請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92513完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 蔡宜妮 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | I-Ni Tsai | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李映璉 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Ying-Lien Li | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-26T16:24:12Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-03-27 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-03-26 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-03-04 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 宋如瑜(2015)。華語教師課堂解說行為探索。《中原華語文學報》,16,109-136。
宋如瑜(2017)。華語實習教師課堂語言偏差分析。《華語文教學研究》,14(2),65-88。 邵敬敏(1996)。《現代漢語疑問句研究》。上海:華東師範大學出版社。 靳洪剛(2018)。提問互動法續論:語言課堂教師提問的實施程序、策略及應用技巧。《台灣華語教學研究》,16,3-20。 彭馨慧(2021)。華語言談標記「的話」之語用化現象及功能探究。國立清華大學碩士論文。 陳俊光(2010)。《漢語篇章分析與教學應用》。臺北:新學林出版社。 陳俊光、劉欣怡(2009)。漢語「好」的多視角分析與教學應用。《華語文教學研究》,6(2),45-98。 黃旭妙(2010)。華語「就是」和「只是」的語用功能探究。國立高雄師範大學碩士論文。 Amarel, M., & Mehan, H. (1980). Learning Lessons, Social Organization in the Classroom. Educational Researcher, 9. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175328 Bolden, G. B. (2009). Beyond Answering: Repeat-Prefaced Responses in Conversation. Communication Monographs, 76(2), 121-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750902828446 Cancino, M. (2020). Increasing EFL Learner Participation through Eliciting Language: Insights from Conversation Analysis. Journal of Language and Education, 6, 76-90. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2020.10304 Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Dolce, F. M., & van Compernolle, R. A. (2020). Topic management and student initiation in an advanced Chinese-as-a-foreign-language classroom. Classroom Discourse, 11(1), 80-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1563799 Dörnyei, Z. (2013). Communicative language teaching in the twenty-first century: The ‘principled communicative approach’. In J. Arnold & T. Murphey (Eds.), Meaningful action: Earl Stevick’s influence on language and teaching (pp. 161-171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp.3-65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Duran, D., & Sert, O. (2021). Student-initiated multi-unit questions in EMI classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 65, 100980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2021.100980 Erickson, F. (2004). Talk and social theory: Ecologies of speaking and listening in everyday life. Malden, MA: Polity Press. Gardner, R. (2012). Conversation Analysis and orientation to learning. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v5i3.229 Garton, S. (2002). Learner initiative in the language classroom. ELT Journal, 56. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.1.47 Garton, S. (2012). Speaking out of Turn Taking the Initiative in Teacher-Fronted Classroom Interaction. Classroom Discourse, 3, 29-45. Greer, T. (2016). Learner initiative in action: Post-expansion sequences in a novice ESL survey interview task. Linguistics and Education, 35, 78-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2016.06.004 Hedman, C., & Mannish, S. (2022). Student agency in relation to space and educational discourse. The case of English online mother tongue instruction. English in Education, 56(2), 160-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2021.1955618 Heinemann, T., & Koivisto, A. (2016). Indicating a change-of-state in interaction: Cross-linguistic explorations. Journal of Pragmatics, 104, 83-88. Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1-29. Heritage, J. (2013). Turn-initial position and some of its occupants. Journal of Pragmatics, 57, 331-337. Jacknick, C. M. (2009). A conversation -analytic account of student -initiated participation in an ESL classroom. Jacknick, C. (2011a). "But this is writing": Post-expansion in student-initiated sequences. Novitas ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 5, 39-54. Jacknick, C. (2011b). Breaking in is hard to do: How students negotiate classroom activity shifts. Classroom Discourse, 2, 20-38. Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp.13-31). John Benjamins: Amsterdam. Kääntä, L. (2014). From noticing to initiating correction: Students’ epistemic displays in instructional interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 66, 86-105. Kääntä, L., & Kasper, G. (2018). Clarification requests as a method of pursuing understanding in CLIL physics lectures. Classroom Discourse, 9(3), 205-226. Kapellidi, C. (2015). The interplay between agency and constraint: some departures from the organization of talk in the classroom. Text & Talk, 35(4), 453-479. Kendrick K. H. (2015). The intersection of turn-taking and repair: the timing of other-initiations of repair in conversation. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 250. Kobin H. Kendrick. (2018). Adjusting epistemic gradients: The final particle ba in Mandarin Chinese conversation, East Asian Pragmatics, 3(1), 5-26. Koshik, I. (2002). Designedly Incomplete Utterances: A Pedagogical Practice for Eliciting Knowledge Displays in Error Correction Sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35(3), 277-309. Kurhila, S., & Kotilainen, L. (2020). Student-initiated language learning sequences in a real-world digital environment. Linguistics and Education, 56, 1-11. Linell, P. (2001). Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives, John Benjamins Publishing. Lilja, N. (2014). Partial repetitions as other-initiations of repair in second language talk: Re-establishing understanding and doing learning. Journal of Pragmatics, 71, 98-116. Markee, N. (1995). Teachers'' answers to students'' questions: Problematizing the issue of making meaning. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 63-92. Markee, N. (2000). Conversation Analysis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606471 McHoul, A. W. (1985). Two Aspects of Classroom Interaction: Turn-Taking and Correction. Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders, 13(1), 53-64. Mehan, H. (1979). "What Time Is It, Denise?": Asking Known Information Questions in Classroom Discourse. Theory Into Practice, 18(4), 285-294. Mori, J., & Markee, N. (2009). Language learning, cognition, and interactional practices: An introduction. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47(1), 1-9. Paoletti, Isabella & Fele, Giolo. (2004). Order and Disorder in the Classroom. Pragmatics, 14(1), 68-95. Rampton, B. (2006). Language in late modernity interaction in an urban school / Ben Rampton. Cambridge University. Robinson, J. D. (2013). Epistemics, action formation, and other-initiation of repair: the case of partial questioning repeats. In G. Raymond, J. Sidnell, & M. Hayashi (Eds.), Conversational Repair and Human Understanding (pp. 261-292). Cambridge University Press. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735. Savignon, S. J. (1991). Communicative language teaching state of the art. TESOL Quarterly, 25(2), 261-275. Schegloff, E. (1997). Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other‐initiated repair. Discourse Processes, 23(3), 499-545. Schegloff, E. (2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis I, 1, 1-300. Schegloff, E. (2000). When ''others'' initiate repair, Applied Linguistics, 21(2), 205-243. Schegloff, E. (2011). Word repeats as unit ends. Discourse Studies, 13(3), 367-380. Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. Seedhouse, Paul. (2004). The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Malden: MA: Blackwell. Sert, O. (2017). Creating opportunities for L2 learning in a prediction activity. System, 70, 14-25. Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, M. (1977). Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. TESOL Quarterly, 11. Solem, M. (2015). Displaying knowledge through interrogatives in student-initiated sequences. Classroom Discourse, 7, 1-18. Waring, H. (2011). Learner initiatives and learning opportunities. Classroom Discourse, 2, 201-218. Waring, H. Z., Reddington, E., & Tadic, N. (2016). Responding artfully to student-initiated departures in the adult ESL classroom. Linguistics and Education, 33, 28-39. Wang, W. (2020). Grammatical conformity in question-answer sequences: The case of meiyou in Mandarin conversation. Discourse Studies, 22, 610-631. Wang, Y. F. (2008). Beyond negation—the roles of meiyou and bushi in Mandarin conversation. Language Sciences, 30(6), 679-713. Wang, Y. F., Tsai, P. H., Goodman, D., & Lin, M. Y. (2010). Agreement, alignment: The discourse-pragmatic functions of hao and dui in Taiwan Mandarin conversation. Discourse Studies, 12(3), 283-309 Wang, Y.-F., Tsai, P.-H., & Ling, M.-Y. (2007). From informational to emotive use: meiyou (`no'') as a discourse marker in Taiwan Mandarin conversation. Discourse Studies, 9(5), 677-701. Wang, Yu-Fang, Mei-Chi Tsai, Wayne Schams, & Chi-Ming Yang. (2013). Restrictiveness, exclusivity, adversativity, and mirativity: Mandarin Chinese zhishi as an affective diminutive marker in spoken discourse, Chinese Language and Discourse, 4.2:181-228 Wong, J. (2000). Delayed next turn repair initiation in native/non-native speaker English conversation. Applied Linguistics, 21(2), 244-67. Wu, R.-J. R. (2016). Doing conversation analysis in Mandarin Chinese: Basic methods. Chinese Language and Discourse, 7(2), 179-209. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92513 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 在華語作為第二語言的課室會話中,由教師提問引導、學生回應、教師再提供評論反饋(Initiation-Response-Evaluation/Feedback)的序列是最為典型的互動結構之一。然而前人研究亦指出,在教師主導的序列之外,學生其實具有主動參與、發起提問的互動能力。從會話分析的角度觀之,學生的提問本身即展現了說話者對特定資訊的追求,而研究學生如何在課室中發起提問,亦能夠增進我們對課室中師生互動模式的瞭解。本研究以會話分析作為研究方法,觀察華語課室中由學生發起提問的行為,發現學生確實能發起不同的提問序列,並邀請教師參與回應、完成由自己發起的序列。
本研究根據Schegloff(2007),將學生發起的提問序列區分為嵌入原序列進行延伸(insert expansion)與向後進行延伸(post-expansion)兩大類。嵌入原序列進行延伸涵蓋了學生理解不順利而嘗試透過提問發起修補,以及在產出話輪時遭遇困難而發起關於特定讀音、詞彙、語法的提問;向後進行延伸則呈現出學生提問的多元性,學生發起提問不只是為了處理語法問題,更可以主動尋求正式的表達策略、臺灣的語言使用習慣和社會文化背景等等具體的知識。整體而言,相較於嵌入原序列的類型,向後進行延伸的提問更廣泛且豐富地反映了學生關注的各式知識內容。 誠然序列類型的差異與提問的內容有關,但是發起提問仍代表學生作為課室互動的主體,主動參與、發起提問以取得特定知識,促進自身的學習與理解。不同於由教師主導課室進程的模式,由學生發起的提問序列帶我們看到了學生的主體性與能動性。透過對華語課室語料的觀察、分析、統整與歸納,本研究亦希望為內容一致性不高的學生提問行為,指出一個理解的方向。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The teachers initiate, students response, and teachers feedback (Initiation-Response-Evaluation/Feedback) sequence is one of the most typical interactive structures in Chinese as a second language (CSL) classroom conversation. However, previous studies have pointed out that outside of the teacher-initiated sequence, students actually have the interactive ability to actively participate and initiate questions. From the perspective of conversation analysis, students' questioning itself demonstrates the speaker's pursuit of specific information, and the study of how students initiate questions in the classroom can also enhance our understanding of teacher-student interactions in the classroom. Using conversation analysis as a research method, this study observed students' questions in Chinese classrooms and found that students did initiate different question sequences, inviting teachers to participate in responding to and completing their own sequences.
Based on Schegloff (2007), this study categorized student-initiated question sequences into insert expansion and post-expansion. Insertion expansion covers students' attempts to repair their comprehension by asking questions, as well as asking questions about specific pronunciation, vocabulary, and grammar, while post-expansion shows the diversified nature of students' questioning, in which students initiate questions not only to deal with grammatical problems, but also to actively search for specific knowledge of formal expression strategies, Taiwan's language practices, and the socio-cultural context. In general, compared with the embedding of the original question, the students' questions were more diverse. On the whole, the post-extended questions reflect a wider and richer range of knowledge that students are interested in. Unlike the teacher-led classroom, the student-initiated question sequence shows us the subjectivity and initiative of students. By observing, analyzing, standardizing, and summarizing the Chinese classroom corpus, this study also aims to point out a direction for understanding students' questioning behaviors | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-03-26T16:24:12Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-03-26T16:24:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝辭 i
中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iii 表目次 vi 語料目次 vii 第一章、緒論 1 1.1 研究動機與背景 1 1.2 研究範圍與研究問題 4 1.3 名詞釋義 5 1.4 論文架構 6 第二章、文獻回顧 7 2.1 課室的基礎互動結構 7 2.2 學生發起的提問序列 10 2.2.1 學生發起的定義 10 2.2.2 提問序列的類型 12 2.3 學生參與及其能動性 20 第三章、研究方法 25 3.1 會話分析方法論 25 3.2 語料資訊與轉寫規則 26 3.3 研究步驟 30 第四章、語料觀察與分析:嵌入延伸(insert expansion)的提問序列 37 4.1 第一話輪後(post-first) 38 4.2 第二話輪前(pre-second) 51 4.3 小結 65 第五章、語料觀察與分析:向後延伸(post-expansion)的提問序列 69 5.1 他人發起的修補(other-initiated repair) 70 5.2 主題化(topicalization) 84 5.3 小結 92 第六章、結論與建議 95 6.1 研究結論 95 6.2 教學建議 97 6.3 研究限制與未來展望 99 參考文獻 101 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 華語課室 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 學生發起提問 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 會話分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Conversation Analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Chinese as a second language (CSL) classroom | en |
| dc.subject | Student-initiated questions | en |
| dc.title | 華語課室中由學生發起的提問序列研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Study of student-initiated question sequences in as a Chinese second language classrooms | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王萸芳;竺靜華 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yu-Fang Wang;Ching-Hua Chu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 華語課室,會話分析,學生發起提問, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Chinese as a second language (CSL) classroom,Conversation Analysis,Student-initiated questions, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 106 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202400760 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-03-04 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 華語教學碩士學位學程 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 華語教學碩士學位學程 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf | 1.32 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
