請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87245
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 周素卿 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Sue-Ching Jou | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃紫翎 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | ZIHLING HUANG | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-18T16:35:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-05-11 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-02-19 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Adell, G. (1999). Literature review: theories and models of the peri-urban interface: a changing conceptual landscape. Retrieved from
Allen, P., & Sachs, C. (1993). Sustainable agriculture in the United States: Engagements, silences, and possibilities for transformation. Food for the future: Conditions and contradictions of sustainability, 139-167. Allen, P., & Sachs, C. (2012). Women and food chains: The gendered politics of food. Taking food public: Redefining foodways in a changing world, 23-40. Barlett, P. F., & Conger, K. J. (2004). Three visions of masculine success on American farms. Men and Masculinities, 7(2), 205-227. Bauhardt, C. (2013). Rethinking gender and nature from a material (ist) perspective: Feminist economics, queer ecologies and resource politics. European Journal of Women's Studies, 20(4), 361-375. Bock, B. (2017). 2 Gender and Mobility. Gender and Rural Globalization: International Perspectives on Gender and Rural Development, 8. Bock, B. B. (2015). Gender mainstreaming and rural development policy; the trivialisation of rural gender issues. Gender, Place & Culture, 22(5), 731-745. Bruce, A. B., & Castellano, R. L. S. (2016). Labor and alternative food networks: challenges for farmers and consumers. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 1-14. Bruce, A. B., & Castellano, R. L. S. (2017). Labor and alternative food networks: challenges for farmers and consumers. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 32(5), 403-416. Carney, J. A. (1992). Peasant women and economic transformation in the Gambia. Development and Change, 23(2), 67-90. Corbett, M. (2007). All kinds of potential: Women and out-migration in an Atlantic Canadian coastal community. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(4), 430-442. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches: Sage. Dempsey, K. (1992). A man's town: inequality between women and men in rural Australia: Oxford University Press. Deutsch, T. (2011). Memories of Mothers in the Kitchen Local Foods, History, and Women's Work. Radical History Review, 2011(110), 167-177. Elmhirst, R. (2015). Feminist political ecology. In The Routledge Handbook of Gender and Development (pp. 82-90): Routledge. Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2016). Building community economies: Women and the politics of place. In The Palgrave handbook of gender and development (pp. 287-311): Springer. Giddens, A., 趙旭東, & 方文. (2002). 現代性與自我認同: 晚期現代的自我與社會. 台北: 左岸文化. Gruen, L. (1992). Janet Biehl. Rethinking Ecofeminist Politics. Boston, South End Press, 1991. Hypatia, 7(3), 216-220. Halfacree, K. (1997). Contrasting roles for the post-productivist countryside. In: Cloke, P. and Little, J (eds.) Contested Countryside Culture.: London: Routledge. Halfacree, K. (2006). From dropping out to leading on? British counter-cultural back-to-the-land in a changing rurality. Progress in Human Geography, 30(3), 309-336. Halfacree, K. (2007a). Back-To-The-Land In The Twenty-First Century - Making Connections With Rurality. . Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geogra?e, 98, No. 1,, 3-8. Halfacree, K. (2007b). Back?to?the?land in the twenty?first century-making connections with rurality. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 98(1), 3-8. Halfacree, K. (2012). Heterolocal identities? Counter?urbanisation, second homes, and rural consumption in the era of mobilities. Population, space and place, 18(2), 209-224. Halfacree, K. J. P., space, & place. (2012). Heterolocal identities? Counter?urbanisation, second homes, and rural consumption in the era of mobilities. 18(2), 209-224. Hambleton, R. (2008). Annie's project: An educator's thoughts. Small farm digest. Haraway, D. (1991). Animal sociology and a natural economy of the body politic: A political physiology of dominance. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, New York: Routledge. Haraway, D. J. (2013). When species meet (Vol. 3): U of Minnesota Press. Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene: Duke University Press. Harcourt, W. (2017). Gender and sustainable livelihoods: linking gendered experiences of environment, community and self. Agriculture and Human Values, 34(4), 1007-1019. Harcourt, W., & Bauhardt, C. (2018). Introduction: conversations on care in feminist political economy and ecology. In Feminist Political Ecology and the Economics of Care (pp. 1-15): Routledge. Harding, S. G. (1986). The science question in feminism: Cornell University Press. Harris, L. (2015). Hegemonic waters and rethinking natures otherwise. Practicing feminist political ecologies: moving beyond the green economy, ed. W. Harcourt, and IL Nelson, 157-181. Hassanein, N. (1999). Changing the way America farms: Knowledge and community in the sustainable agriculture movement (Vol. 12): U of Nebraska Press. Hayes-Conroy, A., & Hayes-Conroy, J. (2015). Political ecology of the body: A visceral approach. In The international handbook of political ecology: Edward Elgar Publishing. Hayes-Conroy, A., & Hayes-Conroy, J. (2016). Bodily Well-being and the Visceral Geographies of the Rural. Routledge International Handbook of Rural Studies. London, New York: Routledge. Hayes-Conroy, J., & Hayes-Conroy, A. (2013). Veggies and visceralities: A political ecology of food and feeling. Emotion, Space and Society, 6, 81-90. Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. New York: Vintage. Jansen, K. (2000). Labour, livelihoods and the quality of life in organic agriculture in Europe. Biological agriculture & horticulture, 17(3), 247-278. Jarosz, L. (2008). The city in the country: Growing alternative food networks in Metropolitan areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 24(3), 231-244. Jarosz, L. (2011). Nourishing women: toward a feminist political ecology of community supported agriculture in the United States. Gender, Place & Culture, 18(3), 307-326. Jochimsen, M., & Knobloch, U. (1997). Making the hidden visible: the importance of caring activities and their principles for any economy. Ecological Economics, 20(2), 107-112. Johnston, J., & Baker, L. (2005). Eating outside the box: FoodShare's good food box and the challenge of scale. Agriculture and Human Values, 22(3), 313-325. King, Y. (1989). The ecology of feminism and the feminism of ecology. Healing the wounds: The promise of ecofeminism, 19. Kuiper, E., & Perkins, P. E. E. (2005). Introduction: exploring feminist ecological economics. Liepins, R. (1995). Women in agriculture: advocates for a gendered sustainable agriculture. The Australian Geographer, 26(2), 118-126. Liepins, R. (1998). "Women of Broad Vision": Nature and Gender in the Environmental Activism of Australia's 'Women in Agriculture'Movement. Environment and Planning A, 30(7), 1179-1196. Little, J. (2013). Pampering, well-being and women's bodies in the therapeutic spaces of the spa. Social & Cultural Geography, 14(1), 41-58. Little, J. (2015). Nature, wellbeing and the transformational self. The geographical journal, 181(2), 121-128. Little, J., & Panelli, R. (2003). Gender research in rural geography. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 10(3), 281-289. Mellor, M. (2006). Ecofeminist political economy. International Journal of Green Economics, 1(1-2), 139-150. Mohanty, C. T., Russo, A., & Torres, L. (1991). Third world women and the politics of feminism (Vol. 632): Indiana University Press. Murdoch, J. (2000). Networks- a New Paradigm of Rural Development. Journal of Rural Studies, 16, 407-419. National Statistics, T. (2018). Key Figures for Calculating Composite Gender Equality Index. Retrieved from https://www.gender.ey.gov.tw/gecdb/Stat_AnalysisReport_Content.aspx?s=yFNcGlMCFdG0nfsWPM7gSA%40%40 New, C. (1996). Man bad, woman good? Essentialisms and ecofeminisms. New Left Review, 79-93. Parker, B., & Morrow, O. (2017). Urban homesteading and intensive mothering:(re) gendering care and environmental responsibility in Boston and Chicago. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(2), 247-259. Pedersen, K. B., & Kj?rg?rd, B. (2004). Do we have room for shining eyes and cows as comrades? Gender perspectives on organic farming in Denmark. Sociologia Ruralis, 44(4), 373-394. Perkins, E. (1997). Special issue on women, ecology and economics. Ecological Economics, 20(2), 105-185. Pilgeram, R., & Amos, B. (2015). Beyond "Inherit It or Marry It": Exploring How Women Engaged in Sustainable Agriculture Access Farmland. Rural Sociology, 80(1), 16-38. Rocheleau, D., Thomas-Slayter, B., & Wangari, E. (2013). Feminist political ecology: Global issues and local experience: Routledge. Sachs, C., Barbercheck, M., Braiser, K., Kiernan, N. E., & Terman, A. R. (2016). The rise of women farmers and sustainable agriculture: University of Iowa Press. Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2016). Mobilizing the new mobilities paradigm. Applied Mobilities, 1(1), 10-25. Shisler, R. C., & Sbicca, J. (2019). Agriculture as carework: The contradictions of performing femininity in a male-dominated occupation. Society & natural resources, 32(8), 875-892. Som Castellano, R. L. (2016). Alternative Food Networks and the Labor of Food Provisioning: A Third Shift? Rural Sociology, 81(3), 445-469. Sundberg, J. (2017). Feminist political ecology. The International Encyclopedia of Geography. Trauger, A. (2004). 'Because they can do the work': Women farmers in sustainable agriculture in Pennsylvania, USA. Gender, Place & Culture, 11(2), 289-307. Tsai, Y.-L. (2019). Farming odd kin in patchy Anthropocenes. Current anthropology, 60(S20), S342-S353. van den Berg, K. (2018). Environmental feminisms: A story of different encounters. In Feminist Political Ecology and the Economics of Care (pp. 55-69): Routledge. Walinsky, L. J., & Ladejinsky, W. (1977). Agrarian reform as unfinished business; the selected papers of Wolf Ladejinsky. Watts, D. C., Ilbery, B., & Maye, D. (2005). Making reconnections in agro-food geography: alternative systems of food provision. Progress in Human Geography, 29(1), 22-40. Wember, C. (2018). Striving towards what we do not know yet: Living Feminist Political Ecology in Toronto's food network 1. In Feminist Political Ecology and the Economics of Care (pp. 162-188): Routledge. WHATMORE, S. (1991). Farming Women: gender work and family labour. In: Baskingstoke, Macmillan. Whyte, M. K. (2005). Continuity and change in urban Chinese family life. The China Journal(53), 9-33. Wilbur, A. (2014). Back-to-the-house? Gender, domesticity and (dis) empowerment among back-to-the-land migrants in Northern Italy. Journal of Rural Studies, 35, 1-10. Wilbur, A. M. (2012). Seeding Alternatives: Back-to-the-land Migration and Alternative Agro-food Networks in Northern Italy: University of Glasgow. Wylie, J. (2005). A single day's walking: narrating self and landscape on the South West Coast Path. Transactions of the institute of British Geographers, 30(2), 234-247. 方怡茹. (2009). 我國農民對農地功能與價值認知研究-鄉村類型化差異比較. 臺北大學不動產與城鄉環境學系學位論文(2009 年), 1-117. 李承嘉, 廖麗敏, & 陳怡婷. (2009). 多功能農業體制下的農地功能與使用方案選擇. Journal of Taiwan Land Research, 12(2), 135-162. 邱元儂. (2013). 飲食革命正流行-大王菜舖子的認同實踐與文化生產. 金惠雯. (2018). 另類農業體系與團結經濟: 以 [部落 e 購] 為例. 臺中區農業改良場特刊, 85-105. 孫治本. (2004). 個人化與生活風格社群: 唐山. 徐于婷. (2011). 248農學市集的實務網絡與運作模式分析. 梁炳琨. (2008). 農業食物在地化:台東縣池上鄉米食產業的探討. 地理學報, 53, 85-117. 黃仲杰. (2013). 臺灣在地食物網絡農夫市集的研究. 臺灣大學農業經濟學研究所學位論文, 1-89. 黃紫翎. (2010). 全球化下在地食物網絡的實踐歷程:以台中合僕農學市集為例. 彰化師範大學地理學系碩士論文. 葉虹靈. (2007). 異端的生存之道-台灣另類有機農業生產者的實作策略. 清華大學社會學研究所學位論文, 1-151. 廖哲強,蕭崑杉. (2010). 西方另類食物網絡文獻回顧及其地方意涵. 臺灣鄉村研究, 127-150. 劉克智, & 董安琪. (2003). 台灣都市發展的演進?歷史的回顧與展望. 蔡晏霖. (2016). 農藝復興: 臺灣農業新浪潮. 文化研究, 22, 23-74. 鄭鈺琳. (2007). 種出綠色生活圈:志願務農者的生活方式選擇與農耕生活風格社群之形成. 蕭崑杉. (2007). 聯合報漂鳥文化之旅座談會[線上資料〕. 賴鳳霙. (2011). 農民市集的形塑與發展: 以臺中合樸農學市集為例. 臺灣師範大學地理學系學位論文, 1-192. 謝琇玲, 侯韋光, 吳靜萍, & 施廣南. (2018). 知遇之恩, 湧泉相報? 社會支持的效應分析-中介式調節模式探討. 商管科技季刊, 19(2), 223-255. 鍾怡婷. (2018). 永續轉型觀點下的食農教育: 以二個學童種稻體驗活動為例. 台灣鄉村研究(13), 35-55. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87245 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 在台灣當代的新農返土浪潮中,可以發現為數不少的農業移居社群,憑藉著在鄉村農業生活中感悟的生活,重新轉譯與反轉農業在鄉村作為糧食生產的價值,不僅在環境教育、環境倫理與永續生活上開發與賦予新的意涵,更讓人重新學習人與自然合作共處的可能。
除了農業的價值被創新開發,更有為數不少的都會女性,不同於以往的離農女性,反其道而行移居鄉村。但是在鄉村傳統異性戀結構下,女性通常在空間分工上受到傳統的規範,公共參與尚有少有決策影響力。而當代多數鄉村的主流意見,仍以經濟開發的角度治理鄉村,未充分考慮到受高等教育的世代,已傾向後工業社會的生活方式和價值觀,移居女性來此如何安居就成為了從私領域到公領域的大哉問。 當女性移居者,透過移居鄉村生活,習得與自然共處並透過自耕自食滋養自我、甚至在鄉村與自然中自得其樂,結社共享、自處或養育下一代。「返土歸農」在以血緣為基礎的非都會生活中,更顯得社會變遷的特殊性。本研究在返土運動的政治經濟脈絡下,關注與「返土歸農」女性互動的鄉村社會,以及城鄉關係的轉變。本研究以「女性主義政治生態學」作為研究途徑,透過深度訪談與參與觀察理解此返土實踐的動力。研究中發現,「返土歸農」女性與自然、返土社群的共處合作,在另類農食網絡的脈絡下透過積極參與環境、食安相關的社會倡議、農食教育,甚至是體制外的實驗教育,找回原先在都市生活中失去的健康福祉,並在公共領域上增加其影響力。 總體而言,受訪者透過關懷倫理的耕種方式與食材的挑選,多次表現出女性氣質。這種關懷是異質的,並非沒有矛盾。女性移居者跨越慣行農業與永續農業的光譜,表現出對社群、教育、環境和健康食品系統的關懷。女農民還將對於自然界的關懷與她們的性別或養育聯繫在一起。這樣的價值觀和實踐的這種結合試圖聲稱,與男性主導,該方法以支配自然,將人按任務和固有的特質進行劃分,的方法不同。相反,女農民接受了人,更大的社區,農作物,動物之間的聯繫,以及環境,彌補農地流失造成的生態危害。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This research examines the motivations of the women of “back-to-the-land” migrants and sustainable smallholder farmers self-identified as “friendly farming” how they actively involved in alternative agri-food networks in Taiwan. Contemporary back-to-the-land women migrants in Yilan embody a wide spectrum of personal and professional backgrounds, complicating attempts to generalize their tendency for adopting farming and their later experiences in rural areas. Certain commonalities endure, notwithstanding, including a discomfort with city life and the hope of health, well-being and greater freedom in the countryside.
Drawing from interviews with “back-to-the-land” women migrants situated between a metropolitan and rural area of Taiwan, it argues that they learn to live with nature and nourish themselves by starting up their business with alternative agri-food networks. "Back-to-the-land" lifestyle in the rural based on blood relation, are more particular than urban life in Taiwan. In this context, this study focuses on the rural society interacting with "back-to-the-land" women migrants and the transformation of urban-rural relations. The study uses "feminist political ecology" as a research approach, and understands the motivation of “back-to-the-land” movement through in-depth interviews and participation observation. Drawing from Foucault’s ethics of self-care, these motivations express a liberatory transformation of self that is also radically responsible to others and expressive of a post-capitalist politics. Feminist care ethics contributes to feminist political ecology by focusing upon the social relations of caring practice, and also revealing how self-care is ethically embodied and politically transformative in the case of "back-to-the-land" women migrants active in alternative agri-food networks in Taiwan. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-05-18T16:35:51Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-05-18T16:35:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
謝辭 ii 中文摘要 iv 英文摘要 vi 圖目次 x 表目次 x 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究問題意識 6 第二章文獻回顧 11 第一節 女性主義政治生態學 11 第二節 另類農食網絡與全球化 20 第三節 城鄉中的性別與移動/居 29 第三章 研究方法 36 第一節 研究架構 36 第二節 研究方法 39 第四章 宜蘭地區的永續農業的社群與脈絡 50 第一節自然與人文條件 50 第二節 另類農食網絡在台灣的發展脈絡 52 第三節 另類農食網絡社群組織在宜蘭 57 第四節 女性移居者在宜蘭歸土移民的類型 61 第五章 移動/居與性別:多層次的分析 63 第一節 移居推/拉力的類型 63 第二節 體現與感知: 透過食物與鄉村療癒所需 67 第六章 另類農食網絡中的性別與永續生計 79 第一節 關懷/照護經濟與身體、情緒 79 第二節 性別氣質與勞動地景 85 第三節 移居中的社群參與合作 90 第三節 另類農食網絡的永續生計創建 93 第七章 結論:城鄉之間移動空間的串聯與分隔 98 第一節 疏離化的都市、親密性的鄉村: 另類農食網絡中自我關懷的重新連結 98 第二節 鄉村異性戀父權秩序鬆動的契機?移動空間帶來的性別角力與挑戰 103 第三節 返土歸農中的女性政治生態學 106 參考文獻 108 附錄一:田野筆記之一 114 附錄二:紮跟理論分析的理論編碼取樣之一 118 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 移居女性的情感與身體體現: 宜蘭另類農食網絡下的返土歸農 | zh_TW |
dc.title | I-turn Female Farmers: Emotion, Embodiment, and Alternative Agri-food Network in Yilan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-1 | - |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 洪伯邑 ;張聖琳;宋郁玲;王驥懋 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Po-Yi Hung;Shenglin Chang;Yuling Sung;Chimao wang | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 返土歸農,另類農食網絡,女性主義政治生態學,關懷倫理,女性移居者,非人關係, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Back-to-the-land,Alternative agri-food networks,Feminist political ecology,Self-care,Back-to-the-land women, | en |
dc.relation.page | 122 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202300626 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-02-20 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 地理環境資源學系 | - |
dc.date.embargo-lift | 2023-06-18 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 地理環境資源學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-1.pdf | 3.29 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。