請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/879
標題: | 不自證己罪特權之適用範圍 The Application of Privilege against Self-Incrimination |
作者: | Yi-Hsin Huang 黃奕欣 |
指導教授: | 薛智仁(Chih-Jen Hsueh) |
關鍵字: | 不自證己罪,供述性證據,身體檢查,行政調查,當事人協力義務, Privilege against Self-Incrimination,Testimonial Evidence,Physical Examination,Administrative Investigation,Obligation to Co-operate, |
出版年 : | 2019 |
學位: | 碩士 |
摘要: | 不自證己罪特權為現代法治國家肯認之重要原則,惟其於適用範圍上向有主動基準與被動基準之討論,本文藉爬梳美國最高法院及歐洲人權法院之判決見解,以釐清此特權之具體適用。第一章為緒論,第二章介紹美國法相關的提出命令制度及刑事豁免制度,以及不自證己罪特權四大要件(供述性、受強迫、入罪危險、自然人)。第三章介紹歐洲人權公約第六條,以及人權法院於個案操作不自證己罪原則時使用的判斷方法。第四章首先歸納美國聯邦最高法院及歐洲人權法院見解之異同,並提出認識權威理論作為支持供述性要件的理論基礎。最後則回歸我國
法,就不自證己罪特權於身體檢查處分、行政調查之當事人協力義務等二部分,討論此特權之具體適用。 The privilege against self-incrimination is well recognized in modern jurisdictions. However, the scope and rationale for the privilege lack clarification. This paper begins with the important cases of the Supreme Court of the United States and the European Court of Human Rights, and then analyzes the meaning of four basic elements of the privilege (“testimonial evidence”, “compulsion”, “incrimination” and “persons”). After that, this paper introduces the theory of epistemic authority which justifies the scope of the privilege. Finally, this paper applies the privilege against self-incrimination to two fields: physical examination and obligation to co-operate. |
URI: | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/879 |
DOI: | 10.6342/NTU201900286 |
全文授權: | 同意授權(全球公開) |
顯示於系所單位: | 科際整合法律學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf | 2.84 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。