請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/95341完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 馮燕 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Joyce Yen Feng | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳秀蕙 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Hsiu-Hui Chen | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-05T16:15:39Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-09-06 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-09-05 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-08-07 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 天下雜誌（2021）。2021幸福城市大調查。天下雜誌，734。https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5118597
王明達（2018年8月12日）。社會領域課綱 課審大會通過增加表意權及不受歧視等內容。青年日報社。https://ynews.page.link/yA5rW 王思淳、胡中宜（2022）。兒少表意權在安置機構的實踐與挑戰。臺大社會工作學刊，46，33-81。https://doi.org/10.6171/ntuswr.202212_(46).0002 中華心理衛生協會（2023）。2023年心閱讀兒少心理韌性新入選書目發佈會。https://www.mhat.org.tw/news2_cont.aspx?id=KTDp8YlTC1k= 余崇齡（2019）。兒童空間教育中的公共參與體驗：以國小四年級實驗課程為例。先進工程學刊，14(1)，33-44。 李佩珊（2019）。Bronfenbrenner 生態系統理論的近期發展與應用。輔導季刊，55（3），14-24。 李茂能（2006）。結構方程模型軟體Amos之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用。心理。 李茂能（2008）。SEM 適配度指標的潛藏問題：最佳模式難求。測驗統計年刊，16（2），17-30。https://doi.org/10.6773/JRMS.200812.0007 李茂能（2011）。圖解AMOS在學術研究之應用。五南。 李瑞典、陳祥美（2021）。我國少年事件運用修復式正義之研究。中正大學法學集刊，71，53-119。 兒童福利聯盟（2023）。2023臺灣兒少網路安全暨網路識讀現況調查。https://www.children.org.tw/publication_research/research_report/2611 兒童權利公約CRC資訊網（2018）。中華民國（臺灣）兒童權利公約首次國家報告國際審查會議結論性意見。https://crc.sfaa.gov.tw/Document/Detail?documentId=26ED12B1-16AB-4BE0-96E1-7E99CC72282F 兒童權利公約CRC資訊網（2022）。兒童權利公約第二次國家報告國際審查結論性意見。https://crc.sfaa.gov.tw/Document/Detail?documentId=2BF473B4-5CAF-48DA-BB15-CC5F42124690 邱皓政（2011）。結構方程模型：LISREL的理論、技術與應用。雙葉書廊。 林沛君（2017）。兒少「表意權」實質意涵的初探－以被安置兒少發聲的權利為中心。臺灣人權學刊，4（1），73-96。 林沛君（2022）。「有意義」的兒少參與：以我國地方兒少代表制度為例。臺大社會工作學刊，45，1-44。https://doi.org/10.6171/ntuswr.202206_(45).0001 林義翔（2021）。囡仔有耳「有」嘴！兒少參與權的在地實踐，為性平教育話聲。性別平等教育季刊，94，46-52。 施慧玲（2004）。論我國兒童人權法制之發展－兼談落實“聯合國兒童權利公約”之社會運動。中正大學法學集刊，14，169-204。https://doi.org/10.30094/NCCULJ.200401.0005 胡中宜（2020）。被隱沒的聲音：離開家外安置照顧青年之自立生活經驗。臺大社會工作學刊，42，95-144。https://doi.org/10.6171/ntuswr.202012_(42).0003 張芳全（2004）。教育在學率對預期壽命的結構方程模型檢定。國立臺北師範學院學報，17（2），153-186。 張茜雲、胡中宜（2017）。安置機構少女接受自立生活準備服務之經驗：服務使用者的觀點。臺灣社會工作學刊，19，1-42。 張偉豪（2011）。論文寫作-SEM不求人。鼎茂。 張偉豪、鄭時宜（2012）。與結構方程模型共舞：曙光初現。前程文化。 許瑛玿、洪榮昭（2003）。皮亞傑認知發展階段的新詮釋。科學教育月刊，260，2-9。https://doi.org/10.6216/SEM.200307_(260).0001 陳心怡、何堯凱、唐宜楨（2021）。從醫療人員觀點來看兒童醫療決策參與權利。醫學與健康期刊，10（2），61-72。 陳心怡、唐宜楨（2017）。從兒童權利觀點論家庭關係的新轉變－以兒童參與表意權為例。家庭教育雙月刊，65，31-42。 陳心怡、唐宜楨（2019）。精神醫療專業人員對兒少精神疾患醫療最佳利益模式考量之初探性研究。身心障礙研究季刊，17（2&3），129-143。 陳心怡、唐宜楨（2020）。特殊教育教師對身心障礙學生參與權實踐之研究。身心障礙研究季刊，18（3&4），159-174。 陳心怡、唐宜楨（2022）。從教師觀點來探討校園兒童參與權實踐之研究。聯大學報，19（2），53-76。 陳佳鈴（2021年4月23日）。冷血柔道教練背景超威！69歲6段高手：愛為理念專收過動。三立新聞網。https://www.setn.com/News.aspx?NewsID=929660 陳秀蕙、吳淑惠、馮燕（2022）。兒童參與了沒？臺灣兒童人權指標調查報告之內容分析。東吳社會工作學報，43，35-69。 陳柯玫、王舒芸（2017）。兒童及少年參與困境之初探。臺灣社會工作學刊，18，63-112。 陳品皓（2020）。心理韌性: 顛覆起跑點迷思，教出有耐挫力、熱情與目的感的孩子。親子天下股份有限公司。 陳寬裕（2023）。結構方程模型：運用AMOS分析。五南。 國立臺灣大學中國信託慈善基金會兒少暨家庭研究中心（2021）。越常練習、越有幫助－正能訓練PILOT課程的素養導向。https://cfrc.ntu.edu.tw/index.php?menu=%E9%9B%BB%E5%AD%90%E5%A0%B1&item=202102 黃芳銘（2007）。結構方程模型理論與應用。五南。 馮燕、賴月蜜、胡中宜（2022）。兒童及少年福利服務概論。國立空中大學。 曾大千（2011）。從學生人權觀點論「表意管教措施」之妥適性。教育實踐與研究，24（1），1-24。https://doi.org/10.6776/JEPR.201106.0001 廖福特（2021）。普世接受的人權條約，兒童階段的個案救濟－兒童權利公約個人申訴案件之分析。東海大學法學研究，62，1-54。 臺灣臺中地方檢察署（2021）。中檢偵結起訴柔道教練何○○傷害兒童致重傷案。臺灣臺中地方檢察署新聞稿。https://www.tcc.moj.gov.tw/295804/295830/657577/876645/post。 劉瓊芬（2021）。以兒少「表意權」檢視十二年國教「核心素養」之內涵。臺灣人權學刊，6（1），161-168。 鄧宗德（2019）。友善平權的博物館兒童人權教育：以國家人權博物館2018年「文化體驗教育課程」為例。博物館與文化，18，3-35。 韓國好鄰居協會（2018）。2018 대한민국 아동권리지수 연구[2018年韓國兒童權利指數研究]。韓國好鄰居協會。https://reurl.cc/Eompkg 聯合國（1989）。兒童權利公約。兒童權利公約（CRC）資訊網。https://crc.sfaa.gov.tw/PublishCRC/CommonDetail?documentId=45733006-3802-4A3F-BBA1-91D23E1195AE 聯合國（2009）。第12號一般性意見「兒童表達意見的權利」。兒童權利公約（CRC）資訊網。https://crc.sfaa.gov.tw/Uploadfile/Document/35_20230517114717_729198.pdf 聯合國（2021）。第25號一般性意見「數位環境中的兒少權利」。兒童權利公約（CRC）資訊網。https://crc.sfaa.gov.tw/Uploadfile/Document/35_20230517115154_3911613.pdf 聯合國兒童基金會（2019）。兒童權利公約。聯合國兒童基金會香港委員會。https://edu.unicef.org.hk/zh-HK/child-rights 蘇育宣（2021年4月24日）。7歲童遭重摔腦死 父淚崩：他說想保護爸媽才學柔道。中時新聞網。https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20210424003943-260402?chdtv。 Alderson, P. (2010). Younger children’s individual participation in ‘all matters affecting the child’. A handbook of children and young people’s participation. Perspectives from theory and practice, 88-104. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of planners, 35(4), 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225 Aydilek Çiftçi, M., & Yücesan, Y. (2023). The perceptions of early childhood children and parents towards children's participation rights: ‘Yes, I and I Disagree!’. Children & Society, 37, 689– 704. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12520 Ben-Arieh, A. (2014). Social policy and the changing concept of child well-being. The role of international studies and children as active participants. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 60(4), 569-581. Bernoff, J., & Li, C. (2010). Social technographics revisited–mapping online participation. Forrester Research. Berrick, J. D., Dickens, J., Pösö, T., & Skivenes, M. (2015). Children's involvement in care order decision-making: A cross-country analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect, 49, 128-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.07.001 Barros, R., Leite, C., Monteiro, A., Lopes, A., & Veiga, A. (2020). Models of Youth Participation Handbook. BePart. http://bepart-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Models-of-Youth-Participation-Handbook.pdf Barros, R. M., Monteiro, A., & Leite, C. (2022). Youth participation: A new approach based on the intersections between models, views and European policies. Bordón Revista De Pedagogía, 74(1), 11–28. Bosisio, R., & Olagnero, M. (2019). Discourses about Daily Activity Contracts: A Ground for Children’s Participation?. Social Sciences, 8(3), 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8030092 Bouma, H., López, M. L., Knorth, E. J., & Grietens, H. (2018). Meaningful participation for children in the Dutch child protection system: A critical analysis of relevant provisions in policy documents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 79, 279-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.02.016 Brodie, E., Hughes, T., Jochum, V., Miller, S., Ockenden, N., & Warburton, D. (2011). Pathways Through Participation. NCVO, Involve, IVR. https://www.sharedpractice.org.uk/Downloads/Pathways_final_report.pdf Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (5th ed.), (pp. 993–1028). Wiley. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development, Vol. 1, (pp.793-828). John Wiley & Sons Inc. Cashmore, J. (2002). Promoting the participation of children and young people in care. Child Abuse & Neglect, 26(8), 837-847. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(02)00353-8 Chawla, L. (2002). “Insight, creativity and thoughts on the environment”: Integrating children and youth into human settlement development. Environment and Urbanization, 14(2), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780201400202 Chen, H. Y., & Tang, I. C. (2020). Parental perspectives on children's right to participation in Taiwan. Feng Chia Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 41, 69-102. Collins, T. M., Rizzini, I., & Mayhew, A. (2021). Fostering global dialogue: Conceptualisations of children's rights to participation and protection. Children & Society, 35(2), 295-310. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12437 Council of Europe. (2008). “Have your say!” Manual on the revised European Charter on the Participation of Young People in Local and Regional Life. Council of Europe Publishing. https://rm.coe.int/16807023e0 Council of Europe. (2011). Child and youth participation in Finland. Council of Europe Publishing. https://rm.coe.int/168046c47e Coyne, I. (2006). Consultation with children in hospital: children, parents’ and nurses’ perspectives. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15(1), 61-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01247.x Creative commons. (2012). Participation Models. Creativecommons Org. https://www.nonformality.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Participation_Models_20121118.pdf Cuevas-Parra, P. (2023). Multi-dimensional lens to article 12 of the UNCRC: a model to enhance children’s participation. Children’s Geographies, 21(3), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2022.2071598 Davidson, S. (1998). Spinning the wheel of empowerment. Planning, 1262(3), 14-15. Davies, T. (2009). Can social networks bridge the participation gap? Tim's Blog. http://www.timdavies.org.uk/2009/05/18/can-social-networks-bridge-the-participation-gap. Davies, T., Bhullar, S., & Dowty, T. (2011). Rethinking Responses to Children and Young People’s Online Lives. Paper presented at the EU Kids Online 2 Final Conference, London School of Economics, London. DFID-CSO Youth Working Group. (2010). Youth participation in development: A guide for development agencies and policy makers. Youth Policy. Org. https://www.youthpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/library/2010_Youth_Participation_in_Development_Guide_Eng.pdf Dimopoulos, G. (2021). A theory of children's decisional privacy. Legal Studies, 41(3), 430-453. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2021.16 Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453-461. https://doi.org/10.2307/249524 Driskell, D. (2002). Creating Better Cities with Children and Youth: A Manual for Participation. Earthscan/UNESCO. Einarsdottir, J., Purola, A. M., Johansson, E. M., Broström, S., & Emilson, A. (2015). Democracy, caring and competence: Values perspectives in ECEC curricula in the Nordic countries. International Journal of Early Years Education, 23(1), 97-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2014.970521 Fletcher, A. (2003). Purpose, empowerment and the experience of volunteerism in community. Freechild Project. Fogg, B. J. (2009). The behavior grid: 35 ways behavior can change. International Conference on Persuasive Technology, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/1541948.1542001 Fogg, B.J., & Eckles, D. (2007). The Behavior Chain for Online Participation: How Successful Web Services Structure Persuasion. In: de Kort, Y., IJsselsteijn, W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., Fogg, B.J. (eds), Persuasive Technology. PERSUASIVE 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4744. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77006-0_25 Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104 Francis, M., & Lorenzo, R. (2002). Seven realms of children's participation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22(1-2), 157-169. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0248 Fuentes, P., & Niimi, R. (2002). Motivating municipal action for children: the Municipal Seal of Approval in Ceará, Brazil. Environment and Urbanization, 14(2), 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780201400210 Funders Collaborative on Youth Organising. (2003). An emerging model for working with youth: Community organizing + youth development = youth organizing (Occasional Papers Series on Youth Organizing No. 1). https://fcyo.org/uploads/resources/8141_Papers_no1_v4.qxd.pdf Fylkesnes, M., Larsen, M., Havnen, K., Christiansen, Ø., & Lehmann, S. (2021). Listening to Advice from Young People in Foster Care - From Participation to Belonging. British Journal of Social Work, 51(6), 1983-2000. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab138 Fylkesnes, M. K., Taylor, J., & Iversen, A. C. (2018). Precarious participation: Exploring ethnic minority youth's narratives about out-of-home placement in Norway. Children and Youth Services Review, 88, 341-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.03.030 Grace, J. & Grace, P. (2017). Youth Participation Handbook. 360 Degrees of Participation, Erasmus Programme. Medvirkningsagentene (NO), Youth Work Europe (UK) and the Institute for Policy Research and Analysis (LT). https://participationpool.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Grace-J-Grace-P.-2017-Youth-Participation-Handbook.pdf Gal, T., & Duramy, B. (2015). Enhancing capacities for child participation: Introduction. In T. Gal, & B. Duramy (Eds.), International perspectives and empirical findings on child participation: From social exclusion to child-inclusive policies (pp. 1–16). Oxford University Press. Gal, T. (2017). An ecological model of child and youth participation. Children and Youth Services Review, 79, 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.05.029 Gaventa, J. (2006). Finding the spaces for change: a power analysis. IDS bulletin, 37(6), 23-33. Gazit, M., & Perry-Hazan, L. (2020). Disadvantaged youth’s participation in collective decision making. Children and Youth Services Review, 110, 104759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104759 Hair, J.F Jr., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black W.C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Hair, J. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall. Hallström, I., & Elander, G. (2004). Decision‐making during hospitalization: Parents’ and children's involvement. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 13(3), 367-375. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00877.x Hart, R. A. (1992). Children’s participation: From tokenism to citizenship. International Child Development Centre of UNICEF. Papers inness92/6, Innocenti Essay. https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/childrens_participation.pdf Head, B. W. (2011). Why not ask them? Mapping and promoting youth participation. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(4), 541-547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.05.015 Horgan, D., Forde, C., Martin, S., & Parkes, A. (2017). Children’s participation: moving from the performative to the social. Children’s Geographies, 15(3), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2016.1219022 Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 Hultgren, F., & Johansson, B. (2019). Including babies and toddlers: A new model of participation. Children's Geographies, 17(4), 375-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2018.1527016 Hummon, N. P., & Dereian, P. (1989). Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory. Social Networks, 11(1), 39-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(89)90017-8 Iacobucci, D. (2010). Structural equations modeling: Fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(1),90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2009.09.003 International Association for Public Participation (2007). Spectrum of Public Participation. International Association for Public Participation, Jans, M., & De Backer, K. (2002a). Youth-work and Social Participation. Elements for a practical theory. Project JeP! Brussels: Flemish Youth Council. https://iap2.org.au/resources/spectrum/ Jans, M., & De Backe, K. (2002b). Youth (work) and social participation. Youth Participation in Slovakia, 1-22. Johnson, V. (2011). Conditions for change for children and young people’s participation in evaluation:‘Change-scape’. Child indicators research, 4, 577-596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-010-9099-6 Karrer, T. (2006). Roles in CoP's. The Learning Circuits Blog. https://learningcircuits.blogspot.com/2006/06/roles-in-cops.html Kennan, D., Redmond, S., Devaney, C., Landy, F., Canavan, J., & Gillen, A. (2015). Toward the development of a participation strategy for children and young people: National guidance and local implementation. Galway: UNESCO Child and Family Research Centre. Kim, S. S., & Yoo, M. S. (2016). A comparative study on the level of realizing children’s rights: A focus on rich countries. Child Indicators Research, 9, 855-872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-015-9344-0 Kiteley, R., & Stogdon, C. (2013). Literature reviews in social work. Sage. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principle and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY:Guilford Press. Knowles-Yánez, K. L. (2005). Children’s participation in planning processes. Journal of Planning Literature, 20(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412205277032 Kosher, H., Ben-Arieh, A., & Hendelsman, Y. (2016). The history of children’s rights. In Children's Rights and Social Work (pp. 9-18). Springer, Cham. Kosher, H., Ben-Arieh, A., & Hendelsman, Y. (2016). Social work and children’s rights: Implications for practice. In Children's Rights and Social Work (pp. 29-44). Springer, Cham. Kosher, H., & Ben-Arieh, A. (2020). Children’s participation: A new role for children in the field of child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 110, 104429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104429 Kosher, H., & Ben‐Arieh, A. (2020). Social workers' perceptions of children's right to participation. Child & Family Social Work, 25(2), 294-303. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12685 Križ, K., & Roundtree-Swain, D. (2017). “We are merchandise on a conveyer belt”: How young adults in the public child protection system perceive their participation in decisions about their care. Children and Youth Services Review, 78, 32-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.05.001 Kudva, N., & Driskell, D. (2009). Creating space for participation: The role of organizational practice in structuring youth participation. Community Development, 40(4), 367-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330903279705 Lardner, C. (2001). Youth Participation – A New Model. Edinburgh: Youth Social Inclusion Partnership Lausten, M., & Kloppenborg, H. S. (2022). Involvement of children and young people in care order decision‐making—A Danish perspective. Child & Family Social Work, 27(2), 349-357 https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12882 Lee, M. J., Wu, W. C., Chang, H. C., Chen, H. J., Lin, W. S., Feng, J. Y., & Lee, T. S. H. (2020). Effectiveness of a school-based life skills program on emotional regulation and depression among elementary school students: A randomized study. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105464 Lipscomb, S. T., Hatfield, B., Goka-Dubose, E., Lewis, H., & Fisher, P. A. (2021). Impacts of roots of resilience professional development for early childhood teachers on young children’s protective factors. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 56, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.02.002 Lister, R. (2007). Why citizenship: Where, when and how children?. Theoretical inquiries in Law, 8(2), 693-718. https://doi.org/10.2202/1565-3404.1165 Liu, J. S., and Lu, L. Y., (2012) An Integrated Approach for the Main Path Analysis: The Development of the Hirsch Index as an Example, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 528-542. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21692 Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y., & Ho, M. H. C. (2012). Total influence and mainstream measures for scientific researchers. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 496-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.04.005 Lowndes, V., & Pratchett, L. (2006). CLEAR: Understanding Citizen Participation in Local Government–and How to Make it Work Better. Local Governance Research Unit, De Montfort University Leicester, United Kingdom. Lundy, L. (2007). ‘Voice’is not enough: conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. British educational research journal, 33(6), 927-942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033 Mannion, G., Sowerby, M., & I’Anson, J. (2022). Four arenas of school-based participation: towards a heuristic for children’s rights-informed educational practice. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 43(1), 30-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2020.1795623 Mårtenson, E. K., & Fägerskiöld, A. M. (2008). A review of children’s decision‐making competence in health care. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(23), 3131-3141. A review of children’s decision‐making competence in health care Martín, P. P. (2015). E-Participation at the local level: The path to collaborative democracy. Participation Models, Citizens, Youth, Online. https://www.nonformality.org/2012/11/participation-models/ Maroufizadeh, S., Zareiyan, A., & Sigari, N. (2014). Reliability and validity of Persian version of perceived stress scale (PSS-10) in adults with asthma. Archives of Iranian Medicine, 17(5), 361-365. Maruyama, G. M. (1998). Basics of Structural Equation Modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Mayfield, R. (2006). Power law of participation. Ross Mayfield’s weblog, 27. https://ross.typepad.com/blog/2006/04/power_law_of_pa.html MacCallum, R. C., & Hong, S. (1997). Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 193-210. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_5 McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analysis. Psychological methods, 7, 64-82. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64 McMellon, C., & Tisdall, E. K. M. (2020). Children and Young People’s Participation Rights: Looking Backwards and Moving Forwards. The International Journal of Children's Rights, 28(1), 157-182. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02801002 Mitchell, K. L., & Colville, T. (2022). ‘Can you hear me? ’An exploratory study investigating the representation and impact of children’s views in multi‐agency meetings. Children & Society, 36(4), 472-493. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12506 Moore, T., & McArthur, M. (2017). ‘You feel it in your body’: How Australianchildren and young people think about and experience feeling and being safe. Children & Society, 31, 206–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12183 Moosa-Mitha, M. (2005). A difference-centred alternative to theorization of children's citizenship rights. Citizenship studies, 9(4), 369-388. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020500211354 Moran-Ellis, J., & Sünker, H. (2018). Childhood studies, children's politics and participation: perspectives for processes of democratisation. International Review of Sociology, 28(2), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2018.1477106 Murray, C., & Hallett, C. (2000). Young people's participation in decisions affecting their welfare. Childhood, 7(1), 11-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568200007001003 New Zealand State Service. (2007). Participation 2.0 Model. In Guide to Online Participation Resources – Glossary. Nir, T., & Perry-Hazan, L. (2016). The framed right to participate in municipal youth councils and its educational impact. Children and Youth Services Review, 69, 174-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.07.012 Noar, S. M. (2003). The role of structural equation modeling in scale development. Structural equation modeling, 10(4), 622-647. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1004_8 Norberg, M., Stenlund, H., Lindahl, B., Andersson, C., Weinehall, L., Hallmans, G., & Eriksson, J. W. (2007). Components of metabolic syndrome predicting diabetes: no role of inflammation or dyslipidemia. Obesity, 15(7), 1875-1885. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2007.222 Olsen, R. K. (2023). Key factors for child participation–an empowerment model for active inclusion in participatory processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1247483. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1247483 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2001). Citizens as Partners: Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-making. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Palisano, R. J., Chiarello, L. A., King, G. A., Novak, I., Stoner, T., & Fiss, A. (2012). Participation-based therapy for children with physical disabilities. Disability and rehabilitation, 34(12), 1041-1052. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.628740 Percy-Smith, B. (2010). Councils, consultations and community: Rethinking the spaces for children and young people's participation. Children's Geographies, 8(2), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733281003691368 Perry-Hazan, L. (2016). Children's participation in national policymaking: “You're so adorable, adorable, adorable! I'm speechless; so much fun!”. Children and Youth Services Review, 67, 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.05.015 Perry-Hazan, L. (2019). Conceptualising conflicts between student participation and other rights and interests. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 42(2), 184-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2019.1599324 Perry‐Hazan, L., & Lambrozo, N. (2018). Young children's perceptions of due process in schools’ disciplinary procedures. British Educational Research Journal, 44(5), 827-846. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3469 Perry-Hazan, L., & Somech, A. (2021). Conceptualising student participation in school decision making: an integrative model. Educational Review, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1976113 Peterson-Badali, M., Morine, S. L., Ruck, M. D., & Slonim, N. (2004). Predictors of maternal and early adolescent attitudes toward children’s nurturance and self-determination rights. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 24(2), 159-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431603262667 Pösö, T. (2022). Children’s consent to child welfare services: Some explorative remarks. Children & Society, 36(1), 52-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12483 Racelis, M., & Aguirre, A. D. M. (2002). Child rights for urban poor children in child friendly Philippine cities: views from the community. Environment and Urbanization, 14(2), 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780201400208 Rainey, L., van Nispen, R., van der Zee, C., & van Rens, G. (2014). Measurement properties of questionnaires assessing participation in children and adolescents with a disability: a systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 23, 2793-2808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0743-3 Ruck, M. D., Keating, D. P., Abramovitch, R., & Koegl, C. J. (1998). Adolescents' and children's knowledge about rights: Some evidence for how young people view rights in their own lives. Journal of Adolescence, 21(3), 275-289. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1998.0153 Roche, J. (1999). Children: Rights, participation and citizenship. Childhood, 6(4), 475-493. Rosa, E. M., & Tudge, J. (2013). Urie Bronfenbrenner's theory of human development: Its evolution from ecology to bioecology. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 5(4), 243-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12022 Rosenberg, L., Jarus, T., & Bart, O. (2010). Development and initial validation of the Children Participation Questionnaire (CPQ). Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(20), 1633-1644. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638281003611086 Rosenberg, L., Jarus, T., Bart, O., & Ratzon, N. Z. (2011). Can personal and environmental factors explain dimensions of child participation?. Child: Care, Health and Development, 37(2), 266-275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2010.01132.x Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online (1st ed.). Kogan Page. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Sevón, E., Mustola, M., & Alasuutari, M. (2023). Dilemmas Related to Young Children’s Participation and Rights: A Discourse Analysis Study of Present and Future Professionals Working with Children. Social Sciences, 13(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13010027 Shier, H. (2001). Pathways to participation: Openings, opportunities and obligations. Children and Society: 15,111. https://doi.org/10.1002/chi.617 Shier, H. (2009) . Pathways to participation’ revisited: Learning from Nicaragua’s child coffee workers. In: Thomas N and Percy-Smith B (eds). A Handbook of Children and Young People’s Participation: Perspectives from Theory and Practice (pp. 215–227). Abingdon: Routledge,. Shier, H., Méndez, M. H., Centeno, M., Arróliga, I., & González, M. (2014). How children and young people influence policy‐makers: Lessons from Nicaragua. Children & Society, 28(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2012.00443.x Shelton, L. G. (2018). The Bronfenbrenner primer: A guide to develecology. New York, NY:Routledge. Strömpl, J., & Luhamaa, K. (2020). Child participation in child welfare removals through the looking glass: Estonian children’s and professionals’ perspectives compared. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105421 Tanaka, J. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models (pp. 10–39). Sage. Ten Brummelaar, M. D., Harder, A. T., Kalverboer, M. E., Post, W. J., & Knorth, E. J. (2018). Participation of youth in decision‐making procedures during residential care: A narrative review. Child & Family Social Work, 23(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12381 Thomas, N., & Percy‐Smith, B. (2012). ‘It's about changing services and building relationships’: evaluating the development of Children in Care Councils. Child & Family Social Work, 17(4), 487-496. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00806.x Torkzadeh, G., Koufteros, X., & Pflughoeft, K. (2003). Confirmatory analysis of computer self-efficacy. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(2), 263-275. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1002_6 Toros, K. (2021). A systematic review of children’s participation in child protection decision‐making: Tokenistic presence or not?. Children & Society, 35(3), 395-411. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12418 Toros, K., DiNitto, D. M., & Tiko, A. (2018). Family engagement in the child welfare system: A scoping review. Children and Youth Services Review, 88, 598-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.03.011 Treseder, P. (1997). Empowering Children and Young People: Training Manual. Save the Children: London, UK; Children’s Rights Office: London, UK. Trilla Bernet, J., & Novella Cámara, A. M. (2001). Educación y participación social de la infancia. Revista Iberoamericana de educación. 26, 137-164. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie260982 Ullman, J. B. (2001). Structural Equation Modeling. In: B. G. Tabachnick, & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston, MA:Pearson Education. United Nations (2003). UN Global E-government Survey 2003. UN. https://desapublications.un.org/file/787/download United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (2001). The Participation Rights of Adolescents: A Strategic Approach. UNICEF Working Paper Series. Vänskä, N., Sipari, S., & Haataja, L. (2020). What makes participation meaningful? Using photo-elicitation to interview children with disabilities. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 40(6), 595-609. https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2020.1736234 Vis, S. A., & Fossum, S. (2013). Representation of children's views in court hearings about custody and parental visitations—A comparison between what children wanted and what the courts ruled. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(12), 2101-2109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.10.015 Vis, S. A., Holtan, A., & Thomas, N. (2012). Obstacles for child participation in care and protection cases—why Norwegian social workers find it difficult. Child Abuse Review, 21(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.1155 Vis, S. A., Strandbu, A., Holtan, A., & Thomas, N. (2011). Participation and health–a research review of child participation in planning and decision‐making. Child & Family Social Work, 16(3), 325-335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00743.x Warburton, D., Wilson, R., & Rainbow, E. (2007). Making a Difference: A Guide to Evaluating Public Participation in Central Government. London: Involve. Wenmoth, D. (2006). Participation Online – the Four Cs. Future Makers. https://futuremakers.nz/2006/11/10/participation_online_the_four_/ White, S. C. (1996). Depoliticising development: the uses and abuses of participation. Development in practice, 6(1), 6-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0961452961000157564 Wicklin, R. (2010). How does participation in social media vary with age? SAS Blogs. https://blogs.sas.com/content/iml/2010/12/03/how-does-participation-in-social-media-vary-with-age.html Wilson, S., Hean, S., Abebe, T., & Heaslip, V. (2020). Children’s experiences with Child Protection Services: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Children and Youth Services Review, 113, 104974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104974 Warming, H. (2019). Trust and power dynamics in children's lived citizenship and participation: the case of public schools and social work in Denmark. Children & Society, 33(4), 333-346. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12311 Wong, N. T., Zimmerman, M. A., & Parker, E. A. (2010). A typology of youth participation and empowerment for child and adolescent health promotion. American journal of community psychology, 46, 100-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9330-0 Woodhouse, B. B. (2014). Listening to children: Participation rights of minors in Italy and the United States. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 36(4),358-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2014.967983 Woolley, H., Dunn, J., Spencer, C., Short, T., & Rowley, G. (1999). Children describe their experiences of the city centre: a qualitative study of the fears and concerns which may limit their full participation. Landscape research, 24(3), 287-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426399908706564 Wu, W. C., Lee, M. J., & Chang, Y. (2023). Effects of the positive Interpersonal and life orientation training (PILOT) program among elementary school students in Taiwan. Children and Youth Services Review, 155, 107212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107212 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/95341 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 兒童參與權作為國際兒童權利公約（CRC）所強調的核心權利之一，不僅被視為兒童權利的基石，更是確保其他權利得以實現的關鍵所在。本研究旨在探討臺灣兒童對參與權的主體經驗，以及其與生活環境及發展狀況的關聯。
透過結構方程模型（SEM）分析隨機抽樣台灣110所小學，3,793位六年級兒童的自我報告調查資料，本研究發現86%的臺灣兒童在家庭與學校的參與權實踐中呈現良好的主體經驗。研究進一步採用「過程–個體–情境–時間(PPCT)」理論模型分析，結果指出，兒童的主體經驗受到與父母、老師的關係、父母的教育程度以及城市環境等因素的影響，同時也受到兒童對參與權的認知和周遭環境氛圍的影響。具體而言，兒童若認為其所在環境重視兒童權利，則其參與權的主體經驗也越佳。 此外，本研究發現兒童的參與權主體經驗對其自信、自主性以及生活幸福感具有顯著影響。綜上所述，本研究不僅驗證了臺灣兒童參與權實踐的主體經驗，更提供了與其生態環境和自身福祉相關的實證資料，從而加深了我們對台灣兒童參與權落實的理解。 本研究之貢獻在於驗證了台灣兒童參與權實踐的主體經驗，並提供了與其生態環境和自身福祉相關的實證資料。研究結果顯示，兒童的主體經驗受到與父母、老師的關係、父母的教育程度以及城市環境等因素的影響，同時也受到兒童對參與權的認知和周遭環境氛圍的影響。此外，兒童的參與權主體經驗對其自信、自主性以及生活幸福感具有顯著影響。故此，大眾應更加注意兒童日常生活之參與落實。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Children's participation rights, emphasized as one of the core rights in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), are not only considered foundational to children's rights but also pivotal in ensuring the realization of other rights. This study aims to explore Taiwanese children's subjective experiences of participation rights and their correlation with their living environment and developmental status.
Through the analysis of self-reported survey data from 3793 sixth-grade children in 110 randomly selected elementary schools in Taiwan using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), this study found that 86% of Taiwanese children exhibit positive subjective experiences of participation rights implementation within their families and schools. Further analysis employing the "Process-Person-Context-Time (PPCT)" theoretical model revealed that children's subjective experiences are influenced by factors such as their relationships with parents and teachers, parents' educational levels, and urban environments. Additionally, children's perceptions of participation rights and the surrounding environmental atmosphere also play significant roles. Specifically, when children perceive their environment as valuing children's rights, their subjective experiences of participation rights tend to be more positive. Moreover, this study found that children's subjective experiences of participation rights significantly impact their confidence, autonomy, and life satisfaction. In conclusion, this study not only verifies the subjective experiences of children's participation rights implementation in Taiwan but also provides empirical evidence related to their ecological environment and well-being. This contributes to a deeper understanding of the implementation of children's participation rights in Taiwan. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-09-05T16:15:39Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-09-05T16:15:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
謝辭 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 目次 vi 圖次 ix 表次 x 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與背景 1 壹、研究動機 2 貳、研究背景 4 第二節 研究問題與目的 5 壹、研究問題 5 貳、研究目的 6 第三節 名詞定義 6 壹、兒童（children） 6 貳、參與權（participation rights） 7 第二章 文獻探討 9 第一節 兒童參與權及生態系統模型 9 壹、過程（Process） 10 貳、個體（Person） 11 參、情境（Context） 11 肆、時間（Time） 11 第二節 英文文獻探討方法–主路徑分析法介紹 13 壹、搜尋路徑次數（search path count, SPC） 13 貳、搜尋路徑連結次數（search path link count, SPLC） 14 參、搜尋路徑節點對（the search path node pair, SPNP） 14 第三節 主要路徑上的兒童參與權英文文獻 16 壹、研究資料與分析流程 16 貳、主路徑分析（main path analysis） 19 參、分支路徑分析（branch analysis） 25 第四節 影響臺灣兒童參與權之因素 42 壹、P（過程）部分–參與權是兒童的，但落實在於成人 42 貳、P（個體，person）部分–「我們不一樣」，兒童個人特質亦與其參與經驗有關 43 參、C（情境）部分–人在情境中，兒童參與經驗亦在其境 44 肆、T（時間）部分–「一樹百穫」兒童參與經驗的累效 45 第五節 參與模型 51 第三章 研究方法 61 第一節 研究架構與假設 61 第二節 測量工具暨發展歷程及與本作者之關係 63 第三節 研究參與者、抽樣與資料收集 65 壹、研究參與者 65 貳、抽樣方法 65 參、資料描述 66 第四節 測量工具各研究變項及其信效度 68 壹、P（個體） 68 貳、P（過程） 70 參、C（情境） 72 肆、T（時間） 74 第五節 分析方法 77 壹、估計方法 77 貳、描述性統計 77 參、SEM模型建構 77 第四章 資料分析 78 第一節 描述性統計分析 78 壹、P‐個體（兒童參與權的主體經驗） 78 貳、P-過程（近身過程中的關係） 79 參、C-情境（微視、外部、鉅視系統） 79 肆、T-時間（十年之後）兒童的賦權與福祉 82 第二節 建構結構方程模型 89 壹、建構本研究結構方程模型的14步分析程序 91 貳、本研究結構方程模型之檢驗 96 參、本研究之假設檢定 102 第五章 研究結果與討論 104 第一節 研究結果 104 壹、臺灣兒童主觀的參與權落實經驗情形 104 貳、影響臺灣兒童主觀參與權落實的環境因素 105 參、臺灣兒童主觀參與權落實對於兒童賦權與福祉的影響 105 第二節 討論與建議 106 壹、我的權利我主張 106 貳、權利被重視的感覺真好，但在網路世界的感受差了點 108 參、你我沒有關係，我的參與就有關係 110 肆、參與可提升兒童的自主、自信和福祉，但對韌性影響較弱 111 伍、我們不一樣，但我們是平等的 112 陸、幸福城市是兒童友善參與的基盤，努力向兒童友善城市邁進吧 113 柒、臺灣兒童參與權量表的優化與發展尚有很大的空間 114 第三節 研究貢獻 115 壹、驗證臺灣兒童參與權的實踐狀況 115 貳、應用「過程–個體–情境–時間(PPCT)」理論模型 116 參、揭示環境對兒童參與權的影響 116 肆、兒童的自信、自主性和幸福感與其參與自身事務是關聯的 116 伍、提供政策建議和實踐指南 116 第四節 研究限制 117 參考文獻 118 附錄一 140 附錄二 141 附錄三 145 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.title | 臺灣兒童參與權的落實–以兒童為主體的經驗研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Implementation of Children's Participation Rights in Taiwan：A Study of Children's Subjective Experiences | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | - |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 沈瓊桃 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | April Chiung-Tao Shen | en |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王舒芸;胡中宜;陳心怡;唐宜楨 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Shu-Yung Wang;Chung-Yi Hu;Hsin-Yi Chen;I-Chen Tang | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 兒童權利公約,表意權,主路徑分析,引證網絡,文字雲,量化研究,參與權, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | UNCRC,the right of the child to be heard,main path analysis,citation network,word cloud,quantitative research,Participation Rights, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 147 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202403557 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-08-10 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會工作學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2029-08-06 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 社會工作學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf 此日期後於網路公開 2029-08-06 | 8.8 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。