請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71222完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 蔡博文(Tsai Bor-wen) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dylan Simon Hunziker | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 胡德倫 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T04:59:26Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2018-08-01 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-01 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2018-07-26 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Chinese Language Sources
Bao, Zhenghao (2009). Yuanzhuminxiang lifa weiyuan de daibiao qu xiang yu wen zheng xingwei: 1993-2008 zhi falu tian neirong fenzi. [Representative Orientations and Representation Behaviors of Taiwan’s Indigenous Legislators: A content Analysis of the Bills Proposed bwteen 1993-2009]. Xuanju Yanjiu, 16: 95-129. 包正豪（2009）原住民籍立法委員的代表取向與問政行為：1993-2008 之法律提案內容分 析，選舉研究，16：95-129。 Cai, Zhonghan (2011). Ameizu chuantong shehui zuzhi yu caichanzhi [Amis Traditional Society and Property System]. Taiwan Yuanzhumin Yanjiu Xuebao, 1(3) 1-17. 蔡中涵(2011) 阿美族傳統社會組織與財產制，台灣原住民族研究學報, 1 ( 3) 1-17。Chen, Jun Nan (2008). Ameizu yanjiu wenxian huigu, [Literature Review on the Amis]. Taiwan Yuanzhumin Yanjiu Lunye, 4:135 160. 陳俊男 （2008）阿美族研究文獻回顧， 台灣原住民研究論叢, 4:135-160。 Chen Wende (2011). Wenhua Fuzhen? Wenhua chuangzao? Yi kadibu (zhiben) beinanren weilei. [Cultural Rebirth? Cultural Construction? A case study of Katadibul]. Taidong Wenxian, Fukan 17: 3-39. 陳文德(2011)。文化復振？文化創造？以卡地布（知本）卑南人為例, 臺東文獻，復刊17: 3-39。 Council of Indigenous People (2016). Yuanzhumin renkou tongji ziliao. [Indigenous people population data]. (2016/12/21). 行政院原住民族委員會 (2016).原住民人口數統計資料. (http://www.apc.gov.tw/ portal/docList.html?CID=940F9579765AC6A0) (2016/12/21)。 Council of Indigenous People (2016). Yuanzhumin tudi huo buluo fanwei tudi banshefa shuomingshu [Indigenous land or tribal area drafting law explanation. 原住民族民委員會 (2017） 原住民族土地或部落範圍土地劃設辦法總說明. APC. https://www.apc.gov.tw/portal/docDetail.html?CID=3552F8D90DBCC5DB&DID=0C3331F0EBD318C2DF0C65401047342B (2/12/2018)。 Guan Da Wei, Lin Yi Ren (2008). Shenme Chuantong? Shei de lingyu? Cong taiyazu maliguang liuyu chuantong diaocha jingyan tan kongjian zhishi de zhuannshe. [What Tradition? Whose Territory? Using Atalyal Meiguang traditional territory investigation to discussion the transformation of spatial knowledge]. Kaogu renlei xuebao, 69: 109-141. 官大偉,林益仁 (2008) 什麼傳統？誰的領域？ 從泰雅族馬里光流域傳統領域調查經驗談 空間知識的轉譯，考古人類學報， 69：109-141。 Huang, Xuanwei (2005). Yi zu guan,diyuxing chabei yu lishi- ameizu yanjiu lunwenji [Different Ethnic Views, Territorial Differences and History- Amis Research Collection]. Taibei: Zhongyanyanjiuyuan minzu xuebao yanjiusuo. 黃宣衛 (2005) 異族觀、地域性差別與歷史-阿美族研究論文集, 台北：中央研究院民族學研究 所。 Huang Ya Hong (2012). Yuanzhumin chuantong lingyu quan? Guiojia de Lingyuquan chongtong: [Yichang duihua de qishi. Indigenous Territory Rights?] Wenhua Yanjiu Shuang YueDao 132: 69-87. 黃雅鴻（2012）原住民傳統領域權？國家的領域權傳統？：一場對話的啟示，文化研究雙月報 132：69-87 Jiang, Kuangshan (2015). Taidongxiang Luye Xiang Yongchang Buluo wenshi ziliao zhaunji [Taidong County, Luye Township, Yongchang Tribe History Collection].姜柷山（2015）台東縣鹿野鄉永昌部落文史資料專輯。 文化部出版。 Kazao Lamulu, Cai Bowen (2017). Yuanzhuminqu de nongye fazhan tiaoshi: yi bunongzu wangxiang buluo weilei. [Indigenous Area’s Agricultural Development Adaptaion: Using Bunong Wangxiang Tribe as an example]. Minzu, Dili yu Fazhan. Taibei: Zhongyang Yanjiu Minzuxue yanjiusuo, shunyi Taiwan yuanzhumin bowuguan zhubian. 卡造藍姆路，蔡博文（2017）原住民區的農業發展調適： 以布農族望鄉部落為例，民族，地理與發展。 台北：中央研究民族學研究所，順益台灣原住民博物館主編。 Lingmu, Zuo Tailing 1988 (1932) Taiwan no fanzu yanjiu (fuke). [Taiwan’s Indignous Research Reproduction]. Taibei: Nantian shuju (Taiwan xiangkan hanghui). 鈴木作太郎 1988（1932）臺灣の蕃族研究（複刻）， 台北：南天書局（臺灣史 籍刊行會）。 Liu, Dekai (2008) Bei Jiangou de chuantong lingyu kongjian –Skadang yu Xoxos buluo gean yanjiu. [The Constructed Traditional Territories of Indigenous Peoples-A Case of Skadang and Xoxos Communities]. Guoli Taiwan Daxue Shuoshi Lunwen. 劉得楷（2008）被建構的傳統領域空間-Skadang 與 Xoxos 部落的個案研究，國立台灣大學碩士論文。 Lin, Yiren (2017). Huashe chuantong lingyu vs. siyou chanquan baozhang: tuogou zhaochu lu.[Drafting traditional territory vs. the promise of private property rights] Baodaozhe. 林益仁 (2017). 劃設傳統領域 vs.私有產權保障：脫鉤找出路. 報道者https://www.twreporter.org/a/opinion-indigenous-areas-private-property-right (2018/06/14) Luo, Su Mei. (2015). Huangjing yu fazhan de wenhua zhengzhi:Taiwan ameizu dulan buluo de chuantong lingyu kangzheng.[The Cultural Politics of Enviromental and Developmental Alternatives Social Struggle on Traditional Territory in ‘Tolan, Amis] Taiwan shehui yanjiu jikan 羅素玫 (2015) 環境與發展的文化政治：台灣阿美族都蘭部落的傳統領域抗爭, 台灣社會研究季刊 , 98: 239 – 257 Luo, Su Mei (2010). Wenhua renting, shengtai chongtu tu zuqun guanxi: you ameizu dulan buluo de chuantong lingyu lunshu tanqi. [Cultural Identity, Ecological Conflict and Ethnic Relations: Discourse on the Traditional Territory by the 'Amis of 'Tolan]. 羅素玫(2010)文化認 同、生態衝突與族群關係：由阿美族都蘭部落的傳統領域論述談起，考古人類學刊，72：1-33. Root Law (2017). Yuanzhuminzu tudi buluo fanwei tudi huashe banfa (2017). [Indigenous tribal land scope drafting regulations]. Root Law.Root Law (2017). 原住民族土地或部落範圍土地劃設辦法 (2017). Root Law.http://www.rootlaw.com.tw/LawArticle.aspx?LawID=A040350000004600-1060218 (2018/06/14) Wang, Ming Hui (2003). Yuanzhumin zizhidu yanjiu guihua weituo yanjiu chengguobao baogao.[Indigenous people system research results report]. Taibei shi: Xingzheng yuan yuanzhuminzu meiyuanhui weituo, Taiwan yuanzhuminzu zhengci xiehui zhexing. 汪明輝 （ 2003） 原住民族自治制度研究規劃委託研究成果報告書， 台北市：行政院原 住民族委員 會委託，台灣原住民族政策協會執行. English Language Sources Arrigo, L.G., J. Si and Si M. (2002) A minority within a minority: Cultural. survival on Taiwan’sorchid island, Cultural Survival Quarterly 26(2): on-line version. Retrieved 8 May 2018, from Website: http://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/arrigo/minority-within-minority-cultural-survival-taiwans-o Barrett, R. E. (1982) Dependency Theory and Taiwan: Analysis of a Deviant Case. Chicago Journals, 87(5): 1064–1089.Bernstein, Henry (1971) Modernization theory and the sociological study of development. The Journal of Development Studies, 7(2) 141-160.Blaser, Mario (2016) On exceeding baroque excess: An exploration through a participatory community workshop. In John Law & Evelyn Ruppert (eds). Modes of Knowing: Resources from the Baroque. Manchester: Mattering Press. 59-83. Blaser, Mario (2004) Life projects: Indigenous people’s agency and development, In Blaser M., Feit, H., and McRae, G.,(eds), In the way of development: indigenous peoples, life projects, and development: Zed Books, New York, 26-45. Brown, G. and Kytta, M. (2014) Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS. Applied Geography, 46: 122-136. Chen, Y.F. (2004) Power, knowledge and education: The politics of resource management in Makao National Park, Taiwan, in R.W. Herber (ed.), Issues in aboriginal/ minority education: Canada, China, Taiwan, Indigenous Studies Research Centre, First Nations University of Canada, Regina, Saskatchewan, 183– 206. Cheng, T.J., Haggard, S. and Kang, D. (1998) Institutions and growth in Korea and Taiwan: The bureaucracy, Journal of Development Studies, 34(6): 87–111Chi, C.-C. (2001) Capitalist expansion and indigenous land rights: Emerging environmental justice issues in Taiwan. The Asia PacificJournal of Anthropology, 2(2):135–153. Corbett, J. and Keller, P., (2005). An analytical framework to examine empowerment associated with participatory geographic information systems (PGIS). Cartographica, 40 (4), 91-103.Conroy, G.C., Anemone, R.L., Regenmorter, J.V., & Addison, A. (2008) Google Earth, GIS, andthe Great Divide: A new and simple method for sharing paleontological data. Journal of Human Evolution, 55:751–755. Cooper, F. and Randall P. (2005) The History and Politics of Development Knowledge. In the anthropology of development and globalization. In: Edelman, M and Haugerud A. (eds.) From Classical Political Economy to Contemporary Neoliberalism, Malden, Mass. : Wiley-Blackwell, 126-139.89 Cunningham, G. and A. Mathie (2002) From clients to citizens: Asset-based community development as a strategy for community-driven development. Proceedings of Asset-Based Community Development (ABCD) Workshop, 21 February 2002, Bangkok, Thailand. Escobar, Arturo (1995) Encountering Development. The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press. Farraro, Vincent (1996). Dependency theory: An introduction. Mount Holyoke College Publications, South Hadley, MA, USA.Feit, Harvey (2004). James bay crees’ life projects and politics: histories of place, animal partners and enduring relationships.. In Blaser M., Feit, H., and McRae, G.,(eds), In the way of development: indigenous peoples, life projects, and development ; Zed Books, New York,, 92-110. Ganapati, S., 2010. Public participation geographic information systems: a literature survey. In: Reddick, C.G. (Ed.), Comparative E-Government. Integrated Series in Information Systems, (25)Springer ScienceþBusiness Media, LLC. Geertman, S. (2002) Participatory planning and GIS: A PSS to bridge the gap. Environmental and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29:21-35.Goodchild, M.F. (2008) The use cases of digital earth. International Journal of Digital Earth, 1(1): 31–42Harris, T. M. and Weiner, D. (2002) Implementing a community-integrated GIS: Perspectives from South African fieldwork. In Craig, W.J., Harris, T.M. and Weiner, D. (eds.) Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems, London: Taylor and Franci , 246-258. Haynes, Jeffery (2005). Development Studies. McMillian: New York. Hette, B. (2009). Thinking about development. Development Matters. Zed Books. New York, New York.Hettne, B. (1993) Ethnicity and development: An Elusive relationship. Contemporary South Asia, 2(2). 123-149. Hipwell, W.T. (2007) Taiwan aboriginal ecotourism: Tanay-iku natural ecology park. Annals of Tourism Research, 34(4): 876–897. Hipwell, W. (2009) “ An asset approach to indigenous development in taiwan”. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 50(3), 289-206. Hipwell, W.T. (2009b) Environmental conflict and democracy in Bella Coola: Political ecology on the margins of Industria, In L.E. Adkins (ed.), Environmental conflict and democracy in Canada, Vancouver and Toronto: UBC Press, 140–158.Hipwell, W.T., J.Y. Battiste, Y.-F. Chen et al. (2008) The aboriginal sustainability network: Post-worksho preport. Taiwan Journal of International Studies, 1(1):107–167.90 Hovorka D. and Auerbach, N (2010) The generative potential of participatory geographic information systems, in Tojo Thatchenkery, David L. Cooperrider, Michel Avital (ed.) Positive Design and Appreciative Construction: From Sustainable Development to Sustainable Value (Advances in Appreciative Inquiry, Volume 3) Emerald Group Publishing Limited: 157 - 173. . Huang, C. (2010) Language revitalization and identity politics: An examination of riraya reclamation in Taiwan. University of Florida, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Jarvis, K. A. and Stearman, A. M. (1995) Geomatics and political empowerment: The Yuqui. Cultural Survival Quarterly, 18:59-61 Kampe, K. (1997) What does foreign aid for education contribute to the maintenance of indigenous knowl-edge in Laos, Thailand and Vietnam? Asia Pacific View-point, 38(2): 155–160. Kemp, W. B. and Brooke, L. F. (1995) Towards information sufficiency. Cultural Survival Quarterly, 18:25-28Kwan, Mei-po (2003). Is GIS for Women? Reflections on Critical Discourse in the 1990s. Gender, Place, and Culture, 9(3):271-279. Laituri, M. (2003). The issue of access: an assessment guide for evaluating public participation geographic information science case studies. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association,15, 25–31. McGregor, D. (2004). Traditional ecological knowledge and sustainable development: towards coexistence. In Blaser M., Feit, H., and McRae, G.,(eds), In the way of development: indigenous peoples, life projects, and development ; Zed Books, New York, 72-91. Nieuwkoop, M. and Uquillas, J. (2000) Defining ethnodevelopment in operational terms : lessons from the Ecuador indigenous and Afro-Ecuadoran peoples development project. Latin America and Caribbean Region sustainable development working paper ;. Washington, D.C. : The World Bank., 6. Poole, P. (1995) Indigenous peoples, mapping, and biodiversity conversation: An analysis of current activities and opportunities for applying geomatics technologies, Biodiversity Support Program Discussion Paper Series, Washington, D.C: WWF. Rostow, W. W. (1960). The stages of economic growth: A non-Communist manifesto. CambridgeEngland: University Press. Rundstrom, R.A. (1995) GIS, indigenous peoples, and epistemological diversity. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 22, 45-57. Sasaki T (2015) Revival of tradition in a Taiwanese aborigines’ community by means of a community development process-from a perspective of agent/agency. Intentional Journal of Social Science, 5(6):566–571. Shalom, P. (2006) Theory gets real, and the case for a normative ethic: Rostow, modernization theory, and the alliance for progress. International Studies Quarterly, 50(2), 287–311.91 Simon, S. (2005) Scarred landscapes and tattooed faces: Poverty, identity and land conflict in a Taiwanese indigenous community, in Eversole R., McNeish J.A., and Cimadamor, A.D., (eds.), Indigenous peoples and poverty: An international perspective, Zed Books, London, 53–68. Simon, S. (2006) Taiwan’s indigenized constitution: What place for aboriginal Formosa? Taiwan International Studies Quarterly, 2(1): 251–270. Simon, S.. (2007). Paths to autonomy: Aboriginality and the nation in Taiwan. In Harrison M. and Stome C. (eds), The Margins of Becoming. Identity and Culture in Taiwan, Harrassowitz Verlag, Wiesbaden, 221-240. Stavenhagen, R. (1986), “Ethnodevelopment: a neglected dimension in development thinking”, in Apthorpe, R.J. and Kra ́hl, A. (eds),Development Studies: Critique and Renewal, E.J. Bril, Leiden, 71-94. Tai, H.S. (2007) Development through conservation: An institutional analysis of indigenous community-based conservation in Taiwan. World Development, 35(7):1186–1203. Tang, C.P. and S.Y. Tang (2001) Negotiated autonomy: Trans-forming self-governing institutions for local common-pool resources in two tribal villages in taiwan. Human Ecology, 29(1): 49–67. Tsai B.W., Chang C.Y., Liu C.C, Lo Y. (2006) Public participation geographic information system and indigenous society: New partnership of indigenous peoples in Taiwan. Geography Research Forum, 26, 152-163. Weiner, D., Harris, T. M., and Craig, W. (2002) Community participation and geographic information systems. In Craig, W.J., Harris, T.M. and Weiner, D. (eds.) Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems, Taylor and Francis, 3-16. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/71222 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 台灣早期傳統領域調查被視為民族發展學的經典範例，意指利用土地調查和地圖設計來培育原住民部落以及重建當地傳統文化。台灣政府期望將傳統領域調查運用在更多現今的原住民部落，因此，原民會於民國 106 年開始以經濟補助的方式，鼓勵原住民部落進行傳統領域的調查。然而，此政策卻引發新的問題，以往台灣進行 PPGIS 的宗旨為「以原住民的心，做原住民的事」，而今似乎被傾向解讀為「以公部門的錢，做原住民的事」。 本研究以台東縣鹿野鄉的 U-rekat （永昌部落）之傳統領域調查為例，試圖更了解國家政策和經費提供是如何影響PPGIS 與原住民部落的發展過程。本研究發現，雖然 PPGIS協助部落繪製傳統領域地圖，但國家力量介入部落的同時，也把漢族的強勢文化、知識與官僚系統，帶入原住民的社群中，使得族人難以掌控部落的自治，以致失去部落培力的主導權。本研究提出 PPGIS 作為原住民部落與國家政策的橋樑，提供民族發展學新的討論。政府如何提供資金又不影響原住民的部落主導權，為本文的核心關懷。藉由參與觀察、半結構訪談等共 8 月的田野工作，試圖解構由上而下的國家力量與漢人中心主義，而不是將原住民社群全然地納入政府管理制度中。唯有了解草根民主的需求，並在公共參與的過程尋求共識的可能。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Taiwan’s early Traditional Territory PPGIS are some of the finest examples of Ethnodevelopment, in which communities used traditional mapping as a means of empowering communities and reclaiming culture. It is no surprise then that the government of Taiwan should try to replicate such success stories and in 2016, the Council of Indigenous People began offering funds to tribes to map their traditional territory. However, this raises interesting concerns; in the past PPGIS was done “For indigenous, by indigenous”; now, it is “for indigenous, by the government”. This research seeks to understand how state support influences the PPGIS process. To help solve these questions, a case study will be carried out in U-rekat, an Amis village located in Taitung County. The research found that even though PPGIS was able to help the tribe produce maps of their traditional territory, the government involvement and legal backing forced the tribe to confirm tribal notions bureaucratic norms, which led to a loss of local ownership and a lack of empowerment. This research suggests that ethnodevelopment may be best left to grassroots organizations, and not a tool to be used by the state. Recommendations to the Council of Indigenous People are also included. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T04:59:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R05228024-1.pdf: 3035872 bytes, checksum: 3e9b051863108b954aaec60ebb4fce1e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Introduction 1
Background and Motivation 1 1.2 Research Objectives 3 1.3 Thesis Overview 4 1.4 Research Questions 5 Chapter 2 Literature Review 6 2.1 Traditional Development 6 2.2 Ethnodevelopment 10 2.3 Public Participation Geographic Information Systems 14 2.4 Taiwanese Aboriginal Traditional Territory 16 Chapter 3 Research Methods 18 3.1 Site of Study: U-rukat Tribe 18 3.2 The Amis 22 3.3 Interviews 25 3.4 Participant Observation 26 3.5 Public Participation Geographic Information Systems 27 Chapter 4 Ethnography 29 4.1 Pre-Workshop Preparation 29 4.3 A Move to Interviews 39 4.4 A Return to PPGIS 45 4.5 The Roots Trip 48 4.6 The Project Concludes 50 Chapter 5 Discussion 52 5.1 The Function of Cultural Traits 52 5.2 The Clash of Cultural Values and Bureaucratic Norms 56 5.3 The Desires of the Tribe 60 Chapter 6 The Maps 65 Chapter 7 Answering of Research Questions 68 7.1. How Does State Involvement Influence Traditional Territory Research? 68 7.2 How does this “legally sanctioned PPGIS” challenge the notion of PPGIS as a form of Ethnodevelopment: 72 Chapter 8 Conclusion 74 8.1 Suggestions for Policy Makers 74 8.2 Suggestions for Future Research 76 8.3 Limitations 77 8.4 Closing Statement 79 References 80 Chinese Language Sources 80 English Language Sources 83 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 傳統領域 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 台灣原住民 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 原民會 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 民族發展 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | PPGIS | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | PPGIS | en |
| dc.subject | Ethnodevelopment | en |
| dc.subject | Traditional Territory | en |
| dc.subject | Taiwanese Indigenous People | en |
| dc.title | 民族發展與國家執行PPGIS的相互作用 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | When Cash Meets Cartography: The Interaction of Ethnodevelopment and State Sponsered PPGIS | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 盧道杰(Lu Dao Jie),張長義(Zhang Chang Yi) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | PPGIS,民族發展,傳統領域,台灣原住民,原民會, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | PPGIS,Ethnodevelopment,Traditional Territory,Taiwanese Indigenous People, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 86 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201801940 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2018-07-26 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 地理環境資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 地理環境資源學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-107-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.96 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。