請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/78364完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 丁俞文(Yu-Wen Ting) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chun-Wei Wu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 吳峻瑋 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-11T14:53:12Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-29 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-07-31 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-07-23 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Gibson, G. R.; Hutkins, R.; Sanders, M. E.; Prescott, S. L.; Reimer, R. A.; Salminen, S. J.; Scott, K.; Stanton, C.; Swanson, K. S.; Cani, P. D., Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics. Nature reviews Gastroenterology hepatology 2017, 14 (8), 491. Davani-Davari, D.; Negahdaripour, M.; Karimzadeh, I.; Seifan, M.; Mohkam, M.; Masoumi, S. J.; Berenjian, A.; Ghasemi, Y., Prebiotics: definition, types, sources, mechanisms, and clinical applications. Foods 2019, 8 (3), 92. Osong, S. H.; Norgren, S.; Engstrand, P., Processing of wood-based microfibrillated cellulose and nanofibrillated cellulose, and applications relating to papermaking: a review. Cellulose 2016, 23 (1), 93-123. Jorfi, M.; Foster, E. J., Recent advances in nanocellulose for biomedical applications. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2015, 132 (14). Slavin, J., Fiber and prebiotics: mechanisms and health benefits. Nutrients 2013, 5 (4), 1417-1435. Balea, A.; Blanco, A.; Negro, C., Nanocelluloses: Natural-Based Materials for Fiber-Reinforced Cement Composites. A Critical Review. Polymers 2019, 11 (3), 518. Dicks, L.; Botes, M., Probiotic lactic acid bacteria in the gastro-intestinal tract: health benefits, safety and mode of action. Beneficial microbes 2009, 1 (1), 11-29. Collins, J.; Thornton, G.; Sullivan, G., Selection of probiotic strains for human applications. International dairy journal 1998, 8 (5-6), 487-490. Toma, M. M.; Pokrotnieks, J., Probiotics as functional food: microbiological and medical aspects. Acta Universitatis Latviensis 2006, 710, 117-129. Lee, Y. K.; Salminen, S., Handbook of probiotics and prebiotics. John Wiley Sons: 2009. Sendra, E.; Fayos, P.; Lario, Y.; Fernandez-Lopez, J.; Sayas-Barbera, E.; Perez-Alvarez, J. A., Incorporation of citrus fibers in fermented milk containing probiotic bacteria. Food microbiology 2008, 25 (1), 13-21. Bao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H.; Liu, Y.; Wang, S.; Dong, X.; Su, F.; Yao, G.; Sun, T.; Zhang, H., In vitro screen of Lactobacillus plantarum as probiotic bacteria and their fermented characteristics in soymilk. Annals of microbiology 2012, 62 (3), 1311-1320. Lilly, D. M.; Stillwell, R. H., Probiotics: growth-promoting factors produced by microorganisms. Science 1965, 147 (3659), 747-748. Parker, R., Probiotics, the other half of the antibiotic story. Anim Nutr Health 1974, 29, 4-8. AFRC, R. F., Probiotics in man and animals. Journal of applied bacteriology 1989, 66 (5), 365-378. HUIS IN'T VELD, J. J.; Havenaar, R.; Marteau, P., Establishing a scientific basis for probiotic R D. Trends in biotechnology (Regular ed.) 1994, 12 (1), 6-8. Naidu, A.; Bidlack, W.; Clemens, R., Probiotic spectra of lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Critical reviews in food science and nutrition 1999, 39 (1), 13-126. Dary, O.; Hurrell, R., Guidelines on food fortification with micronutrients. World Health Organization, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations: Geneva, Switzerland 2006. van Reenen, C. A.; Dicks, L. M., Horizontal gene transfer amongst probiotic lactic acid bacteria and other intestinal microbiota: what are the possibilities? A review. Archives of microbiology 2011, 193 (3), 157-168. Noda, M.; Danshiitsoodol, N.; Inoue, Y.; Okamoto, T.; Sultana, N.; Sugiyama, M., Antibiotic susceptibility of plant-derived lactic acid bacteria conferring health benefits to human. The Journal of antibiotics 2019, 1-9. Holzapfel, W. H.; Wood, B. J., Lactic acid bacteria: biodiversity and taxonomy. John Wiley Sons: 2014. Walter, J., Ecological role of lactobacilli in the gastrointestinal tract: implications for fundamental and biomedical research. Applied and environmental microbiology 2008, 74 (16), 4985-4996. Tissier, H. Recherches sur la flore intestinale des nourrissons:(état normal et pathologique). 1900. Ventura, M.; Canchaya, C.; Tauch, A.; Chandra, G.; Fitzgerald, G. F.; Chater, K. F.; van Sinderen, D., Genomics of Actinobacteria: tracing the evolutionary history of an ancient phylum. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews 2007, 71 (3), 495-548. Dimidi, E.; Cox, S. R.; Rossi, M.; Whelan, K., Fermented Foods: Definitions and Characteristics, Impact on the Gut Microbiota and Effects on Gastrointestinal Health and Disease. Nutrients 2019, 11 (8), 1806. Kindt, T. J.; Goldsby, R. A.; Osborne, B. A.; Kuby, J., Kuby immunology. Macmillan: 2007. Begley, M.; Hill, C.; Gahan, C. G., Bile salt hydrolase activity in probiotics. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72 (3), 1729-1738. Ross, R.; Fitzgerald, G.; Collins, K.; Stanton, C., Cheese delivering biocultures--probiotic cheese. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 2002, 57 (2), 71. Bukowska, H.; Pieczul-Mróz, J.; Jastrzebska, M.; Chełstowski, K.; Naruszewicz, M., Decrease in fibrinogen and LDL-cholesterol levels upon supplementation of diet with Lactobacillus plantarum in subjects with moderately elevated cholesterol. Atherosclerosis 1998, 137 (2), 437. Matsumoto, S.; Hara, T.; Hori, T.; Mitsuyama, K.; Nagaoka, M.; Tomiyasu, N.; Suzuki, A.; Sata, M., Probiotic Lactobacillus‐induced improvement in murine chronic inflammatory bowel disease is associated with the down‐regulation of pro‐inflammatory cytokines in lamina propria mononuclear cells. Clinical Experimental Immunology 2005, 140 (3), 417-426. Takahashi, N.; Kitazawa, H.; Iwabuchi, N.; Xiao, J.; Miyaji, K.; Iwatsuki, K.; Saito, T., Immunostimulatory oligodeoxynucleotide from Bifidobacterium longum suppresses Th2 immune responses in a murine model. Clinical Experimental Immunology 2006, 145 (1), 130-138. Holzapfel, W.; Geisen, R.; Schillinger, U., Biological preservation of foods with reference to protective cultures, bacteriocins and food-grade enzymes. International journal of food microbiology 1995, 24 (3), 343-362. Gilliland, S., Acidophilus milk products: a review of potential benefits to consumers. Journal of Dairy Science 1989, 72 (10), 2483-2494. Nagpal, R.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, M.; Behare, P. V.; Jain, S.; Yadav, H., Probiotics, their health benefits and applications for developing healthier foods: a review. FEMS microbiology letters 2012, 334 (1), 1-15. HOMMA, N., Bifidobacteria as a resistance factor in human beings. Bifidobacteria and Microflora 1988, 7 (1), 35-43. FERNANDES, C. F.; SHAHANI, K. M., Anticarcinogenic and immunological properties of dietary lactobacilli. Journal of Food Protection 1990, 53 (8), 704-710. Goldin, B.; Gorbach, S. L., Alterations in fecal microflora enzymes related to diet, age, lactobacillus supplements, and dimethylhydrazine. Cancer 1977, 40 (S5), 2421-2426. Modler, H. W.; McKellar, R.; Yaguchi, M., Bifidobacteria and bifidogenic factors. Canadian Institute of Food Science and Technology Journal 1990, 23 (1), 29-41. Grill, J. P.; Crociani, J.; Ballongue, J., Effect of bifidobacteria on nitrites and nitrosamines. Letters in applied microbiology 1995, 20 (5), 328-330. Colombel, J.; Cortot, A.; Neut, C.; Romond, C., Yoghurt with Bifidobacterium longum reduces erythromycin-induced gastrointestinal effects. The Lancet (USA) 1987. Siitonen, S.; Vapaatalo, H.; Salminen, S.; Gordin, A.; Saxelin, M.; Wikberg, R.; Kirkkola, A.-L., Effect of Lactobacillus GG yoghurt in prevention of antibiotic associated diarrhoea. Annals of medicine 1990, 22 (1), 57-59. Koebnick, C.; Wagner, I.; Leitzmann, P.; Stern, U.; Zunft, H., Probiotic beverage containing Lactobacillus casei Shirota improves gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with chronic constipation. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology 2003, 17. Midolo, P.; Lambert, J.; Hull, R.; Luo, F.; Grayson, M., In vitro inhibition of Helicobacter pylori NCTC 11637 by organic acids and lactic acid bacteria. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 1995, 79 (4), 475-479. Salminen, S., Lactic acid bacteria in health and disease. Lactic acid bacteria 1997. Saarela, M.; Lähteenmäki, L.; Crittenden, R.; Salminen, S.; Mattila-Sandholm, T., Gut bacteria and health foods—the European perspective. International journal of food microbiology 2002, 78 (1-2), 99-117. Tsuda, H.; Miyamoto, T., Guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. Report of a joint FAO/WHO working group on drafting guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food Guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. Report of a joint FAO/WHO working group on drafting guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food, 2002. Food science and technology research 2010, 16 (1), 87-92. Langella, P.; Martín, R., Emerging health concepts in the probiotics field: streamlining the definitions. Frontiers in Microbiology 2019, 10, 1047. Roberfroid, M., Functional food concept and its application to prebiotics. Digestive and Liver Disease 2002, 34, S105-S110. Macfarlane, G. T.; Steed, H.; Macfarlane, S., Bacterial metabolism and health‐related effects of galacto‐oligosaccharides and other prebiotics. Journal of applied microbiology 2008, 104 (2), 305-344. Van Loo, J.; Coussement, P.; De Leenheer, L.; Hoebregs, H.; Smits, G., On the presence of inulin and oligofructose as natural ingredients in the western diet. Critical Reviews in Food Science Nutrition 1995, 35 (6), 525-552. Bengmark, S., Use of some pre-, pro-and synbiotics in critically ill patients. Best Practice Research Clinical Gastroenterology 2003, 17 (5), 833-848. Lam, K.-L.; Cheung, P. C.-K., Non-digestible long chain beta-glucans as novel prebiotics. Bioactive carbohydrates and dietary fibre 2013, 2 (1), 45-64. Mandadzhieva, T.; Ignatova-Ivanova, T.; Kambarev, S.; Iliev, I.; Ivanova, I., Utilization of Different Prebiotics by Lactobacillus Spp. and Lactococcus Spp. Biotechnology Biotechnological Equipment 2011, 25 (sup1), 117-120. Pineiro, M.; Asp, N.-G.; Reid, G.; Macfarlane, S.; Morelli, L.; Brunser, O.; Tuohy, K., FAO Technical meeting on prebiotics. Journal of clinical gastroenterology 2008, 42, S156-S159. Gibson, G. R.; Scott, K. P.; Rastall, R. A.; Tuohy, K. M.; Hotchkiss, A.; Dubert-Ferrandon, A.; Gareau, M.; Murphy, E. F.; Saulnier, D.; Loh, G., Dietary prebiotics: current status and new definition. Food Sci Technol Bull Funct Foods 2010, 7 (1), 1-19. Lei, X. J.; Yun, H. M.; Yang, Y.; Kim, I. H., Growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and selected fecal microbiota are improved by β-glucan supplementation in weaner pigs. Annals of Animal Science 2018, 18 (3), 769-779. Spiegel, J. E.; Rose, R.; Karabell, P.; Frankos, V. H.; Schmitt, D. F., Safety and benefits of fructooligosaccharides as food ingredients. Food technology (Chicago) 1994, 48 (1), 85-89. Mohanty, D.; Misra, S.; Mohapatra, S.; Sahu, P. S., Prebiotics and synbiotics: Recent concepts in nutrition. Food bioscience 2018, 26, 152-160. Louis, P.; Flint, H. J.; Michel, C., How to manipulate the microbiota: prebiotics. In Microbiota of the human body, Springer: 2016; pp 119-142. Fuentes‐Zaragoza, E.; Sánchez‐Zapata, E.; Sendra, E.; Sayas, E.; Navarro, C.; Fernández‐López, J.; Pérez‐Alvarez, J. A., Resistant starch as prebiotic: A review. Starch‐Stärke 2011, 63 (7), 406-415. Carlson, J.; Erickson, J.; Hess, J.; Gould, T.; Slavin, J., Prebiotic dietary fiber and gut health: comparing the in vitro fermentations of beta-glucan, Inulin and Xylooligosaccharide. Nutrients 2017, 9 (12), 1361. Tzounis, X.; Rodriguez-Mateos, A.; Vulevic, J.; Gibson, G. R.; Kwik-Uribe, C.; Spencer, J. P., Prebiotic evaluation of cocoa-derived flavanols in healthy humans by using a randomized, controlled, double-blind, crossover intervention study. The American journal of clinical nutrition 2011, 93 (1), 62-72. Brownawell, A. M.; Caers, W.; Gibson, G. R.; Kendall, C. W.; Lewis, K. D.; Ringel, Y.; Slavin, J. L., Prebiotics and the health benefits of fiber: current regulatory status, future research, and goals. The Journal of nutrition 2012, 142 (5), 962-974. Balthazar, C.; Silva, H. A.; Vieira, A.; Neto, R.; Cappato, L.; Coimbra, P.; Moraes, J.; Andrade, M.; Calado, V.; Granato, D., Assessing the effects of different prebiotic dietary oligosaccharides in sheep milk ice cream. Food Research International 2017, 91, 38-46. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, N.; Allergies, Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to “native chicory inulin” and maintenance of normal defecation by increasing stool frequency pursuant to Article 13.5 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. EFSA Journal 2015, 13 (1), 3951. Dufresne, A., Cellulose nanomaterials as green nanoreinforcements for polymer nanocomposites. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 2018, 376 (2112), 20170040. Desch, H. E.; Dinwoodie, J. M., Timber: structure, properties, conversion and use. Macmillan International Higher Education: 2016. Sharma, A.; Thakur, M.; Bhattacharya, M.; Mandal, T.; Goswami, S., Commercial Application of Cellulose Nano-composites-A review. Biotechnology Reports 2019, e00316. Slavin, J. L., Position of the American Dietetic Association: health implications of dietary fiber. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2008, 108 (10), 1716-1731. Li, F.; Mascheroni, E.; Piergiovanni, L., The potential of nanocellulose in the packaging field: A review. Packaging Technology and Science 2015, 28 (6), 475-508. Press, C., Boca Raton. FL: 2006. Rowland, S. P.; Roberts, E. J., The nature of accessible surfaces in the microstructure of cotton cellulose. Journal of Polymer Science Part A‐1: Polymer Chemistry 1972, 10 (8), 2447-2461. Thomas, S.; Maria, H. J., Progress in rubber nanocomposites. Woodhead Publishing: 2016. Bardet, M.; Emsley, L.; Vincendon, M., Two-dimensional spin-exchange solid-state NMR studies of 13C-enriched wood. Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance 1997, 8 (1), 25-32. Klemm, D.; Heublein, B.; Fink, H. P.; Bohn, A., Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angewandte chemie international edition 2005, 44 (22), 3358-3393. Festucci-Buselli, R. A.; Otoni, W. C.; Joshi, C. P., Structure, organization, and functions of cellulose synthase complexes in higher plants. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology 2007, 19 (1), 1-13. Kolpak, F. J.; Weih, M.; Blackwell, J., Mercerization of cellulose: 1. Determination of the structure of mercerized cotton. Polymer 1978, 19 (2), 123-131. Kolpak, F.; Blackwell, J., The structure of regenerated cellulose. Macromolecules 1975, 8 (4), 563-564. Marrinan, H.; Mann, J., Infrared spectra of the crystalline modifications of cellulose. Journal of Polymer Science 1956, 21 (98), 301-311. Gardiner, E. S.; Sarko, A., Packing analysis of carbohydrates and polysaccharides. 16. The crystal structures of celluloses IVI and IVII. Canadian journal of chemistry 1985, 63 (1), 173-180. Woodings, C., Regenerated cellulose fibres. Elsevier: 2001. Perez-Gago, M.; Serra, M.; Alonso, M.; Mateos, M.; Del Río, M., Effect of whey protein-and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose-based edible composite coatings on color change of fresh-cut apples. Postharvest Biology and Technology 2005, 36 (1), 77-85. Su, J.-F.; Huang, Z.; Yuan, X.-Y.; Wang, X.-Y.; Li, M., Structure and properties of carboxymethyl cellulose/soy protein isolate blend edible films crosslinked by Maillard reactions. Carbohydrate polymers 2010, 79 (1), 145-153. Wang, Z.; Sun, X.-x.; Lian, Z.-x.; Wang, X.-x.; Zhou, J.; Ma, Z.-s., The effects of ultrasonic/microwave assisted treatment on the properties of soy protein isolate/microcrystalline wheat-bran cellulose film. Journal of Food Engineering 2013, 114 (2), 183-191. Hoeng, F.; Denneulin, A.; Bras, J., Use of nanocellulose in printed electronics: a review. Nanoscale 2016, 8 (27), 13131-13154. Khalil, H. A.; Bhat, A.; Yusra, A. I., Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: A review. Carbohydrate polymers 2012, 87 (2), 963-979. Fujisawa, S.; Togawa, E.; Kuroda, K., Nanocellulose-stabilized Pickering emulsions and their applications. Science and Technology of advanced MaTerialS 2017, 18 (1), 959-971. Rånby, B. G., Fibrous macromolecular systems. Cellulose and muscle. The colloidal properties of cellulose micelles. Discussions of the Faraday Society 1951, 11, 158-164. Saito, T.; Nishiyama, Y.; Putaux, J.-L.; Vignon, M.; Isogai, A., Homogeneous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 2006, 7 (6), 1687-1691. Isogai, A.; Saito, T.; Fukuzumi, H., TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. nanoscale 2011, 3 (1), 71-85. Pääkkö, M.; Ankerfors, M.; Kosonen, H.; Nykänen, A.; Ahola, S.; Österberg, M.; Ruokolainen, J.; Laine, J.; Larsson, P. T.; Ikkala, O., Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8 (6), 1934-1941. Janardhnan, S.; Sain, M. M., Isolation of cellulose microfibrils–an enzymatic approach. Bioresources 2006, 1 (2), 176-188. Klemm, D.; Cranston, E. D.; Fischer, D.; Gama, M.; Kedzior, S. A.; Kralisch, D.; Kramer, F.; Kondo, T.; Lindström, T.; Nietzsche, S., Nanocellulose as a natural source for groundbreaking applications in materials science: Today’s state. Materials Today 2018, 21 (7), 720-748. Adam, W.; Saha-Möller, C. R.; Ganeshpure, P. A., Synthetic applications of nonmetal catalysts for homogeneous oxidations. Chemical Reviews 2001, 101 (11), 3499-3548. Kargarzadeh, H.; Mariano, M.; Huang, J.; Lin, N.; Ahmad, I.; Dufresne, A.; Thomas, S., Recent developments on nanocellulose reinforced polymer nanocomposites: A review. Polymer 2017, 132, 368-393. Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Yu, Y.; Chen, W.; Liu, Y.; Yu, H., Nanoformulations of quercetin and cellulose nanofibers as healthcare supplements with sustained antioxidant activity. Carbohydrate polymers 2019, 207, 160-168. Balea, A.; Sanchez-Salvador, J. L.; Monte, M. C.; Merayo, N.; Negro, C.; Blanco, A., In Situ Production and Application of Cellulose Nanofibers to Improve Recycled Paper Production. Molecules 2019, 24 (9), 1800. Isogai, A.; Zhou, Y., Diverse nanocelluloses prepared from TEMPO-oxidized wood cellulose fibers: Nanonetworks, nanofibers, and nanocrystals. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science 2019, 23 (2), 101-106. Miller, G. L., Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytical chemistry 1959, 31 (3), 426-428. Farahnaky, A.; Darabzadeh, N.; Majzoobi, M.; Mesbahi, G., Physicochemical properties of crude and purified locust bean gums extracted from Iranian carob seeds. 2014. Hernández-Hernández, O.; Muthaiyan, A.; Moreno, F. J.; Montilla, A.; Sanz, M. L.; Ricke, S., Effect of prebiotic carbohydrates on the growth and tolerance of Lactobacillus. Food microbiology 2012, 30 (2), 355-361. Senadeera, S.; Prasanna, P.; Jayawardana, N.; Gunasekara, D.; Senadeera, P.; Chandrasekara, A., Antioxidant, physicochemical, microbiological, and sensory properties of probiotic yoghurt incorporated with various Annona species pulp. Heliyon 2018, 4 (11), e00955. Pakutsah, K.; Aht-Ong, D., Facile isolation of cellulose nanofibers from water hyacinth using water-based mechanical defibrillation: Insights into morphological, physical, and rheological properties. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2020, 145, 64-76. Li, Y.; Wang, S.; Sun, Y.; Zheng, H.; Tang, Y.; Gao, X.; Song, C.; Liu, J.; Long, Y.; Liu, L., Apple polysaccharide could promote the growth of Bifidobacterium longum. International journal of biological macromolecules 2019. Gibson, G. R.; Probert, H. M.; Van Loo, J.; Rastall, R. A.; Roberfroid, M. B., Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: updating the concept of prebiotics. Nutrition research reviews 2004, 17 (2), 259-275. Gibson, G. R.; Roberfroid, M. B., Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. The Journal of nutrition 1995, 125 (6), 1401-1412. Isogai, A.; Bergström, L., Preparation of cellulose nanofibers using green and sustainable chemistry. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 2018, 12, 15-21. Matsumoto, T.; Shimada, S.; Hata, Y.; Tanaka, T.; Kondo, A., Multi-functional glycoside hydrolase: Blon_0625 from Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis ATCC 15697. Enzyme and microbial technology 2015, 68, 10-14. Wang, J.; Sun, B.; Cao, Y.; Wang, C., In vitro fermentation of xylooligosaccharides from wheat bran insoluble dietary fiber by Bifidobacteria. Carbohydrate polymers 2010, 82 (2), 419-423. Chen, T.; Chen, D.; Tian, G.; Zheng, P.; Mao, X.; Yu, J.; He, J.; Huang, Z.; Luo, Y.; Luo, J., Effects of soluble and insoluble dietary fiber supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, intestinal microbe and barrier function in weaning piglet. Animal Feed Science and Technology 2020, 260, 114335. Nsor-Atindana, J.; Chen, M.; Goff, H. D.; Zhong, F.; Sharif, H. R.; Li, Y., Functionality and nutritional aspects of microcrystalline cellulose in food. Carbohydrate Polymers 2017, 172, 159-174. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/78364 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 近幾年，益生菌及益生質被廣泛的探討及研究。纖維素為一種膳食纖維，無法在胃腸道中消化，其在應用上具有一些缺點（如高吸水性），為了克服這些缺點而生產出纖維素奈米纖維（cellulose nanofiber，CNF），使其除了保有纖維素的特性外，也具有更好的應用性。 本研究目的為評估纖維素奈米纖維之益生質特性，將纖維素奈米纖維預處理後進行物化及益生質特性分析。益生質分析中使用的菌株為Lactobacillus acidophilus BCRC 14079及Bifidobacterium longum BCRC 14602作為目標菌株，觀察兩株菌於不同碳源配方的培養基中之生長存活能力。正控制組以已知的益生質（果寡糖）作為碳源添加於培養基。結果顯示，經高壓處理之長製程纖維素奈米纖維與果寡糖組別在L. acidophilus的活菌數具有相同的結果，而另一株菌B. longum中無論在活菌數或pH值果寡糖皆有最佳效果，且纖維素奈米纖維組別顯著高於未額外添加碳源的組別。由結果得知，纖維素奈米纖維具有益生質特性，但不同製備時間、加工處理及不同菌株皆會影響其益生質特性，因此需進行更多探討。本實驗結果證實纖維素奈米纖維有望成為新興之益生質物質，可增加其於食品領域中的應用性。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In the recent years, probiotics and prebiotics have been extensively researched. Cellulose is a dietary fiber, as a non-digestible food ingredients, has some disadvantages in application (e.g. high water absorption). In order to overcome these, cellulose nanofibers (CNF) weree produced, maintaining the characteristics of cellulose and having better applicability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prebiotic properties of cellulose nanofibers. After pretreatment of cellulose nanofibers, we analyzed the physicochemical and the prebiotic properties of it. In prebiotic analysis: Lactobacillus acidophilus BCRC 14079 and Bifidobacterium longum BCRC 14602 as the target strains, observed the growth and survival ability of the two strains in different carbon source medium. The positive control group was added to the culture medium with known prebiotic (fructose oligosaccharides, FOS) as a carbon source. The results showed that the long production CNF treated with high pressure has the same results as FOS in L. acidophilus viable count, and the results of another strain B. longum showed that FOS has the best effect in viable count and pH value. However, the CNF group was significantly higher than the group without additional carbon source. In the results, we found that CNF has the prebiotic properties, but the different production flow, processing treatments and different strains will affect their prebiotic properties. So more discussion is needed. The results of this experiment confirm that cellulose nanofiber is expected to become an emerging probiotic substance, which can increase its applicability in the food field. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-07-11T14:53:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2207202022305300.pdf: 3910673 bytes, checksum: efa08fc09615ca66b8268f38547af132 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 I 摘要 III ABSTRACT IV 目錄 VI 圖目錄 IX 表目錄 X 第一章、前言 1 第二章、文獻回顧 3 2.1 益生菌 3 2.1.1益生菌概述及定義 3 2.1.2乳酸菌 4 2.1.3益生菌健康生理功效 6 2.1.4益生菌的控管 11 2.2 益生質 12 2.2.1益生質概述及定義 12 2.2.2益生質分類 16 2.2.3益生質健康益處 18 2.2.4益生質應用及未來趨勢 21 2.3纖維素 23 2.3.1纖維素概述 23 2.3.2結構組成 24 2.3.3纖維素特性 25 2.3.4纖維素應用 26 2.4奈米纖維 27 2.4.1奈米纖維概述 27 2.4.2奈米纖維定義 27 2.4.3奈米纖維生產方式 29 2.4.4奈米纖維種類 30 2.4.5奈米纖維應用 33 第三章、研究目的與實驗架構 35 3.1研究目的 35 3.2實驗架構 35 第四章、材料與方法 36 4.1實驗材料 36 4.1.1藥品 36 4.1.2實驗原料 37 4.1.2實驗菌株 37 4.1.3實驗儀器設備 38 4.2實驗方法 39 4.2.1 奈米纖維素預處理 39 4.2.2 奈米纖維素酸處理之糖含量變化 39 4.2.3奈米纖維素溶解度 40 4.2.4奈米纖維素型態結構觀察 40 4.2.5 菌種保存與活化 40 4.2.6 培養基製備 41 4.2.7 不同碳源培養基 41 4.2.8 奈米纖維素培養基製備 42 4.2.9 初始菌數檢測 42 4.2.10 益生菌生長曲線 42 4.2.11益生菌活菌數量 43 4.2.12 培養液pH值及可滴定酸度 43 4.2.13 培養液糖含量 44 4.2.14 統計分析與圖表繪製 44 第五章、結果與討論 45 5.1奈米纖維素預處理 45 5.2奈米纖維素糖含量變化 45 5.3奈米纖維素溶解度 46 5.4奈米纖維素型態結構觀察 49 5.5初始菌數檢測 51 5.6益生菌生長曲線 52 5.7益生菌活菌數量 55 5.8培養液PH值及可滴定酸度 57 5.9培養液糖含量 61 第六章、結論 63 第七章、未來展望 64 第八章、參考文獻 65 附錄1 ⅰ 附錄2 ⅱ | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 膳食纖維 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 胃腸道微生物 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 益生菌 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 益生質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 纖維素奈米纖維 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Prebiotic | en |
| dc.subject | Gastrointestinal microorganism | en |
| dc.subject | Cellulose nanofiber | en |
| dc.subject | Dietary fiber | en |
| dc.subject | Probiotic | en |
| dc.title | 纖維素奈米纖維之益生質功效研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Investigation of the Prebiotic Effects of Cellulose Nanofibers | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳瑞碧(Swi-Bea Wu),沈賜川(Szu-Chuan Shen),鄭光成(Kuan-Chen Cheng),蔡宗佑(Tsung-Yu Tsai) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 胃腸道微生物,益生菌,益生質,膳食纖維,纖維素奈米纖維, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Gastrointestinal microorganism,Probiotic,Prebiotic,Dietary fiber,Cellulose nanofiber, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 103 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202001756 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-07-24 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 食品科技研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-07-29 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 食品科技研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-2207202022305300.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.82 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。