請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89523
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 楊志偉 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Chih-Wei Yang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 劉政亨 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Cheng-Heng Liu | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-08T16:09:46Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-09-08 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-08-08 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | [1] Alomar M, Tawfiq AM, Hassan N, Palaian S. Post marketing surveillance of suspected adverse drug reactions through spontaneous reporting: current status, challenges and the future. Ther Adv Drug Saf 2020;11:2042098620938595. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042098620938595.
[2] Baker GR, Norton PG, Flintoft V, Blais R, Brown A, Cox J, et al. The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. Can Méd Assoc J 2004;170:1678–86. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1040498. [3] Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, Hebert L, Localio AR, Lawthers AG, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I*. Qual Saf Heal Care 2004;13:145. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2002.003822. [4] Stefl ME. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System in 1999. Frontiers Heal Serv Management 2001;18:1–2. [5] Elliott RA, Camacho E, Jankovic D, Sculpher MJ, Faria R. Economic analysis of the prevalence and clinical and economic burden of medication error in England. BMJ Qual Saf 2020;30:96–105. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010206. [6] Russ AL, Fairbanks RJ, Karsh B-T, Militello LG, Saleem JJ, Wears RL. The science of human factors: separating fact from fiction. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22:802. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001450. [7] Linnard-Palmer L, Ngo T. Near misses: Nurses’ experiences with medication errors, power distance and error recover. Clin Nurs Stud 2015;4. https://doi.org/10.5430/cns.v4n1p40. [8] Chang A, Schyve PM, Croteau RJ, O’Leary DS, Loeb JM. The JCAHO patient safety event taxonomy: a standardized terminology and classification schema for near misses and adverse events. Int J Qual Heal Care 2005;17:95–105. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzi021. [9] GOROVITZ S, MACINTYRE A. Toward a theory of medical fallibility. Hastings Cent Rep 1975;5:13–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/3560992. [10] Chicago I for HI and N at the U of. Americans’ Experiences with Medical Errors and Views on Patient Safety n.d. [11] Bari A, Khan RA, Rathore AW. Medical errors; causes, consequences, emotional response and resulting behavioral change. Pak J Med Sci 2016;32:523–8. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.323.9701. [12] Sajid S, Sultana R, Masaratunnisa M, Naaz S, Adil M. A Questionnaire Study of Food – Drug Interactions to Assess Knowledge of People from Diverse Backgrounds. Asian J Med Heal 2017;5:1–9. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajmah/2017/33682. [13] Kneebone RL, Scott W, Darzi A, Horrocks M. Simulation and clinical practice: strengthening the relationship. Med Educ 2004;38:1095–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01959.x. [14] Yang C-W, Ku S-C, Ma MH-M, Chu T-S, Chang S-C. Application of high-fidelity simulation in critical care residency training as an effective learning, assessment, and prediction tool for clinical performance. J Formos Med Assoc 2019;118:1347–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2018.12.003. [15] Wong BM, Levinson W, Shojania KG. Quality improvement in medical education: current state and future directions. Med Educ 2011;46:107–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04154.x. [16] Niehaus JZ, Palmer MM, Slaven JE, Fettig L. Teaching Empathic Communication to Pediatric Interns: Immediate and 3-Month Impact. Am J Hospice Palliat Medicine 2021;38:1451–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909121999791. [17] Krumwiede KH, Wagner JM, Kirk LM, Duval TM, Dalton TO, Daniel KM, et al. A Team Disclosure of Error Educational Activity: Objective Outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 2019;67:1273–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15883. [18] Kim CW, Myung SJ, Eo EK, Chang Y. Improving disclosure of medical error through educational program as a first step toward patient safety. Bmc Med Educ 2017;17:52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0880-9. [19] Stroud L, McIlroy J, Levinson W. Skills of Internal Medicine Residents in Disclosing Medical Errors: A Study Using Standardized Patients. Acad Med 2009;84:1803–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e3181bf9fef. [20] Raper SE, Resnick AS, Morris JB. Simulated Disclosure of a Medical Error by Residents: Development of a Course in Specific Communication Skills. J Surg Educ 2014;71:e116–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.06.020. [21] Yalcinturk AA, Ustun B. Medical errors room: The effect of simulation training on increasing the awareness of nursing students about the medical errors they may encounter in psychiatry clinics. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 2023;43:37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2022.12.030. [22] Kaldjian LC, Jones EW, Rosenthal GE. Facilitating and Impeding Factors for Physicians’ Error Disclosure: A Structured Literature Review. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2006;32:188–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1553-7250(06)32024-7. [23] Kaldjian LC, Jones EW, Wu BJ, Forman-Hoffman VL, Levi BH, Rosenthal GE. Disclosing Medical Errors to Patients: Attitudes and Practices of Physicians and Trainees. J Gen Intern Med 2007;22:988–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0227-z. [24] Ghalandarpoorattar SM, Kaviani A, Asghari F. Medical error disclosure: the gap between attitude and practice. Postgrad Med J 2012;88:130. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2011-130118. [25] Linthorst GE, Kallimanis-King BL, Dekker ID, Hoekstra JBL, Haes JCJM de. What contributes to internists’ willingness to disclose medical errors? Neth J Med 2012;70:242–8. [26] Gallagher TH, Waterman AD, Ebers AG, Fraser VJ, Levinson W. Patients’ and Physicians’ Attitudes Regarding the Disclosure of Medical Errors. Jama 2003;289:1001–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.8.1001. [27] McLennan SR, Engel-Glatter S, Meyer AH, Schwappach DLB, Scheidegger DH, Elger BS. Disclosing and reporting medical errors. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2015;32:471–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000000236. [28] 曹嘉珞(Chia-Lo T, 唐福瑩(Fu-In T. 探討醫護人員對醫療及給藥錯誤告知之態度及障礙. Handbook of qualitative research 2018;19:263–81. https://doi.org/10.6174/jhm.201812_19(4).263. [29] Krauss S. Research Paradigms and Meaning Making: A Primer. Qual Rep 2015. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2005.1831. [30] Cruickshank J. Positioning positivism, critical realism and social constructionism in the health sciences: a philosophical orientation. Nurs Inq 2012;19:71–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1800.2011.00558.x. [31] Elo S, Kääriäinen M, Kanste O, Pölkki T, Utriainen K, Kyngäs H. Qualitative Content Analysis. SAGE Open 2014;4:2158244014522633. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633. [32] Jiang Y, Ying X, Zhang Q, Tang SR, Kane S, Mukhopadhyay M, et al. Managing patient complaints in China: a qualitative study in Shanghai. Bmj Open 2014;4:e005131. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005131. [33] Britten N. Qualitative Research: Qualitative interviews in medical research. BMJ 1995;311:251. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.6999.251. [34] Corbin JM, Strauss A. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol 1990;13:3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00988593. [35] Birt L, Scott SE, Cavers D, Campbell C, Walter FM. Member Checking 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870. [36] Shalowitz DI, Barnosky A, Smith LB. Ethical Analysis of Communicating the Risk of Iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease. Infect Control 2009;30:805–6. https://doi.org/10.1086/599004. [37] Kwon C-Y, Lee B, Kwon O-J, Kim M-S, Sim K-L, Choi Y-H. Emotional Labor, Burnout, Medical Error, and Turnover Intention among South Korean Nursing Staff in a University Hospital Setting. Int J Environ Res Public Heal 2021;18:10111. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910111. [38] Mazor KM, Reed GW, Yood RA, Fischer MA, Baril J, Gurwitz JH. Disclosure of Medical Errors: What Factors Influence How Patients Respond? J Gen Intern Med 2006;21:704–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00465.x. [39] Turillazzi E, Neri M. Medical error disclosure: from the therapeutic alliance to risk management: the vision of the new Italian code of medical ethics. BMC Méd Ethics 2014;15:57. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-57. [40] Ebrahimi S, Tabei SZ, Kalantari F, Ebrahimi A. Medical Interns’ Perceptions about Disclosing Medical Errors. Educ Res Int 2021;2021:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1102135. [41] Alsafi E, Bahroon SA, Tamim H, Al-Jahdali HH, Alzahrani S, Sayyari AA. Physicians’ Attitudes Toward Reporting Medical Errors-An Observational Study at a General Hospital in Saudi Arabia. J Patient Saf 2011;7:144–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/pts.0b013e31822c5a82. [42] Jeffs L, Espin S, Shannon SE, Levinson W, Kohn MK, Lingard L. A new way of relating: perceptions associated with a team-based error disclosure simulation intervention. Qual Saf Heal Care 2010;19:i57. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2009.036418. [43] Madani RA, Al-Rayes SA, Alumran A. Policies vs Practice of Medical Error Disclosure at a Teaching Hospital in Saudi Arabia. Risk Management Healthc Policy 2020;13:825–31. https://doi.org/10.2147/rmhp.s253275. [44] Young JQ, Sewell JL. Applying cognitive load theory to medical education: construct and measurement challenges. Perspect Méd Educ 2015;4:107–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0193-9. [45] Schafer S, Nowlis DP. Personality Disorders Among Difficult Patients. Arch Fam Med 1998;7:126–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfami.7.2.126. [46] Neergaard H, Leitch C. Handbook of Qualitative Research Techniques and Analysis in Entrepreneurship 2015:271–2. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849809870.00025. [47] Harvey AC, Vrij A, Hope L, Leal S, Mann S. A Stability Bias Effect Among Deceivers. Law Hum Behav 2017;41:519–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000258. [48] Sackman H. The Delphi method. Futures 1976;8:444–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(76)90011-2. [49] HORTON JN. Nominal group technique. Anaesthesia 1980;35:811–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1980.tb03924.x. [50] Thomann E, Maggetti M. Designing Research With Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Approaches, Challenges, and Tools. Sociol Methods Res 2020;49:356–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729700. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89523 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 背景:醫療錯誤揭露(medical error disclosure)是近年因應病人自主與安全文化意識運動,逐漸被重視的主題。然而過去的文獻指出,醫療錯誤被妥善告知的比例約落在兩成左右。背後潛在的因素包含對於醫療訴訟的畏懼,擔心失去病患信任,或是害怕病人及家屬的情緒反應等。而過去文獻多以問卷調查形式進行量性分析,而住院醫師的訓練過程也是承先啟後的重要階段,因此本研究希望能以質性方法針對住院醫師族群探討其醫療錯誤揭露的影響因素,並嘗試建構出架構化的模型。
方法:本研究為一質性訪談研究,以內科住院醫師為研究對象,在其完成急重症模擬訓練中的醫療錯誤揭露情境後,針對影響醫療錯誤揭露的因素進行半結構式訪談。訪談過程全程錄音並轉譯為逐字稿,繼而採用基於紮根理論的編碼方式進行編碼,最後萃取出類目及主題。質性分析過程中除了第二研究者參與分析,也會將初部結果回寄給受訪者參閱以增加研究效度。 結果:本研究於訪談22位內科住院醫師後達到理論飽和,並從中產生十個影響醫療錯誤揭露的十個類目,包含前因後果、醫療糾紛,情緒反應、告知內容,倫理價值、個人經驗,內部流程、團隊合作、支援系統及醫病關係。十個類目經過歸納後共有四個主題:事件因素、病人因素、醫師因素、系統因素,而特定類目可能歸屬至兩個主題,如告知內容與病人因素及事件因素均相關,因此提出架構化的四因子模型,用以歸類及解釋本研究結果中類目與主題的關係。 結論:本研究所產出之四因子模型,以及其下的十個類目,可以用來架構化的分析影響醫療錯誤揭露的因素,並用於設計情境模擬教案或是作為未來訓練住院醫師參考。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Medical errors are encountered daily worldwide. However, less than thirty percent of medical errors were adequately disclosed to the patients. Previous studies reported that factors influencing error reporting include fear of medical disputes, losing patient’s trust and ethical issues. Residents have dual roles of both healthcare providers and learners in training, and few studies have probed this topic from residents’ perspectives. We sought to gain insight into the perspectives of resident doctors on the disclosure of medical errors and subsequently construct a comprehensive, structured model encapsulating these findings.
Methods: We conducted a qualitative investigation using semi-structured interview methods on internal medicine trainees partake critical medicine training course, during which they would underwent a medical error disclosure scenario. Semi-structured interviews probing factors influencing the decision to error disclosure were conducted on residents recruited by purposive sampling. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and subsequently coded using a grounded theory approach. In addition to involving a second researcher in the analysis, the preliminary results were sent to the interviewees for review, aiming to enhance research validity. Results: The study reached theoretical saturation following interviews with 22 residents. Ten categories regarding medical error disclosure were identified, namely causal relationship, medical disputes, emotional reactions, information to disclosure, ethical values, personal experiences, internal processes, teamwork, support systems, and physician-patient relationships. These categories were consolidated into four overarching themes: event factors, patient factors, physician factors, and system factors. Certain categories, for example, information to disclosure, related to multiple themes. Consequently, a structured four-factor model was proposed to articulate and elucidate the relationship between these categories and themes. Conclusions: The four-factor model resulting from this study, along with its constituent ten categories, serves as a robust framework for structurally analyzing factors influencing medical error disclosure. It has potential utility in designing case-based simulation curricula and as a guide for future resident doctor training programs. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-09-08T16:09:46Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-09-08T16:09:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
口試委員會審定書 i 誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 目錄 v 圖目錄 vii 表目錄 viii 第一章 緒論 9 第一節 研究背景與動機 9 第二節 研究目的 10 第二章 文獻探討 11 第一節 醫療錯誤的發生與揭露 11 第二節 情境模擬學習訓練 12 第三節 影響醫療錯誤揭露的因素 13 第四節 本章小結 15 第三章 研究設計與研究方法 16 第一節 研究架構與研究問題 16 第二節 研究對象及實驗流程 21 第三節 研究工具 23 第四節 資料處理及分析 25 第五節 研究倫理 27 第四章 研究結果 29 第一節 受訪者基本資料 29 第二節 文本分析結果 30 第五章 討論 38 第一節 四因子模型的形式 38 第二節 四因子架構在其他文獻中的呼應 41 第三節 四因子架構對於情境模擬教學的回饋 44 第四節 四因子架構的延伸運用 46 第五章 結論與建議 47 第一節 研究結論 47 第二節 研究限制 47 第三節 研究建議 49 參考文獻 52 附錄 56 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 探討內科住院醫師在情境模擬中進行醫療錯誤揭露之影響因素 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Factors influencing medical error disclosure among internal medicine residents during simulation-based training | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 古世基;邱晏麟 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Shih-Chi Ku;Yen-Lin Chiu | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 醫療錯誤揭露,醫療爭議,質性研究,醫病溝通,情境模擬,住院醫師, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | medical error disclosure,qualitative research,medical disputes,physician-patient,communication,simulation, residents, | en |
dc.relation.page | 68 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202303116 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-08 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 醫學教育暨生醫倫理研究所 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 醫學教育暨生醫倫理學科所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf | 2.55 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。