請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/79003
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 歐陽明 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Hsuan Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃宇軒 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-11T15:35:45Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2028-08-14 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-21 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-08-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. M. Achibet, A. Girard, A. Talvas, M. Marchal and A. Lécuyer. 2015. Elastic-Arm: Human-scale passive haptic feedback for augmenting interaction and perception in virtual environments. in 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), 63-68. 10.1109/VR.2015.7223325
2. Marco Agus, Enrico Gobbetti, Giovanni Pintore, Gianluigi Zanetti and Antonio Zorcolo. 2006. Real-time Cataract Surgery Simulation for Training. Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference. 3. American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2005. Clinical optics, 2005-2006. American Academy of Ophthalmology, San Francisco, Calif. 4. American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2014. Lens and cataract. American Academy of Ophthalmology, San Francisco, Calif. 5. I. M. Asuquo, H. M. Busuyi and K. O. Umar. 2014. The dangers of couching in southwest Nigeria. Malays J Med Sci, 21 (5). 60-65. 6. P. P. Banerjee, D. P. Edward, S. Liang, C. S. Bouchard, P. J. Bryar, R. Ahuja, P. Dray and D. P. Bailey. 2012. Concurrent and face validity of a capsulorhexis simulation with respect to human patients. Stud Health Technol Inform, 173. 35-41. 7. J. Bergqvist, A. Person, A. Vestergaard and J. Grauslund. 2014. Establishment of a validated training programme on the Eyesi cataract simulator. A prospective randomized study. Acta Ophthalmol, 92 (7). 629-634. 10.1111/aos.12383 8. E. Bloch, N. Uddin, L. Gannon, K. Rantell and S. Jain. 2015. The effects of absence of stereopsis on performance of a simulated surgical task in two-dimensional and three-dimensional viewing conditions. Br J Ophthalmol, 99 (2). 240-245. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304517 9. Norbert Bornfeld, Manfred Spitznas, Winrich Breipohl and Gerhard J. Bijvank. 1974. Scanning electron microscopy of the zonule of Zinn. Albrecht von Graefes Archiv für klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 192 (2). 117-129. 10.1007/bf00410698 10. Nadia Boubchir, Stephane Cotin, Christian Duriez, Jérémie Dequidt, Jeremie Allard and Jean-Francois Rouland. 2009. Computer-Based Simulation of IOL Injection: Toward a Full Featured Cataract Surgery Training System. in Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, San Diego, United States. 11. J. R. Broyles, P. Glick, J. Hu and Y. W. Lim. 2013. Cataract Blindness and Simulation-Based Training for Cataract Surgeons: An Assessment of the HelpMeSee Approach. Rand Health Q, 3 (1). 7. 12. Meena Chakrabarti, Sonia Rani John and Arup Chakrabarti. 2009. The Eyesi: Ophthalmic Surgical Simulator. 13. C. C. Chan. 2010. Couching for cataract in China. Surv Ophthalmol, 55 (4). 393-398. 10.1016/j.survophthal.2010.02.001 14. K. S. Choi, S. Soo and F. L. Chung. 2009. A virtual training simulator for learning cataract surgery with phacoemulsification. Comput Biol Med, 39 (11). 1020-1031. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2009.08.003 15. Jungman Chung, Kyungwon Yun and Hyunwoo Bang. 2013. MicroTips: augmenting information for microscopic inspection ACM SIGGRAPH 2013 Emerging Technologies, ACM, Anaheim, California, 1-1. 16. Olivier Comas, Stéphane Cotin and Christian Duriez. 2010. A Shell Model for Real-Time Simulation of Intra-ocular Implant Deployment. in Bello, F. and Cotin, S. eds. Biomedical Simulation: 5th International Symposium, ISBMS 2010, Phoenix, AZ, USA, January 23-24, 2010. Proceedings, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 160-170. 17. Olivier Comas, Zeike A. Taylor, Jérémie Allard, Sébastien Ourselin, Stéphane Cotin and Josh Passenger. 2008. Efficient Nonlinear FEM for Soft Tissue Modelling and Its GPU Implementation within the Open Source Framework SOFA. in Bello, F. and Edwards, P.J.E. eds. Biomedical Simulation: 4th International Symposium, ISBMS 2008, London, UK, July 7-8, 2008 Proceedings, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 28-39. 18. D. A. Cook, R. Brydges, B. Zendejas, S. J. Hamstra and R. Hatala. 2013. Technology-enhanced simulation to assess health professionals: a systematic review of validity evidence, research methods, and reporting quality. Acad Med, 88 (6). 872-883. 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828ffdcf 19. S. L. Cremers, J. B. Ciolino, Z. K. Ferrufino-Ponce and B. A. Henderson. 2005. Objective Assessment of Skills in Intraocular Surgery (OASIS). Ophthalmology, 112 (7). 1236-1241. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.01.045 20. S. L. Cremers, A. N. Lora and Z. K. Ferrufino-Ponce. 2005. Global Rating Assessment of Skills in Intraocular Surgery (GRASIS). Ophthalmology, 112 (10). 1655-1660. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.05.010 21. Andreas Dünser, Karin Steinbügl, Hannes Kaufmann and Judith Glück. 2006. Virtual and augmented reality as spatial ability training tools Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCHI New Zealand chapter's international conference on Computer-human interaction: design centered HCI, ACM, Christchurch, New Zealand, 125-132. 22. J. Dequidt, H. Courtecuisse, O. Comas, J. Allard, C. Duriez, S. Cotin, E. Dumortier, O. Wavreille and J. F. Rouland. 2013. Computer-based training system for cataract surgery. Simulation, 89 (12). 1421-1435. 10.1177/0037549713495753 23. L. Doyle, N. Gauthier, S. Ramanathan and A. Okamura. 2008. A simulator to explore the role of haptic feedback in cataract surgery training. Stud Health Technol Inform, 132. 106-111. 24. Thomas Eiter and Heikki Mannila. 1994. Computing discrete Fréchet distance, Tech. Report CD-TR 94/64, Information Systems Department, Technical University of Vienna. 25. N. R. El-Far, S. Nourian, Zhou Jilin, A. Hamam, Shen Xiaojun and N. D. Georganas. 2005. A cataract tele-surgery training application in a hapto-visual collaborative environment running over the CANARIE photonic network. in IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and their Applications, 4 pp. 10.1109/HAVE.2005.1545647 26. John V. Forrester. 2002. The eye : basic sciences in practice. W.B. Saunders, Edinburgh ; New York. 27. David Fuerst, Marianne Hollensteiner and Andreas Schrempf. 2014. A novel augmented reality simulator for minimally invasive spine surgery Proceedings of the 2014 Summer Simulation Multiconference, Society for Computer Simulation International, Monterey, California, 1-5. 28. Mario Gomez-Blanco, Cameron N. Riviere and Pradeep K. Khosla. 1999. Sensing Hand Tremor in a Vitreoretinal Microsurgical Instrument. in. 29. M. H. Grodin, T. M. Johnson, J. L. Acree and B. M. Glaser. 2008. Ophthalmic surgical training: a curriculum to enhance surgical simulation. Retina, 28 (10). 1509-1514. 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31818464ff 30. Jürgen Hahn, Bernd Ludwig and Christian Wolff. 2015. Augmented reality-based training of the PCB assembly process Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, ACM, Linz, Austria, 395-399. 31. A. Hamam, S. Nourian, N. R. El-far, F. Malric, X. Shen and N. D. Georganas. 2006. A distributed, collaborative and haptic-enabled eye cataract surgery application with a user interface on desktop, stereo desktop and immersive displays. in 2006 IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and their Applications (HAVE 2006), 105-110. 10.1109/HAVE.2006.283773 32. R. C. Harwell and R. L. Ferguson. 1983. Physiologic tremor and microsurgery. Microsurgery, 4 (3). 187-192. 33. HelpMeSee. 2013. Simulation-Based Training Program, http://helpmesee.org/Our-Technology. 34. Ian W. Hunter, Lynette Jones, Tilemachos Doukoglou, Serge Lafontaine, Peter J. Hunter and Mark Sagar. 1995. Ophthalmic microsurgical robot and surgical simulator. in, 184-190. 35. B. Julesz. 1960. Binocular Depth Perception of Computer-Generated Patterns. Bell System Technical Journal, 39 (5). 1125-1162. 36. Shintaro Kitazawa, Koh Sueda and Henry Been-Lirn Duh. 2012. NanoAR: mobile AR application with microscopic interaction ACM SIGGRAPH 2012 Posters, ACM, Los Angeles, California, 1-1. 37. A. Kopfle, F. Beier, C. Wagner and R. Manner. 2007. Real-time Marker-based Tracking of a Non-rigid Object. Stud Health Technol Inform, 125. 232-234. 38. Chee Kiang Lam, Kenneth Sundaraj and M. Nazri Sulaiman. 2013. Virtual Reality Simulator for Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery Education and Training. Procedia Computer Science, 18. 742-748. 10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.238 39. C. G. Laurell, P. Soderberg, L. Nordh, E. Skarman and P. Nordqvist. 2004. Computer-simulated phacoemulsification. Ophthalmology, 111 (4). 693-698. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.06.023 40. H. Y. Lin, Y. J. Chuang, X. Tang, C. C. Lin, H. Y. Chen and P. J. Lin. 2017. Pivot concept: achieving a good-quality capsulorrhexis through a 2.2 mm or less clear corneal incision by using standard capsulorhexis forceps. Int J Ophthalmol, 10 (7). 1175-1177. 10.18240/ijo.2017.07.25 41. Bing Liu, Dennis Maier, Markus Schill and Reinhard Maenner. ROBUST REAL-TIME LOCALIZATION OF SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS IN THE EYE SUGERY SIMULATOR (EYESI). 42. Bing Liu, Dennis Maier, Markus Schill and Reinhard Maenner. 2002. Robust Real-Time Localization Of Surgical Instruments In The Eye Surgery Simulator (EYESI). 43. Matthias Müller, Bruno Heidelberger, Matthias Teschner and Markus Gross. 2005. Meshless deformations based on shape matching ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Papers, ACM, Los Angeles, California, 471-478. 44. M. A. Mahr and D. O. Hodge. 2008. Construct validity of anterior segment anti-tremor and forceps surgical simulator training modules: attending versus resident surgeon performance. J Cataract Refract Surg, 34 (6). 980-985. 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.02.015 45. C. A. McCannel, D. C. Reed and D. R. Goldman. 2013. Ophthalmic surgery simulator training improves resident performance of capsulorhexis in the operating room. Ophthalmology, 120 (12). 2456-2461. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.05.003 46. S. Nourian, X. Shen and N. D. Georganas. 2006. XPHEVE: An Extensible Physics Engine for Virtual Environments. in 2006 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, 1546-1549. 10.1109/CCECE.2006.277848 47. NVIDIA. 2014. Automotive Screen Density Calculator. http://phrogz.net/tmp/ScreenDens2In.html. 48. FCI ophthalmics. 2011. KITARO Kits: A Superior Way to Practice Cataract Surgery, http://www.fci-ophthalmics.com/blog/kitaro-kits-a-superior-way-to-practice-cataract-surgery/. 49. World Health Organization. 2010. Gobal data on visual impairment 2010. http://www.who.int/blindness/publications/globaldata/en/. 50. Marc Pallot, Remy Eynard, Benjamin Poussard, Olivier Christmann and Simon Richir. 2013. Augmented sport: exploring collective user experience Proceedings of the Virtual Reality International Conference: Laval Virtual, ACM, Laval, France, 1-8. 51. S. S. Patel, M. T. Ukwade, H. E. Bedell and V. Sampath. 2003. Near stereothresholds measured with random-dot stereograms using phase disparities. 52. R. Pointdujour, H. Ahmad, M. Liu, E. Smith and D. Lazzaro. 2011. beta-Blockade Affects Simulator Scores. Ophthalmology, 118 (9). 1893-U1237. 53. B. Privett, E. Greenlee, G. Rogers and T. A. Oetting. 2010. Construct validity of a surgical simulator as a valid model for capsulorhexis training. J Cataract Refract Surg, 36 (11). 1835-1838. 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.05.020 54. S. P. Rabethge, H. J. Bender and J. B. Jonas. 2002. Computer Assisted Training System for Pars Plana Vitrectomy. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 43 (13). 3510-3510. 55. S. Ruit, G. Paudyal, R. Gurung, G. Tabin, D. Moran and G. Brian. 2000. An innovation in developing world cataract surgery: sutureless extracapsular cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation. Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 28 (4). 274-279. 56. S. Ruit, G. C. Tabin, S. A. Nissman, G. Paudyal and R. Gurung. 1999. Low-cost high-volume extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in Nepal. Ophthalmology, 106 (10). 1887-1892. 10.1016/s0161-6420(99)90397-4 57. Per Söderberg, Carl-Gustaf Laurell, Wamidh Simawi, Per Nordqvist, Eva Skarman and Leif Nordh. 2006. Evaluation of response variables in computer-simulated virtual cataract surgery. in SPIE BiOS, SPIE, 9. 58. Per Söderberg, Carl-Gustaf Laurell, Wamidh Simawi, Eva Skarman, Leif Nordh and Per Nordqvist. 2008. Measuring performance in virtual reality phacoemulsification surgery. in SPIE BiOS, SPIE, 9. 59. Per Söderberg, Carl-Gustaf Laurell, Wamidh Simawi, Eva Skarman, Per Nordqvist and Leif Nordh. 2007. Performance index for virtual reality phacoemulsification surgery. in SPIE BiOS, SPIE, 9. 60. R. Sachdeva and E. I. Traboulsi. 2011. Performance of patients with deficient stereoacuity on the EYESi microsurgical simulator. Am J Ophthalmol, 151 (3). 427-433 e421. 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.09.011 61. G. M. Saleh, V. Gauba, A. Mitra, A. S. Litwin, A. K. Chung and L. Benjamin. 2007. Objective structured assessment of cataract surgical skill. Arch Ophthalmol, 125 (3). 363-366. 10.1001/archopht.125.3.363 62. G. M. Saleh, K. Theodoraki, S. Gillan, P. Sullivan, F. O'Sullivan, B. Hussain, C. Bunce and I. Athanasiadis. 2013. The development of a virtual reality training programme for ophthalmology: repeatability and reproducibility (part of the International Forum for Ophthalmic Simulation Studies). Eye (Lond), 27 (11). 1269-1274. 10.1038/eye.2013.166 63. Yuji Sano, Koya Sato, Ryoichiro Shiraishi and Mai Otsuki. 2016. Sports Support System: Augmented Ball Game for Filling Gap between Player Skill Levels Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces, ACM, Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada, 361-366. 64. Markus A. Schill, Clemens Wagner, Marc Hennen, Hans-Joachim Bender and Reinhard Männer. 1999. EyeSi – A Simulator for Intra-ocular Surgery. in Taylor, C. and Colchester, A. eds. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI’99: Second International Conference, Cambridge, UK, September 19-22, 1999. Proceedings, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1166-1174. 65. O. Schuppe. 2012. An optical tracking system for a microsurgical training simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform, 173. 445-449. 10.3233/978-1-61499-022-2-445 66. M. Selvander and P. Asman. 2013. Cataract surgeons outperform medical students in Eyesi virtual reality cataract surgery: evidence for construct validity. Acta Ophthalmol, 91 (5). 469-474. 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02440.x 67. M. Selvander and P. Asman. 2011. Stereoacuity and intraocular surgical skill: effect of stereoacuity level on virtual reality intraocular surgical performance. J Cataract Refract Surg, 37 (12). 2188-2193. 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.048 68. Adalberto L. Simeone, Eduardo Velloso and Hans Gellersen. 2015. Substitutional Reality Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15, 3307-3316. 69. Michael J. Sinclair, John W. Peifer, Ray Haleblian, Malcolm N. Luxenberg, Keith Green and David S. Hull. 1995. Computer-simulated Eye Surgery. Ophthalmology, 102 (3). 517-521. 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30992-x 70. A. Singh and G. H. Strauss. 2015. High-fidelity cataract surgery simulation and third world blindness. Surg Innov, 22 (2). 189-193. 10.1177/1553350614537120 71. Jacquelyn Slomka. 1992. Playing with Propranolol. Hastings Center Report, 22 (4). 13-17. 10.2307/3563017 72. Per G. Soderberg, Carl-Gustaf Laurell, Per Nordqvist, Eva Skarman and Leif Nordh. 2003. Virtual cataract surgery: clinical evaluation. in Biomedical Optics, SPIE, 5. 73. Per G. Soederberg, Carl-Gustaf Laurell, D. Artzen, Leif Nordh, Eva Skarman, P. Nordqvist and Mats Andersson. 2002. Computer-simulated phacoemulsification improvements. in International Symposium on Biomedical Optics, SPIE, 5. 74. D. J. Solverson, R. A. Mazzoli, W. R. Raymond, M. L. Nelson, E. A. Hansen, M. F. Torres, A. Bhandari and C. D. Hartranft. 2009. Virtual reality simulation in acquiring and differentiating basic ophthalmic microsurgical skills. Simul Healthc, 4 (2). 98-103. 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318195419e 75. A. V. Spiteri, R. Aggarwal, T. L. Kersey, M. Sira, L. Benjamin, A. W. Darzi and P. A. Bloom. 2014. Development of a virtual reality training curriculum for phacoemulsification surgery. Eye (Lond), 28 (1). 78-84. 10.1038/eye.2013.211 76. Roger F. Steinert and I. Howard Fine. 1995. Cataract surgery : technique, complications & management. Saunders, Philadelphia. 77. Jonathan Stevens and Latika Eifert. 2014. Augmented reality technology in U.S. army training (WIP) Proceedings of the 2014 Summer Simulation Multiconference, Society for Computer Simulation International, Monterey, California, 1-6. 78. Michael W. Strandby, Magnus K. Szatkowski, Jonas L. Petersen, Asger Storebjerg, Christian Dindler and Timothy P. Ryan. 2016. URBAN FIFA: Augmenting Social Sports with Video Game Elements Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, ACM, Gothenburg, Sweden, 1-10. 79. R. Sudan, J. S. Titiyal, H. S. Sethi and H. K. Rai. 2002. Animal model for teaching phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg, 28 (1). 4-5. 80. Koh Sueda, Jian Gu, Shintaro Kitazawa and Henry Been-Lirn Duh. 2011. Micro AR for education: using metaphors for familiar actions SIGGRAPH Asia 2011 Emerging Technologies, ACM, Hong Kong, China, 1-1. 81. Zeike A. Taylor, Olivier Comas, Mario Cheng, Josh Passenger, David J. Hawkes, David Atkinson and Sébastien Ourselin. 2008. Modelling Anisotropic Viscoelasticity for Real-Time Soft Tissue Simulation. in Metaxas, D., Axel, L., Fichtinger, G. and Székely, G. eds. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2008: 11th International Conference, New York, NY, USA, September 6-10, 2008, Proceedings, Part I, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 703-710. 82. A. S. Thomsen, J. F. Kiilgaard, H. Kjaerbo, M. la Cour and L. Konge. 2015. Simulation-based certification for cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmol, 93 (5). 416-421. 10.1111/aos.12691 83. A. S. Thomsen, J. F. Kiilgaard, M. la Cour, R. Brydges and L. Konge. 2017. Is there inter-procedural transfer of skills in intraocular surgery? A randomized controlled trial. Acta Ophthalmol. 10.1111/aos.13434 84. A. S. Vergmann, A. H. Vestergaard and J. Grauslund. 2017. Virtual vitreoretinal surgery: validation of a training programme. Acta Ophthalmol, 95 (1). 60-65. 10.1111/aos.13209 85. Hans Visser, Olivier Comas, David Conlan, #233, bastien Ourselin, Josh Passenger and Olivier Salvado. 2008. Deforming a High-Resolution Mesh in Real-Time by Mapping onto a Low-Resolution Physical Model Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on Biomedical Simulation, Springer-Verlag, London, UK, 135-146. 86. S. Waqar, O. Williams, J. Park, N. Modi, T. Kersey and T. Sleep. 2012. Can virtual reality simulation help to determine the importance of stereopsis in intraocular surgery? Br J Ophthalmol, 96 (5). 742-746. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-301150 87. Ian M. Watt. 1997. The principles and practice of electron microscopy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge ; New York. 88. R. Webster, J. Sassani, R. Shenk, M. Harris, J. Gerber, A. Benson, J. Blumenstock, C. Billman and R. Haluck. 2005. Simulating the continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis procedure during cataract surgery on the EYESI system. Stud Health Technol Inform, 111. 592-595. 89. L. M. Wilcox and J. M. Harris. 2010. Fundamentals of Stereopsis. 90. K. Yun, J. Chung, Y. Park, B. Lee, W. G. Lee and H. Bang. 2013. Microscopic augmented-reality indicators for long-term live cell time-lapsed imaging. Analyst, 138 (11). 3196-3200. 10.1039/c3an00124e | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/79003 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis proposes CatAR, a novel stereoscopic augmented reality (AR) cataract surgery training system. It provides dexterous instrument tracking ability using a specially de-signed infrared optical system with two cameras and one reflective marker. The tracking accuracy on the instrument tip is 20 µm, much higher than previous simulators. Moreover, our system allows trainees to use and to see real surgical instruments while practicing. Five training modules with 31 parameters were designed and 28 participants were en-rolled to conduct efficacy and validity tests. The results revealed significant differences between novice and experienced surgeons. Improvements in surgical skills after practicing with CatAR were also significant. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-07-11T15:35:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-F01944025-1.pdf: 12126327 bytes, checksum: 5a411a41f6b9d327283a349c24a8318f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Abstract i
Table of Contents iii List of Figures vii List of Tables xiii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation 1 1.2 Objectives / challenges of cataract surgery training 3 1.2.1 Absence of haptic feedback 3 1.2.2 Difficult to reproduce subtle movement 3 1.2.3 Lack of realistic training tools 3 1.3 Contributions 4 1.4 Overview and organization 4 Chapter 2 Medical Background 7 2.1 The human eye 7 2.2 The lens and cataract 8 2.3 The cataract surgery 10 2.3.1 Phacoemulsification surgery 15 2.3.2 Pivot concept 17 2.3.3 Continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC) 19 2.3.4 Hand-foot-eye coordination 21 2.4 The cataract surgery training 22 2.4.1 Dry laboratory 22 2.4.2 Wet laboratory 24 2.4.3 Assessment tools 25 Chapter 3 Ophthalmology Surgical Simulators 31 3.1 Introduction 31 3.2 PhacoVision 32 3.3 Cataract Tele-Surgery 33 3.4 EYESIM: Cataract Surgery Simulator 34 3.5 SOFA: EYE (Inria) 36 3.6 HelpMeSee 36 3.7 EyeSi 37 Chapter 4 Sterescopic Augmented Reality Microscope Platform 41 4.1 Types of optical microscope 41 4.1.1 Compound Microscopes 41 4.1.2 Stereo Microscopes 42 4.1.3 Surgical Microscopes 43 4.2 Related work 46 4.3 Augmented reality technologies 49 4.4 Interaction detection 49 4.4.1 Color detection 50 4.4.2 Motion detection 51 4.4.3 Feature detection 52 4.5 Video see-through microscope module 53 4.5.1 Camera specs 53 4.5.2 Convergence angle 54 4.5.3 Acceleration design 55 4.6 Illumination system 56 4.7 Mechanical design and control unit 57 4.7.1 Foot pedal 57 4.7.2 Motorized X-Y translation control 58 4.7.3 Motorized focus control mechanism 59 4.7.4 Digital zoom 60 Chapter 5 Interaction Design for Augmented Reality in the Microscopic Environment 61 5.1 User interface for the AR microscope 61 5.1.1 Interaction with fixed area 61 5.1.2 Interaction with moving objects 63 5.2 User interaction in the AR microscope 65 5.2.1 Augmented information 65 5.2.2 Interactive guidance system 65 5.2.3 Substitutional reality 69 5.2.4 Binocular v.s. monocular 71 Chapter 6 Dexterous Instruments Tracking System 73 6.1 Introduction 73 6.2 Domain know-how of surgical procedure 74 6.3 Instruments preparation 75 6.4 Camera module and calibration 76 6.4.1 Camera calibration 76 6.4.2 Top Camera Module 77 6.4.3 Bottom Camera Module 78 6.5 Instruments tracking algorithm 79 6.6 System evaluation 81 Chapter 7 Passive Haptic Feedback 83 7.1 Mannequin design 83 7.2 Realistic eye model 84 Chapter 8 Display System 87 8.1 Resolution 87 8.2 Stereopsis 88 Chapter 9 Training Module Design 91 9.1 Introduction 91 9.2 Wound touch detection 91 9.3 Antitremor module 92 9.4 Anterior chamber navigation module 93 9.5 Circular tracing module 94 9.6 Forceps training module 95 9.7 Capsulorhexis module 96 Chapter 10 User Study 97 10.1 Participants 97 10.2 Intervention 99 10.3 Validation of the CatAR system 100 10.4 Results 101 10.4.1 Statistical analysis 101 10.4.2 Construct validity analysis 101 10.4.3 Objective efficacy analysis 103 10.4.4 Subjective efficacy analysis 103 10.4.5 System performance evaluation 103 10.4.6 Subjective skill transfer after intervention 105 Chapter 11 Discussion 107 Chapter 12 Conclusion and Future Work 113 Bibliography 115 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 立體視覺擴增實境白內障手術訓練系統 | zh_TW |
dc.title | CatAR: A Stereoscopic Augmented Reality Cataract Surgery Training System | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 葉正聖,林奕成,楊傳凱,莊永裕,徐宏民 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 擴增實境,顯微手術,手術模擬器,手術訓練,白內障,器械追蹤,精細動作輸入, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Augmented reality,Microsurgery,Surgical simulator,Surgical training,Cataract,Instru-ment tracking,Dexterous input, | en |
dc.relation.page | 125 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201802301 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-08-15 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 電機資訊學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊網路與多媒體研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.date.embargo-lift | 2028-08-14 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 資訊網路與多媒體研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-F01944025-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 11.84 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。