請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92899
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 郭瑞祥 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Ruey-Shan Guo | en |
dc.contributor.author | 徐鳯韓 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Feng-Han Hsu | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-03T16:11:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-04 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2024-07-03 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2024-05-27 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部份
(一)期刊 1. 毛家驊,“都會型運動場館經營模式之探討以台茂購物中心Action Zone爲例”。輔仁大學體育學刊,5,(2006),120-132。 2. 余宏,“日本商業銀行的私人金融服務業務”。城市金融論壇5,4,(2000),52-56。 3. 林陽助,“理財專員屬性、關係銷售行為、品質與顧客忠誠度關係之研究-以財富管理為例”。台灣金融財務季刊,6,1,(2005),87-118。 4. 林翠蓉、張力、侯啟娉與葉文瑞,“主管領導風格與理財專員人格特質對工作績效影響之探討-以國內某財富管理銀行為例”。績效與策略研究,10,2,(2013),37-62。 5. 莊世杰、黃千容與許信仁,“理財專員職業道德知覺對工作績效的影響--兼論工作年資與主管支持的干擾效果”。商業現代化學刊,7,3,(2014),219-244。 6. 楊雪蘭、陳寶蓮與張如惠,“消費者對理財專員服務接觸與關係品質之認知-以銀行業為例”。行銷評論,3,4,(2006),447-472。 7. 劉維琪、黃春長、謝玲芬、趙瑀、侯玉松、王張煒與鄭淑芳,“我國北區社會企業特性分析研究”。勞動及職業安全衛生研究季刊,24,4,(2016),377-388。 8. 謝如梅、方世杰、劉常勇與蔡馥陞,“團隊社會資本與新產品開發績效:知識分享機會,意願與能力之中介效果”。中山管理評論,17,4,(2009),1001-1044。 (二)書籍 1. Adner R., “生態系競爭策略:重新定義價值結構,在轉型中辨識正確的賽局,掌握策略工具,贏得先機”,黃庭敏(譯)。天下雜誌,(2022)。 2. Osterwalder A., Pigneur Y., Bernarda G., Smith A., and Papadakos T., “價值主張年代:設計思考×顧客不可或缺的需求=成功商業模式的獲利核心”,季晶晶(譯)。天下雜誌,(2017)。 3. 林吉郎,“民間團體發展社會企業的策略途徑:香港經驗的啟發。多元就業開發方案-民間團體發展成為社會企業論述精選集”。行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局中彰投區就業服務中心,(2008),47-60。 4. 台灣金融研訓院,“高資產財富管理人才職能地圖”。(2022),5月版。 (三)已出版博碩士論文 1. 方佳敏,“財富新觀念:人人都學經濟學”。清華大學出版社,(2010)。 2. 任小,“財富沒有「潛規則」:讀懂財務、把握財富”。清華大學出版社,(2014)。 3. 李慧敏,“投資理財技巧速查寶典(實例白金版)”。清華大學出版社,(2013)。 4. 金淑麗,“做一個幸福的財女”。清華大學出版社,(2010)。 5. 孫恆,“財富新觀念:理財就這麼簡單”。清華大學出版社,(2010)。 6. 陳鎮與趙敏捷,“家庭理財”。清華大學出版社,(2009)。 (四)未出版博碩士論文 1. 吳淑郁,“數位浪潮下的商模轉型-以NVIDIA公司為例”。國立臺灣大學管理學院碩士在職專班資訊管理組,(2023)。 2. 李明洲,“即時通訊軟體建立生態系之策略分析--以LINE及其在台灣發展為例”。國立臺灣大學管理學院商學研究所,(2023)。 3. 林東和,“私人銀行業務在國內之發展策略與現況探討”。國立臺灣大學工商管理研究所,(2000)。 4. 林佳儒,“結構型商品之評價與分析-以股權連動商品及目標贖回型雪球式利率連動商品為例”。政治大學金融研究所學位論文,(2007)。 5. 梁勁煒,“退休生活理財規劃與個人年金保險”。國立陽明交通大學經營管理研究所,(2002)。 6. 莊永丞,“我國證券交易法再次發行之理論基礎與規範缺失”。中原財經法學、東吳大學法律學系專題,(2011)。 7. 陳漢傑,“涉入、產品屬性的評估與購買意願之相關研究-以銀行消費者購買理財服務為實證”。國立成功大學高階管理,(2005)。 8. 陳昇鴻,“銀行競爭對銀行系統性風險影響的全球銀行實證研究:公司治理、內部風險管理、國家治理、金融監理的角色”。南華大學財務金融學系,(2015)。 9. 廖四郎、康榮寶與張嘉倩,“保本型票券之訂價及避險策略”。國立政治大學金融系專題,(2003)。 10. 鄭如吟,“銀行理財服務購買意願之研究”。成功大學統計學系,(2006)。 二、英文部份 1. Adner, R., and Kapoor, R., “Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations”, Strategic Management Journal, 31,3, (2010), 306-333. 2. Afuah, A., and Tucci, C. L., “Internet business models and strategies: Text and cases (Vol. 2, p. 384)”, New York: McGraw-Hill, (2003). 3. Aldridge, A., “Habitus and cultural capital in the field of personal finance” , The Sociological Review, 46,1, (1998), 1-23. 4. Armstrong, J. S., Morwitz, V. G., and Kumar, V., “Sales forecasts for existing consumer products and services: Do purchase intentions contribute to accuracy?”, International Journal of Forecasting, 16,3, (2000), 383-397. 5. Battistella, K.,Colucci, A.F., and De Toni, F.,“NoninoMethodology of business ecosystems network analysis: a case study in Telecom Italia Future CentreTechnol”, Forecast. Soc. Chang., 80,6, (2013), 1194-1210. 6. Bellman, R., “Dynamic programming”, Science, 153(3731), (1966), 34-37. 7. Cao, Y.,and Zhai, J., “Bridging the gap–the impact of ChatGPT on financial research”, Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, (2023), 1-15. 8. Crossley, T. F., Emmerson, C., and Leicester, A., “Raising household saving. Institute For Fiscal Studies”, London February, (2012). 9. Daily,G.C., and Matson,P.A., “Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation”, Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences, 105,28, (2008), 9455-9456. 10. DaSilva, C. M., and Trkman, P., “Business model: What it is and what it is not”, Long Range Planning, 47,6, (2014), 379-389. 11. Despeisse, M., Ball, P. D., Evans, S., and Levers, A., “Industrial ecology at factory level–a conceptual model”, Journal of cleaner production, 31, (2012), 30-39. 12. Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., and Grewal, D., “Effects of price, brand and store information on buyers’ product evaluations”. Journal of Marketing Research, 28,3, (1991), 307-319. 13. Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R., and Miniard, P. W., “ConsumerBehavior”, The Dryden Press, USA, (1995). 14. Foss, N. J., Schmidt, J., & Teece, D. J., “Ecosystem leadership as a dynamic capability”, Long range planning, 56(1), (2023), 102270. 15. Ghina, A., Anggadwita, G., Palalic, R., & Dewi, R. N., “Designing Value Proposition for Increasing Business Competitiveness: A Case Study of Startup Business in Indonesia. In Open Innovation in Small Business: Creating Values for Sustainability, (pp. 99-115)”. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. (2023). 16. Gómez-Uranga, M., Miguel, J. C., and Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M., “Epigenetic economic dynamics: The evolution of big internet business ecosystems, evidence for patents”, Technovation, 34,3, (2014), 177-189. 17. Hellier, P. K., Geursen, G. M., Carr, R. A., and Rickard, J. A., “Customer repurchase intention: A general structural equation model”, European Journal Of Marketing, 37,11/12, (2003), 1762-1800. 18. Hienerth, C., Lettl, C., and Keinz, P., “Synergies among producer firms, lead users, and user communities: The case of the LEGO producer–user ecosystem”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31,4, (2014), 848-866. 19. Ikenami, R.K., Gomes, L.A.V., Facin, A.L.F., & Salerno, M.S., “Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, (2018), 30-48. 20. Jackson, W. T., Scott, D. J., and Schwagler, N., “Using the business model canvas as a methods approach to teaching entrepreneurial finance”, Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 18,2, (2015), 99. 21. James F. Moore., “Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition”. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), (1993),75-86. 22. Jones, G. M., “Educators, electrons, and business models: A problem in synthesis”, The Accounting Review, 35,4, (1960), 619. 23. Kapoor, R., and Lee, J. M., “Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments”, Strategic Management Journal, 34,3, (2013), 274-296. 24. Kouptsov, A., & Srai, J. S., “Value proposition-driven reconfiguration of business models in dynamic industries: a design-science approach”. Business Process Management Journal, 29(6), (2023), 1838-1866. 25. Kraemer-Mbula, E., Tang, P., and Rush, H., “The cybercrime ecosystem: Online innovation in the shadows?”, Technological Forecasting, and Social Change, 80,3, (2013), 541-555. 26. Legowo, M. B., Subanidja, S., and Sorongan, F. A., “Fintech, and bank: Past, present, and future”, Jurnal Teknik Komputer AMIK BSI, 7,1, (2021), 94-99. 27. Lester, R. H., Certo, S. T., Dalton, C. M., Dalton, D. R., and Cannella Jr, A. A., “Initial public offering investor valuations: An examination of top management team prestige, and environmental uncertainty”, Journal of Small Business Management, 44,1, (2006), 1-26. 28. Lewin, A. Y., and Zhong, X., “The evolving diaspora of talent: A perspective on trends and implications for sourcing science and engineering work”, Journal of International Management, 19,1, (2013), 6-13. 29. Linder, J., and Cantrell, S., “Carved in water: Changing business models fluidly”, Accenture Institute for Strategic Change Research Report, 12, (2000), 1-13. 30. Mansfield, G. M., and Fourie, L. C. H., “Strategy and business models-strange bedfellows? A case for convergence and its evolution into strategic architecture”, South African Journal Of Business Management, 35,1, (2004), 35-44. 31. Marchi, F., and Sampieri, C., “From data analysis to paper writing: How Artificial intelligenceis changing the face of scientific literature”, Oral Oncology, 138, (2023), 106312. 32. Maxwell, J. C., “The 21 indispensable qualities of a leader: Becoming the person others will want to follow”, HarperCollins Leadership, (2007). 33. Meyer, A. D., Gaba, V., and Colwell, K. A., “Organizing far from equilibrium: Nonlinear change in organizational fields”, Organization Science, 16,5, (2005), 456-473. 34. Mullet, G. M., and Karson, M. J., “Analysis of purchase intent scales weighted by probability of actual purchase”, Journal Of Marketing Research, 22,1, (1985), 93-96. 35. Murcia, C., Aronson, J., Kattan, G. H., Moreno-Mateos, D., Dixon, K., and Simberloff, D., “A critique of the novel ecosystem concept”, Trends In Ecology And Evolution, 29,10, (2014), 548-553. 36. Osterwalder, A., and Pigneur Y., “Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers Vol. 1”, John Wileyand Sons, (2010). 37. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., and Tucci,C. L.,“Clarifying business models: Origins,present, and future of the concept”. Communications of the association for Information Systems, 16(1), (2005), 1. 38. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Bernarda, G., and Smith, A., “Value proposition design: How to create products, and services customers want (Vol. 2)”, John Wiley, and Sons, (2015). 39. Pierce, L., “Big losses in ecosystem niches: How core firm decisions drive complementary product shakeouts”. Strategic Management Journal, 30,3, (2009), 323-347. 40. Porter, M. E., “Interbrand choice, strategy, and bilateral market power. No. 146”, Harvard University Press, (1976). 41. Robinson Jr, R. B., and Pearce, J. A., “Planned patterns of strategic behavior and their relationship to business‐unit performance”, Strategic Management Journal, 9,1, (1988), 43-60. 42. Shafer, S.M., Linder, J.C., Smith, H.J., “The power of research models”, Business Horizons, 48, (2005), pp. 199-207. 43. Sigelman, L., and Tsai, Y. M., “Personal finances ,and voting behavior: A reanalysis”, American Politics Quarterly, 9,4, (1981), 371-399. 44. Spinella, M., Yang, B., and Lester, D., “Development of the executive personal finance scale”, International Journal of Neuroscience, 117,3, (2007), 301-313. 45. Stonig, J., Schmid, T., & Müller‐Stewens, G., “From product system to ecosystem: How firms adapt to provide an integrated value proposition”. Strategic Management Journal, 43(9), (2022), 1927-1957. 46. Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. M., “Grounded theory in practice”, Sage, (1997). 47. Teece, D. J., “Business models,business strategy and innovation”, Long range planning, 43,2-3, (2010), 172-194. 48. Thomas, L. D. W., & Ritala, P., “Ecosystem legitimacy emergence: A collective action view”. Journal of Management, 48(3), (2022), 515-541. 49. Tokarski, A., Maciej T., and Jacek Wójcik., “The possibility of using the business model canvas in the establishment of an operator''s business plan”, Torun Business Review, 16,4, (2017), 17-31. 50. Tsujimoto, M., Kajikawa, Y., Tomita, J., & Matsumoto, Y., “A review of the ecosystem concept—Towards coherent ecosystem design”, Technological Forecasting And Social Change, 136, (2018), 49-58. 51. Wareham J., Fox P.B., and Cano Giner J. L., “Technology ecosystem governance”, Organization science, 25,4, (2014), 1195-1215. 52. Welch , W. P., “ The political feasibility of full ownership property rights: The cases of pollution and fisheries”, Journal of Policy Sciences Volume, 16, (1983), 165-180. 53. Zaremba A., and Demir E., “ChatGPT: Unlocking the future of NLP in finance”, Available at SSRN, 4323643, (2023). | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92899 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究文獻貢獻在於發現,個案銀行本身金控關係企業眾多,需要的是整合內部資源,全力支援財富管理理專服務高端客戶,並未產生新生態系統。嚴格來講並無須有相關產業作為參與者,加入個案銀行的連結平台。而個案銀行在地化策略,並無積極為高端客層進行國際性資金流動,焦點放在為本土高端客戶資產進行客製化整體規劃。
在創新商業模式方面,本研究採用Osterwalder與Johnson兩者相同商業模式架構元素綜合設計研究工具,在需求導向方面:A銀行高資產客層目標仍以金控相關事業體的自有客戶進行挖掘被隱藏的高端客戶。在與高端顧客關係上,以朋友化由專人服務。在銷售通路上,傳遞品牌正能量與一條龍服務。在價值主張方面,品牌定位在地化、客戶關係朋友化、品牌信賴長期化以及在地長期合作。在供給導向方面,高資產客層關鍵資源,最重要的還是理專專業跟能力,不崇尚外商與高端客群的網銀交易,擴大HR的資源投入,訓練在地化專業人才,成為關鍵合作夥伴,讓提供高端顧客財富問題的solution(解方)成為重要的關鍵活動。在財務導向方面,價值主張以財經知識的提供收取服務費的重要性,這是A銀行利潤的重要來源。 銀行收益流來自於整體金融商品的銷售。財富管理的收益是提供財經知識的服務費,也是銀行重要的收入來源。銀行對高資產客層成本結構表現在知識型服務,金融服務業,越來越講求財經專業,使用銀行財富管理諮詢,已不是一個便宜的平台,服務收費是因為提供了價值,而不是價格競爭。在價值驅動上,A銀行以高價值、高體驗,建立強大的品牌系統,所增加的成本可以完全被高收費所吸收。價值驅動的特性非成本驅動型所能取代。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The contribution of this research literature is that it found that the case bank itself has many financial holding companies, and what it needs is to integrate internal resources to fully support wealth management professionals in serving high-end customers, but no new ecosystem has been created. Strictly speaking, there is no need to have relevant industries as participants to join the link platform of individual banks. As for the localization strategy of individual banks, they do not actively carry out international capital flows for high-end customers, and focus on customized overall planning for the assets of local high-end customers.
In terms of innovative business models, this study uses the same business model architecture elements comprehensive design research tools of Osterwalder and Johnson. In terms of demand orientation: Bank A's high-asset customer target is still explored with its own customers of financial holding-related entities. Hidden high-end customers. In the relationship with high-end customers, we provide friendly service with dedicated personnel. In the sales channel, deliver the positive energy of the brand and one-stop service. In terms of value proposition, brand positioning is localized, customer relationships are friendly, brand trust is long-term, and local long-term cooperation is achieved. In terms of supply orientation, the most important key resources for high-asset customers are the professional expertise and ability of professional students. We do not advocate online banking transactions for foreign businessmen and high-end customer groups. We need to expand HR resource investment, train local professional talents, and become key partners. , making providing solutions to high-end customers’ wealth problems an important key activity. In terms of financial orientation, the value proposition is the importance of charging service fees for the provision of financial knowledge, which is an important source of Bank A's profits. The bank's revenue stream comes from the sale of overall financial products. The income from wealth management is the service fee for providing financial knowledge, which is also an important source of income for banks. The cost structure of banks for high-asset customers is reflected in knowledge-based services. The financial services industry is increasingly focusing on financial professionals. Using bank wealth management consulting is no longer a cheap platform. Service charges are based on the value provided, not price competition. . In terms of value drive, Bank A has established a strong brand system with high value and high experience, and the increased costs can be completely absorbed by high fees. Value-driven attributes cannot be replaced by cost-driven ones. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-07-03T16:11:09Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-07-03T16:11:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次
口試委員會審定書 i 謝誌 ii 中文摘要 iii THESIS ABSTRACT iv 目次 ⅵ 圖次 vii 表次 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節、研究背景與動機 1 第二節、研究問題 2 第三節、研究目的 4 第四節、研究流程 4 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節、高資產財富管理簡介 7 第二節、九宮格商業模式 17 第三節、價值主張 20 第四節、創新生態系統 22 第三章 研究方法 26 第一節、A銀行發展成效簡介 26 第二節、質性研究法選擇與研究架構 32 第三節、研究資料分析 33 第四節、研究工具設計 34 第五節 研究倫理 37 第四章 A銀行訪談資料分析 39 第一節、A銀行訪談資料歸類 39 第二節、A銀行新商業模式分析 68 第三節、A銀行深度訪談效度 74 第五章 結論與管理意涵 78 第一節、結論 78 第二節、管理意涵 80 參考文獻 81 圖次 圖 1-1 高資產管理服務需求人才部門規劃 3 圖 1-2 研究流程圖 6 圖 2-1 九宮格商業模式與四大導向 20 圖 2-2 特斯拉(Tesla)價值主張 22 圖 2-3 2020年亞馬遜旗下主要43家公司生態系 24 圖 3-1 環球貿易共享區塊鏈 28 圖 3-2 中台微服務發展主軸 29 圖 3-3 IT技術轉型願景 30 圖 3-4 研究架構圖 33 圖 4-1 A銀行高資產顧客新商業九宮格與四項導向 75 圖 4-2 A銀行高資產顧客價值主張 76 表次 表 2-1 財富管理金額分層定義與可投資商品 8 表 2-2 三大外銀子行耕転台灣財管市場策略 9 表 2-3 外商銀行高資產財管發展現況 10 表 2-4 銀行辦理財冨管理2.0策略及內容 11 表 2-5 本國銀行高資產財管發展現況 12 表 2-6 臺銀進軍私人銀行高端理財利基 13 表 2-7 家族財富傳承與繼承關注之議題問卷調查比率 14 表 2-8 高資產客戶非金融商品經營模式 16 表 2-9 Osterwalder與Johnson兩者架構的元素比較表 18 表 3-1 訪談對象資料 36 表 4-1 銀行經營高資產價值導向 41 表 4-2 銀行高資產客層目標編譯 45 表 4-3 銀行與顧客關係編譯 49 表 4-4 銀行吸引高資產客戶的銷售通路 52 表 4-5 銀行經營高資產客層關鍵資源 55 表 4-6 銀行經營高資產客層關鍵合作夥伴 59 表 4-7 銀行經營高資產客層關鍵活動 63 表 4-8 銀行對高資產客層收益流表現 65 表 4-9 銀行對高資產客層成本結構表現 67 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 銀行高資產財富管理經營轉型及創新策略之研究 ─以A銀行為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Research on Bank’S High-Asset Wealth Management Operation Transformation and Innovation Strategies ─Take Bank A as an Example | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 陳聿宏 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | Yu-Hung Chen | en |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳俊忠;廖咸興 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chun-Chung Chen ;Hsien-Hsing Liao | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 新生態系統,創新商業模式,價值主張,高淨資產客層,財富管理, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | new ecosystem,innovative business model,value proposition,high net worth customer base,wealth management, | en |
dc.relation.page | 87 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202401010 | - |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2024-05-27 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 碩士在職專班國際企業管理組 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業管理組 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-112-2.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.06 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。