Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 國際企業學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/80103
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor吳政衞(Cheng-Wei Wu)
dc.contributor.authorChun-Yung Chengen
dc.contributor.author鄭鈞擁zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-23T09:26:14Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-23
dc.date.available2022-11-23T09:26:14Z-
dc.date.copyright2021-08-23
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.submitted2021-07-08
dc.identifier.citationAli, W., Frynas, J. G., Mahmood, Z. (2017). Determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in developed and developing countries: A literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(4), 273-294. Anheier, H. K. (2001). Foundations in Europe: A comparative perspective. Centre for civil society, London school of economics and Political Science. Antal, A. B., Sobczak, A. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in France: A mix of national traditions and international influences. Business Society, 46(1), 9-32. Askeroğlu, E.-D., Bahar, Z. (2014). Contribution of foundations to reputation in corporate social responsibility applications: Vodafone Turkey Foundation review. Internafional journal of economic pracfices and theories, 4(5), 718-725. Avolio, B., Bass, B. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire (TM). Mind Garden, Inc. Menlo Park, CA. Barney, J. B. (1986). Organizational culture: can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of management review, 11(3), 656-665. Bazerman, M. H., Moore, D. A. (2012). Judgment in managerial decision making. John Wiley Sons. Bethmann, S., von Schnurbein, G. (2015). Effective governance of corporate foundations. Bhattacharya, C. B., Sen, S., Korschun, D. (2008). Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent. MIT Sloan management review, 49(2). Boran, F. E., Genç, S., Akay, D. (2011). Personnel selection based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing Service Industries, 21(5), 493-503. Brammer, S., Millington, A. (2005). Corporate reputation and philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Journal of business ethics, 61(1), 29-44. Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 97(2), 117-134. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business horizons, 34(4), 39-48. Conger, J. A., Kanungo, R. N. (1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Sage Publications. Damak-Ayadi, S., Pesqueux, Y. (2005). Stakeholder theory in perspective. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 5(2), 5-21. Deephouse, D. L. (2000). Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of management, 26(6), 1091-1112. Denison, D. R. (1984). Bringing corporate culture to the bottom line. Organizational dynamics, 13(2), 5-22. Denison, D. R., Mishra, A. K. (1995). Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organization science, 6(2), 204-223. DiMaggio, P. J., Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 147-160. Donaldson, G. Lorsch, J. W. (1983). Decision Making at the Top. Basic Books, New York. Donaldson, T., Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of management review, 20(1), 65-91. Donelly, R. M. (1981). The controllers' role in corporate planning. Management Accounting September. Drucker, P. F. (1984). Converting social problems into business opportunities: The new meaning of corporate social responsibility. California Management Review (pre-1986), 26(000002), 53. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative inquiry, 12(2), 219-245. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman Gareth, R. J. Jennifer, M. G. (2011). Contemporary management: Global edition , New York, US. McGraw-Hill. Garriga, E., Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of business ethics, 53(1), 51-71. Gehringer, T., von Schnurbein, G. (2020). Corporate Foundations in Europe. In Handbook on Corporate Foundations (pp. 85-106). Springer. Hofstede, Geert. (1980). Culture's Consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications Hofstede, Geert, Michael Harris Bond. (1988). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4): 4-21. Honigmann J. (1982). Sampling in ethnographic fieldwork, in: BURGESS, R. (Ed.) Field Research: A Sourcebook and Field Manual, pp. 79-90 (London, Unwin). Jensen, M. C. (2000). Value maximization and the corporate objective function. In Beer, M. and Nohria, N. (Eds), Breaking the Code of Change. Boston, MA: HBS Press, 37–57. Jung, D. I., Chow, C., Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The leadership quarterly, 14(4-5), 525-544. Kang, Y.-C., Wood, D. J. (1995). Before-profit social responsibility: Turning the economic paradigm upside down. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society. Kaptein, M. (2004). Business codes of multinational firms: What do they say? Journal of business ethics, 50(1), 13-31. Khan, H. u. R., Ali, M., Olya, H. G., Zulqarnain, M., Khan, Z. R. (2018). Transformational leadership, corporate social responsibility, organizational innovation, and organizational performance: Symmetrical and asymmetrical analytical approaches. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(6), 1270-1283. Liping, X. , Shuxia, Z. , Ning, L. Li, C. (2018). Corporate Hypocrisy: Role of Non-Profit Corporate Foundations in Earnings Management of For-Profit Founder Firms. Sustainability, 10, 3991. doi:10.3390/su10113991 Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C. (2001). Corporate citizenship as a marketing instrument‐Concepts, evidence and research directions. European journal of marketing. Martin, J., Siehl, C. (1983). Organizational culture and counterculture: An uneasy symbiosis. Organizational dynamics, 12(2), 52-64. Masulis, R. W., Reza, S. W. (2015). Agency problems of corporate philanthropy. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(2), 592-636. Max, B. E. C. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117. https://doi.org/10.2307/258888 McAlister, D. T., Ferrell, L. (2002). The role of strategic philanthropy in marketing strategy. European journal of marketing. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Minciullo, M., Pedrini, M. (2015). Knowledge Transfer between For‐Profit Corporations and Their Corporate Foundations: Which Methods Are Effective? Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 25(3), 215-234. Minefee, I., Neuman, E. J., Isserman, N., Leblebici, H. (2015). Corporate foundations and their governance. Annals in Social Responsibility. Monfort, A., Villagra, N. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and corporate foundations in building responsible brands. Profesional de la Información, 25(5), 767-777. Payton, R. L., Moody, M. P. (2008). Understanding philanthropy: Its meaning and mission. Indiana University Press. Pedrini, M., Minciullo, M. (2011). Italian corporate foundations and the challenge of multiple stakeholder interests. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 22(2), 173-197. Porter, M. E., Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate. Radzi, N. A. M., Lee, K. E., Halim, S. A., Siwar, C. (2018). An empirical study of critical success factors and challenges in corporate social responsibility (CSR) implementation: The case of selected corporate foundations in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(3), 70-90. Renz, D., Roza, L. Simons, FJ. (2020). Challenges in Corporate Foundation Governance. In: Roza L., Bethmann S., Meijs L., von Schnurbein G. (eds) Handbook on Corporate Foundations. Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies (An International Multidisciplinary Series). Springer, Cham. Rey-Garcia, M., Martin-Cavanna, J., Alvarez-Gonzalez, L. I. (2012). Assessing and advancing foundation transparency: Corporate foundations as a case study. The Foundation Review, 4(3), 6. Robbins, S. P., Judge, T. (2012). Essentials of organizational behavior. Roza, L., Bethmann, S., Meijs, L., Von Schnurbein, G. (2019). Handbook on Corporate Foundations: Corporate and Civil Society Perspectives. Springer Nature. Schein, Edgar H. (1985). Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Sethia, Nirmal, K. Mary Ann Von Glinow. (1985). Arriving at Four Cultures By Managing the Reward System. In Ralph H.Kilmanetal.(eds.), Gaining Control of the Corporate Culture, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass , pp400-420. Smith, L. M. (1978). 8: An evolving logic of participant observation, educational ethnography, and other case studies. Review of research in education, 6(1), 316-377. Sánchez, C. M. (2000). Motives for corporate philanthropy in El Salvador: Altruism and political legitimacy. Journal of business ethics, 27(4), 363-375. Smith, K. (1995). Interactions in Knowledge Systems: Foundations, Policy Implications and Empirical Methods. STI Review 16. Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. Sternberg, E. (1996). STAKEHOLDER THEORY EXPOSED. Economic Affairs, 16(3), 36-38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0270.1996.tb00539.x Treviño, L. K., Brown, M., Hartman, L. P. (2003). A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human relations, 56(1), 5-37. Tunstall, W. B. (1986). The Breakup of the Bell System: A Case Study in Cultural Transformation. California Management Review, 28(2). Turban, D. B., Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of management journal, 40(3), 658-672. Van Maanen, J. (1983). Qualitative Methods Reclaimed. Votaw, D. (1973). Genius becomes rare: a comment on the doctrine of social responsibility Pt. II. California Management Review, 15(3), 5-19. Warrick, D. (2017). What leaders need to know about organizational culture. Business horizons, 60(3), 395-404. Waterman, R. H., Peters, T. J. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America's best-run companies. New York: Harper Row. Webb, N. J. (1994). Tax and government policy implications for corporate foundation giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23(1), 41-67. Westhues, M., Einwiller, S. (2006). Corporate foundations: Their role for corporate social responsibility. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(2), 144-153. Wilkins, A. L., Ouchi, W. G. (1983). Efficient cultures: Exploring the relationship between culture and organizational performance. Administrative science quarterly, 468-481. Windsor, D. (2001). The future of corporate social responsibility. The international journal of organizational analysis. Wu, M. (2006). Hofstede's cultural dimensions 30 years later: A study of Taiwan and the United States. Intercultural communication studies, 15(1), 33. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: SAGE. 吳羽喬. (2011). 企業基金會塑造企業形象之研究 - 以某科技集團基金會為例 淡江大學]. 新北市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/g88yr2 林家五, 彭玉樹, 熊欣華, 林裘緒. (2004). 企業文化形成機制: 從認知基模到共享價值觀的形成. 人力資源管理學報, 4(3), 91-115. 陈钢, 李维安. (2016). 企业基金会及其治理: 研究进展和未来展望. 外国经济与管理, 38(6), 21-37. 陳至安, 蔡佳蓉. (2015). 企業型基金會推動企業社會責任運作模式之成效研究. 通識論叢(18), 81-108. 楊雅智. (2015). 淺談企業社會責任之國際發展趨勢與國內推動現況, 金管會. 潘欣欣. (2006). 以奇美文化基金會爲例談台灣私人企業對藝文的贊助. 藝術論壇(4), 319-333. 鄭澄宇. (2013). 我國企業基金會及財團法人在大型家族集團扮演角色之研究. 臺灣大學國際企業管理組學位論文, 1-131. 賴昭銘. (2019). 臺灣電子製造廠商的企業社會責任與社會參與. 臺灣師範大學東亞學系學位論文, 1-179. 蕭瑞麟. (2017). 不用數字的研究-質性研究的思辯脈絡. 臺北市: 五南.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/80103-
dc.description.abstract企業須兼衡經濟、環境、社會的永續發展,已成為全球共識。企業社會責任的實踐由單一、短期的企業捐贈,進展至組織化、長期經營的企業基金會,顯示社會期待與企業投入的日益提升。基金會治理與決策模式,影響目標擬定、資源整合、成效衡量、產生綜效的效率,進而強化採取行動與成立理念的一致。目前企業基金會的經營模式與公共關係,仍存在區域差異。本文以法國Air Liquide與臺灣中鼎兩間企業基金會個案,藉由企業公開資訊、半結構化訪談,對照東西方企業基金會的治理模式與發展差異。研究顯示企業基金會的治理模式受外部制度與社會文化、內部企業文化與領導人影響。順應法國與歐洲較成熟的企業社會責任外部環境,法國的個人主義傾向、Air Liquide尋求外部合作的企業文化與實行變革型領導,提供企業基金會連結員工與外部組織,展開長期創新的基礎。另一方面,臺灣社會逐步提升的永續意識,搭配東方的集體主義傾向與強調內部整合的企業文化,凸顯基金會標準的變動性與領導者的關鍵影響力。綜合而言,兩者實踐方式差異則凸顯企業社會責任的多元性。然而,基金會展現的國家文化價值取向與前行研究出現差異,隱含文化具變遷或企業與社會發展速度不一致的可能。藉由深入理解制度與文化環境如何形塑企業基金會治理模式,本文提供差異來源的思考脈絡,為未來學者奠立內外部環境影響因素的研究基礎,並為國際企業在實踐跨國企業社會責任時,提供在地化調整治理模式的參考。zh_TW
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2022-11-23T09:26:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-0807202114314400.pdf: 1887970 bytes, checksum: b30a6062ad2f36ac5f181f8cb3dd069e (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2021
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目 錄 第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………….. 4 第一節 研究背景………………………………………………………… 4 第二節 研究動機………………………………………………………… 5 第三節 研究目的………………………………………………………… 6 第二章 文獻回顧………………………………………………………………….. 8 第一節 企業社會責任…………………………………………………… 8 第二節 企業基金會……………………………………………………… 10 第三節 企業基金會治理………………………………………………… 11 第四節 企業文化………………………………………………………… 12 第三章 研究方法………………………………………………………………….. 14 第一節 質性研究………………………………………………………… 14 第二節 個案研究………………………………………………………… 17 第三節 半結構訪談……………………………………………………… 19 第四章 個案介紹………………………………………………………………….. 20 第一節 液空基金會治理模式…………………………………………… 20 第二節 中鼎教育基金會治理模式……………………………………… 24 第五章 外部環境分析與結果…………………………………………….. 29 第一節 法國外部環境…………………………………………………… 29 第二節 臺灣外部環境…………………………………………………… 31 第三節 Hofstede國家文化……………………………………………… 32 第六章 內部環境分析與結果…………………………………………………….. 41 第一節 個案企業文化概述……………………………………………… 41 第二節 個案企業文化分析與小結……………………………………… 43 第三節 個案領導者分析與結果………………………………………… 44 第七章 結論與研究展望………………………………………………………….. 48 參考文獻…………………………………………………………………….…… 51 附錄……………………………………………………………………………… 57 表目錄 表3-1 企業基金會治理研究的基本框架………………………….……………. … 14 表3-2 企業基金會獨立程度………………………….…………….……………… 15 表3-3 企業基金會治理挑戰與平衡………………………….……………. ……… 16 表4-1 液空基金會與液空集團可視度比較………………………………….…… 24 表4-2 中鼎教育基金會與中鼎集團可視度比較…………………………….…… 27 表5-1 Hofstede文化傾向的結果對照……………………………………….…… 39
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject利益關係人管理zh_TW
dc.subject企業基金會zh_TW
dc.subject企業社會責任zh_TW
dc.subject治理模式zh_TW
dc.subject企業文化zh_TW
dc.subject領導人zh_TW
dc.subject管理價值zh_TW
dc.subject國家文化zh_TW
dc.subject文化差異zh_TW
dc.subject企業慈善zh_TW
dc.subject企業身分認同zh_TW
dc.subject永續zh_TW
dc.subjectcultural differenceen
dc.subjectHofstede's cultural dimensionsen
dc.subjectsustainabilityen
dc.subjectcorporate identityen
dc.subjectstakeholder managementen
dc.subjectcorporate foundationen
dc.subjectcorporate social responsibilityen
dc.subjectgovernanceen
dc.subjectcorporate cultureen
dc.subjectleadershipen
dc.subjectvaluesen
dc.title法國與臺灣企業基金會治理模式差異之比較zh_TW
dc.titleThe Comparison between French and Taiwanese Corporate Foundation Governanceen
dc.date.schoolyear109-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee林舒柔(Hsin-Tsai Liu),蘇威傑(Chih-Yang Tseng)
dc.subject.keyword企業基金會,企業社會責任,治理模式,企業文化,領導人,管理價值,國家文化,文化差異,企業慈善,企業身分認同,永續,利益關係人管理,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordcorporate foundation,corporate social responsibility,governance,corporate culture,leadership,values,Hofstede's cultural dimensions,cultural difference,sustainability,stakeholder management,corporate identity,en
dc.relation.page60
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202101343
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2021-07-08
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept國際企業學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:國際企業學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
U0001-0807202114314400.pdf1.84 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved