請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8213
標題: | 實驗動物法制與其檢討 A Review on the Legal System of Laboratory Animals in Taiwan |
作者: | Tzu-Ying Wu 吳姿穎 |
指導教授: | 林明鏘(Ming-Chiang Lin) |
關鍵字: | 動物權,動物福利,動物保護,實驗動物保護,動物實驗,動物之人道使用, Animal rights,Animal welfare,Laboratory animal protection,Animal experiment, |
出版年 : | 2020 |
學位: | 碩士 |
摘要: | 我國動物保護法自1998年制定,幾經十幾次修正,動物保護意識在我國經過法規的完整化,以及流浪動物、伴侶動物的相關問題獲得人民重視後,動保意識在人民心中已經逐漸萌芽茁壯,但是伴侶動物以外的許多動物使用議題仍舊被擱置或有意忽略,並沒有因為民眾的動保意識崛起,而獲得應有的關注。虐待動物事件在我國媒體報導後普遍會受到大眾撻伐,但是實驗動物時時刻刻受到不當使用或虐待,不論立法者、政府或人民,卻總是置若罔聞,未曾將對動物的關懷觸及到實驗動物之上。 本文之研究,從我國實驗動物保護法制上的缺陷出發,意在探討我國實驗動物法制健全化的可能性,希望能夠提高動物保護法上動物實驗管制的實效性,並且寄望在憲法和法律規範中,能夠均取得管理動物實驗的正當性基礎。現行憲法及憲法增修條文中均缺乏有關動物保護的條款,在法律規範中,動物保護法之條文大量集中於寵物保護上,實驗動物保護卻僅寥寥四條條文,且這四條動保法條文及其相關法規命令,將動物實驗管制大幅度的交給從事實驗的科學應用機構自行管理。這些規範現象都導致我國無法確實落實實驗動物保護,動物福利沒辦法在我國獲得全面實現。 藉由比較並分析歐盟、英國立法例後,本文分別從憲法增修條文之修正、動物動物之科學應用機構管制、動物實驗計畫進行之事前、事中、事後管制各自進行檢討,並提出修正之建議,以期藉由我國法規之修正,能讓受到剝削的動物中終能告別殘酷,讓動物福利和實驗動物管理能夠有效銜接。 The Animal Protection Act was enacted in 1998 and has been amended for more than ten times. The awareness of animal protection in Taiwan has gradually sprouted for several years, and people has taken attention on animal protection. However, many issues on the use of animals other than companion animals are still deliberately ignored. People mostly care about companion animals like dogs and cats. Despite of the abuse of laboratory animals, no one speaks for them or makes efforts to change this miserable situation. Animal abuse incidents are generally criticized by the public after being reported by the media in Taiwan; however, improper use or abuse of experimental animals is always ignored by the media, the government and the people in Taiwan. Starting from the defects of the legal system of laboratory animal protection in Taiwan, this thesis intends to explore the possibility of improving the legal system of labortary animals in Taiwan. By improving the control of the competent authority in the animal protection law, the purpose of this thesis is improving the effectiveness of animals experiment control in animal protection legal system, including the Constitution and Animal Protection Act. The current Constitution and constitutional amendments lack provisions related to animal welfare. Moreover, Animal Protection Act mostly focus on the protection of pets, while there are only four articles related to laboratory animals. This normative phenomena have caused Taiwan’s failure to implement the protection of experimental animals and realization of animal welfare. The thesis comparing and analyzing the legislation of the EU and the United Kingdom, based on the experience of EU law and English law, try to construct the regulation of animal experiment projects before, during and after the experiment events. |
URI: | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8213 |
DOI: | 10.6342/NTU202003336 |
全文授權: | 同意授權(全球公開) |
顯示於系所單位: | 法律學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-1308202022253100.pdf | 11.4 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。