請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85597完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 石之瑜 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chih yu Shih | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 余澤霖 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | ZeLin Yu | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T23:19:23Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-10 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-07-05 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2002-01-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
Chandra, Kanchan, and David Laitin, 2002, “A Framework for Thinking about Identity Change.” Paper presented at the fifth meeting of Laboratory in Comparative Ethnic Processes, 9-12 May, Stanford, Calif.. Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and its critics, New Haven: Yale University Press Davis, Thomas C., 1999, “Revisiting Group Attachment: Ethnic and National Identity.” Political Psychology 20 (1): 25-47. Goodman, N. 1992. Introduction to sociology. New York: HarperCollins Publishers. Hail, H. C. (2015). Patriotism abroad overseas Chinese students’ encounters with criticisms of China.Journal of Studies in International Education Hsu, Yung-ming, 1999, e Formation of National Identity in Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Political Science, The University of Michigan,Ann Arbor, Mich.Kelly, T. 2004. “Unlocking the Iron Cage: Public Administration in the DeliberativeDemocracy Theory of Jurgen Harbermas.”Administration & Society, 36(1):38-61. Rogers Brubaker and Frederick Cooper,Beyond "Identity"Theory and Society Vol. 29, No. 1 (Feb., 2000), pp. 1-47 Rogers Brubaker , 2001, “Cognitive Perspectives.” Ethnicities 1 (1): 15-17. Smelser, N. J. 1995. Sociology (4th ed). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Thompson, Andrew, Graham Day, and David Adamson, 1999, “Bringing the ‘Local’Back In: The Production of Welsh Identities.” pp. 49-67 in Thinking Identities:Ethnicity, Racism and Culture, edited by Avtar Brah, Mary J. Hickman, and Mairtin Mac an Ghaill. London: Macmillan Press Ltd. Weeks, Edward C. 2000 “The Practice of Deliberative Democracy: Results from FourLarge-Scale Trials.” Public Administration Review, 60(4): 360-372. 王菡,2011, 〈陸生的第三種台灣想象〉,陽光時務周刊。 王嘉州,2011,〈來臺陸生的政治態度與臺灣主權接受程度〉,《台灣政治學刊》,15(2):67-113。 王嘉州,2012,〈來臺陸生統一態度變遷初探-政治社會化途徑與定群追蹤法之分析〉,《台灣民主季刊》,9(3):85-118。 李文瑜,〈大陸學生來台學習參與影響調查之研究.〉,國際事務學院. 台北: 國立政治大學,2009。 李佩雯,2014,〈我群與他群:兩岸學生社會認同差異之跨群體溝通研究〉,《傳播研究與實踐》, 4(1):129-171。 李仲彬、黃東益,2011,〈審議式民主在台灣實務推動的定位與價值:從公民會議的經驗分析〉,《競爭力評論》,14:51-71。 江宜樺,1997,〈自由民主體制下的國家認同〉,《臺灣社會研究季刊》,25:83-121。 吳玉山,1997,《抗衡或扈從—兩岸關係新詮》。臺北:正中書局。 吳政達、湯家偉,2009,〈從國際學生流動趨勢分析開放陸生來臺就學政策〉,《教育研究月刊》, 187: 39-46。 林玉體,2010,〈談「陸生」來臺與承認中國學歷〉,《新世紀智庫論壇》, 50: 84-94。 林家正,2011,〈大陸學生來臺交換就讀滿意度之研究:以臺灣大學與義守大學為例〉,國立臺灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。 林瑞華、胡偉星、耿曙,2011,〈「階級差異」或「認同制約」?大陸臺灣人當地融入的分析〉,《中國大陸研究》, 54 (4): 29-56。 洪佩郁譯,1994,《交往行動理論》,重慶:重慶出版社。譯自Habermas Jurgen。 柯曉翔,2011,《跨海公民課 —大陸交換學生的台灣經驗》。台灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。 胡紹嘉,2012,〈旅歷臺灣,返想中國:一位來臺陸生的跨文化敘事與認同重構〉,《新聞學研究》, 111: 43-87。 徐子婷,何景榮譯,2006,《政治學的基礎》,台北:韋伯文化出版,譯自Barrie Axford et.陳榮政譯,2014,《基礎社會研究法--質化與量化取向》,台北:學富文化 事業有限公司。譯自W.Lawrence Neuman。 張可,2018,<「RIP,426」:解析「大陸地區旅台學位生」的國族經驗>,《政治與社會哲學 評論》,第65期,1-88 張國保,2010,〈近十年臺灣技職教育發展談招收中國大陸學生來臺就學之問題與策略〉,《高等教育》, 5( 1): 1-35。 張鈞凱,2012,〈臺灣陸生政策的歧視與不合理─陸生現身說法,呼籲臺灣社會平等以待〉,《海峽評論》, 257 :50-54 。 張瑞雄,2007,〈開放大陸學生來臺問題之剖析〉,《師友月刊》,480:1-5。教育部統計處資料《102-103學年度大專校院陸生及畢業陸生人數-按等級別、 性別與學科類別分》 黃政傑,2008,〈陸生能解救臺灣的大學?〉,《師友月刊》,497: a1+1-4。 黃政傑,2011,〈陸生首招的成果與問題〉,《師友月刊》, 530: a2+1-4。 黃重豪、賈士麟、藺桃、葉家興,《陸生元年》,2013,台北:秀威資訊。 敬菁華,2010,〈淺析“外族敵人”形象在俄羅斯文化中形成的心理機制〉,《西伯利亞研究》,13 楊景堯,2004,〈開放大陸學生來臺就學對臺灣私立大學生存之助益〉,《展望與探索》, 2( 9): 111-114。 楊景堯,2014,臺灣招收陸生第四年的思考,展望與探索, 12(5):P107-110。 趙鼎新,2007,〈民主的生命力、局限與中國的出路〉,網絡文章:(http://www.aisixiang.com/data/related-16563.html) 蕭伊婷( 2009)。《我國大學生預期陸生來台就學之生活壓力調查研究》。台北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文。 藍佩嘉、吳伊凡,2011 ,〈在「祖國」與「外國」之間:旅中臺生的認同與畫界〉,《臺灣社會學》, 22 :1-57 。 彭懷恩,1996。《社會學概論》。臺北:風雲論壇出版社。 楊國樞、文崇一、吳聰賢、李亦園(編),1989,《社會及行為科學研究法》,台北:東華書局。 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85597 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究探討陸生來台經驗,如何影響他們看待中國,即:陸生來台經驗是否影響他們對國家的「愛國心」?他們是否會因為自己的台灣經驗更加願意主動捍衛中國的形象?他們是否會因為自身的台灣經驗更加願意展開交流?陸生是否從「親台派」一步步走向漠視台灣,甚至「更加愛國」?基於認同理論與對6位受訪者的訪談,本研究試圖歸納,陸生的留台經驗如何在三個面向上影響其對中國觀念,此三者分別為:從受訪者們的看法、觀點、價值等方面歸納得出的「同化面向」;從受訪者們的情感面歸納得出的「愛國面向」;從受訪者們的實踐行為歸納得出的「交流面向」。
本文發現此三種面向均能說明,台灣經驗對陸生的中國觀念產生了多樣差異的影響,從而否定了陸生研究中與台灣經驗接觸,勢必加深陸生嚮往民主價值的論點;同時也複雜化如今的海外中國留學生愛國主義研究中,主張中國留學生的海外經歷是否會更加「愛國」的預設。儘管就本研究所依據的六位陸生訪談是一個小樣本,卻依然對理解陸生整體狀況具有啟發性,並能作為未來陸生研究理論化的先行研究。本文主張,陸生研究具有能超越「愛國」語境帶來的二元對立,並展現台灣經驗所帶來的寶貴啟發性。本文認為台灣經驗確實對陸生的中國觀念產生影響,但也會進一步加劇陸生身陷兩岸意識形態衝突之中,從而更進一步降低他們的交流意願,走向更加失語的狀態;但從另一個方面本研究也發現,受訪者放棄了在兩岸越發激烈的意識形態衝突之間選擇一個「標準答案」的過程,雖然交流意願降低,但受訪者並未放棄交流。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study explores how Mainland China students' experience in Taiwan affects their perspective of Chinese. This study asks: does Mainland China students' experience in Taiwan affect how "patriotic'' they are to their country? Or would they be more willing to defend China's image because of their Taiwan experience? Would they be more open to communication because of their Taiwan experience? Would Mainland China students have moved from a "Pro-Taiwan" stance to being indifferent to Taiwan, or even "more patriotic".
Based on the identity theory and interviews with 6 Mainland China students, this research attempts to summarize how the experience of studying in Taiwan by Chinese students affects their perceptions of Chinese in three aspects: the "assimilation aspect" derived from the respondents' views, perspectives, and values; the "patriotic aspect" derived from the respondents' emotions; and the "communication aspect" derived from the respondents' practical behaviors. This thesis finds that these three aspects all illustrate the diverse effects of Taiwan's experience on Chinese students' perspective of Chinese, thus rejecting the argument in studies of Mainland China students that contact with Taiwan is found to deepen their yearning for democratic values. At the same time, it also complicates the presumption that Chinese students' overseas study experiences make them more "patriotic'' in studies of patriotism among overseas Chinese students today.Although the interviews of six Mainland China students in Taiwan on which the findings of this study are based is a small sample, this thesis is still instructive for understanding the overall status of Mainland China students, and can serve as a precursor to the theorization of future Mainland China students research. This thesis argues that contact with Taiwan affects Mainland China students in many ways,but it also further exacerbates the ideological conflict between China and Taiwan,which further reduces students' willingness to communicate and frustrates their ability to figuratively understand their positionality.However,this study also finds that Mainland students contact with Taiwan has the possibility to transcend the binary opposition brought by the context of "patriotism",and these students have not closed the door on communications,despite reduced willingness to to do so. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T23:19:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2806202209294500.pdf: 1983814 bytes, checksum: 792242c880083431f3e7d54ea4770bb9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
口試委員會審定書…………………………………………………………………2 誌謝…………………………………………………………………………………4 中文摘要……………………………………………………………………………5 Abstract……………………………………………………………………………5 第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………………6 第二章 文獻與理論…………………………………………………………………9 壹、文獻回顧 ……………………………………………………………………9 貳、理論背景 ……………………………………………………………………12 第三章 研究方法與問題設計………………………………………………………16 第四章、中國還是台灣?陸生的選擇與撕裂 ……………………………………18 壹、是否運用台灣經驗審視中國事物--「同化面向」………………………18 貳、是否因為台灣經驗影響「愛國心」?--「愛國面向」…………………29 叁、是否因為自身台灣經驗更願意進行兩岸交流?--「交流面向」………42 第五章 結語…………………………………………………………………………47 參考文獻 ……………………………………………………………………………49 附錄一 疫情時間軸 …………………………………………………………………51 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 認同研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 陸生研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 愛國主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 兩岸關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Mainland China student Study | en |
| dc.subject | Nationalism | en |
| dc.subject | Identification Study | en |
| dc.title | 消失的搭橋人?在台陸生「中國觀」之轉變 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | No Where in Between: The Changing Perspective of Chinese Mainland Students in Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳志柔;郭銘峰 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chih Jou Chen;Mingfeng Kuo | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 陸生研究,認同研究,愛國主義,兩岸關係, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Mainland China student Study,Identification Study,Nationalism, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 55 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202201168 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-07-03 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2022-07-05 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-110-2.pdf | 1.94 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
