請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93556
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 劉康慧 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Helen K. Liu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 張詠晴 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | YUNG-CHING CHANG | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-05T16:33:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-06 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2024-08-05 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2024-07-30 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 英文文獻
Adams, J. S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422-436. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity In Social Exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 267-299. Al Zamel, L., Khatijah, L. A., Chong, M. C., & Chua, Y. P. (2020). Factors Influencing Nurses’ Intention to Leave and Intention to Stay: An Integrative Review. Home Health Care Management & Practice, 32(4), 218-228. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1987). A longitudinal analysis of the early development and consequences of organizational commitment. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 19(2), 199-215. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 63, 1-18. Allen, N.J. and Meyer, J.P. (1991). A Three-Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61-89. Arif Hassan (2002). Organizational justice as a determinant of organizational commitment and intention to leave. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 7(2), 55-66. Azeem, M. U., Bajwa, S. U., Shahzad, K., & Aslam, H. (2020). Psychological contract violation and turnover intention: The role of job dissatisfaction and work disengagement. Employee Relations, 42(6), 1291-1308. Baldwin, M. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 461-484. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. Bergman, M. E. (2006). The relationship between affective and normative commitment: review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 645-663. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351-370. Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts. Social Justice Research, 1, 199-218 Bies, R., & Moag, J. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 1, 43-55. Bizer, G. Y. (2020). Who’s bothered by an unfair world? The emotional response to unfairness scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 159, 109882. Bizer, G. Y. (2020). Who's bothered by an unfair world? The emotional response to unfairness scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 159(6), 109882. Bradley, G. (2007). Job tenure as a moderator of stressor–strain relations: A comparison of experienced and new-start teachers. Work & Stress, 21(1), 48-64. Cahalane, H., & Sites, E. W. (2008). The Climate of Child Welfare Employee Retention. Child Welfare, 87(1), 91-114. Calò, F., Teasdale, S., Roy, M. J., Bellazzecca, E., & Mazzei, M. (2023). Exploring Collaborative Governance Processes Involving Nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 53(1), 54-78. Carrell, M. R., & Dittrich, J. E. (1978). Equity theory: The recent literature, methodological considerations, and new directions. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review (Pre-1986), 3(2), 202-210. Cavanaugh, M. A., & Noe, R. A. (1999). Antecedents and consequences of relational components of the new psychological contract. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(3), 323-340. Chen, Y. W., Huang, M. Y., Wang, J. C., & Chen, H. H. (2013). Mediating effect of organizational equity on freshmen' organizational commitment in the workplace. Life Science Journal, 10(3), 1162-1170. Cho, S., Johanson, M. M., & Guchait, P. (2009). Employees intent to leave: A comparison of determinants of intent to leave versus intent to stay. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28(3), 374-381. Cohen, G., Blake, R. S., & Goodman, D. (2016). Does Turnover Intention Matter? Evaluating the Usefulness of Turnover Intention Rate as a Predictor of Actual Turnover Rate. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(3), 240-263. Cole, M. S., & Bruch, H. (2006). Organizational Identity Strength, Identification, and Commitment and their Relationships to Turnover Intention: Does Organizational Hierarchy Matter? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 585-605. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425-445. Colquitt, J. A., Zapata-Phelan, C. P., & Roberson, Q. M. (2005). Justice in Teams: A Review of Fairness Effects in Collective Contexts. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 24, 53-94. Corbin, J. (1999). A study of factors influencing the growth of nonprofits in social services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 296-314. Daniel, J. L., & Fyall, R. (2019). The Intersection of Nonprofit Roles and Public Policy Implementation. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(6), 1351-1371. Davidovitz, M., & Cohen, N. (2022). Which Clients Inspire or Reduce the Trust of Street-Level Bureaucrats? Administration & Society, 54(8), 1516-1541. DePanfilis, D., & Zlotnik, J. L. (2008). Retention of front-line staff in child welfare: A systematic review of research. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(9), 995-1008. Dick, D. T., & Henningsen, D. D. (2020). The Perception of Leaders: A Competitive Test of Social Exchange Theory and Equity Theory. Groupwork, 28(3), 37-52. Feld, S. L., & Grofman, B. (1990). Collectivities as Actors: Consistency of Collective Choices. Rationality and Society, 2(4), 429-448. Gharbi, H., Aliane, N., Al Falah, K. A., & Sobaih, A. E. E. (2022). You Really Affect Me: The Role of Social Influence in the Relationship between Procedural Justice and Turnover Intention. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 19(9), 5162. Gim, G. C. W., & Mat Desa, N. (2014). The Impact of Distributive Justice, Procedural Justice, and Affective Commitment on Turnover Intention among Public and Private Sector Employees in Malaysia. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 4(6), 487-492. Gundlach, G. T., Achrol, R. S., & Mentzer, J. T. (1995). The structure of commitment in exchange. Journal of Marketing, 59(1), 78-92. Huang, X., Wright, R. P., Chiu, W. C. K., & Wang, C. (2008). Relational schemas as sources of evaluation and misevaluation of leader-member exchanges: Some initial evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(3), 266-282. Jerald Greenberg (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), 340-342. Jerald Greenberg (1987). A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 9-22. Johnson, J. L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (2003). The effects of psychological contract breach and organizational cynicism: not all social exchange violations are created equal. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(5), 627-647. June M. L. Poon (2012). Distributive Justice, Procedural Justice, Affective Commitment, and Turnover Intention: A Mediation–Moderation Framework. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(6), 1505-1532. Karen A. Froelich (1999). Diversification of Revenue Strategies: Evolving Resource Dependence in Nonprofit Organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,28(3), 246-268. Khalid, S., Rehman, Ch. A., & Muqadas, F. (2018). Exploring the mediating role of affective commitment on organizational justice and turnover intention. Pakistan Business Review, 19,1012-1028. Khodaparast Sareshkeh, S., Ghaziani, F. G., & Tayebi, S. M. (2012). Impact of Organizational Justice Perceptions on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment: The Iranian Sport Federations Perspective. Annals of Biological Research, 3(8), 4229-4238. Kim, S. E., & Lee, J. W. (2007). Is Mission Attachment an Effective Management Tool for Employee Retention An Empirical Analysis of a Nonprofit Human Services Agency. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27(3), 227-248. Kim, S.W., Price, J. L., Mueller, C. W., & Watson, T. W. (1996). The Determinants of Career Intent Among Physicians at a U.S. Air Force Hospital. Human Relations, 49(7), 947-976. Kirk Emerson, Tina Nabatchi, Stephen Balogh (2012). An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1-29. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What Should Be Done with Equity Theory? Social Exchange, 27-55. Lipsky, M., & Smith, S. R. (1989). Nonprofit organizations, government, and the welfare state. Political Science Quarterly, 104(4), 625-648. Liu, M., & Wang, Y. (2015). Data collection mode effect on feeling thermometer questions: A comparison of face-to-face and Web surveys. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 212-218. López-Cabarcos, M. Á., Machado-Lopes-Sampaio-de Pinho, A. I., & Vázquez-Rodríguez, P. (2015). The Influence of Organizational Justice and Job Satisfaction on Organizational Commitment in Portugal’s Hotel Industry. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 56(3), 258-272. Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 171-194. Mdhlalose, D. (2022). The Innovative Employee: The Assessment of Reward Equity on the Predisposition to Make Creative Contributions through Literature Review. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 10(3), 433-448. Mercurio, Z. A. (2015). Affective Commitment as a Core Essence of Organizational Commitment: An Integrative Literature Review. Human Resource Development Review, 14(4), 389-414. Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538-551. Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20-52. Miller, L. E., Powell, G. N., & Seltzer, J. (1990). Determinants of turnover among volunteers. Human Relations, 43(9), 901-917. Moon, K. K. (2017). Fairness at the Organizational Level: Examining the Effect of Organizational Justice Climate on Collective Turnover Rates and Organizational Performance. Public Personnel Management, 46(2), 118-143. Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224-247. Mowday, R.T. (1998). Reflections on the Study and Relevance of Organizational Commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 8, 387-401. Nancarrow, S., Bradbury, J., Pit, S. W., & Ariss, S. (2014). Intention to Stay and Intention to Leave: Are They Two Sides of the Same Coin? A Cross-sectional Structural Equation Modelling Study among Health and Social Care Workers. Journal of Occupational Health, 56(4), 292-300. Never, Brent & de Leon, Erwin (2014). The Effect of Government Contracting on Nonprofit Human Service Organizations:Impacts of an Evolving Relationship. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 38(3), 258-270. Nguyen Phong Nguyen, Felicitas Evangelista, Tai Anh Kieu (2019). The contingent roles of perceived budget fairness, budget goal commitment and vertical information sharing in driving work performance. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies,26(1), 98-116. Nojani, M. I., Arjmandnia, A. A., Afrooz, G. A., & Rajabi, M. (2012). The Study on Relationship between Organizational Justice and Job Satisfaction in Teachers Working in General, Special and Gifted Education Systems. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2900-2905. Ohana, M., & Meyer, M. (2016). Distributive justice and affective commitment in nonprofit organizations: Which referent matters? Employee Relations, 38(6), 841-858. Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469. Ou, Qiong. (2017). A Brief Introduction to Perception. Studies in Literature and Language, 15, 18-28. Peng, S., Liao, Y., & Lu, J. (2020). Stay or Exit: Why Do Nonprofits Maintain Collaborations With Government? American Review of Public Administration, 50(1), 18-32. Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603-609. Pritchard, R. D. (1969). Equity theory: A review and critique. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 4(2), 176-211. Radford, K., Shacklock, K., & Bradley, G. (2013). Personal care workers in Australian aged care: retention and turnover intentions. Journal of Nursing Management, 23(5), 557-566. Ramamoorthy, N., & Flood, P. C. (2004). Gender and Employee Attitudes: The Role of Organizational Justice Perceptions. British Journal of Management,15(3), 247-258. Ratnasahara Elisabeth, D., Yuliastanti, R., Suyono, J., Chauhan, R., & Thakar, I. (2021). Affective Commitment, Continuance Commitment, Normative Commitment, and Turnover Intention in Shoes Industry. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 25(3),1937-1945. Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. (2000). The Development of Psychological Contract Breach and Violation: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(5), 525-546. Robinson, S. L., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract:Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 245-259. Romzek, Barbara S., LeRoux, Kelly, & Blackmar, Jeannette M. (2012). A Preliminary Theory of Informal Accountability among Network Organizational Actors. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 442-453. Sako, M., & Helper, S. (1998). Determinants of trust in supplier relations: Evidence from the automotive industry in Japan and the United States. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 34(3), 387-417. Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1992). In search of the non-profit sector. I: The question of definitions. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 3, 125-151. Sandhya, S., & Sulphey, M. M. (2020). Influence of empowerment, psychological contract and employee engagement on voluntary turnover intentions. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 70(2), 325-349. Smith, Brett R., Kistruck, Geoffrey M., & Cannatelli, Benedetto (2016). The impact of moral intensity and desire for control on scaling decisions in social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), 677-689. Srivastava, K., & Sharma, N. K. (2013). Service Quality, Corporate Brand Image, and Switching Behavior: The Mediating Role of Customer Satisfaction and Repurchase Intention. Services Marketing Quarterly, 34(4), 274-291. Steers, R. M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 46-56. Suliman, A., & Al Kathairi, M. (2013). Organizational justice, commitment and performance in developing countries: The case of the UAE. Employee Relations, 35(1), 98-115. Susilawati, N., Gunadi, & Rahayu, N. (2022). A systematic literature review for distinguishing tax terms: Equality, equity, justice, and fairness. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 13(6), 19-39. Tayfur, O., Bayhan Karapinar, P., & Metin Camgoz, S. (2013). The mediating effects of emotional exhaustion cynicism and learned helplessness on organizational justice-turnover intentions linkage. International Journal of Stress Management, 20(3), 193-221. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1978). A Theory of Procedure. California Law Review, 66(3), 541-566. Thornton, J., & Lecy, J. (2023). Net impact of government funding on nonprofit fiscal health: burden or benefit? Nonprofit Management and Leadership,33(3), 561-584. Usadolo, Q. E., & Usadolo, S. E. (2021). The Effect of Motive Fulfilment as a Meditating Variable between Perceived Organisational Support and Volunteers’ Affective Commitment in Non-Profit Organisations. African Journal of Inter/Multidisciplinary Studies,3(1), 75-90. Usadolo, Q. E., Brunetto, Y., Nelson, S., & Gillett, P. (2022). Connecting the Dots: Perceived Organization Support, Motive Fulfilment, Job Satisfaction, and Affective Commitment Among Volunteers. SAGE Open, 12(3), 215824402211161. Vogel, R., & Werkmeister, L. (2021). What Is Public about Public Leadership? Exploring Implicit Public Leadership Theories. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31, 166-83. Weick, K. E. (1966). The concept of equity in the perception of pay. Administrative Science Quarterly, 11(3), 414-439. Weick, K. E., & Nesset, B. (1968). Preferences among forms of equity. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 3(4), 400-416. Wilson, M., Bakkabulindi, F. E. K., & Ssempebwa, J. (2016). Validity and Reliability of Allen and Meyer’s (1990) Measure of Employee Commitment in the Context of Academic Staff in Universities in Uganda. Journal of Sociology and Education in Africa, 14(1), 1-9. Yanagi, I., Kobashi, Y., Pekkanen, R. J., Tsujinaka, Y. (2021). Distinguishing Providing Public Services from Receiving Government Funding as Factors in Nonprofit Advocacy. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32, 534-547. 中文文獻 Neuman, W. L(2014)。當代社會研究法:質化與量化取向(王佳煌、潘中道、蘇文賢、江吟梓譯)。臺北市:學富。(原著出版於2010年) 丁學勤(2006)。分配公平性與程序公平性對滿意度與承諾的相對影響力之缺口評論。顧客滿意學刊,2(1),105-126。 王千文、陳敦源(2012)。形式上還是實質上的「公私協力」:全民健康保險總額支付制度個案分析。公共行政學報,(42),99-137。 王月雲、張永富(2003)。工作特性與組織承諾之關係研究:以社會資本為調節變項。遠東學報,20(4),983-990。 王兆慶(2017)。托育公共化的最後一塊拼圖:0-2 歲托育政策。社區發展季刊,159,126-137。 王淑英、孫嫚薇(2003)。托育照顧政策中的國家角色。國家政策季刊,2(4),147-174。 王篤強、高迪理、吳秀照(2010)。 台灣社會福利民營化的未預期後果:地方政府相關人員「官僚自主性」的初步闡釋。 社會政策與社會工作學刊,14(2),91-146。 朱年珍(2021)。新北市公共托嬰中心托育人員的工作價值觀、組織承諾與留任意願之關係研究。未出版之碩士論文,中國文化大學青少年兒童福利碩士學位學程,臺北市。 吳青娟、楊詠翔(2019)。臺北市非營利幼兒園政策執行現況。幼兒教育,(328),20-33。 吳英明(1993)。公私部門協力關係和「公民參與」之探討。中國行政評論,2(3),1-14。 吳培儷、陸宛蘋(2002) 。臺灣非營利部門之現況與組織運作分析。康寧學報,4,159-211。 吳雪華(2013)。地方政府與第三部門的契約委外關係之研究:以我國社會福利型非營利組織為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立中央大學法律與政府研究所,桃園市。 吳憶珮(2023)。托嬰中心托育人員心理資本、社會支持與角色行為之關係研究—以新北市公共托育中心之托育人員為例。未出版之碩士論文,中國文化大學青少年兒童福利碩士學位學程,臺北市。 李永祥、余宗龍(2014)。計畫行為理論對大學生從事規律運動行為之影響因素。大專體育學刊,16(1),45-58。 李佩欣、林弘昌(2022)。激勵制度影響非營利組織專職人員留任意願之探討。科技與人力教育季刊,8(4),47-65。 李坤城(2021)。臺北市公共托育政策之推動與檢討-從「祝妳好孕」到「公共托育家園」。國會季刊,49(4),1-28。 李宗勳(2004)。公私協力與委外化的效應與價值:一項進行中的治理改造工程。公共行政學報,(12),41-77。 李昭瑢(2015)。幼兒園護理人員價值創造:公私協力觀點。未出版之碩士論文,嘉南藥理大學醫務管理系,臺南市。 李家瑩、方郁惠、吳柏勳(2013)。以期望理論及公平理論探討線上服務失誤補救。電子商務學報,15(3),367-388。 李淑麗(2016)。非營利幼兒園公私協力關係之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系,臺北市。 李進福(2006)。數學教材設計之研究-以視覺設計理論為基礎。未出版之碩士論文,國立交通大學理學院碩士在職專班網路學習學程,新竹市。 杜友蘭(1998)。護理的質性與量性研究-哪一類研究比較重要?護理雜誌,45(2),75-78。 阮光勛(2014)。促進質性研究的品質與可信性。國教新知,61(1),92-102。 周怡君(2019)。從事前溝通機制論政府與民間團體在社福服務契約委託中的關係。社區發展季刊,(166),56-64。 林永順、顔財發(2007)。公平性、滿意度、信任與承諾的關係:連鎖超商與非連鎖超商實證研究。中華農學會報,8(6),502-516。 林言同、蘇容梅(2015)。推動非營利幼兒園的挑戰與建議。師友月刊,(580),20-23。 林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花(2005)。質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身心障礙研究季刊,3(2),122-136。 林俊傑(2007)。組織承諾的理論與相關研究之探討。學校行政,(51),35-53。 林俊瑩、張凱程、林志豪(2022)。臺灣地區非營利幼兒園的政策效果與侷限。臺北市立大學學報,53(1),23-42。 林信廷、王舒芸(2015)。公私協力托嬰中心的成就與限制:兒童照顧政策理念的檢視。臺灣社會福利學刊,12(2),15-55。 林淑馨(2008)。社福型非營利組織與政府在服務輸送互動上之困境分析。社區發展季刊,(122),47-61。 林淑馨(2015)。我國非營利組織與地方政府協力現況之初探與反思:以臺北市為例。文官制度,7(2),17-45。 林淑馨(2018)。協力神話的崩壞?我國地方政府與非營利組織的協力現況。公共行政學報,(55),1-36。 林淑馨(2023)。非營利組織概論 (第3版)。臺北市:元照。 林慧芝(2005)。激勵制度對留任意願影響之探討-以內部稽核人員為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所,桃園市。 邱志鵬(2007)。臺灣幼托整合政策的概念、規劃歷程及未來展望。研習資訊,24(3),3-21。 侯伯樺、龔心怡(2019)。老師,暑假後你還會回來嗎?探究中彰投偏遠地區國小教師留任意願之影響因素。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,12(3),79-108。 施又瑀(2018)。公私協力模式推動非營利幼兒園之探究。臺灣教育評論月刊,7(7),20-28。 施承斌(2004)。社會福利機構承接政府公設民營業務的考量-以非營利組織管理觀點探討。未出版之碩士論文,慈濟大學社會工作研究所,花蓮縣。 柯于璋(2020)。公私協力夥伴關係之爭議與課責-以我國文化創意產業園區委外經營為例。公共行政學報,(58),55-87。 范麗娟(1994)。深度訪談簡介。戶外遊憩研究,7(2),25-35。 孫本初、陳衍宏(2003)。「新公共服務」對政府再造的啟示:歷史發展系絡的解析途徑。人事月刊,36(5),9-23。 孫煒(2016)。台灣地方社會服務契約委外的績效與競爭。公共行政學報,51,1-33。 徐千惠(2018)。從公共政策之角度思考非營利幼兒園的設立與營運。臺灣教育評論月刊,7(7),16-19。 翁崇文(2015)。非營利幼兒園經營問題與改善作為。師友月刊,(579),44-48。 翁麗芳(2013)。從臺灣史觀點論臺灣幼兒教育的發展。教育資料與研究,104,1-26。 張育誠、吳鴻昌、李清潭(2015)。意義、脈絡、反身性:質性研究的科學性與正當性。商略學報,7(2),71-88。 張津婕(2010)。研發人員組織適配度與留任意願的關聯性探討-以人格特質為干擾變項。未出版之碩士論文,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所,桃園市。 張雅婷(2020)。社會企業利害關係人之社會網絡分析-以里仁事業股份有限公司為例。中國行政評論,26(3),30-63。 莊淑惠、林鴻南、翁佩瑜(2011)。線上顧客再購意圖之研究:結合期望-不確認理論與承諾-信任理論觀點。Electronic Commerce Studies,9(4),383-406。 許書華(2022)。公私協力推動社區公共托育家園之研究-以臺北市為例。未出版之碩士論文,臺北市立大學社會暨公共事務學系公共事務學碩士班,台北市。 陳佩吟(2015)。公、私部門如何協力:新北市公共托育中心制度的推動與協力治理。未出版之碩士論文,國立中正大學社會福利學系暨研究所,嘉義縣。 陳怡君、劉廷揚(2019)。外包人員留任因素研究:交通運輸公司之個案研究。政策與人力管理,10(2),1-29。 陳金貴(2002)。非營利組織社會企業化經營探討。新世紀智庫論壇,19,39-51。 陳品榕(2013)。論公私協力履行社會福利任務─兼論國家擔保責任之理論與實踐。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學法律學研究所,臺北市。 陳姿諭(2014)。薪酬制度公平知覺與員工工作滿意及工作績效之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所,高雄市。 陳彥廷(2007)。合併公平理論與信任對B2C消費者持續購買意願之研究(NSC95-2416-H262-002)。行政院國家科學委員會;龍華技術學院資訊管理系。 陳律睿、張俊民、鄭又慈(2021)。探討影響共享經濟提供者持續參與意圖之因素:整合自我決定和公平理論觀點。全球管理與經濟,17(2),53-70。 陳思培(2017)。托育人員工作滿意、組織承諾及其留任意願之關係─以新北市公共托育中心為例。未出版之碩士論文,中國文化大學青少年兒童福利碩士學位學程,臺北市。 陳喻暄(2023)。基於期望確認理論探討認知與情感對線上再購意圖之影響。未出版之碩士論文,國立雲林科技大學資訊管理系,雲林縣。 陳敦源、張世杰(2010)。公私協力夥伴關係的弔詭。文官制度季刊,2(3),17-71。 曾冠球(2011)。協力治理觀點下公共管理者的挑戰與能力建立。文官制度季刊,3(1),27-52。 曾冠球(2017)。良善協力治理下的公共服務民間夥伴關係。國土及公共治理,5(1),67-79。 曾筱茹(2019)。非營利幼兒園經營之探究-以南投縣為例。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(5),20-24。 黃秀琴(2014)。非營利幼兒園公私協力關係之研究-以花蓮縣為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立東華大學公共行政學系,花蓮縣。 黃琢嵩、吳淑芬、劉寶娟(2005)。社會福利團體承接政府公設民營服務之省思。社區發展季刊,107,147-153。 黃源協、莊俐昕(2019)。社會服務契約委外何去何從?社區發展季刊,(166),75-87。 楊政議、李麗紅、曾雯琦(2008)。質性研究與實證主義的關係。護理雜誌,55(5),64-68。 楊曉苓(2022)。公辦民營托嬰中心之公私協力方式及托育品質探討。人類發展與家庭學報,(23),63-98。 劉淑瓊(1997)。依賴與對抗論福利服務契約委託下政府與民間受託單位間的關係。社區發展季刊,(80),113-129。 劉淑瓊(2011)。理想與現實:論台灣社會服務契約委託的變遷及課題。社區發展季刊,133,462-478。 劉淑瓊(2016)。不為與不能:論政府購買社會服務之進場障礙與市場管理策略。中國非營利評論,17,87-124。 劉淑瓊(2019)。我們不一樣—論小型在地非營利組織承接政府社服委外的挑戰與機會。社區發展季刊,(166),170-188。 歐姿秀、保心怡、江弘基(2022)。從績效考評指標修正變化看非營利幼兒園辦理目標之引導與實施。臺灣教育評論月刊,11(11),11-17。 歐姿秀、陳淑琦、李淑惠(2013)。非營利幼兒園應有之核心價值。國教新知,60(4),49-58。 潘中道(2019)。台灣「混合型非營利組織」治理的挑戰-組織使命的維護V.S 組織生存的維護。東吳社會工作學報,(36),1-32。 賴貞男(2009)。公私協力治理理論與應用—以屏東縣黑鮪魚文化觀光季為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學政治學研究所,臺北市。 韓意慈(2022)。規模重要嗎?民間宗教型戒癮安置機構的組織運作差異。行政暨政策學報,(75),69-102。 簡秋萍(2018)。托嬰中心托育人員工作生活品質與離職傾向關係之研究。未出版之碩士論文,中臺科技大學文教事業經營研究所,臺中市。 魏季李(2019)。同中有異?政府契約委託對受託組織發展的影響-以臺灣五個兒少福利機構為例。社區發展季刊,(166),130-144。 羅筱葳(2017)。照顧管理專員工作滿意度與留任意願之相關性研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學護理學研究所,臺北市。 蘇中信、陳俊言(2018)。從組織公平因素結構探討臺灣組織公平的發展。高苑學報,23,40-54。 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93556 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 非營利幼兒園政策作為我國的熱門議題,對於公部門而言,是一項已向外宣布且要持續推動的幼教政策,對於民眾而言,是介於公立與私立中具有品質與優惠價格的服務方案。由於非營利幼兒園政策以公私協力方式推動,所以可以說政策能否推動與非營利組織的持續意向有很大的關係,然而我國社會服務契約委託長期出現公部門釋出的委外資源遠超於民間的供應量能(劉淑瓊,2019),且近期非營利組織的街頭遊行與召開之記者會,促使思考這項政策是否能真的如政府預想的推動。依循公私協力理論,公平是促進協力發展的關鍵要素,也正是近期非營利幼兒園倡議行動向政府傳遞之訊息,然而以公平為主題討論公私協力的研究卻屈指可數,為此本研究借鑒公平理論觀察公平感知與非營利組織在此業務的持續意向。又考量到非營利的特性,包含志願主義、社群主義、交易成本理論與資源依賴理論,故亦納入組織承諾對公平與持續的關係來做討論。本研究使用個案研究法、深度訪談法與文獻分析法研究四個非營利組織,並呈現其協力感受,感受的形成以及影響。
結果發現個案組織對於公平的衡量標準與感知狀態不同,但仍可以理解公平是法人重視的協力要素。這種感知不僅來自於與公部門的互動,與其他協力對象互動形成的感受也會進一步影響非營利組織對協力公平的看法,甚至僅透過認知制度也會提升對現有協力的認可,故「比較」是感知形成的重要過程,非營利組織也頻繁通過研商會議來累積他們對於協力公平的認識。其次,存在公平的感知主要是受到規範性承諾的作用,非營利法人會為了推動理念和使命而調整如何處理不公平以及不公平帶來的影響,不要求公平而追求對理念的尊重,為此本研究指出協力情形僅須滿足部份項目即可能被認定為公平,且非營利組織認為大部分協力有達到公平。相較之下,資金方面的成本與對政府的歸屬感就不是法人所在意的部分。第三,依目前情況,非營利法人會持續辦理已經承辦的非營利幼兒園,但不太會新辦園所,並且雖然法人跨足其他協力業務,但仍以非營利幼兒園為主。這種跨足其他協力業務的經驗與認知也通過比較而影響法人的感知形成。最後,本研究顯示公平與不公平的感知是以複雜且有條件的情況影響持續意向,公平有限地助於促進法人選擇續辦,不公平則是在影響園所經營或阻礙理念展現的前提下降低法人的續辦與新辦,其中其他法人與社會大眾對非營利組織的不公平對經營能力會產生的直接影響,而公部門也被認為有協力義務介入處理。 是以,本研究以組織層次且討論公私協力的抽象概念,利用不同的研究方法與研究設計為早期文獻使用的研究框架做出了重要貢獻,並且讓公部門能夠在公平、組織承諾與持續意向的關係上更了解合作夥伴的想法,進一步思考與精進公私協力。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The policy of non-profit kindergartens is a hot topic in our country. For the public sector, it is a childcare policy that has been announced externally and is being continuously promoted. For the public, it represents a service option with quality and favorable prices, situated between public and private sectors. As the policy for non-profit kindergartens is promoted through public-private partnership, its success is closely related to the continued intention of non-profit organizations to participate. However, in our country, the outsourcing resources released by the public sector have far exceeded the supply capacity of the private sector in long-term social service contracts(Liu, 2019). Recent street demonstrations and press conferences by non-profit organizations have prompted reflection on whether this policy can truly be implemented as envisioned by the government. Based on the theory of public-private partnerships, justice is a key element in promoting the development of such partnerships, which is also the message conveyed by recent advocacy actions of non-profit kindergartens to the government. However, research discussing public-private partnerships with justice as the main theme is scarce. Therefore, this study draws on the theory of justice to observe the perceptions of justice and the continuing intentions of nonprofit organizations in this field. Considering the characteristics of nonprofit organizations, including voluntarism, communitarianism, transaction cost theory, and resource dependence theory, this study also incorporates the relationship between organizational commitment to justice and sustainability. This study utilizes case studies, in-depth interviews, and literature analysis to examine four nonprofit organizations, presenting their perceptions of cooperation, the formation of these perceptions, and their impacts.
The results show that cases have different standards and perceptions of justice, but it can still be understood that justice is an key element in cooperation. This perception not only arises from interactions with the public sector, but also from interactions with other collaborative partners, which further influence non-profit organizations' views on the fairness of collaboration. Even solely through cognitive institutions, recognition of existing collaborations can be enhanced. Therefore, "comparison" is an important process in forming perception, and non-profit organizations frequently accumulate their understanding of collaboration fairness through deliberative conferences. Secondly, the perception of justice is mainly influenced by normative commitments, and nonprofit organizations adjust how they handle injustice and its impacts in order to advance their ideals and mission, even sometimes prioritizing respect for their ideals over the pursuit of justice. Hence, this study points out that cooperation situations may only need to meet some criteria to be considered justice, and non-profit organizations believe that cooperation has achieved justice. In contrast, financial costs and the sense of belonging to the government are not major concerns for organizations. Thirdly, under the current situation, nonprofit organizations will continue to operate the non-profit kindergartens they have already undertaken, but are less likely to establish new ones. Although organizations venture into other cooperative businesses, non-profit kindergartens remain their primary focus. Experiences and perceptions gained from venturing into other cooperative businesses also influence the formation of organizations' perceptions through comparison. Finally, this study indicates that perceptions of justice and injustice are complex and conditional in affecting the intention to continue, with justice limitedly facilitating organizations' choices to continue operation, while injustice diminishes their intention to continue or establish new kindergartens under the premise of impacting operations or hindering the manifestation of ideals. The direct impact of injustice from other organizations and the public on the operational capacity of non-profit organizations, as well as the perceived obligation of the public sector to intervene in cooperation, are also highlighted. Therefore, by discussing PPPs from an organizational level and abstract perspective, this study makes an important contribution to the research framework used in the early literature by utilizing a different research methodology and research design, and enables the public sector to further reflect on and refine PPPs by better understanding the partner's thinking in terms of the relationship between justice, organizational commitment, and continuing intentions. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-08-05T16:33:41Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-05T16:33:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
謝辭 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 v 目次 viii 圖次 xii 表次 xiii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節、問題意識 1 第二節、研究問題與目的 15 壹、研究目的 15 貳、研究問題 17 第三節、重要性與可行性 17 壹、研究的重要性 17 貳、研究的可行性 18 第四節、重要名詞解釋 19 壹、公平 19 貳、組織承諾 20 參、協力持續意向 21 第二章 文獻回顧 23 第一節、公平理論 23 第二節、組織承諾 29 第三節、持續意向 32 第四節、公平、組織承諾與持續意向的關係 36 第三章 研究方法 41 第一節、研究架構 42 第二節、研究方法 45 壹、質性研究方法 46 貳、個案研究法 46 參、半結構式訪談法 47 肆、文獻分析法 48 第三節、研究對象 48 壹、研究個案 48 貳、研究對象 49 參、個案介紹 54 第四節、研究工具 57 第四章 個案發現與分析 60 第一節、個案A 60 壹、公平層次 61 貳、組織承諾層次 72 參、持續意向層次 75 肆、公平、組織承諾、持續意向等三者關係的探討 78 第二節、個案B 81 壹、公平層次 82 貳、組織承諾層次 93 參、持續意向層次 96 肆、公平、組織承諾、持續意向等三者關係的探討 99 第三節、個案C 102 壹、公平層次 103 貳、組織承諾層次 112 參、持續意向層次 116 肆、公平、組織承諾、持續意向等三者關係的探討 120 第四節、個案D 123 壹、公平層次 123 貳、組織承諾層次 130 參、持續意向層次 133 肆、公平、組織承諾、持續意向等三者關係的探討 138 第五章 綜合討論 141 第一節、公平層次的探討 144 壹、公平感知的比較對象不限於公部門而涵蓋其他互動對象 144 貳、強調程序與互動的公平面向 152 第二節、組織承諾層次的探討 155 壹、公私協力會產生責任感而非歸屬感 156 貳、成本的主要考量為人力 157 參、法人強烈的使命感 159 第三節、持續意向層次的探討 160 壹、以續辦為主,並依情形選擇新辦 161 貳、以投入非營利幼兒園的協力為主 163 第四節、三者關係的探討 165 壹、部分認同公平、組織承諾與持續意向存在關係 166 貳、利用特別的方法達到公平、助於公私部門之持續合作 172 第六章 結論與建議 177 第一節、研究結論 177 第二節、研究建議 182 壹、實務建議 182 貳、學術建議 184 第三節、研究限制 185 第七章 參考資料 188 壹、英文文獻 188 貳、中文文獻 196 第八章 附件 203 附件、訪談大綱參考之量表的信度與效度 203 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 以質性研究探討公平感知、組織承諾與協力持續意向之關係—以非營利幼兒園為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Qualitative Study on the Relationship between Justice Perception, Organizational Commitment, and Intentions for Collaborative Sustainability -A Case Study of Non-Profit Kindergarten | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蔡錦昌;洪美仁 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chin-Chang Tsai;Mei-Jen Hung | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 公平感知,組織承諾,協力持續意向,非營利組織,非營利幼兒園政策, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Justice perception,Organizational commitment,Intentions for collaborative sustainability,Nonprofit Organization,Non-profit kindergarten policy, | en |
dc.relation.page | 205 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202402451 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2024-08-01 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共事務研究所 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 公共事務研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-112-2.pdf | 2.36 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。