Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9550
Title: | 跳出「中」心,吃進中「華」:北市官辦大眾節慶的文化政治(1994-2006) China-out/Chinese-in: Cultural Politics of the Popular Festivals in Taipei(1994-2006) |
Authors: | Min-Yue Siao 蕭民岳 |
Advisor: | 李明璁(Ming-Tsung Lee) |
Keyword: | 節慶,文化政策,文化政治,文化經濟,文化離心化, festivals,cultural policy,cultural politics,cultural economy,cultural decentralization, |
Publication Year : | 2008 |
Degree: | 碩士 |
Abstract: | 本文位處文化政策研究與節慶研究交會的領域,試圖歷史地分析台北市在陳水扁(1994~1998)與馬英九(1998~2006)市長時期創辦的大眾節慶活動。首先,本文認為大眾節慶內含一套特定的文化框架,召喚人民進入特定時空,其在符號層次上操作轉換,帶來結構變遷的可能性。進而,大眾節慶相對於例行業務,作為動態地、直接影響一般人民的官方文化措施,是文化政策研究的必要切入點。
此外,在關連到台灣整體變遷發展的層次上,相較於多數文化政策研究以地方型文化產業節慶為研究對象,中心(首都)的節慶活動具有不同於邊陲(地方)的研究意涵。基於此,本文提出三組問題:一、此時期的官辦大眾節慶,其文化框架的內涵為何?二、不同內涵的官辦大眾節慶何以出現?三、這些官辦大眾節慶反映╱回應何種整體變遷過程? 陳水扁時期的官辦大眾節慶不同於先前三種建構論的觀點,意圖打造特定認同,相反地,本文以「共鳴時刻•我們在這裡」的總統府前飆舞活動作為分析個案,說明其嘗試解離過去威權時期的文化遺緒。相較陳水扁時期位處文化政治的歷史脈絡,馬英九時期則處於城市意象打造的文化經濟脈絡中,然而,何種意象被挑選出來仍需置於在地政治脈絡來理解,本文分析其文化元素揀取過程,並以「台北牛肉麵節」做為例子,說明其嘗試打造「華人城市」的城市意象。 這兩個時期的官辦大眾節慶內涵儘管相異,但其位處於同一個變遷過程,我稱之為「文化離心化」,此過程的另一面則與台灣兩種國族主義的消長相關連。官辦大眾節慶反映也回應了整體文化變遷,不同時期有其相異的回應方式。文化離心化具有兩個層次:首先,文化詮釋權從中央掌握轉移到地方,這具體展現在民眾的凝視對象,從廟堂之上的國族文物與現代藝文到人民的日常生活;其次,文化離心化也具有空間的意涵,文化焦點從作為國族文物與現代藝文中心的台北,離開到台北之外的地方文史。 本文認為,官辦大眾節慶具有一套特定文化框架,在符號層次上引導著節慶實作的細節:一方面深受整體社會文化變遷之影響,另一方面更進一步回應(擴大或修正)了此變遷。 This thesis is located in the overlap between cultural policy research and festival study, trying historically to analyze the new government-organized festive events in Taipei during the governance of Mayor Chen Shui-Bian (陳水扁, 1994-1998) and Mayor Ma Ying-Jiou (馬英九, 1998-2006). I propose that the festival as a cultural frame summoning people into a specific time and space, creating the possibility of structural change through symbol operating. Furthermore, festival, as a direct cultural impact on citizens, must be a key point on cultural policy study. In comparison to most of the cultural policy studies focusing on the local festivals which often be thought of cultural industry, the festivals related to the structural change in the centre(the urban) was different from those in the periphery( the rural). Based on the above discussion, this thesis involves three issues. First, what are the content of these cultural frames? Second, why did the different cultural frames emerge? Third, what structural changes did these festivals reflect and respond to? |
URI: | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9550 |
Fulltext Rights: | 同意授權(全球公開) |
Appears in Collections: | 社會學系 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf | 1.13 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.