義詞的學習和應用能力。此外,延宕測驗結果顯示,DDL 教學法有助於學生長期記憶和保留近義詞的能力。B2 及 C1 學習者在測驗中表現最佳,而 B1 學習者雖然起初成績較差,但在 DDL 課程結束後成績顯著提升,顯示 DDL 課程尤其有助於協助中等程度學習者區辨近義詞。
在學習者態度部分,本研究透過量化與質性分析,探討 DDL 在華語學習中的應用與接受程度。量化分析顯示,學習者對「搭配」與「詞類」等概念表現出高度滿意,認為能提升語言能力並促進自主學習和同儕討論。課程結構與活動也獲得正面評價。大部分學習者在課前皆聽過語料庫,在兩個語料庫中,對中文簡單語料庫的滿意度較高。質性分析則顯示,學習者在 DDL 課程中能有效利用語料庫資源,提升詞彙使用和語境理解,增強語言理解與學習自主性。學習者認為DDL 課程適合各種學習水平,特別是中級以上的學習者,對初學者也有幫助。
本研究對中文作為第二語言的教學提供了新的啟示,顯示出語料驅動學習在詞彙教學中的潛力。未來研究中可以採用不同的教學設計,例如,先實施直接DDL、後實施間接 DDL 的教學順序,或增加更多近義詞組的教學內容,另外也須評估教學地點、課時及設備安排,以提高整體教學效果。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of Data-Driven Learning (DDL) is to transform learners from passive knowledge receivers to active researchers by using a large amount of context-rich language input to drive a bottom-up learning process. While DDL has been widely applied in English language teaching, it is still relatively uncommon in Chinese language instruction. Therefore, this study aims to explore the effectiveness of DDL in teaching Chinese near-synonyms.
The study selected nine groups of near-synonyms from the Taiwanese Chinese textbook "Contemporary Chinese Course" and involved seventeen Chinese as a second language learners from different countries and age groups as experimental subjects. The teaching experiment employed both indirect and direct DDL methods. The first session of each lesson used the indirect method, while the second session used the direct method, totaling ten sessions, each lasting 50 minutes, over two weeks. The corpora used were the Chinese Easy Corpus and the COCT 2019 Written Corpus. In the indirect method, the teacher prepared worksheets in advance, while in the direct method, students explored the corpus themselves.
The experimental results indicate that the DDL teaching method significantly enhances students' recognition and usage of near-synonyms. The post-test scores showed an average increase of 8% compared to the pre-test scores, demonstrating that the DDL teaching method effectively promotes the learning and application of near-synonyms. Furthermore, the delayed post-test results show that the DDL teaching method aids in the long-term memory and retention of near-synonyms. B2 and C1 level learners performed the best in the tests, while B1 learners, although initially scoring lower, showed significant improvement after the DDL course, indicating that the DDL course is particularly beneficial for intermediate learners in distinguishing near-synonyms.
In terms of learner attitudes, this study used both quantitative and qualitative analyses to explore the application and acceptance of DDL in Chinese learning. Quantitative analysis showed that learners were highly satisfied with concepts like "collocation" and "word class," believing that these enhance language proficiency and promote autonomous learning and peer discussions. The course structure and activities also received positive feedback. Most learners had heard of corpora before the course, and among the two corpora used, they showed higher satisfaction with the Chinese Easy Corpus. Qualitative analysis revealed that learners could effectively use corpus resources in the DDL course, enhancing vocabulary usage and contextual understanding, thereby strengthening language comprehension and autonomous learning. Learners felt that the DDL course is suitable for various learning levels, particularly for intermediate and advanced learners, but it also benefits beginners.
This study provides new insights into Chinese as a Second Language teaching, highlighting the potential of data-driven learning in vocabulary instruction. Future research could explore different instructional designs, such as implementing direct DDL first, followed by indirect DDL, or incorporating more synonym sets into the teaching content. Additionally, evaluating factors such as teaching locations, class duration, and equipment arrangements will be necessary to enhance the overall teaching effectiveness.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-09-15T16:10:34Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-09-15T16:10:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 ........................................................................................................i

誌謝 ...............................................................................................................................ii

中文摘要 ......................................................................................................................iv

英文摘要 ......................................................................................................................vi

第一章 緒論 .................................................................................................................1

1.1 研究背景與動機..............................................................................................1

1.2 研究目的與問題..............................................................................................2

第二章 文獻探討 ..........................................................................................................3

2.1 詞彙教學研究 ..................................................................................................3

2.2 語料驅動學習法(DDL)之理論基礎..........................................................5

2.3 語料驅動學習之教學設計 ..............................................................................8

2.3.1 初級 DDL 教學設計..............................................................................8

2.3.2 中級 DDL 教學設計............................................................................11

2.3.3 中高級 DDL 教學設計........................................................................12

2.3.4 小結......................................................................................................14

2.4 關於 DDL 的成效研究..................................................................................15

2.4.1 DDL 成效分析方法.............................................................................15

2.4.2 學習者態度..........................................................................................22

2.4.3 小結......................................................................................................25

第三章 研究方法 ........................................................................................................27

3.1 實驗設計 ........................................................................................................27

3.1.1 課程設計..............................................................................................28

3.1.2 學習者背景資料..................................................................................30

3.2 資料收集 ........................................................................................................31
3.2.1 課前基本資料問卷..............................................................................31

3.2.2 前測、後測及延宕後測......................................................................31

3.2.3 學習者態度問卷..................................................................................32

3.3 語料庫工具....................................................................................................33

3.3.1 中文簡單語料庫..................................................................................33

3.3.2 COCT 2019 書面語語料庫 .................................................................35

3.3.2.1 頻率彙整(frequency breakdown).........................................36

3.3.2.2 搭配詞(collocation)..............................................................36

第四章 成效分析與討論 ............................................................................................39

4.1 DDL 教案設計...............................................................................................39

4.2 成效分析........................................................................................................43

4.2.1 整體試題作答情況..............................................................................43

4.2.2 近義詞題作答情況..............................................................................49

4.2.3 小結......................................................................................................58

4.3 學習者態度....................................................................................................59

4.3.1 個人學習偏好......................................................................................59

4.3.2 教學滿意度..........................................................................................65
4.3.3 對中文簡單語料庫和 COCT 2019 書面語語料庫的看法 ................72

4.3.4 小結......................................................................................................80

4.4 學習者態度對成效分析之影響....................................................................81

4.4.1 個人學習偏好對成效分析之影響......................................................81

4.4.2 教學滿意度對成效分析之影響..........................................................82

4.4.3 對中文簡單語料庫及 COCT 2019 書面語語料庫的看法對成效分析之
影響...............................................................................................................84

4.4.4 小結......................................................................................................85

第五章 結論 ................................................................................................................86


5.1 語料驅動學習法應用在詞彙教學的成效 ....................................................86

5.2 中高級華語學習者對語料驅動學習法的態度............................................86

5.3 中高級華語學習者對語料驅動學習法的態度對學習成效的影響............87

5.4 研究限制與未來展望....................................................................................88

參考文獻 .....................................................................................................................90

附錄一、學生背景資料問卷 .....................................................................................97

附錄二、前測試題 .....................................................................................................98

附錄三、後測及延宕後測試題 ...............................................................................103
附錄四、課後問卷 ...................................................................................................108

附錄五、學習者背景資料 .......................................................................................116

附錄六、間接 DDL 使用之語料單 .........................................................................119

附錄七、直接 DDL 使用之提問單 .........................................................................151
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject成效分析zh_TW
dc.subject學習者態度zh_TW
dc.subject語料庫zh_TW
dc.subject近義詞教學zh_TW
dc.subject語料驅動學習法zh_TW
dc.subjectlearner attitudesen
dc.subjectData-Driven Learningen
dc.subjectnear-synonym teachingen
dc.subjectcorpusen
dc.subjecteffectiveness learningen
dc.title語料驅動學習應用在中文詞彙教學之成效分析zh_TW
dc.titleAnalysis of the Effectiveness of Data-Driven Learning on Chinese Vocabulary Teachingen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear112-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee劉德馨;蕭惠貞zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeTe-Hsin Liu;Hui-Chen Hsiaoen
dc.subject.keyword語料驅動學習法,近義詞教學,語料庫,成效分析,學習者態度,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordData-Driven Learning,near-synonym teaching,corpus,effectiveness learning,learner attitudes,en
dc.relation.page158-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202404292-
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)-
dc.date.accepted2024-08-14-
dc.contributor.author-college文學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept華語教學碩士學位學程-
顯示於系所單位:華語教學碩士學位學程

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-112-2.pdf2.28 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved