Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 食品科技研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74155
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor蔣丙煌
dc.contributor.authorPin-Wei Taien
dc.contributor.author戴品維zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T08:22:10Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-18
dc.date.copyright2019-08-18
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.submitted2019-08-13
dc.identifier.citation張永生, 靳慧慧, 江方, 劉媛, 與王豔萍. (2017). 酶解工藝對燉煮風味雞肉香精特徵香味的影響. 食品研究與開發, 15, 68-77.
Agirrezabal-Telleria, I., Guo, Y., Hemmann, F., Arias, P. L., & Kemnitz, E. (2014). Dehydration of xylose and glucose to furan derivatives using bifunctional partially hydroxylated MgF2 catalysts and N2-stripping. Catal. Sci. Technol., 4(5), 1357-1368.doi:10.1039/c4cy00129j
Ajandouz, E. H., & Puigserver, A. (1999). Nonenzymatic Browning Reaction of Essential Amino Acids: Effect of pH on Caramelization and Maillard Reaction Kinetics. J. Agric.Food. Chem, 47(5), 1786-1793.
Anuar, M. A. K., Narashid, N. H. N., Salleh, M. M., & Yahya, A. (2017). Conversion of chicken viscera into protein hydrolysate for palatant production. Malaysian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 13(3), 606-611.
Arias-Moscoso, J. L., Maldonado-Arce, A., Rouzaud-Sandez, O., Márquez-Ríos, E., Torres-Arreola, W., Santacruz-Ortega, H., Gaxiola-Corté, M. G., & Ezquerra-Brauer, J. M. (2014). Physicochemical Characterization of Protein Hydrolysates Produced by Autolysis of Jumbo Squid (Dosidicus gigas) Byproducts. Food Biophysics, 10(2),145-154.doi:10.1007/s11483-014-9374-z
Arihara, K., Zhou, L., & Ohata, M. (2017). Bioactive Properties of Maillard Reaction Products Generated From Food Protein-derived Peptides. Adv Food Nutr Res, 81, 161-185.doi:10.1016/bs.afnr.2016.11.005
Bohak, Z. (1969). Purification and characterization of chicken pepsinogen and chicken pepsin. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 244(17), 4638-4648.
Byrne, D. V., Bredie, W. L. P., Mottram, D. S., & Martens, M. (2002). Sensory and chemical investigations on the effect of oven cooking on warmed-over flavour development in chicken meat. Meat Sci, 61, 127-139.
Cai, L., Li, D., Dong, Z., Cao, A., Lin, H., & Li, J. (2016). Change regularity of the characteristics of Maillard reaction products derived from xylose and Chinese shrimp waste hydrolysates. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 65, 908-916.doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2015.09.007
Cao, W., Zhang, C., Hong, P., & Ji, H. (2008). Response surface methodology for autolysis parameters optimization of shrimp head and amino acids released during autolysis. Food Chem, 109(1), 176-183. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.11.080
Carine, H., Marcel, H., Boniface, Y., & Emile, F. (2014). Effect of packaging on the microbiological quality of chicken and fish viscera flour. Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci., 3(10), 233-242
Cerny, C. (2007). Origin of carbons in sulfur-containing aroma compounds from the Maillard reaction of xylose, cysteine and thiamine. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 40(8),1309-1315. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2006.09.008
Cerny, C. (2015). The role of sulfur chemistry in thermal generation of aroma. In Flavour Development, Analysis and Perception in Food and Beverages (pp. 187-210).
Cerny, C., & Briffod, M. (2007). Effect of pH on the Maillard Reaction of [13C5]Xylose, Cysteine, and Thiamin. J Agric Food Chem, 55, 1552-1556.
Cerny, C., & Guntz-Dubini, R. (2013). Formation of cysteine-S-conjugates in the Maillard reaction of cysteine and xylose. Food Chem, 141(2), 1078-1086.doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.04.043
Chen, M., Chen, X., Nsor-Atindana, J., Masamba, K. G., Ma, J., & Zhong, F. (2017). Optimization of key aroma compounds for dog food attractant. Animal feed science and technology, 225, 173-181.doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.12.005
Chiang, J. H., Loveday, S. M., Hardacre, A. K., & Parker, M. E. (2018). Effects of enzymatic hydrolysis treatments on the physicochemical properties of beef bone extract using endo- and exoproteases. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 54(1), 111-120. doi:10.1111/ijfs.13911
Crévieu-Gabriel, I., Gomez, J., Caffin, J. P., & Carré, B. (1999). Comparison of pig and chicken pepsins for protein hydrolysis. . Reproduction Nutrition Development, 39(4), 443-454.
Cui, H., Jia, C., Hayat, K., Yu, J., Deng, S., Karangwa, E., Duhoranimana, E., Xia, S., & Zhang, X. (2017). Controlled formation of flavor compounds by preparation and application of Maillard reaction intermediate (MRI) derived from xylose and phenylalanine. RSC Adv., 7(72), 45442-45451. doi:10.1039/c7ra09355a
Damle, M., Harikumar, P., & Jamdar, S. (2010). Chicken intestine: A source of aminopeptidases. ScienceAsia, 36, 137-141.
Di Donfrancesco, B., Koppel, K., Swaney-Stueve, M., & Chambers, E. (2014). Consumer Acceptance of Dry Dog Food Variations. Animals (Basel), 4(2), 313-330.doi:10.3390/ani4020313
Donfrancesco, B. D. (2007). Sensory analysis and acceptability of pet food. Department of Food, Nutrition, Dietetics and Health College of Human Ecology.
Dong, X.-b., Li, X., Zhang, C.-h., Wang, J.-z., Tang, C.-h., Sun, H.-m., Jia, Wei., Li, Yin., & Chen, L.-l. (2014). Development of a novel method for hot-pressure extraction of protein from chicken bone and the effect of enzymatic hydrolysis on the extracts. Food chemistry, 157, 339-346. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.02.043
dos Santos Aguilar, J. G., de Souza, A. K. S., & de Castro, R. J. S. (2019). Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Chicken Viscera to Obtain Added-Value Protein Hydrolysates with Antioxidant and Antihypertensive Properties. International Journal of Peptide Research and Therapeutics. doi:10.1007/s10989-019-09879-3
Echavarría, A. P., Pagán, J., & Ibarz, A. (2012). Melanoidins Formed by Maillard Reaction in Food and Their Biological Activity. Food Engineering Reviews, 4(4), 203-223.doi:10.1007/s12393-012-9057-9
Fan, M., Xiao, Q., Xie, J., Cheng, J., Sun, B., Du, W., Wang, Y., & Wang, T. (2018). Aroma Compounds in Chicken Broths of Beijing Youji and Commercial Broilers. J Agric Food Chem, 66(39), 10242-10251. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.8b03297
Feng, L., Qiao, Y., Zou, Y., Huang, M., Kang, Z., & Zhou, G. (2014). Effect of Flavourzyme on proteolysis, antioxidant capacity and sensory attributes of Chinese sausage. Meat Sci, 98(1), 34-40.doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.04.001
Gasser, U., & Grosch, W. (1990a). Primary odorants of chicken broth. Zeitschrift für Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und Forschung, 190(1), 3-8.
Gasser, U., & Grosch, W. (1990b). Primary odorants of chicken broth. Zeitschrift für Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und Forschung, 190(3-8).
Graf, E., & Panter, S. (1991). Inhibition of warmed‐over flavor development by polyvalent cations. Journal of food science, 56(4), 1055-1058.
Guo, X., Tian, S., & Small, D. M. (2010). Generation of meat-like flavourings from enzymatic hydrolysates of proteins from Brassica sp. Food chemistry, 119(1), 167-172.doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.05.089
Hofmann, T., & Schieberle, P. (1998). Quantitative Model Studies on the Effectiveness of Different Precursor Systems in the Formation of the Intense Food Odorants 2-Furfurylthiol and 2-Methyl-3-furanthiol. J Agric Food Chem, 46, 235-241.
Hou, L., Xie, J., Zhao, J., Zhao, M., Fan, M., Xiao, Q., Liang, J., & Chen, F. (2017). Roles of different initial Maillard intermediates and pathways in meat flavor formation for cysteine-xylose-glycine model reaction systems. Food chemistry, 232, 135-144.doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.03.133
Houpt, K. A., & Smith, S. L. (1981). Taste preferences and their relation to obesity in dogs and cats. The Canadian Veterinary Journal, 22(4), 77-81.
Hrckova, M., Rusnakova, M., & Zemanovic, J. (2002). Enzymatic hydrolysis of defatted soy flour by three different proteases and their effect on the functional properties of resulting protein hydrolysates. Czech journal of food sciences, 20(1), 7-14.
Imm, J. Y., & Lee, C. M. (1999). Production of Seafood Flavor from Red Hake (Urophycis chuss) by Enzymatic Hydrolysis. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 47(6),2360-2366.
Jamdar, S. N., & Harikumar, P. (2005). Autolytic degradation of chicken intestinal proteins. Bioresour Technol, 96(11), 1276-1284. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.10.014
Jamdar, S. N., & Harikumar, P. (2008). Radiation decontamination of poultry viscera. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 77(4), 467-472. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2007.07.004
Jayasena, D. D., Ahn, D. U., Nam, K. C., & Jo, C. (2013a). Factors affecting cooked chicken meat flavour: a review. World's Poultry Science Journal, 69(3), 515-526.doi:10.1017/s0043933913000548
Jayasena, D. D., Ahn, D. U., Nam, K. C., & Jo, C. (2013b). Flavour chemistry of chicken meat: a review. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci, 26(5), 732-742. doi:10.5713/ajas.2012.12619
Kechaou, E. S., Dumay, J., Donnay-Moreno, C., Jaouen, P., Gouygou, J. P., Berge, J. P., & Amar, R. B. (2009). Enzymatic hydrolysis of cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) and sardine (Sardina pilchardus) viscera using commercial proteases: effects on lipid distribution and amino acid composition. J Biosci Bioeng, 107(2), 158-164. doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2008.10.018
Kerler, J., & Grosch, W. (1997). Character impact odorants of boiled chicken: changes during refrigerated storage and reheating. Zeitschrift für Lebensmitteluntersuchung und-Forschung A, 205(3), 232-238.
Komata, Y. (1969). The taste and constituents of foods. Nippon Shokuhin Kogyo Gakkaishi, 3,26.
Koppel, K., Adhikari, K., & Di Donfrancesco, B. (2013). Volatile Compounds in Dry Dog Foods and Their Influence on Sensory Aromatic Profile. Molecules, 18(3), 2646-2662.doi:10.3390/molecules18032646
Koppel, K., Gibson, M., Alavi, S., & Aldrich, G. (2014). The Effects of Cooking Process and Meat Inclusion on Pet Food Flavor and Texture Characteristics. Animals, 4(2), 254-271.doi:10.3390/ani4020254
Lapena, D., Vuoristo, K. S., Kosa, G., Horn, S. J., & Eijsink, V. G. H. (2018). Comparative Assessment of Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Valorization of Different Protein-Rich Industrial Byproducts. J Agric Food Chem, 66(37), 9738-9749.
doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.8b02444
Laroque, D., Inisan, C., Berger, C., Vouland, É., Dufossé, L., & Guérard, F. (2008). Kinetic study on the Maillard reaction. Consideration of sugar reactivity. Food chemistry, 111(4), 1032-1042. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.05.033
Lasekan, A., Abu Bakar, F., & Hashim, D. (2013). Potential of chicken by-products as sources of useful biological resources. Waste Manag, 33(3), 552-565.doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.08.001
Li, H. (2014). Development of a preference ranking procedure with dogs Department of Food, Nutrition, Dietetics and Health College of Human Ecology.
Lian, P. Z., Lee, C. M., & Park, E. (2005). Characterization of Squid-Processing Byproduct Hydrolysate and Its Potential as Aquaculture Feed Ingredient. J Agric Food Chem, 53, 5587-5592.
Lin, Y. L., Tai, S. Y., Chen, J. W., Chou, C. H., Fu, S. G., & Chen, Y. C. (2017). Ameliorative effects of pepsin-digested chicken liver hydrolysates on development of alcoholic fatty livers in mice. Food Funct, 8(5), 1763-1774. doi:10.1039/c7fo00123a
Liu, J., Liu, M., He, C., Song, H., & Chen, F. (2015). Effect of thermal treatment on the flavor generation from Maillard reaction of xylose and chicken peptide. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 64(1), 316-325.doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2015.05.061
Martins, S. I. F. S., Jongen, W. M., & Van Boekel, M. A. (2001). A review of Maillard reaction in food and implications to kinetic modelling. Trends in food science & technology, 11(9-10), 364-373.
Martins, S. I. F. S., Leussink, A., Rosing, E. A. E., Desclaux, G. A., & Boucon, C. (2010). Meat Flavor Generation in Complex Maillard Model Systems. In Controlling Maillard Pathways To Generate Flavors (pp. 71-83).
Melton, S. L. (1999). Current status of meat flavor. In Quality attributes of muscle foods (pp. 115-133): Springer.
Merz, M., Appel, D., Berends, P., Rabe, S., Blank, I., Stressler, T., & Fischer, L. (2015).
Batch-to-batch variation and storage stability of the commercial peptidase preparation Flavourzyme in respect of key enzyme activities and its influence on process reproducibility. European Food Research and Technology, 242(7), 1005-1012.doi:10.1007/s00217-015-2606-8
Merz, M., Eisele, T., Berends, P., Appel, D., Rabe, S., Blank, I., Stressler, T., & Fischer, L. (2015). Flavourzyme, an Enzyme Preparation with Industrial Relevance: Automated Nine-Step Purification and Partial Characterization of Eight Enzymes. J Agric Food Chem, 63(23), 5682-5693. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.5b01665
Meynier, A., & Mottram, D. S. (1995). The effect of pH on the formation of volatile compounds in meat-related model systems. Food chemistry, 52, 361-366.
Modi, V. K., Linforth, R., & Taylor, A. J. (2008). Effect of pH and water activity in Generation of Selected Meat Aroma Compounds in a Meat Model System. American Journal of Food Technology, 3(2), 68-78.
Morioka, K., Fujii, S., Itoh, Y., Liu, C., & Obatake, A. (1999). Recovery of Amino Acid from the Protein in the Head and Viscera of Frigate Mackerel by Autolysis. Fisher Science, 65(4), 588-591.
Mottram, D. S. (1994). Flavor compounds formed during the Maillard reaction. In ACS symposium series.
Mottram, D. S. (1998). Flavour formation in meat and meat products: a review. Food chemistry,62(4), 415-424.
Murray, S. M., Patil, A. R., Fahey Jr, G. C., Merchen, N. R., & Hughes, D. M. (1997). Raw and rendered animal by-products as ingredients in dog diets. Journal of animal science, 75(9), 2497-2505.
Nchienzia, H. A., Morawicki, R. O., & Gadang, V. P. (2010). Enzymatic hydrolysis of poultry meal with endo- and exopeptidases. Poult Sci, 89(10), 2273-2280.doi:10.3382/ps.2008-00558
Nielsen, P. M., Petersen, D., & Dambmann, C. (2001). Improved method for determining food protein degree of hydrolysis. Journal of food science, 66(5), 642-646.
Nikolaev, I. V., Sforza, S., Lambertini, F., Ismailova, D. Y., Khotchenkov, V. P., Volik, V. G., Dossena, A., Popov, V. O., & Koroleva, O. V. (2016). Biocatalytic conversion of poultry processing leftovers: Optimization of hydrolytic conditions and peptide hydrolysate
characterization. Food Chem, 197(Pt A), 611-621. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.10.114
Nilsang, S., Lertsiri, S., Suphantharika, M., & Assavanig, A. (2005). Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of fish soluble concentrate by commercial proteases. Journal of Food Engineering, 70(4), 571-578. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.10.011
Nogata, Y., & Nagamine, T. (2009). Production of Free Amino Acids and γ-Aminobutyric Acid by Autolysis Reactions from Wheat Bran. J Agric Food Chem, 57, 1331-1336.
Normah, I., & Noorasma, M. (2018). Flavor improvement of mud clam (Polymesoda erosa) hydrolysate by using Maillard reaction. International Food Research Journal, 25(3), 1146-1152.
Ovissipour, M., Rasco, B., Shiroodi, S. G., Modanlow, M., Gholami, S., & Nemati, M. (2013). Antioxidant activity of protein hydrolysates from whole anchovy sprat (Clupeonella engrauliformis) prepared using endogenous enzymes and commercial proteases. J Sci Food Agric, 93(7), 1718-1726. doi:10.1002/jsfa.5957
Perez-Alvarez, J. A., Sendra-Nadal, E., Sanchez-Zapata, E. J., & Viuda-Martos, M. (2010). Poultry flavour: General aspects and applications. 2, 339-357.
Raju, A. A., Rose, C., & Rao, N. M. (1997). Enzymatic hydrolysis of tannery fleshings using chicken intestine proteases. Animal feed science and technology, 66(1-4), 139-147.
Rathina Raj, K., & Mahendrakar, N. S. (2010). Effect of ensiling and organic solvents treatment on proteolytic enzymes of layer chicken intestine. J Food Sci Technol, 47(3), 320-324.doi:10.1007/s13197-010-0051-z
Rathinaraj, K., Sakhare, P. Z., Sachindra, N. M., & Mahendrakar, N. S. (2009). Effect of Ensilaging and Organic Solvent Treatment on Activity of Proteases from Chicken Intestine. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 3(5), 783-788. doi:10.1007/s11947-009-0293-9
Rivera, J. A., Sebranek, J. G., Rust, R. E., & Tabatabai, L. B. (2000). Composition and protein fractions of different meat by-products used for petfood compared with mechanically separated chicken (MSC). Meat Science, 55(1), 53-59.
Rufián-Henares, J. A., & Pastoriza, S. (2016). Maillard Reaction. In Encyclopedia of Food and Health (pp. 593-600).
Ryan, D., Shellie, R., Tranchida, P., Casilli, A., Mondello, L., & Marriott, P. (2004). Analysis of roasted coffee bean volatiles by using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1054(1-2), 57-65. doi:10.1016/s0021-9673(04)01408-6
Seong, P. N., Cho, S. H., Park, K. M., Kang, G. H., Park, B. Y., Moon, S. S., & Ba, H. V. (2015). Characterization of Chicken By-products by Mean of Proximate and Nutritional Compositions. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour, 35(2), 179-188.doi:10.5851/kosfa.2015.35.2.179
Shi, H., & Ho, C.-T. (1994). The flavour of poultry meat. In Flavor of meat and meat products (pp. 52-70): Springer.
Sun, H.-M., Wang, J.-Z., Zhang, C.-H., Li, X., Xu, X., Dong, X.-B., Hu, Li., & Li, C.-H. (2014). Changes of Flavor Compounds of Hydrolyzed Chicken Bone Extracts during Maillard Reaction. Journal of food science, 79(12), C2415-C2426. doi:10.1111/1750-3841.12689
Sun, W., Zhao, M., Cui, C., Zhao, Q., & Yang, B. (2010). Effect of Maillard reaction products derived from the hydrolysate of mechanically deboned chicken residue on the antioxidant, textural and sensory properties of Cantonese sausages. Meat Sci, 86(2),
276-282. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.04.014
Tan, T. C., Abbas, F. M. A., & Azhar, M. E. (2012). Characterization of the ribose-induced maillard reaction in minced chicken and minced pork: a potential means of species differentiation. International Food Research Journal, 19(2), 481-489.
Thombre, A. G. (2004). Oral delivery of medications to companion animals: palatability considerations. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 56(10), 1399-1413.doi:10.1016/j.addr.2004.02.012
Thompson, A. (2008). Ingredients: where pet food starts. Top Companion Anim Med, 23(3), 127-132. doi:10.1053/j.tcam.2008.04.004
Toldrá, F., Mora, L., & Reig, M. (2016). New insights into meat by-product utilization. Meat Science, 120, 54-59.doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.021
Van Ba, H., Hwang, I., Jeong, D., & Touseef, A. (2012). Principle of Meat Aroma Flavors and Future Prospect. In Latest Research into Quality Control. Van Boekel, M. A. (2006). Formation of flavour compounds in the Maillard reaction. Biotechnol Adv, 24(2), 230-233. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2005.11.004
Vikman, M., Siipola, V., Kanerva, H., Slizyte, R., & Wikberg, H. (2017). Poultry By-products as a Potential Source of Nutrients. Advances in Recycling and Waste Management.doi:10.4172/2475-7675.1000142
Wang, R., Yang, C., & Song, H. (2012). Key meat flavour compounds formation mechanism in a glutathione–xylose Maillard reaction. Food chemistry, 131(1), 280-285.doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.08.079
Wang, Y. Q., Ye, D. Q., Zhu, B. Q., Wu, G. F., & Duan, C. Q. (2014). Rapid HPLC analysis of amino acids and biogenic amines in wines during fermentation and evaluation of matrix effect. Food chemistry, 163, 6-15.
Whiteside, C. H., & Prescott, J. M. (1962). Activities of Chicken Pancreatic Proteinases Toward Synthetic Substrates. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, 110(4), 741-744.
Xiao, Z., Wu, M., Niu, Y., Chen, F., Zhang, X., Zhu, J., Song, S., & Zhu, G. (2015). Contribution of chicken base addition to aroma characteristics of Maillard reaction products based on gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, electronic nose, and statistical analysis. Food Science and Biotechnology, 24(2), 411-419.doi:10.1007/s10068-015-0054-7
Xu, Q., Liu, J., Song, H., Zou, T., Liu, Y., & Zhang, S. (2013). Formation mechanism of volatile and non-volatile compounds in peptide–xylose Maillard reaction. Food Research International, 54(1), 683-690. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2013.07.066
Zhou, Y.-Y., Li, Y., & Yu, A.-N. (2016). The effects of reactants ratios, reaction temperatures and times on Maillard reaction products of the L-ascorbic acid/L-glutamic acid system. Food Science and Technology, 36(2), 268-274. doi:10.1590/1678-457x.02415
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74155-
dc.description.abstract雞肉為全球動物性蛋白質來源,需求量逐年上升,也產生更多的副產物,即雞內臟。目前,常通過一些加工方式來增加雞內臟的利用性,如作為寵物食品、風味添加劑等。風味之組成包括味道與氣味,兩者皆為生產風味添加劑必須考量之重點。雞內臟富含蛋白質,且含有動物體內本身的酵素,可以透過自體酵素來進行水解,但受限於微生物的生長,相關研究仍甚少。本研究透過調整 pH 及溫度來優化自體水解的能力,於 pH 8及50oC下水解 4 小時能達到約 39% 水解率,再搭配添加商業用風味酶 (Flavourzyme), 可以進一步提高水解率至 41.96% - 46.50%,改善風味。水解後,本研究透過梅納反應生成揮發性成份,藉由額外添加木糖與前述水解物進行反應,於 420 nm 吸光值觀察不同木糖濃度及反應時間對梅納反應程度的影響,最後選定處理條件為添加 15% 木糖 於 95oC 下加熱 3 小時。本研究以 SPME-GC-MS 進行分析,比較梅納反應前後揮發性成分的變化,發現透過梅納反應可使揮發性物質含量上升至少五倍,產生 Furan 及 Aldehyde 等香氣成分。綜合以上加工及分析結果,透過自體水解及梅納反應的加工,能使雞內臟的風味更佳且氣味更豐富,可以提升雞內臟作為風味添加劑的潛力。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractChicken is a global source of animal protein. The demand is increasing year by year. Consequently, more by-product, such as chicken viscera would yield. Chicken viscera can be processed by various methods to produce pet foods or
flavoring additives. The organoleptic property of so called flavoring additive includes taste and aroma. Both of them are important and must to be considered when producing flavoring additives.
Chicken viscera is rich in protein. It also contains enzymes which originally exist in its digestive system. These enzymes can be used for hydrolysis, called autolysis. However, growth of microorganism during autolysis is often a problem, which limits the hydrolysis time. In this study, the condition of autolysis of chicken viscera was optimized by adjusting pH and temperature. Results showed that the degree of hydrolysis (DH%) could reach 39% at pH 8 and 50oC by autolysis for 4 h. By adding commercial protease, Flavourzyme, DH% could be further increased to 41.96% - 46.50% which may improve the flavor and change the content of free amino acid. To generate the volatile compounds after
hydrolysis, Maillard reaction was used with addition of xylose. The proper processing conditions for Maillard reaction is addition of 15% xylose and heating for 3 h at 95oC. We used SPME-GC-MS to analyze and compare the changes of volatile compounds before and after Maillard reaction. It was found that the content of volatile compounds increased at least five times by Maillard reaction, and the aroma compounds such as furan and aldehyde were produced. Based on the aforementioned results, we can induce that the chicken viscera can be made more flavorful and diverse by autolysis and Maillard reaction, and improve the potential of chicken viscera as a raw material for manufacturing flavoring additive.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T08:22:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-108-R06641027-1.pdf: 3773214 bytes, checksum: 1ae60646df6954195b7a542b6d2e4112 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2019
en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝...i
摘要...ii
Abstract...iii
目錄...iiv
圖次...vi
表次...viii
縮寫表...iix
壹、前言... 1
貳、文獻整理... 2
一、雞肉加工副產物... 2
二、自體水解... 5
三、風味物質... 10
四、味道... 11
五、肉品氣味... 13
參、實驗架構... 25
肆、材料與方法... 26
一、實驗材料... 26
二、實驗方法... 28
伍、結果與討論... 36
一、不同 pH 及溫度之自體水解對於水解率變化之影響 ... 36
二、添加不同濃度 Flavourzyme 對於水解率之影響... 38
三、自體水解 1 ~ 4 小時對於水解率變化之影響... 40
四、自體水解 20 ~ 100 分鐘對於水解率變化之影響... 42
五、不同時間點添加 1% Flavourzyme 對於水解率之影響... 44
六、於自體水解開始 20 分鐘後添加 1% Flavourzyme 行水解 1 ~ 4 小時對於水解率變化之影響... 45
七、不同時間點添加 0.1% Flavourzyme 對於水解率變化之影響... 48
八、於自體水解開始 40 分鐘後添加 0.1% Flavourzyme,水解 1 ~ 4 小時對於水解率變化之影響... 50
九、於不同時間添加不同濃度 Flavourzyme 對於水解率變化之影響... 52
十、添加不同木糖濃度及不同加熱時間對梅納反應程度之影響... 54
十一、不同加工處理對於樣品中游離胺基酸含量變化之影響... 57
十二、不同水解條件處理對樣品中總胺基酸含量之影響... 62
十三、不同加工處理對樣品中揮發性成分含量之影響... 65
十四、透過水解及梅納反應處理,分析風味並研擬一套加工流程... 75
陸、總結論... 79
柒、參考文獻... 80
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject風味zh_TW
dc.subject雞內臟zh_TW
dc.subjectSPME-GC-MSzh_TW
dc.subjectFlavourzymezh_TW
dc.subject梅納反應zh_TW
dc.subject自體水解zh_TW
dc.subjectFlavourzymeen
dc.subjectSPME-GC-MSen
dc.subjectMaillard reactionen
dc.subjectAutolysisen
dc.subjectFlavoren
dc.subjectChicken visceraen
dc.title以雞內臟為原料利用酵素水解及梅納反應生產風味物質zh_TW
dc.titleProduction of flavoring ingredient by enzyme hydrolysis and Maillard reaction of chicken visceraen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear107-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳政雄,蔡國珍,陳錦樹
dc.subject.keyword風味,雞內臟,自體水解,Flavourzyme,梅納反應,SPME-GC-MS,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordFlavor,Chicken viscera,Autolysis,Flavourzyme,Maillard reaction,SPME-GC-MS,en
dc.relation.page87
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201903126
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2019-08-14
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept食品科技研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:食品科技研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-108-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
3.68 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved