請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87765
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 周繼祥 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Jih-Shine Chou | en |
dc.contributor.author | 趙大同 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Dah-Torng Chao | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-19T16:22:11Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-07-19 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-05-20 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 壹、中文
方偉達 (2018)。人文社科研究方法。臺北市:五南圖書出版。 方燕 (2019)。宋代信息傳播與管控:以流言為中心的考察。北京市:中華書局。 王石番 (1992)。傳播內容分析法:理論與實證。臺北市:幼獅文化事業。 王潤 (2013)。Rumor:一個需要澄清的概念—基於流言與謠言研究的文獻梳理與思考。北京市:第九屆全國新聞學子優秀論文評選參評論文 中華民國教育部 (2021)。重編國語辭典修訂本。臺北市:國家教育研究院。 台灣中華書局辭海編輯委員會 (1989)。辭海。台北市:中華書局。 早川忠典 (2020)。神國日本荒謬的愛國技法 (鳳氣至純平、許倍榕譯)。臺北市:遠足文化。(原著作出版年:2014年) 羊正鈺 (2016)。美國總統大選的分歧:政見比一比、驚世語錄以及歷史回顧。The News Lens關鍵評論。2016. 11. 05. 取自:https://www.thenewslens.com/article/53309/fullpage 呂宗力 (2011)。漢代的謠言。杭州:浙江大學出版社。 呂文玲 (2018)。網路散布假新聞、假消息之法制研析。2018年11月1日立法院新聞稿。 李若建 (2011)。虛實之間:20世紀50年代中國大陸謠言研究。北京市:社會科學文獻出版社。 李鎮宇 (2023)。英國推公共秩序法 在英港人憂抗議權利遭限制。Newtalk新聞,2023.01.30.,取自:https://newtalk.tw/news/view/2023-01-30/855066 邢泰釗 (2003)。憲法上之權利與義務—-(一)言論自由。台灣法律網。2003.02.28.,取自:https://www.lawtw.com/archives/310246 何娜瑩 (2022)。淺論社會秩序維護法有關「散佈謠言,足以影響公共安寧」之行為。台一國際智慧財產事務所。2022.03.,取自:https://www.taie.com.tw/tc/p4-publications-detail.asp?article_code=03&article_classify_sn=66&sn=2240 何義麟 (2021)。台灣的禁書傳播及其民主化效應。威權鬆動-解嚴前台灣重大政治案件與政治變遷(1977-1987)國際學術討論會論文集。台北市:國史館。416-419 吳柏軒 (2020)。教授蘇宏達批故宮被警傳喚 台大聲明︰政府應恪遵憲法。自由時報。2020. 01. 02.,取自:https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/3027526 吳寧康 (2023)。英國推公共秩序法 擴大警察權制止破壞性抗議。中央廣播電台。2023.01.16.,取自:https://www.rti.org.tw/news/view/id/2156434 林子儀(1993)。言論自由與新聞自由。台北:月旦。 林子儀 (1997)。言論自由的限制與雙軌理論。現代國家與憲法—李鴻禧教授六秩華誕祝賀論文集。645-648。 林子儀(2002)。言論自由導論。輯於李鴻禧等(著),台灣憲法之縱剖橫切。台北:元照。 林齊皓 (2015)。封鎖太平洋:美國的戰時新聞檢查。轉角國際。2015.10.16.,取自:http://global.udn.com/global_vision/story/8664/1231349 黃奕瀠 (2015)。二戰中的日本新聞 I:窒息中的媒體之聲。轉角國際。2015.10.16.,取自:http://global.udn.com/global_vision/story/8664/1219803 松田美佐 (2019)。流言效應 (林以庭譯)。新北市:一起來、遠足文化。(原著作出版年:2014) 苫米地英人 (2019)。現代洗腦手冊 (李建銓譯)。新北市:光現、遠足文化。(原著作出版年:2017) 岡田尊司 (2020)。當洗腦統治了我們:思想控制的技術 (陳令嫻譯)。臺北市:遠流出版。(原著作出版年:2016) 周裕琼 (2012)。當代中國社會的網路謠言研究。北京市:商務印書館。37-44 周軼君 (2016)。當日本出兵海外,媒體就不可能再中立—來自《朝日新聞》的懺悔。端傳媒。2016.09.02.,取自:https://theinitium.com/article/20160902-international-asahi/ 胡冰(2009)。謠言作為一種社會抗議。傳播與社會學刊,總(9),67-94 胡幼慧(1996)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北市:巨流圖書。 英國政府擬立法限制示威集會,民眾抗爭近一年要求撤回法案。香港01。2022.02.17.,取自:https://www.hk01.com/article/736496?utm_source=01articlecopy&utm_medium=referral 孫宇青、劉宜庭 (2019)。國安危機!美德法加立法杜絕假新聞。自由時報。2019.03.18.,取自:https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/1274872 陳向明 (2002)。社會科學質的研究。臺北市:五南圖書。 陳朝建 (2003)。淺談言論自由之目的及其限制。台灣法律網,法律知識庫。 陳曉芙 (2020)。台大教授蘇宏達批故宮政策遭送辦 法院認定言論自由不罰。上報。2020.01.06.,取自:https://www.upmedia.mg/news_info.php?Type=24&SerialNo=78978 楊明暐 (2016)。2016美國大選「被遺忘的」選民唾棄政客憤怒力量反撲造就川普現象。中國時報。2016.11.10.,取自:https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20161110000355-260119?chdtv 趙大同 (2021)。從近世文本初探當代權力流動間的流言文化 (碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。 臧國仁、蔡琰 (2017)。敘事傳播:故事/人文觀點。臺北市:五南圖書。 廖為民 (2017)。台灣禁書的故事。台北市:允晨文化。19-23 廖為民 (2021)。國民黨禁書始末。台北市:前衛出版社。 鄭惟佳 (2010)。迷與迷群:媒介使用中的身分認同建構。北京市:中國傳媒大學出版。 潘維庭 (2021)。《謠言罪暴增28倍》「執政者覺得好用」李念祖:用「謠言」處罰一定不會合憲。【新新聞】。2021.03.26.,取自:https://www.storm.mg/article/3561804 蔡文輝 (1995)。社會變遷。臺北市:三民書局。 橘玲 (2020)。上級國民/下級國民 (林雯譯)。臺北市:先覺出版。(原著作出版年:2019) Allport, G., & Postman, L. (2003)。謠言心理學 (劉水準譯)。瀋陽:遼寧教育出版社。(原著作出版年:1947年) Ann Gray (2008)。文化研究 民族誌方法與生活文化 (許夢芸譯)。新北市:韋伯文化。(原著作出版年:2003) Arlette Farge & Jacques Revel (2017)。謠言如何威脅政府:法國大革命前的兒童失蹤事件 (楊磊譯)。杭州市:浙江大學出版社。(原著作出版年:1988) BBC News中文 (2022)。李文亮逝世兩週年:BBC盤點中國政府控制輿論的三大手段。2022.02.08.,取自:https://www.storm.mg/article/4184311?page=5 Benjamin F. Crabtree., & William L. Miller. (2003)。最新質性方法與研究 (黃惠雯、童琬芬、梁文蓁、林兆衛譯)。臺北市:韋伯文化。(原著作出版年:1999) Dan Gardner (2009)。販賣恐懼:脫軌的風險判斷 (李靜怡、黃慧慧譯)。臺北市:博雅書屋。(原著出版年:2008) D. Jean Clandinin & F. Michael Connelly (2003)。敘說探究:質性研究中的經驗與故事(蔡敏玲、餘曉雯譯)。臺北市:心理出版。(原著作出版年:2000) Edward Louis B. (2020)。宣傳學 (楊理然譯)。臺北市:麥田出版。(原著作出版年:1928) Garth S. Jowett & Victoria O’Donnell (2003)。宣傳與說服 (陳彥希、林嘉玫、張庭譽譯)。新北市:韋伯文化。(原著作出版年:1999) Hugo Mercier (2020)。為什麼這麼荒謬還有人信 (鍾沛君譯)。臺北市:商周出版。(原著作出版年:2020) Kapferer, J. N.(1992)。謠言 (鄭若麟、邊芹譯) 。臺北市:桂冠圖書。(原著作出版年:1990) Katherine Eban (2021)。謊言之瓶:學名藥奇蹟背後,全球製藥產業鏈興起的內幕、利益與真相 (高子梅譯)。台北市:臉譜出版、城邦文化。(原著作出版年:2019) 25-32 Klaus Krippendorff (2014)。內容分析:方法學入門 Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (曹永強譯)。臺北市:五南圖書。(原著作出版年:2004) Lesley M. M. Blume (2020)。無聲的閃光:揭發美國最致命的政府掩蓋事件!首位報導廣島原爆真相的普立茲得獎記者 × 二十世紀美國新聞史上最偉大的祕密調查。(李珮華譯)。台北市:城邦文化。(原著作出版年:2020) Manuel Castells (2002)。認同的力量 (夏鑄九、黃麗玲譯)。臺北市:唐山出版。(原著作出版年:1997) Michael Emery, Edwin Emery, & Nancy L. Roberts (2001)。美國新聞史:大眾傳播媒介解釋史(展江、殷文譯)。北京市:新華出版。(原著作出版年:1996) Pamela J. Stewart & Andrew Strathern (2005)。人類學的四個講座-謠言・想像・身體・謠言・歷史 (梁永佳、阿嘎佐詩譯)。北京市:中國人民大學出版社。(原著作出版年:2005) Robert B. Cialdini (2016)。影響力:說服的六大武器,讓人在不知不覺中受擺佈[個案升級版] (閭佳譯)。臺北市:久石文化。(原著作出版年:2008年) Scott, J. C. (2020). 弱者的武器:農民反抗的日常形式 (鄭廣懷、張敏、何江穗譯)。南京市:譯林出版。(原著作出版年:1985) S. Stephens Davidowitz (2017)。數據、謊言與真相 (陳琇玲譯)。臺北市:商周出版。(原著作出版年:2017) Veronique C. V. & Jean B. R. (2003)。都市傳奇 (楊子葆譯) 。台北市:麥田出版。(原著作出版年:1992) W. Lawrence Neuman (2002)。社會研究方法:質化與取向 (朱柔若譯)。台北市:揚智文化。(原著作出版年:1997) 貳、日文 山﨑紗紀子,宮代こずゑ,菊池由希子,高橋昌一郎(監修)(2021)。情報を正しく選択するための認知バイアス事典。Forest Publishing Co., Ltd. 佐藤卓己 (2019)。流言のメディア史。岩波書店。 佐藤健二 (1995)。流言蜚語: うわさ話を読みとく作法。有信堂高文社。 松田美佐 (2014)。うわさとは何か-ネットで変容する「最も古いメディア」。中央公論新社。 清水幾太郎 (1937)。流言蜚語。築摩書房。 廣辭苑 (2020)。日本:岩波書店。 參、英文 Allport, G. W. & L. J. Postman (1947). The psychology of Rumor, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Amy Chua (2018). Political Tribes: Group Instinct and the Fate of Nations. London: Penguin Press. Bessi, A., Coletto, M., Davidescu, G. A., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2015). Science vs. conspiracy: Collective narratives in the age of misinformation. PLOS ONE, 10 ( 2 ), e0118093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118093 Bordia, P., N. DiFonzo & A. Chang (1999). Rumor as group problem solving:developing patterns in information computer mediated groups, Small Group Research 30(1), 8-28. Bordia, P. & R. L. Rosnow (1998). Rumor rest stops on the information highway, Human_Communication Research 25(2), 163-179. Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press. Buckner, H. T. (1965). A theory of Rumor transmission, The Public Opinion Quarterly 29(1), 54-70. Caplow, T. (1947). Rumors in war, Social Force 15, 302. Cambridge University Press. (2013). Cambridge advanced learner's dictionary. 4th Edition Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chorus, A. (1952). The basic law of Rumor, The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 48, 313-314. Chriss, J. J. (2007). Social control: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Polity. Cohen, S. (1972). Folk devils and moral panics: The creation of mods and rockers. London: MacGibbon & Kee. Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (Eds.). (1992). Research methods for primary care, Vol. 3. Doing qualitative research. Sage Publications, Inc. Dawson, G. (1994). Soldier Heroes:British Adventure, Empire and the Communication. London:Routledge. DiFonzo, N. (2008). The watercooler effect: A psychologist explores the extraordinary power of rumors. New York: Avery. Dominic Hyde & Diana Raffman. (2018). “Sorites Paradox”in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. Eder, D., & Enke, J. L. (1991). The structure of gossip: Opportunities and constraints on collective expression among adolescents. American Sociological Review, 56 (4), 494-508. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/2096270 Edward Damer. (2008). Attacking Faulty Reasoning: A Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments. Cengage Learning. Einwiller, S. A., & Kamins, M. A. (2008). Rumor has it: The moderating effect of identification on rumor impact and the effectiveness of rumor refutation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38 (9), 2248-2272. doi: 10.1111/jasp.2008.38.issue-9 Fisher, D. R. (1998). Rumoring theory and the Internet, Social Science Computer Review 16(2), 158-168. Fiske, S. T. & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social Cognition, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock Publications. Friggeri, A., Adamic, L. A., Eckles, D., & Cheng, J. (2014). Rumor cascades. In Proceedings of the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media 101-110. Retrieved from http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM14/paper/download/8122/8110 Funabashi, Yoichi (FRW)/ Kushner, Barak (TRN) (2015) Media, Propaganda and Politics in 20th-Century Japan. Bloomsbury Academic. Furedi, F. (1997) Culture of Fear. Continuum Press, London. Garrett, R. K. (2011). Troubling consequences of online political rumoring. Human Communication Research, 37 (2), 255-274. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01401.x Garrett, R. K., Nisbet, E. C., & Lynch, E. K. (2013). Undermining the corrective effects of media-based political fact checking? The role of contextual cues and naïve theory. Journal of Communication, 63 (4), 617-637. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12038 Giglietto, F., Iannelli, L., Rossi, L., & Valeriani, A. (2016). Fakes, news and the election: A new taxonomy for the study of misleading information within the hybrid media system. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2878774 Glasser, W. (1984). Take effective control of your life. New York, NY: Harper & Row. Hassan, S. (2000). Releasing the bonds: Empowering people to think for themselves. Somerville, MA: Freedom of Mind Press. Hollingshead, A. B., McGrath, J. E., & O’Connor, K. M. (1993). Group task. performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer–mediated communication versus face-to-face work groups, Small Group Research 24, 304-333. Hornby, A. S. (2010). Oxford advanced learner s dictionary of current English. Oxford: Oxford university press. Hudgins, B. B., & Edelman, S. (1986). Teaching critical thinking skills to fourth and fifth graders through teacher-led small-group discussion. Journal of Educational Research, 79, 333-342. Human Rights Watch (2021). Covid-19 Triggers Wave of Free Speech Abuse. 2021.02.11. Retrieved from https://www.hrw.org/zh-hant/news/2021/02/11/covid-19-triggers-wave-free-speech-abuse Jack A. Vernon (1963). Inside the black room. New York.:C.N. Potter. John A. (1980). Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications, W. H. Freeman and Company. John Hersey (1946). Hiroshima, Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. Jonathan E., Julie B. & Paul P. (1983). On the conflict between logic and belief in Syllogistic easoning. Memory & Cognition. 11[3], 295-306. Kapferer, J. N. (1990). Rumors: uses, interpretations, and images, New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. Knapp, R. H. (1944). A psychology of Rumor, Public Opinion Quarterly 53, 467-481. Landau, M. J., Kay, A. C., & Whitson, J. A. (2015). Compensatory control and the appeal of a structured world. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 694–722. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038703 Larry B. Christensen, R. Burke Johnson & Lisa A. Turner. (2015), Research Methods, Design, and Analysis, Global Edition,Pearson Education. Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people's choice. Duell, Sloan & Pearce. Lesley M. M. Blume (2021). Fallout:The Hiroshima Cover-up and the Reporter Who Revealed It to the World. New York:Simon & Schuster. Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13 (3), 106-131. doi: 10.1177/1529100612451018 Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: reading, analysis and interpretation. Thousand Oaks (Calif.): Sage. Linda, A. Wood, & Rolf. O. Kroger. (2000). Doing Discourse Analysis: Methods for Studying Action in Talk and Text. SAGE Publications. Ma, A., Landau, M. J., Narayanan, J., & Kay, A. C. (2017). Thought-control difficulty motivates structure seeking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146 (8), 1067–1072. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000282 Ma, A., Tang, S., & Kay, A. C. (2019). Psychological reactance as a function of thought versus behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103825 Meiklejohn, A. (1960). Political freedom: The constitutional powers of the people. New York: Harper. Michael E., Edwin E. & Nancy L. Roberts. (1996). The Press and America: An Interpretive History of the Mass Media. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. 347. Michael S. (1981). Discovering The News: A Social History of American Newspapers. New York: Basic Books. 167. Mill, John Stuart (1859). On Liberty. London: John W. Parker & Son. Mocanu, D., Rossi, L., Zhang, Q., Karsai, M., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2015). Collective attention in the age of (mis)information. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 1198–1204. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.024 Morin, E. (1971). Rumour in Orleans. (P. Green Trans). NY: Blond. Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32 (2), 303-330. doi: 10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2 Oh, O., Gupta, P., Agrawal, M., & Raghav Rao, H. (2018). ICT mediated rumor beliefs and resulting user actions during a community crisis. Government Information Quarterly, 35 (2), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.006 Parsons, T. (1937). The Structure of Social Action, New York, McGraw-Hill. Peterson, W. & N. Gist (1951). Rumor and public opinion, America Journal of Sociology 57, 159-167. Pierre Bourdieu, & Hans Haacke. (1995). Free Exchange, Stanford University Press Philip G. Zimbardo (1969). Influencing Attitudes and Changing Behavior: A Basic Introduction to Relevant Methodology, Theory, and Applications, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Polkinghorne, D. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. Qualitative Studies in Education, 8, 5–23. Procter, P. (1990). Longman dictionary of contemporary English. Harlow: Longman. Riessman, C. K. (1993). Qualitative research methods, Vol. 30. Narrative analysis. Sage Publications, Inc. Robert Audi. (1999). The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. Robert B. Cialdini (2007). Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. New York: Collins Business. Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of Innovations. Glencoe: Free Press. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations, 4th Edition. New York: Free Press. Rosnow, Ralph L. & Gary A. Fine. (1976). Rumor and Gossip: The Social Psychology of Hearsay. New York: Elsevier. Rosnow, R. L. (1961). Inside rumor:Apersonal journey. American Psychologist. 46-86. Rosnow, R. L. (1988). Rumor as communication: A contextual approach, Journal of Communication 38(1), 12-28. Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Shin, J., Driscoll, K., & Bar, F. (2016). Political rumoring on Twitter during the 2012 U.S. presidential election: Rumor diffusion and correction. New Media & Society, 1 - 22. doi: 10.1177/1461444816634054 Smelser, N. J. (1962). Theory of collective behavior. New York: Free Press. Steedman, C. (1997) “Writing the self:the end of the scholarship girl”, in J. McGuigam (ed.) Cultural Methodologies. London:Sage. Strauss, A. & J. Corbin. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research - Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage Publications. Tamotsu Shibutani. (1966). Improvised News: A Sociological Study of Rumor. Ardent Media. United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights United Nations (General Assembly). (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Treaty Series 999 (December): 171. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights U.S. Const. amend. Amendment # (Ⅰ). Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/first_amendment Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. Retrieved from https://0-doi.org.opac.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/10.1126/science.aap9559 Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction, Human Communication Research 19, 50-88. Walther, J. B. (1995). Rational aspects of computer–mediated communication: experimental observations, Organizational Science 6, 180-203. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, nterpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction, Communication Research 23(1), 3-43. Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. New York: Bedminster Press. York. Fredricks, A. J., & Dossett, D. L. (1983). Attitude-behavior relations: A comparison of the Frishbein-Ajzen and the Bentler-Speckart models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45, 501-512 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87765 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 民主國家中謠言與言論自由之間存在著復雜的關係。言論自由是一項重要的人權,有助於保護公民對政府的監督權,促進公開討論和思想交流。近年來,許多研究亦發現了謠言的負面影響。許多假消息和謠言在社交媒體上流傳,導致公眾的誤解和恐慌,許多國家都以此理由限縮民眾權力。然而研究發現英文Rumor的意涵,有真有假,中文翻譯應為流言更為真確。
如何在言論自由與言論責任中取得平衡,故本研究先透過文獻分析觀察近代國內外重大事件中,政府機關對於言論自由箝制的手法與策略為基礎,其後以國內社會秩序維護法第63條第1項第5款為中心,再透過量化統計內容分析探討民眾言論自由與政府反制流言的關聯性。研究發現:(一) 英文的Rumor華文翻譯為謠言有誤;(二) 因應時代與傳播科技的發展與變化,流言(Rumor)需要重新定義;(三)不同情境下,流言具有不同的意義與功能;(四) 容易受流言影響的人格特質;(五) 政府組織常以「國家生存」或「國家安全」為理由,箝制言論自由;(六) 依據我國社維法第63條第1項第5款102~111年之裁判案件,顯示我國警察機關移送相關案件,其建構不罰之原則始終似與法院存在差異;(七) 警察與法官對法之見解出現重大分歧,易造成法律明確性與安定性的影響;(八) 反制流言的最佳方法,不是限制而是以更開放的言論自由因應之。以避免政府反制流言過當,對民眾造成干擾而心生恐懼引發寒蟬效應,不敢暢所欲言,進而影響民眾言論自由。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | There is a complex relationship between rumors and freedom of expression in democracies. Freedom of expression is an important human right that helps protect citizens' right to monitor their government and promotes open discussion and the exchange of ideas. In recent years, many studies have also found the negative effects of rumors. A lot of fake news and rumors spread on social media, causing public misunderstanding and panic, and many countries use this as a reason to limit the power of the people. However, research has found that the meaning of English Rumor is either true or false, and the Chinese translation should be more true.
How to strike a balance between freedom of speech and responsibility for speech, so this study first observes the methods and strategies used by government agencies to suppress freedom of speech in major domestic and foreign events in modern times through literature analysis, and then Focus on Subparagraph 5, Paragraph 1, Article 63 of Social Order Maintenance Act. of Taiwan. (R.O.C.), and then through quantitative statistical content analysis, it discusses the correlation between the freedom of speech of the people and the government's countermeasures against rumors. The study found that, (a) The English translation of Rumor into Chinese is wrong. (b) In response to the development and changes of the times and communication technology, rumors need to be redefined. (c) Rumors have different meanings and functions in different situations. (d) Personality Traits Easily Influenced by Rumors. (e) Government organizations often restrict freedom of speech on the grounds of "national survival" or "national security". (f) The adjudication cases in accordance with Subparagraph 5, Paragraph 1, Article 63 of Social Order Maintenance Act. of Taiwan. (R.O.C.) from 102 to 111 years show that the relevant cases transferred by our country's police agencies, and the principle of non-punishment in their construction always seems to be different from that of the courts. (g) Significant differences in the views of the police and judges on the law may easily affect the clarity and stability of the law. (h) The best way to counter rumors is not to restrict but to respond to them with a more open freedom of speech. In order to avoid the government's excessive countermeasures against rumors, causing interference to the public and causing fear to cause a chilling effect, they dare not speak freely, which in turn affects the freedom of speech of the public. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-07-19T16:22:11Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-07-19T16:22:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 目錄 v 圖目錄 vii 表目錄 viii 第壹章、 緒論 1 第一節、 研究動機 1 第二節、 研究目的 4 第三節、 研究範圍 7 第四節、 研究方法 8 第五節、 研究架構 11 第貳章、 言論自由與流言之關聯 13 第一節、 言論自由 13 第二節、 言論自由的價值 17 第三節、 言論自由的限制 19 第四節、 何謂流言 22 第五節、 流言與謠言的不同 26 第六節、 有關流言的研究 31 第七節、 流言的意涵與定義 34 第參章、 流言發展與對社會之影響 39 第一節、 促成流言的環境 39 第二節、 不同情境下的流言意義 42 第三節、 誰容易接受流言 45 第四節、 防制謠言的幾個面向 47 第五節、 我國判定或限制不實訊息的標準與依據 49 第肆章、 謬誤還是真實之認定 51 第一節、 在台灣威權時代下的禁書限制 51 第二節、 軍國主義下的日本新聞 53 第三節、 二次世界大戰時美國的新聞檢查 56 第四節、 美國政府對廣島原子彈爆炸的掩蓋 59 第五節、 英國「公共秩序法案」(The Public Order Bill) 61 第六節、 以防止新冠疫情為由對言論自由限制之國家 63 第七節、 衝擊全球公共衛生的學名藥造假事件 65 第八節、 小結 67 第伍章、 社維法第63條第1項裁罰樣態分析 71 第一節、 我國社會秩序維護法之簡介 71 第二節、 研究假設 73 第三節、 研究對象、資料來源與分析工具 75 第四節、 近十年社維法第63條第1項各款裁判案件數蒐集方法 77 第五節、 社維法第63條第1項第5款近年裁判案件數之比較 79 第六節、 社維法第63條第1項各款裁判案件輪廓及佔比統計 82 第陸章、 結論 91 第一節、 分析與解釋 91 第二節、 研究發現 95 第三節、 研究價值 109 第四節、 未來研究建議 111 參考文獻 113 壹、中文 113 貳、日文 118 參、英文 119 附錄 125 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 民眾言論自由與政府反制流言的關聯性研究~以我國社會秩序維護法第63條第1項第5款為中心 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Study of the Relationship Between People's Freedom of Speech and Government's Countermeasures Against rumors. Focus on Subparagraph 5, Paragraph 1, Article 63 of Social Order Maintenance Act of Taiwan. (R.O.C.) | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 胡元輝;陳思賢 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yuan-Hui Hu;Sy-Shyan Chen | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 言論自由,流言,謠言,社會秩序維護法,反制, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Freedom of Speech,Rumors,False Rumor,Social Order Maintenance Act,Countermeasures Against, | en |
dc.relation.page | 125 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202300798 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-05-22 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 國家發展研究所 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 國家發展研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.3 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。