Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 醫學院
  3. 醫學教育暨生醫倫理學科所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89824
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor吳造中zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorChau-Chung Wuen
dc.contributor.author吳書豪zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorShu-Hao Wuen
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-22T16:16:38Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-10-
dc.date.copyright2023-09-22-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.date.submitted2023-08-14-
dc.identifier.citation1. Roser HRaM. "Causes of Death". Published online at OurWorldInData.org. 2020.
2. Lo W-C, Ku C-C, Chiou S-T, et al. Adult mortality of diseases and injuries attributable to selected metabolic, lifestyle, environmental, and infectious risk factors in Taiwan: a comparative risk assessment. Population Health Metrics 2017; 15: 17.
3. World Health O. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2008: the MPOWER package. Geneva: World Health Organization 2008.
4. 國人吸菸行為調查結果. 2019.
5. Collaborators GBDRF. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet (London, England) 2017; 390: 1345-422.
6. Six-month quit rate in Taiwan. https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/List.aspx?nodeid=3836: Health Promotion. Administration, Ministry of Health and Walfare 2023.
7. Conrod PJ, Castellanos-Ryan N, Mackie C. Long-term effects of a personality-targeted intervention to reduce alcohol use in adolescents. J Consult Clin Psychol 2011; 79: 296-306.
8. Karen Glanz BKR, K. Viswanath, C. Tracy Orleans. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice 4th ediction. 2008.
9. Green LW, Kreuter, M. W., Deeds, S. G., and Partridge, K. B. Health Education Planning: A Diagnostic Approach. 1980.
10. Green LW, and Kreuter, M. W. Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Ecological Approach. (4th
ed.). 2005.
11. Cengelli S, O'Loughlin J, Lauzon B, Cornuz J. A systematic review of longitudinal population-based studies on the predictors of smoking cessation in adolescent and young adult smokers. Tob Control 2012; 21: 355-62.
12. Vallata A, O'Loughlin J, Cengelli S, Alla F. Predictors of Cigarette Smoking Cessation in Adolescents: A Systematic Review. J Adolesc Health 2020.
13. Riaz M, Lewis S, Naughton F, Ussher M. Predictors of smoking cessation during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction 2018; 113: 610-22.
14. Orton S, Coleman T, Coleman-Haynes T, Ussher M. Predictors of Postpartum Return to Smoking: A Systematic Review. Nicotine Tob Res 2018; 20: 665-73.
15. Malouff JM, Thorsteinsson EB, Schutte NS. The five-factor model of personality and smoking: a meta-analysis. J Drug Educ 2006; 36: 47-58.
16. Hakulinen C, Hintsanen M, Munafo MR, et al. Personality and smoking: individual-participant meta-analysis of nine cohort studies. Addiction 2015; 110: 1844-52.
17. Akbari M, Hasani J, Seydavi M. Negative affect among daily smokers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2020; 274: 553-67.
18. Munafò MR, Zetteler JI, Clark TG. Personality and Smoking Status: A Meta-Analysis. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2007; 9: 405-13.
19. Kale D, Stautz K, Cooper A. Impulsivity related personality traits and cigarette smoking in adults: A meta-analysis using the UPPS-P model of impulsivity and reward sensitivity. Drug Alcohol Depend 2018; 185: 149-67.
20. Bos J, Hayden MJ, Lum JAG, Staiger PK. UPPS-P impulsive personality traits and adolescent cigarette smoking: A meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend 2019; 197: 335-43.
21. Goldberg LR. An alternative "description of personality": the big-five factor structure. J Pers Soc Psychol 1990; 59: 1216-29.
22. John OJ, & Srivastava, S. The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. New York: Guilford. 1999.
23. Steptoe A. Psychophysiological base of disease. Comprehensive clinical psychology. Health Psychol. 8, 3978. 1998.
24. Gilbert DG. Smoking: Individual differences, psychopathology, and emotion. Philadelphia, PA, US: Taylor & Francis 1995.
25. Eysenck HJ. 2 - Psychophysiology and Personality: Extraversion, Neuroticism and Psychoticism. In: Gale A, Edwards JA, eds. Individual Differences and Psychopathology. Vol. 3: Academic Press 1983; 13-30.
26. Lynam DR SG, Whiteside SP, Cyders MA. The UPPS-P: Assessing five personality pathways to impulsive behavior (Technical Report). West Lafayette: Purdue University 2006.
27. Birkley EL, Smith GT. Recent advances in understanding the personality underpinnings of impulsive behavior and their role in risk for addictive behaviors. Current drug abuse reviews 2011; 4: 215-27.
28. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. 1988.
29. Leung DY, Au DW, Lam TH, Chan SS. Predictors of long-term abstinence among Chinese smokers following treatment: the role of personality traits. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013; 14: 5351-4.
30. Yoshimura K. The psychological characteristics of tobacco dependence in a rural area of Japan. J Epidemiol 2000; 10: 271-9.
31. Waga C, Iwahashi K. CYP2A6 gene polymorphism and personality traits for NEO-FFI on the smoking behavior of youths. Drug Chem Toxicol 2007; 30: 343-9.
32. Kulkarni PS, Parkar SR, Kate N, Ninawe K, Limbachiya R. Role of personality in tobacco smoking behavior in corporate sector: A cross-sectional study. Ind Psychiatry J 2018; 27: 103-9.
33. Cohen S, Lichtenstein E. Partner behaviors that support quitting smoking. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1990; 58: 304-9.
34. Smoking Cessation and Related Indications: Developing Nicotine Replacement Therapy Drug Products. 2019.
35. 林秋菊. 量表的建構與測試. 2014; 31: 12-21.
36. 楊世瑩. SPSS 22 統計分析嚴選教材. 2015.
37. 吳明隆. SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計. 2003.
38. Huang WH, Hsu HY, Chang BC, Chang FC. Factors Correlated with Success Rate of Outpatient Smoking Cessation Services in Taiwan. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15.
39. Wu PC, Hsueh KC, Mar GY, et al. Gender Differences in Outcome of an Attempt to Stop Smoking Among Smokers Attending a Smoking Cessation Clinic in Taiwan: 3-Year Follow-Up Study. Eval Health Prof 2016; 39: 317-25.
40. 王秀美、李常燦. 五大人格特質量表中文版之信效度研究. 美和科技大學社會工作系會議論文 2011.
41. Sutton S. Encyclopedia of Research Design. Library Journal 2010; 135: 105-6.
42. Howard MC. A Review of Exploratory Factor Analysis Decisions and Overview of Current Practices: What We Are Doing and How Can We Improve? International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 2016; 32: 51-62.
43. Bujang MA, Sa'at N, Sidik TMITAB, Joo LC. Sample Size Guidelines for Logistic Regression from Observational Studies with Large Population: Emphasis on the Accuracy Between Statistics and Parameters Based on Real Life Clinical Data. The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS 2018; 25: 122-30.
44. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis: Pearson Education Limited 2013.
45. Hair JFJ, Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C. Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 1998.
46. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics: Pearson 2013.
47. Henson RK. Understanding Internal Consistency Reliability Estimates: A Conceptual Primer on Coefficient Alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development 2001; 34: 177-89.
48. Fincham JE. Response rates and responsiveness for surveys, standards, and the Journal. American journal of pharmaceutical education 2008; 72: 43-.
49. Draugalis JR, Coons SJ, Plaza CM. Best practices for survey research reports: a synopsis for authors and reviewers. American journal of pharmaceutical education 2008; 72: 11-.
50. Le Foll B, Piper ME, Fowler CD, et al. Tobacco and nicotine use. Nature Reviews Disease Primers 2022; 8: 19.
51. Chiang CY, Chang HY. A population study on the time trend of cigarette smoking, cessation, and exposure to secondhand smoking from 2001 to 2013 in Taiwan. Popul Health Metr 2016; 14: 38.
52. 簡武雄, 丘亮, 董道興, et al. 台灣北部某區域教學醫院戒菸門診介入之成效評估. 台灣家庭醫學雜誌 2010; 20: 181-91.
53. 薛光傑, 杜明勳, 葛魯蘋, 周明岳, 陳麗玲. 某醫學中心門診戒菸成效. 台灣家庭醫學雜誌 2006; 16: 1-12.
54. 張文道, 王雅瑜, 周崇頌, et al. 台灣中部某醫學中心門診戒菸治療病患一年追蹤. 台灣家庭醫學雜誌 2007; 17: 38-52.
55. 陳全裕, 王如雪, 張秦松, et al. 住院與門診不同戒菸場域對於吸菸病人三個月戒菸成功率之影響. 台灣家庭醫學雜誌 2020; 30: 225-34.
56. Chang Y-C, Huang W-H, Tsai C-Y, Hwang L-C. Comparisons of early and delayed abstainers and its effects on long-term smoking cessation in Taiwan. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2019; 14: 31.
57. 邱于容, 陳劭淇, 江香慧, et al. 國軍醫院免費戒菸門診成效之探討. 台灣公共衛生雜誌 2016; 35: 631-41.
58. 薛光傑, 杜明勳, 葛魯蘋, et al. 台灣某醫學中心之老人門診戒菸成效. 台灣老年醫學雜誌 2006; 2: 104-15.
59. 陳依萱, 王鵬智, 柯毓麟, 汪慧鈴. 動機式晤談及行動社群網路支持介入對於男性冠心病病人戒菸成效之探討. 護理雜誌 2021; 68: 53-64.
60. Lee S, Tsai Y-W, Sung H-Y. Smoking cessation and receipt of cessation advice from health professionals among older smokers in Taiwan. Preventive Medicine 2016; 91: 89-95.
61. van Meurs T, Çoban FR, de Koster W, van der Waal J, Oude Groeniger J. Why are anti-smoking health-information interventions less effective among low-socioeconomic status groups? A systematic scoping review. Drug Alcohol Rev 2022; 41: 1195-205.
62. Smith CE, Hill SE, Amos A. Impact of population tobacco control interventions on socioeconomic inequalities in smoking: a systematic review and appraisal of future research directions. Tob Control 2020; 30: e87-95.
63. Zhou X, Nonnemaker J, Sherrill B, Gilsenan AW, Coste F, West R. Attempts to quit smoking and relapse: Factors associated with success or failure from the ATTEMPT cohort study. Addictive Behaviors 2009; 34: 365-73.
64. 蔡晏平, 柯文欽, 李碧霞, 苗迺芳. 冠狀動脈心臟病住院病人戒菸行為相關因素之研究. 新臺北護理期刊 2018; 20: 27-39.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89824-
dc.description.abstract在近年大力推動戒菸後,吸菸在台灣仍然位居死亡相關風險因子的第二名。僅四成的人戒菸成功,近三成的在嘗試戒菸後又復吸。本研究目的在分析戒菸民眾之人格特質與戒菸成效的相關性。針對2017年起參與馬偕紀念醫院「醫事機構戒菸服務補助計畫」之病友,實施紙本問卷調查。除收錄去連結之個人基本資料和戒菸動機外,另有「人格特質量表」及「夥伴支持量表」。收150位病友後,利用卡方檢定及獨立樣本t檢定來分析戒菸成功和失敗者間的特質差異。另外,利用二元羅吉斯迴歸(Binary Logistic Regression)來進一步分析戒菸動機、人格特質、夥伴支持和戒菸成敗的相關性。單變項分析時發現短期戒菸成功與否與個人月所得、開始吸菸年齡、和盡責性相關。多變項分析的時候發現短期戒菸成功與否與開始吸菸年齡、戒菸次數、月所得、因為生病而戒菸、和正向支持有相關。在長期戒菸成功與否上,在單變項和多變項分析中皆顯示戒菸次數和正向支持有顯著相關。未來在戒菸衛生教育上,如何讓現有結構化的戒菸計畫更臻完善,提供戒菸者足夠的正向支持或許是現今最需要加強的。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractSmoking is still the second leading risk factor of death in Taiwan even though the government has been taking several measures for smoking cessation these years. Only forty percent people has successful smoking cessation, and around thirty percent people smokes after quitting attempts. This study aimed to analysis the correlation between the efficacy of smoking cessation and the personality in people seeking medical care. We aimed to enroll 150 those patients joined the smoking cessation program and a paper-based survey questionnaire would be collected. Personal information, motivations for smoking cessation, modified big five personality tests, and partner interaction questionnaire were included. We would perform statistical analysis by using descriptive statistics, Chi-square test, Independent Sample t test, and logistic regression analysis. Univariate analysis reveals short-term smoking cessation is related to income, age of smoking initiation, and conscientiousness, while multivariate analysis reported short-term smoking cessation is related to age of smoking initiation, quit attempts, income, smoking cessation due to illness, and positive support. For long-term smoking cessation, both univariate and multivariate analysis disclosed quit attempts and positive support have the crucial role. How to provide sufficient positive support may be an important measurement to improve smoking cessation in the health education.en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-09-22T16:16:38Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-09-22T16:16:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定 i
誌謝 ii
中文摘要 iii
英文摘要 iv
目 錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章 緒論與導言 1
1.1 研究緣起 1
1.2 研究目的 2
第二章 文獻探討 2
2.1 PRECEDE-PROCEED模式 2
2.2 影響戒菸因素 4
2.3 人格特質與戒菸行為之相關研究 5
第三章 研究方法 8
3.1 研究架構 8
3.2 研究假設 9
3.3 研究對象 10
3.3.1 收案條件 10
3.3.2 收案方法 10
3.4 測量工具 12
3.4.1 問卷設計 13
3.4.2 問卷設計與項目分析 (Item Analysis) 18
3.4.3 問卷設計與信效度檢驗 19
3.5 研究工具信效度檢驗結果 23
3.5.1 人格特質量表之項目及因素分析結果 23
3.5.2. 夥伴支持量表之項目及因素分析結果 29
3.6 統計分析方式 34
3.6.1單變項分析 34
3.6.2 二元羅吉斯迴歸 (binary logistic regression) 34
第四章 研究結果發現 35
4.1 人口學變項描述性統計 35
4.1.1 基本資料整併 35
4.1.2 短期戒菸基本資料分析 37
4.1.3 長期戒菸基本資料分析 39
4.2 研究假設驗證與研究發現 42
4.2.1 短期戒菸成效與戒菸動機分析 42
4.2.2 短期戒菸與因素分數分析 42
4.2.3 短期戒菸成功與否之迴歸分析 43
4.2.4 長期戒菸成效與戒菸動機分析 45
4.2.5 長期戒菸與因素分數分析 46
4.2.6 長期戒菸成功與否之迴歸分析 46
第五章 結果與討論 48
5.1 研究架構與戒菸率的相關性 48
5.2 分析結果的探討 50
5.3研究限制與結論 52
參考文獻 53
附件 58
1. 戒菸成效分析問卷 58
2. 著作權授權同意書 63
3. 馬偕紀念醫院人體研究倫理審查委員會核可通知書 64
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject衛生教育zh_TW
dc.subject戒菸zh_TW
dc.subject人格zh_TW
dc.subject動機zh_TW
dc.subject夥伴支持zh_TW
dc.subjectpersonalityen
dc.subjectsmoking cessationen
dc.subjectheatlth educationen
dc.subjectsocia supporten
dc.subjectmotivationen
dc.title探討結構化戒菸計畫的影響因素以改善未來的衛生教育zh_TW
dc.titleExploring Factors Influencing Structured Smoking Cessation Programs to Enhance Future Health Educationen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear111-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee葉宏一;邱晏麟zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeHung-I Yeh;Yen-Lin Chiuen
dc.subject.keyword戒菸,人格,動機,夥伴支持,衛生教育,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordsmoking cessation,personality,motivation,socia support,heatlth education,en
dc.relation.page64-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202304166-
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)-
dc.date.accepted2023-08-14-
dc.contributor.author-college醫學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept醫學教育暨生醫倫理研究所-
顯示於系所單位:醫學教育暨生醫倫理學科所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-111-2.pdf
授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務)
1.94 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved