Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 國際企業學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88933
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陳瑀屏zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorYu-Ping Chenen
dc.contributor.author楊宗翰zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorZong-Han Yangen
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-16T16:25:16Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-09-
dc.date.copyright2023-08-16-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.date.submitted2023-07-17-
dc.identifier.citation未來流通研究所(2022年7月25日)。【商業數據圖解】2021台灣「零售與電商」產業市佔率英雄榜。未來流通研究所。https://www.mirai.com.tw/2021-taiwan-retail-amd-ecommerce-companies-market-share-structure/
吳家豪、江明晏(2019年3月15日)。中國OTT來台搶市 戰火一觸即發。中央通訊社。https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/201903150297.aspx
林滿儀(2022)。網購免運費對消費行為影響〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立高雄科技大學國際企業系。
翁申霖(2023年5月27日)。Netflix抓寄生帳號最高收200!1招破解「等於沒漲」:沒同住也能用 客服認了。今周刊。https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/183030/post/202305270009/
陳東慶(2022)。免費版要做得多好? 探討免費增值策略對於持續使用與升級意圖之影響 —以免費影音串流平台為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立成功大學。
國家通訊傳播委員會(2022)。111年通訊傳播市場報告。國家通訊傳播委員會。
張耕輔(2021)。如何扭轉誘餌效應-劣勢商品的促銷活動〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立成功大學。
黃郁欣(2021年12月01日)。Netflix穩佔影音平台龍頭,Disney+ 上線兩周即收割近兩成付費訂戶。創市際市場研究顧問。https://www.ixresearch.com/news/news_12_01_21
黃敬淳(2021年9月22日)。Disney+ 公布確切登台時間!估 10 月初透露相關月費。自由時報。https://3c.ltn.com.tw/news/46012
楊又肇(2022年10月15日)。Netflix正式在全球12個國家地區推出以廣告支撐的低價訂閱方案。聯合新聞網。https://tech.udn.com/tech/story/123154/6687304
楊雅婷(2018)。OTT影音平台的使用者研究:以整合科技接受與資訊系統成功模式探討行為意圖與付費意願〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立政治大學。
資策會產業情報研究所(2022年5月12日)。【零售電商消費者調查系列一】6成網友愛用蝦皮24h、momo 行動App購物冠軍為蝦皮 10大網購數位科技 消費者最重視電子支付、跨平台比價。資策會產業情報研究所。https://mic.iii.org.tw/news.aspx?id=621
資誠聯合會計師事務所(2022)。2022-2026 臺灣娛樂暨媒體業展望。https://www.pwc.tw/zh/publications/topic-report/assets/taiwan-entertainment-and-media-outlook-2022-2026.pdf
劉幼琍(1994)。有線電視經營管理與頻道規劃策略。正中書局。
劉柏立(2017)。日本 OTT TV 的經營模式與政策法規。載於劉幼琍(主編),OTT TV 的創新服務、經營模式與政策法規(頁173-208)。五南圖書。
鄭詩韻(2022年8月11日)。Disney+無廣告方案變貴了 美國地區12月起漲38%。中央通訊社。https://www.cna.com.tw/news/amov/202208110178.aspx
賴祥蔚(2016年2月14日)。我見我思-本土OTT元年?中國時報。https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20160214000298-260502?chdtv
顏理謙(2016年10月14日)。內容決勝負!台灣OTT百家爭鳴。數位時代。https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/41346/taiwan-ott
羅之盈(2015年12月29日)。Netflix台灣版登台倒數,7個數字搞懂它。天下雜誌。https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5073526
Adgate, B. (2020, November 2). The Rise And Fall Of Cable Television. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bradadgate/2020/11/02/the-rise-and-fall-of-cable-television/?sh=4ab43d96b31f
Ak, Ö. (2019). Framework for Video-On-Demand Industry in Sweden.
Attwood, S., Chesworth, S.T., & Parkin, B.L. (2020). Menu engineering to encourage sustainable food choices when dining out: An online trial of priced-based decoys. Appetite, 149.
Bhattacharyya, R., Kohli, S., & Rupali, M. (2020). Change In Consumption Habits Of Entertainment During Lockdown And The Role Of OTT Platforms. Ilkogr. Online-Elem. Educ. Online, 19(4), 4686-4695.
Bordalo, P., Gennaioli, N., & Shleifer, A. (2013). Salience and consumer choice. Journal of Political Economy, 121(5), 803-843.
Bouma, L. (2019, August 13). Cord Cutting’s Growth Has More Than Tripled in 2019. Cord Cutters News. https://cordcuttersnews.com/cord-cuttings-growth-has-more-than-tripled-in-2019/
Cassidy, T. (2019, August 28). Only 17.5% of online retailers offer free shipping. Digital Commerce 360. https://www.digitalcommerce360.com/2019/08/28/only-17-5-of-online-retailers-offer-free-shipping/
Cui, Y. G., Kim, S. S., & Kim, J. (2021). Impact of preciseness of price presentation on the magnitude of compromise and decoy effects. Journal of Business Research, 132, 641-652.
Danaher, P. J. (2002). Optimal pricing of new subscription services: Analysis of a market experiment. Marketing Science, 21(2), 119-138.
Dextre-Mamani, R., Pérez-Arce, B., & Zubiria, M. L. L. (2022, November). Content Richness, Perceived Price, and Perceived Ease of Use in Relation to the Satisfaction Level and Brand Equity in Streaming Platforms. In Advanced Research in Technologies, Information, Innovation and Sustainability: Second International Conference, ARTIIS 2022, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, September 12–15, 2022, Revised Selected Papers, Part I (pp. 272-286). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Dhar, R., & Glazer, R. (1996). Similarity in context: Cognitive representation and violation of preference and perceptual invariance in consumer choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 280–293. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0080
Eisenmann, T. R. (2000). Cable TV: From community antennas to wired cities. Business History Review.
Espósito, F. (2023, March 23). Apple TV+ global market share shrinks and platform is overtaken by Paramount+. 9to5Mac. https://9to5mac.com/2023/03/23/apple-tv-global-market-share-shrinks/
Fitzgerald, T. (2019, March 6). Why Cord Cutting Doubled In 2018 And 10 Million Have Left Since 2012. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/tonifitzgerald/2019/03/06/why-cord-cutting-doubled-in-2018-and-10-million-have-left-since-2012/?sh=611e2bfa409f
Freedman, L. (2022, September 22). The Shopper Speaks: Is free shipping still everything to online shoppers? Digital Commerce 360. https://www.digitalcommerce360.com/2022/09/22/the-shopper-speaks-is-free-shipping-still-everything-to-online-shoppers/
Ha, Y. W., Park, S., & Ahn, H. K. (2009). The influence of categorical attributes on choice context effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 463-477.
Hadar, L., Danziger, S., & Hertwig, R. (2018). The attraction effect in experience-based decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31, 461-468.
Heath, T. B., & Chatterjee, S. (1995). Asymmetric decoy effects on lower-quality versus higher-quality brands: Meta-analytic and experimental evidence. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(3), 268–284. https://doi.org/10.1086/209449
Heath, T. B., Ryu, G., Chatterjee, S., McCarthy, M. S., Mothersbaugh, D. L., Milberg, S., & Gaeth, G. J. (2000). Asymmetric competition in choice and the leveraging of competitive disadvantages. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(3), 291-308.
Hsu, H. C., & Liu, W. L. (2011). Using Decoy Effects to Influence an Online Brand Choice: The Role of Price–Quality Trade-Offs. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(4), 235-239.
Huber, J., Payne, J. W., & Puto, C. (1982). Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 90–98. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2488940
Huber, J., & Puto, C. (1983). Market boundaries and product choice: Illustrating attraction and substitution effects. Journal of consumer research, 10(1), 31-44.
Iyengar, R., Park, Y. H., & Yu, Q. (2022). The impact of subscription programs on customer purchases. Journal of Marketing Research, 59(6), 1101-1119.
Josiam, B. M., & Hobson, J. P. (1995). Consumer choice in context: the decoy effect in travel and tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 34(1), 45-50.
Kevin W. & Steven C. (2023, April 28). Disney Plus offers ad-supported and ad-free options — here's how much each plan and bundle costs. Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/guides/tech/disney-plus-price
Kim, J., Park, J., & Ryu, G. (2006). Decoy effects and brands. ACR North American Advances.
Kirkpatrick, D. (2017, September 14). EMarketer lowers TV ad spend forecast as cord-cutting accelerates. Marketing Dive. https://www.marketingdive.com/news/emarketer-lowers-tv-ad-spend-forecast-as-cord-cutting-accelerates/504901/
Kokaram, A., Crinon, R., & Catania, N. (2015). OTT (Over-the-Top) in 2015. SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal, 124(6), 65-68.
Kweon, H. J., & Kweon, S. H. (2021). Pricing strategy within the US streaming services market: A focus on Netflix’s price plans. International Journal of Contents, 17(2), 1-8.
Leowarin, T., & Thanasuta, K. (2021). Consumer Purchase Intention for Subscription Video-on-Demand Service in Thailand. Journal of Business Administration and Languages (JBAL), 9(1), 14-26.
Li, S., Luo, Q., Qiu, L., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2020). Optimal pricing model of digital music: subscription, ownership or mixed?. Production and Operations Management, 29(3), 688-704.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22 140, 55.
Lisa R. & Dawn C. (2022, August 11). Disney tops Netflix on streaming subscribers, sets higher prices. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/technology/disney-tops-netflix-streaming-subscribers-raises-prices-ad-free-options-2022-08-10/
Maniar, N. (2012). Streaming Media. In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 3199-3202). Springer.
McCluskey, M. (2023, April 19). Everything You Need to Know About Netflix Cracking Down on Password Sharing. TIME. https://time.com/6251148/netflix-password-sharing-crackdown-rules/
Media Partners Asia. (2021). Taiwan Online Video Consumer Insights & Analytics. https://media-partners-asia.com/AMPD/Q4_2021/TAIWAN/PreviewContent.pdf
Monk, R. L., Qureshi, A. W., Leatherbarrow, T., & Hughes, A. (2016). The decoy effect within alcohol purchasing decisions. Substance Use & Misuse, 51(10), 1353-1362.
Motion Picture Association. (2019). A comprehensive analysis and survey of the theatrical and home entertainment market environment. (THEME) for 2018. https://www.motionpictures.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/MPAA-THEME-Report-2018.pdf
Mourali, M., Böckenholt, U., & Laroche, M. (2007). Compromise and attraction effects under prevention and promotion motivations. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 234–247. https://doi.org/10.1086/519151
Nagaraj, S., Singh, S., & Yasa, V. R. (2021). Factors affecting consumers’ willingness to subscribe to over-the-top (OTT) video streaming services in India. Technology in Society, 65, 101534.
Parducci, A. (1995). Happiness, pleasure, and judgment: The contextual theory and its applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Patterson, B. (2023, April 18). Netflix password sharing crackdown: What you need to know. TechHive. https://www.techhive.com/article/1357666/netflix-password-sharing-crackdown-2.html
Pettibone, J. C., & Wedell, D. H. (2000). Examining models of nondominated decoy effects across judgment and choice. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 81(2), 300-328.
Robert E. W. III (2023, April 21). Netflix vs. Disney Plus: What's the Difference? Lifewire. https://www.lifewire.com/netflix-vs-disney-plus-7376885
Sarah K. (2022, December 20). Netflix’s Ad-Supported Tier Was Its Least Popular Plan, Analytics Firm Estimates. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/netflixs-ad-supported-tier-was-its-least-popular-plan-in-launch-month-analytics-firm-estimates-11671539939?mod=hp_lead_pos12
Sato, S. (2019). Freemium as optimal menu pricing. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 63, 480-510.
Sellers-Rubio, R., & Nicolau-Gonzalbez, J. L. (2015). Testing the decoy effect in the presence of store brands. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43(2), 113-125.
Seth S. (2022). Netflix subscriber growth returns as ad tier launch looms. S&P Global Market Intelligence. https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/research/netflix-subscriber-growth-returns-as-ad-tier-launch-looms
Shahzeidi, A. (2022, June 13). Top OTT Statistics for 2022. Uscreen. https://www.uscreen.tv/blog/ott-statistics/
Simon, J. P. (2012). The Dynamics of the Media and Content Sector: A Synthesis (No. JRC76471). Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1992). Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172740
Spangler, T. (2022, August 10). Disney Beats Quarterly Expectations, Disney+ Soars to 152 Million Subscribers. Variety. https://variety.com/2022/digital/news/disney-earnings-beat-disney-plus-subscribers-152-million-1235338055/
Sürücü, O., Djawadi, B. M., & Recker, S. (2019). The asymmetric dominance effect: Reexamination and extension in risky choice–An experimental study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 73, 102-122.
Süss, H. M., & Schmiedek, F. (2000). Fatigue and practice effects during cognitive tasks lasting several hours. Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie: Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie, 47(3), 162-179.
Toonkel, J. (2022, May 18). Netflix Cancellations Rise Among Long-Standing Subscribers. The Information. https://www.theinformation.com/articles/netflix-cancellations-rise-among-long-standing-subscribers
Tversky, A., & Simonson, I. (1993). Context-Dependent Preferences. Management Science, 39(10), 1179–1189. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2632953
Ulin, S. (2018). Cord-Cutting: An Analysis of the Cable-Quitting Phenomenon. University of Miami. https://com.miami.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/mma_2018_firstplace.pdf
Wu, C., & Cosguner, K. (2020). Profiting from the decoy effect: A case study of an online diamond retailer. Marketing Science, 39(5), 974-995.
Wu, S., & Yu, R. (2019). Fatigue biases the decoy effect in males but not females. International journal of psychology, 54(5), 604-611.
Xu, L., Yu, M., & Chen, X. (2021). Decoy Effect on Consumers' Purchase Behaviors in Relation to Meat Products: Comparison of Pork and Chicken. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 679256.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88933-
dc.description.abstract近年隨著線上影視串流平台逐漸興盛,全球影視串流平台龍頭Netflix及Disney+紛紛搶進臺灣市場,為了在臺取得更大的市占率並提高營收,兩平台或許可藉由新增訂閱方案的選項作為其策略,而此新方案可考慮以「誘餌訂閱方案」的形式推出,此誘餌方案的想法來自於誘餌效應,該效應經常被應用於行銷領域中且被眾多研究證實有效,能夠透過消費選項的新增來影響消費者的決策,因此誘餌訂閱方案的推出,或許能影響影視平台使用者的訂閱方案選擇,進而為臺灣線上影視串流平台市場帶來變化。
由於過去少有針對線上影視串流平台訂閱方案的誘餌效應研究,因此本研究以問卷調查法及實驗法探討新誘餌訂閱方案的推出,將如何影響臺灣使用者在線上影視串流平台(以Netflix及Disney+兩平台作為主要研究平台)的方案選擇,同時了解臺灣使用者對於本地尚未推出的廣告版訂閱方案及嚴格打擊的密碼共享限制政策之看法,並將其元素加入至誘餌方案的內容設計中。
本研究發現在加入誘餌方案之後,能夠顯著降低所有樣本在線上影視串流平台中選擇競爭方案的比例,表示其方案選擇決策受到誘餌方案的存在與否所影響。同時本研究也探討了可能影響誘餌方案效果的因素,例如誘餌方案的內容、消費者的輪廓特質等,這些研究發現幫助我們了解訂閱方案設計如何影響影視串流平台的消費者決策,並提供兩研究平台在設計誘餌方案上的實務建議。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractWith the recent surge in popularity of video streaming platforms, global streaming leaders Netflix and Disney+ have entered the Taiwanese market to secure a larger market share and higher revenue. To achieve these goals, both platforms could consider introducing a new subscription plan as part of their strategies. One potential approach is to introduce a "decoy subscription plan" inspired by the decoy effect. It is a phenomenon that adds a new but inferior alternative to consumers’ choice set and may influence their decision making. The decoy effect is widely acknowledged and proven effective in the field of marketing. Similarly, introduction of an additional decoy subscription plan may influence the decision-making process of consumers and potentially bring about some changes to the streaming platform market in Taiwan.
Given the lack of research on the decoy effect in the context of subscription plans of video streaming platforms, this study utilizes questionnaire and experiment methods to explore the impact of a new decoy subscription plan on user choice preferences in Taiwanese video streaming platforms, focusing on Netflix and Disney+ as the primary research platforms. Additionally, the study aims to understand users' perspectives on ad-supported subscription plans and password sharing crackdown policy, which have not yet been officially introduced in Taiwan. Their components will be incorporated into the content design of decoy subscription plans.
The findings of this study reveal a significant reduction in the proportion of all samples selecting “competing plans” on video streaming platforms after the introduction of a decoy subscription plan. This indicates that the decision-making process regarding plan selection is influenced by the presence of a decoy subscription plan. The study also examines factors that may affect the effectiveness of a decoy subscription plan, such as content of a decoy subscription plan and consumers’ persona. These research findings provide insights into how subscription plan design influences consumers’ decision-making on video streaming platforms and offer practical recommendations for the design of decoy subscription plans for Netflix and Disney+.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-08-16T16:25:16Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-08-16T16:25:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii
摘要 iii
Abstract iv
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章、緒論 1
第一節、研究背景與動機 1
第二節、研究目的 6
第二章、文獻回顧 8
第一節、線上影視串流平台的發展 8
第二節、訂閱方案的設計 12
第三節、誘餌效應於行銷領域的應用 13
第三章、研究方法 17
第一節、研究架構與假設 17
第二節、研究設計 19
第四章、研究結果與分析 41
第一節、受測者資料分析 41
第二節、研究假說之驗證 52
第三節、其他發現與討論 60
第五章、結論與建議 108
第一節、研究結論 108
第二節、學術貢獻 110
第三節、管理實務意涵 110
第四節、研究限制與未來研究建議 112
參考文獻 116
附錄 125
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject影音串流平台zh_TW
dc.subject誘餌效應zh_TW
dc.subject不對稱支配效應zh_TW
dc.subject訂閱方案zh_TW
dc.subjectOTT媒體服務zh_TW
dc.subjectAsymmetric Dominance Effecten
dc.subjectDecoy Effecten
dc.subjectVideo Streaming Platformen
dc.subjectOver-the-top Media Serviceen
dc.subjectSubscription Planen
dc.title線上影視串流平台如何利用誘餌效應改變使用者的方案選擇zh_TW
dc.titleLeveraging the Decoy Effect to Influence User’s Plan Selection on Video Streaming Servicesen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear111-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳聿宏;林嘉薇zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeYu-Hung Chen;Jia-Wei Linen
dc.subject.keyword誘餌效應,不對稱支配效應,訂閱方案,OTT媒體服務,影音串流平台,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordDecoy Effect,Asymmetric Dominance Effect,Subscription Plan,Over-the-top Media Service,Video Streaming Platform,en
dc.relation.page153-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202301475-
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)-
dc.date.accepted2023-07-18-
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept國際企業學系-
顯示於系所單位:國際企業學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-111-2.pdf4.37 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved