請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/75297
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Sheng-Feng Shen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 沈聖峰 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-01T08:12:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-07-01T08:12:34Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Literature Cited 1: Aebischer, N. J., P. A. Robertson, and E. R. Kenward. 1993. Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology. 74:1313-1325. Andreassen, H. P., K. Hertzberg, and R. A. Ims. 1998. Space-use responses to habitat fragmentation and connectivity in the root vole Microtus oeconomus. Ecology 79:1223-1235. Andren, H. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71: 355-366 Andren, H. 1995. Effects of landscape composition on predation rates at habitat edges. Pages 225-255 in Mosaic landscapes and ecological processes. (Hansson. L., L. Fajrig and G. Merriam, editors). Chapman & Hall, London, UK. Bourque, J. and M. A. Villard. 2001. Effects of selection cutting and landscape-scale harvesting in the reproductive success of two neotropical migrant bird species. Conservation Biology 15:184-195. Donovan, T. M., H. R. Lamberson, A. Kimber, F. R. Thompson III, and J. Faaborg. 1995. Modeling the effects of habitat fragmentation on source and sink demography of neotropical migrant birds. Conservation Biology.9:1396-1407. Donovan, T. M., P. W. Jones, E. M. Annand, and F. R. Thompson III. 1997. Variation in local-scale edge effects: mechanisms and landscape context. Ecology 78: 2064-2075. Donovan, T. M., and F. R. Thompson III. 2001. Modeling the ecological trap hypothesis: a habitat and demographic analysis for migrant songbirds. Ecological Applications 11: 871-882. Flaspohler, D. J., and S. A. Temple, and R. N. Rosenfield. 2001. Species-specific edge effects on nest success and breeding bird density in a forested landscape. Ecological Applications 11: 32-46. Gates, J. E., and L. S. Gysel. 1978. Avian nest dispersion and fledgling success in field-forest ecotone. Ecology 59: 871-883. Garshelis, D. L. 2000. Delusions in habitat evaluation: measuring use, selection, and importance. Pages 111-164 in Research techniques in animal ecology, (Boitani. L.and T. K. Fuller, editors). Columbia University Press, New York, USA. Haila, Y., I. K. Hanski, and S. Raivio. 1989. Methodology for studying the minimum habitat requirements of forest birds. Annales Zoologici Fennici 26:173-180 Hannon, S. J., and S. E. Cotterill. 1998. Nest predation in aspen woodlots in an agricultural area in Alberta: the enemy from within. Auk 115: 16-25. Hansell, M. 2000. Bird nests and construction behavior. Cambridge University Press,Cambridge, UK. Huhta, E., J. Jokimaki, and P. Helle. 1998. Predation on artificial nests in a forest dominated landscape: the effects of nest type, patch size and edge structure. Ecography 21: 464-471. Ims, R. A. 1995. Movement patterns in relation to landscape structures. Pages 89-109 in Mosaic landscapes and ecological processes. (Hansson. L., L. Fajrig and G. Merriam, editors). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. Johnson, D. H. 1980. The composition of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 6: 65-71. Jones, J. 2001. Habitat selection studies in Avian Ecology: A critical review. Auk 118:557-562. Liao, C. Y. 1997. The spatial distribution and predictive model of Timaliinae in Taiwan. Master thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. (In Chinese). Liu, M. 1999. The cooperative breeding of Taiwan Yuhina (Yuhina brunneiceps) at May-Fung area, Taiwan. Master thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. (In Chinese). Manly, B. F. J., L. L. McDonald, and D. L. Thomas. 1993. Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. Chapman & Hall, New York, USA. May, R.M., and S. K. Robinson. 1985. Population dynamics of avian brood parasitism. American Naturalist 126: 475-494. Martin, T. E. 1992. Breeding productivity considerations: What are the appropriate habitat features for management Pages 455-473 in Ecology and conservation of Neotropical migrant landbirds. (Hagan. J. M, III, and D. W. Johnston, editors). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C, USA. Martin, T. E. 1996. Life history evolution in tropical and south temperate birds: What do we really know Journal of Avian Biology 27: 263-272. Mayfield, H. 1975. Suggestions for calculation nest success. Wilson Bulletin 87:456-466. McClean. S. A., M.A. Rumble, R. M. King, and W. L. Baker. 1998. Evaluation of resource selection methods with different definitions of availability. Journal of wildlife management 62:793-801. Morrison, S. A., and D. T. Bolger. 2002. Lack of an urban edge effect on reproduction in a fragmentation-sensitive sparrow. Ecological Applications 12:398-411. Murcia, C. 1995. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10:58-62. Mysterud, A., and R. A. Ims. 1998. Functional responses in habitat use: availability influences relative use in trade-off situations. Ecology 79:1435-1441. Norton, M. R., S. J. Hannon, and F. K. A. Schmiegelow. 2000. Fragments are not islands: patch vs landscape perspectives on songbird presence and abundance in a harvested boreal forest. Ecography 23:209-223. Patton, D. W. 1994. The effect on avian nest success: how strong is the evidence Conservation Biology 8:17-26. Powell, R. A. 2000. Animal home ranges and territories and home range estimators. Pages 65-110 in Research techniques in animal ecology, (Boitani. L. and T. K. Fuller, editors). Columbia University Press, New York. USA. Pulliam, H. R. 1988. Sources and sinks, and population regulation. American Naturalist 132: 652-661. Ricklefs, R. E. 1973.Fecundity, mortality, and avian demography. Pages 366-434 in Breeding biology of birds, (Farnon. D. S., editor). National Academy of Science, Washington, D.C. USA. Robinson, S. K., F. R. Thompson, T.M. Donovan, D. R. Whitehead, and J. Faaborg. 1995. Regional forest fragmentation and the nesting success of migratory birds. Science 267: 1987-1990 Roadewald, A. D., and R. H. Yahner. 2001. Influence of landscape composition on avian community structure and associated mechanisms. Ecology 82:3493 -3504. Russell, E. M. 2000. Avian life histories: is extended parental care the southern secret Emu 100: 77-399. Schmiegelow, F. K. A. and M. Monkkonen. 2002. Habitat loss and fragmentation in dynamic landscapes: avian perspectives from the boreal forest. Ecological Applications 12: 398-411 Silerman. B. W. 1986. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman & Hall, London,UK. Stouffer, P. C., and R. O. Bierregaard. 1995. Effects of forest fragmentation on understory hummingbirds in Amazonian Brazil. Conservation Biology 9:1085-1094. Stutchbury, B. J. M. and E. S. Morton. 2001. Behavioral ecology of tropical birds. Academic Press, London, UK. Tewksbury. J. J., S. J. Hejl. and T. E. Martin. 1998. Breeding productivity does not decline with increasing fragmentation in a western landscape. Ecology 79:2890-2903. Thompson, F. R. III. 1993. Simulated responses of a forest-interior bird population to forest management options in central hardwood forests of United States. Conservation Biology 7:325-333. Trine, C. L. 1998. Wood thrush population sinks and implications for the scale of regional conservation strategies. Conservation Biology 12:576-585. Warkentin, I. G., R. Greenberg, and O. J. Salgado. 1995. Songbird use of gallery woodlands in recently cleared and older settled landscapes of the Selva Lacandona, Chiapas, Mexico. Conservation Biology 9: 1095-1106. Wolf, B. O., and G. E. Walsberg. 1996. Thermal effects of radiation and wind on a small bird and implications for microsite selection. Ecology 77:2228-2236. Wiens, J. A., N. C. Stenseth, H. B.Van, and R. A. Ims. 1993. Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. Oikos 66: 369-380. Wiens, J. A. 1994. Habitat fragmentation: island vs. landscape perspectives on bird conservation. Ibis 137: S97-S104. Wilson, E. O. 1992. The diversity of life. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA, USA. Literacture Cited Ⅱ: Alexander, R. D. 1974. The evolution of social behavior. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5:325-383. Arnold, K. E. 2000 . Strategies of the cooperatively breeding noisy miner to reduce nest predation. Emu 100:280-285. Arnold, K. E. and I. P. F. Owens. 1999. Cooperative breeding in birds: the role of ecology. Behavioral ecology 10: 465-471. Arnold, K. E., and I. P. F. Owens. 1998. Cooperative breeding in birds: a comparative test of the life history hypothesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London-Series B: Biological Sciences 265: 739-745. Austad, S. N. and K. N. Rabenold. 1985. Reproductive enhancement by helpers and an experimental examination of its mechanism in the Bicolored Wren: a facultative communal breeder. Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 17:19-27. Bart, J., M. A. Fligner and W. I. Notz. 1998. Sampling and Statistical Methods for Behavioral Ecologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Bennett, P. M. and I. P. F. Owens. 2002. Evolutionary Ecology of Birds: Lfe Histories, Mating Systems and Extinction. Oxford University Press. Oxford, U.K. Boland C. R. J. 1998. Helpers improve nest defense in cooperatively breeding White-winged Choughs. Emu 98: 320-324. Boyce, M. S., and C. M. Perrins. 1987. Optimizing great tit clutch size in a fluctuating environment. Ecology 68:142-153. Brown J. L., and E. R. Brown. 1981 Kin selection and individual selection in babblers. Pages 244-256 in Natural Selection and Social Behavior: Recent Research and New Theory.(R.D. Alexander and D. W. Tinkle, editors), Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. U.K. Brown, J. L. 1974. Alternate routes to sociality in jays-with a theory for the evolution of altruism and communal breeding. American Zoologist 14:63-80. Brown, J. L. 1987. Helping and Communal Breeding in Birds. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, U.S.A. Brown, J. L., E. R. Brown S. D. Brown and D. D. Dow. 1982. Helpers; effects of experimental removal on reproductive success. Science 215:421-422. Burley, N. 1980. Clutch overlap and clutch size: Alternative and complementary reproductive tactics. American Naturalist 115:223-246. Caffrey, C. 2000. Correlates of reproductive success in cooperatively breeding Western American Crows: If helpers help, it’s not by much. Condor 102: 333-341. Cant, M. A. 1998. A model for the evolution of reproductive skew without reproductive suppression. Animal Behaviour 55:163-169. Chalambor, C. K. and T. E. Martin. 2001. Fecundity-survival trade-offs and parental risk-taking in birds. Science 292:494-497. Clutton-Brock T. H., P. N. M. Brotherton A. F. Russell M. J. O’Riain D. Gaynor R. Kansky A. Griffin M. Manser L. Sharpe G. M. Mcllrath T. Small A. Moss and S. Monfort. 2001. Cooperation, control, and concession in meerkat groups. Science 291: 478-481. Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1991. The Evolution of Parental Care. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA. Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1998. Reproductive Skew, Concessions and Limited Control. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13:288-292. Clutton-Brock, T. H. 2002. Breeding together: kin selection and mutualism in cooperative vertebrate. Science 296: 69-72. Cockburn, A. 1998. Evolution of helping behavior in cooperatively breeding birds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29:141-177 Cole, L. C. 1954. The population consequences of life history phenomena. The Quarterly Review of Biology 29:103-137. Craig, J. L. and I. G. Jamieson. 1990 Pukeko: different approaches and some different answers. Pages 385-412 in Cooperative Breeding in Birds: long-term studies of ecology and behavior. (P. B. Stacey and W. D. Koenig, editors), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. Crick, H. Q. P. 1992. Load-lightening in cooperatively breeding birds and the cost of reproduction . Ibis 134:56-61. Curry, R. L. and P. R. Grant. 1989. Demography of the cooperative breeding Galapagos Mockingbird, Nesomimus parvulus, in a climatically variable environment. Journal of Animal Ecology 58:441-464. Davies . N.B. 1992. Dunnock Behaviour and Social Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA Duun, P. O., A. Cockburn, and R. A. Mulder. 1995. Fairy-wren helpers often care for young to which they are unrelated. Proceedings of the royal society of London B, Biological Sciences 256: 339-343. Eguchi, K., S. Yamagishi, S. Asai, H. Nagata, and T. Hino. 2002. Helping does not enhance reproductive success of cooperatively breeding rufous vanga in Madagascar. Journal of Animal Ecology 71:123-130. Emlen, S T. 1991. Evolution of cooperative breeding in birds and mammals. Pages 301-337 in Behavioural Ecology:An Evolutionary Approach. (J. R. Kreb and N. B Davies, editors), Blackwell Scientific Publications, Cambridge, USA. Emlen, S. T. 1982a. The evolution of helping I: an Ecological Constrains Model. The American Naturalist 119:29-39. Emlen, S. T. 1982b. The evolution of helping II: the role of behavioral conflict. The American Naturalist 119:40-53. Emlen, S. T. 1994. Benefits, constraints and the evolution of the family. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 9:282-285. Emlen, S. T. 1995. An evolutionary theory of the family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92:8092-8099. Emlen, S. T. 1997. Predicting family dynamics in social vertebrates. Pages 228-253 in Behavioural Ecology 4th ed. (J. R. Kreb and N. B. Davies, editors), Blackwell Scientific Publications. Malden, U.S.A. Emlen, S. T. and S. L. Vehrencamp. 1983. Cooperative breeding strategies among birds. Pages 93-120 in Perspectives in Ornithology. (A. H. Brush and G. A. Clark, Jr., editors). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, London. UK. Farnsworth, G. L. and T. R. Simons. 2001. How many baskets Clutch sizes that maximize annual fecundity of multiple-brooded birds. Auk 118: 973-982. Gibbons, D. W. 1987. Juvenile helping in the moorhen, Gallinula chioropus. Animal Behaviour 35: 170-181. Griffin, A. S. and S. A. West. 2002. Kin selection: fact and fiction. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:15-21. Haccou, P. and J. M. McNamara. 1998. Effects of parental survival on clutch size decisions in fluctuating environments. Evolutionary Ecology 12:459-475. Hatchwell, B. J. 1999. Investment strategies of breeders in avian cooperative breeding systems. American Naturalist 154: 205-219. Hatchwell, B. J. and J. Komdeur. 2000. Ecological constraints, life history traits and the evolution of cooperative breeding. Animal Behaviour 59:1079-1086 Haydock, J., Koenig, W. D., and M. T. Stanback. 2001. Shared parentage and incest avoidance in the cooperatively breeding acorn woodpecker. Molecular Ecology 10:1515-1525. Innes, K. E. and R. E. Johnston. 1996. Cooperative breeding in the white-throated magpie-jay. How do auxiliaries influence nesting success Animal Behaviour 51: 519-533. Jamieson, I. G. 1997. Testing reproductive skew models in a communally breeding bird, the pukeko, Porphyrio Porphyrio. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London - Series B:Biological Sciences 264: 335-340. Johnstone, R. A. 2000. Models of reproductive skew: A review and synthesis. Ethology 106:5-26. Johnstone, R. A. and M. A. Cant. 1999. Reproductive skew and the threat of eviction: a new perspective. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London - Series B: Biological Sciences 266: 275-279. Julliard, R. R., H. McCleery, J. Clobert, and C. M. Perrins. 1997. Phenotypic adjustment of clutch size due to nest predation in the Great Tit. Ecology 78: 394-404. Keller, L. and H. K. Reeve. 1994. Partitioning of reproduction in animal societies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 98-102. Kluyer, H. N., J. H. van Balen, and A. J. Cave. 1977. The occurrence of time-saving mechanisms in the breeding biology of the great tit, Parus major. Pages 153-169 in Evolutionary Ecology, (B. Stonehouse and C. Perrins, editors), Macmillan, London, UK. Koenig, W. D. and F. A. Pitelka. 1981. Ecological factors and kin selection in the evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Pages 261-280 in NaturalSelection and Social Behavior: RecentResearch and New Theory, (R. D. Alexander and D. W. Tinkle, editors). Chiron Press, New York, NY, USA. Koenig, W. D., F. A. Pitelka, W. J. Carmen, R. L. Mumme and M. T. Stanback. 1992. The evolution of delayed dispersal in cooperative breeders. The Quarterly Review of Biology 67: 111-150. Koenig, W. D., J. Haydock, and M. T. Stanback. 1998. Reproductive roles in the cooperatively breeding acorn woodpecker: incest avoidance versus reproductive competition. American Naturalist 151:243-255. Koford, R. R., B. S. Bowen and S. L. Vehrencamp. 1990. Groove-billed anis: joint-nesting in a tropical cuckoo. Pages 335-355 in Cooperative Breeding in Birds: Long-Term Studies of Ecology and Behavior. (P. B. Stacey and W. D. Koenig, Editors), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Kokoo, H., and R. A. Johnstone. 1999. Social queuing in animal societies: a dynamic model of reproductive skew. Proceedings of the royal society of London B, Biological Sciences 266:571-578. Langen, T.A. 1996. The mating system of the white-throated Magpie-jay Calocitta formosa and Greenwood’s hypothesis for sex-biased dispersal. Ibis 138: 506-513. Ligon, J. D. 1999. The Evolution of Avian Breeding Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York. Lima, S. L. 1987. Clutch size in birds: a predation perspective. Ecology 68: 1062-1070. Liao, C. Y. 1997. The spatial distribution and predictive models of Timaliinae in Taiwan. Master thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. (In Chinese). Liu, M. 1999. The cooperative breeding of Taiwan Yuhina (Yuhina brunneiceps) at May-Fung area, Taiwan. Master thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. (In Chinese). Macedo, R. H. 1992. Reproductive patterns and social organization of the communal guira cuckoo (Guira guira) in central Brazil. Auk 109: 786-799. Macedo, R. H. and C. A.Bianchi. 1997. Communal breeding in tropical guira cuckoos:sociality in the absence of a saturated habitat. Journal of Avian Biology 28:207-215. Magrath, R. D. and R. G. Heinsohn. 2000. Reproductive skew in birds: models, problems and prospects. Journal of Avian Biology 31: 247-258. Magrath, R. D. and L. A. Whittingham. 1997. Subordinate males are more likely to help if unrelated to the breeding female in cooperatively breeding white-browed scrub wrens. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 41:185-192. Martin, T. E. 2002. A new view of avian life-history evolution tested on an incubation paradox. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London-Series B: Biological Sciences 269: 309-316. Martin, T. E., P. R. Martin, C. R. Olson, B. J. Heidinger, and J. J. Fontaine. 2000. Parental care and clutch sizes in North and South American birds. Science 287:1482-1485. Mayfield, H. 1961. Nesting success calculated from exposure. Wilson Bulletin 73:255-261. Mayfield, H. 1975. Suggestions for calculation nest success. Wilson Bulletin 87: 456-466. McRae, S. B. 1996. Family values: Costs and benefits of communal nesting in the moorhen. Animal Behaviour 52: 225-245. Monaghan, P. and R. G. Nager. 1997. Why Don’t Birds Lay More Eggs. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 12:270-274. Mumme, R. L. 1997. A bird’s-eye view of mammalian cooperative breeding. Pages 364-388 in Cooperative Breeding in Mammals. (N. G. Solomon and J. A. French, editors). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Murphy, G. I. 1968. Pattern in life history and environment. American Naturalist 102:390-404. Orzack, S. H. and S. Tuljapurkar. 2001. Reproductive effort in variable environments, or environmental variation is for the birds. Ecology 82: 2659-2665. Poiani, A. and J. L. Sommer. 1994. A comparative analysis of some life-history traits between cooperatively and non-cooperatively breeding Australian passerines. Evolutionary Ecology 8:471-488. Poiani, A. and M. Pagel. 1997. Evolution of avian cooperative breeding-comparative tests of the nest predation hypothesis. Evolution 51: 226-240. Quinn, J. S., R. Macedo, and B. N. White. 1994. Genetic relatedness of communally breeding guira cuckoos. Animal Behaviour 47: 515-529. Reeve, H. K. 2000. A transactional theory of within-group conflict. American Naturalist 155:365-382. Reeve, H. K. and F. L. W. Ratnieks. 1993. Queen-queen conflicts in polygynous societies: mutual tolerance and reproductive skew. In: Queen Number and Sociality in Insects. (Keller, L., eds). pp.45-85. Oxford University Press. Oxford, U.K. Reyer, H.-U. 1984. Investment and relatedness: A cost /benefit analysis of breeding and helping in the pied kingfisher (Ceryle rudis). Animal Behaviour 32:1163-1178. Reyer, H.-U. 1990. Pied kingfishers: ecological causes and reproductive consequences of cooperative breeding. Pages 527-557 in Cooperative Breeding in Birds: Long-Term Studies of Ecology and Behavior. (P. B. Stacey and W. D. Koenig, editors). Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK. Roff, D. 1992. The Evolution of Lfe Histories: Theory and Analysis. Chapman and Hall. New. York. U.S.A. Rowley, I. 1978. Communal activities among white-winged choughs Corcorax melanorhamphus. Ibis 120: 178-197. Rowley, I. C. R. and E. Russell. 1990. Splendid fairy-wrens: demonstrating the importance of longevity. Pages 1-30 in Cooperative Breeding in Birds: Long-Term Studies of Ecology and Behavior. (P. B. Stacey and W. D. Koenig, editors). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. UK. Rubenstein, D. I. and R. W. Wrangham. 1986. Ecological Aspects of Social Evolution: Birds and Mammals. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA. Russel, E. and I. Roweley. 1988. Helper contributions to reproductive success in the splendid fairy-wren. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 22:131-140. Russel, E. M. 1989. Cooperative breeding-a Gondwanan perspective. Emu 89: 61-62. Schaffer, W. M. 1974. Optimal reproductive effort in fluctuating environments. American Naturalist 108:783-790. Shreeves, G., and J. Field. 2002. Group size and direct fitness in social queues. American Naturalist 159:81-95. Sherley, G. H. 1990. Co-operative breeding in rifleman (Acanthisitta chioris): benefits to parents, offspring and helpers. Behaviour 112:1-22. Sherman, P. T. 1995. Social organization of cooperatively polyandrous white-winged trumpeters (Psophia leucoptera). Auk 112:296-309. Skutch, A. F. 1949. Do tropical birds rear as many young as they can nourish Ibis 91:430-455. Slagsvold, T. 1982. Clutch size variation in passerine birds: the nest predation hypothesis. Oecologia 54: 159-169. Stacey, P. B. and J. D. Ligon. 1987. The benefits-of-philopatry hypothesis for the evolution of cooperative breeding variation in territory quality and group size effects. American Naturalist 130: 654-676. Stacey, P. B. and J. D. Ligon. 1991. Territory quality and dispersal options in the acorn woodpecker and a challenge to the habitat-saturation model of cooperative breeding. American Naturalist 137: 831-846. Stallcup, J. A. and G. E. Woodfenfen. 1978. Family status and contributions to breeding by Florida scrub jays. Animal Behaviour 26:1144-1156. Stearns S. C. 1992. The Evolution of Lfe Histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. Stearns, S. C. 1976. Life-history tactics: a review of the ideas. The Quarterly Review of Biology 21: 3-47. Vehrencamp, S. L. 1977. Relative fecundity and parental effort in communally nesting anis, Crotophaga sulcirostris. Science 197:403-405. Vehrencamp, S. L. 1979. The roles of individual, kin, and group selection in the evolution of sociality. Pages 351-379 in Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology Vol 3. (P. Marler and J. G. Vandenbergh, editors). Plenum Press, New York, NY, U.S.A. Vehrencamp, S. L. 1983. A model for the evolution of despotic versus egalitarian societies. Animal Behaviour 31: 667-682. Vehrencamp, S. L. 2000. Evolutionary routes to joint-female nesting in birds. Behavioral Ecology 11:334-344. Vehrencamp, S. L., B. S. Bowen, and R. R. Koford. 1988. The effect of breeding-unit size on fitness components in Groove-billed Anis. Pages 291-304 in Reproductive Success, (T. H. Clutton-Brock, editor), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA. Vehrencamp, S. L. and J. S. Quinn. 2002. The evolution of joint-nesting systems:mutual cooperation or conspecific brood parasitism in Cooperative Breeding in Birds:Recent Research and New Theory. (W. Koenig and J. Dickinson, editors) In published. Visser, M. E. and C. M. Lessells. 2001. The costs of egg production and incubation in great tits (Parus major). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London-Series B: Biological Sciences 268:1271-1277. White, G. C. and R. A. Carrott. 1990. Analysis of Wildhfe Radio-Tracking Data. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA. Williams, G. C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton University Press. Princeton, New Jersey, USA. Woolfenden, G. E. and J. W. Fitzpatrick. 1984. The Florida Scrub Jay: Demography of a Cooperatively breeding Bird. Princeton University Press. Princeton, New Jersey,USA. Yamashina, M. 1938. A sociable breeding habit among timaliine birds. IX th Congres Ornithologique International, Rouen: 453-456. Yu, H. T. and L. K. Lin. 1985. New record of the group breeding of Formosan Yuhina. Journal of Taiwan Museum 38:47-48. Zahavi, A. 1974. Communal nesting by the Arabian Babbler: a case of individual selection. Ibis 116:84-87. Williams, G. C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton University Press. Princeton, New Jersey, USA. Woolfenden, G. E. and J. W. Fitzpatrick. 1984. The Florida Scrub Jay: Demography of a Cooperatively breeding Bird. Princeton University Press. Princeton, New Jersey,USA. Yamashina, M. 1938. A sociable breeding habit among timaliine birds. IX th Congres Ornithologique International, Rouen: 453-456. Yu, H. T. and L. K. Lin. 1985. New record of the group breeding of Formosan Yuhina. Journal of Taiwan Museum 38:47-48. Zahavi, A. 1974. Communal nesting by the Arabian Babbler: a case of individual selection. Ibis 116:84-87. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/75297 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 摘要一: 1999年六月到2001年九月,我們在台灣中海拔台大梅峰實驗農場,研究棲地破碎對合作生殖冠羽畫眉族群動態與棲地選擇的影響。我們追蹤11到13群以彩色腳環個體辨識的繁殖群。我們以組成分析研究冠羽畫眉的棲地選擇,發現在可利用範圍中,冠羽畫眉偏好選擇道路與樹林作為95% kernel活動範圍,而在95% kernel活動範圍內實際利用地點時則偏好樹林與果園。我們以食物與巢位的角度,探討棲地選擇偏好的可能解釋,冠羽畫眉偏好選擇樹木為巢位(Manly-Chesson selectivity index=1.86),並且在95% home range中的食物密度(Prunus campanulata)也顯著高於vailable area中的食物密度(Marm-Whitney U test=15.000, P<0.0001, n=13 groups)。更詳細來看,冠羽畫眉傾向於選擇樹林邊緣(within 10 m to edge)作為築巢地點(Mann-Whitney U test=1154.500, P<0.000, n=74 ),而在樹林邊緣的食物也較豐富。然而冠羽畫眉有很高的巢失敗率(0.14?0.27, Mayfield nest success),而巢失敗的主因為被捕食。令人驚訝的是,我們的族群動態資料顯示此地的冠羽族群仍然屬於來源族群。我們的研究顯示,在面對各種不同的生態因數與物種組成的情形下,邊緣效應與棲地破碎化帶來的影響並非同質的棲地破碎化與邊緣效應的機制應該有進一步詳細的研究與探討。 摘要二: 冠羽畫眉是合作生殖的鳥類中,唯一發現有多對繁殖鳥共用一巢的燕雀目物種。我們在1999年六月到2001年九月,於台灣的中部山區進行冠羽畫眉共用一巢制演化適應性優缺點與孵蛋角色研究。在冠羽畫眉中,不論是在白天或是夜間均主要由最高位階母鳥進行主要的孵蛋工作,(白天母鳥孵蛋比例67%, n=27,夜間母鳥孵蛋比例73%, n=11), 此現象與公烏孵蛋假說並不相符。冠羽畫眉生活在亞熱帶巢捕食率高與颱風頻繁的高度變動環境之下,在適應性成分方面,較大繁殖群體的冠羽畫眉並沒有較高的巢成功率或幼鳥離巢率;然而除了最高位階公鳥之外,在大的群中(6-7隻),個體的存活率顯著高於其他較小群的個體,另外也我們發現越大群平均每一對烏在孵蛋與育雛的工作量也較低。此外,在繁殖速度方面,較大的繁殖群,築巢的速度與繁殖失敗後再度嘗試的速度,也比單對繁殖烏快;並且也佔有較大的領域與比較好的可能巢位、食物資源與樹木掩蔽。我們研究資料也顯示次位階,尤其是公烏有較高的機會變成最高位階繁殖鳥,這提供了次位階繁殖鳥的未來可能的直接利益,而吸引其留在群體之中。我們的研究顯示,共用一巢制可能與面對變動環境的分擔風險策略有關 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Abstract Ⅰ: In 1999-2001, we study a cooperative breeding bird, Taiwan yuhina in a highly fragmented habitat in sub-tropic Taiwan. By following 11 and 13 individual banded breeding groups each year, we performed a multi-level study to explore the effects of habitat fragmentation in population as well as in individual level. In individual level, the compositional analysis of habitat selection shows that yuhinas selected road and tree most in 95% kernel home range vs. available area, and tree and fruit most in usage locations vs. 95% kernel home range level. Furthermore, the behavioral explanation of habitat selection in terms of nest site selection and food resource suggest that yuhinas selected tree most as nest sites (Manly-Chesson selectivity index=1.86) and significant higher food density (Prunus campanulata) in 95% home range than available area ((Mann-Whitney U test=15.000, P<0.0001, n=13 groups). In further detail, yuhinas selected edge tree (within 10 m to edge) as nest sites (Mann-Whitney U test=1154.500, P<0.000, n=74), and food resources are more abundant in the edge tree. However, yuhinas incurred very high nest failure rate (0.14?0.27, Mayfield nest success) mainly caused by predation. Surprisingly, our demographic studies showed that this population was still the source population. yuhinas have several adaptations to high nest failure rate like multiple breeding and load-lightening strategy by cooperative breeding. Our study supports that effects of edges and fragmentation are not homogeneous. The mechanisms of those effects in different ecological contexts and species should be studied more detail. Abstract Ⅱ: We studied Taiwan yuhinas(Yuhina brunneiceps),the only found passerine with frequen joint-nesting behaviors, to study the male incubation hypothesis and the costs and benefits of joint-nesting behavior in the mountains of central Taiwan, from June 1999 to September 2001. Alpha females took the major incubation works in both diurnal (67%, n=27) and nocturnal (73%, n=11) incubations, which didn't fit the male incubation hypothesis. Yuhinas inhabited in a sub-tropic fluctuating environment with high nest predation and frequent typhoons. In the aspects of fitness components, larger groups did not have higher nest success rates or more fledglings. Instead, they reduced their investment to single nest attempt by laying fewer eggs in one nest, lightening the work loads of incubation and provision in joint-nesting groups. Individuals, except alpha males, in larger groups had higher survival probabilities, especially for the females who lightened the incubation works in larger groups. Larger groups could also build nests and renest faster than solitary pairs and have better home ranges in terms of possible nests site, food and tree covers. Therefore, the joint-nesting behavior was possibly benefit from bet-hedging strategies in the fluctuating environment. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-07-01T08:12:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2002 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Chapter 1 The Source population of Taiwan yuhinas (Yuhina brunneiceps)in a sub-tropic fragmented habitat………………………………………………………1 Abstract………………………………………………………2 中文摘要………………………………………………………3 Introduction………………………………………………………4 Materials and Methods………………………………………………………5 Results………………………………………………………8 Discussion………………………………………………………10 Literature Cited………………………………………………………12 Figures………………………………………………………17 Tables………………………………………………………27 Appendix………………………………………………………29 Chapter 2 The Costs and Benefits of Joint-Nesting Type Cooperative Breeding of Taiwan Yuhinas (Yuhina brunneiceps) ……………………………………………………34 Abstract………………………………………………………35 中文摘要………………………………………………………36 Introduction………………………………………………………37 Materials and Methods………………………………………………………40 Results………………………………………………………42 Discussion………………………………………………………47 Literature Cited………………………………………………………52 Figures………………………………………………………62 Tables………………………………………………………75 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 梅峰地區冠羽書眉合作生殖之生態研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Ecology of Cooperative Breeding Taiwan Yuhinas (Yuhina brunneiceps)in Mayfeng Areas | en |
dc.date.schoolyear | 90-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.relation.page | 84 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生命科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 動物學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 動物學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
沒有與此文件相關的檔案。
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。