請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70198
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 明居正(Chu-cheng Ming) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chih-chiang Lee | en |
dc.contributor.author | 李志強 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T03:48:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-26 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-02-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-01-23 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 壹、中文部分
王建勛,1984,〈中美洲及加勒比海情勢之檢討與展望〉,《問題與研究》,第23卷第4期,頁57-65。 朱浤源,1999,《撰寫博碩士論文實戰手冊》,臺北:正中書局。 何元圭,1989,《美國與格瑞那達關係之研究:1983年美國軍事干預格瑞那達事件》,文化大學碩士論文。 明居正,2013,《大美霸權的浮現:後冷戰時期大國政治的邏輯》,台北:五南圖書出版公司。 林立樹,1999,《美國通史》,台北:五南圖書出版公司。 林享能,1985,〈軍事干涉格瑞那達之法理問題〉,《問題與研究》,第24卷第12期,頁66-77。 徐恒淑,1983,〈美國出兵格瑞那達與黎巴嫩之剖析〉,《東方雜誌》,復刊第17卷第6期,頁55-58。 區鉅龍,1982,〈雷根政府重振「實力外交」的構想與目標〉,《中華戰略學刊》,21卷7期,頁43-52。 張亞中,2008,《小國崛起:轉捩點上的關鍵抉擇》,台北:聯經。 陳小雀,2007,《加勒比海諸國史》,台北:三民。 陳弘基,1983,《蘇聯拉丁美洲政策之研究(1970-1983)》,淡江大學歐洲研究所碩士論文。 葉志誠、葉立程,1999,《研究方法與論文寫作》,臺北:商鼎文化 葉超明,1983,〈美國為何出兵格瑞那達〉,《夏聲雜誌》,第228期,頁6-8。 趙明義,1983,〈美、俄對抗的戰略架構與政策取向評估〉,《復興崗學報》,第30期,頁87-110。 劉天均,1984,〈格瑞那達問題-「鄉土社會主義」的悲劇〉,《問題與研究》,第23卷第6期,頁68-79。 黔人,1983,〈格瑞那達政變與俄古陰謀〉,《共黨問題研究》,頁54-61。 貳、西文部分 Adkin, Mark. 1989. Urgent Fury: The Battle for Grenada. London: Leo Cooper. Alexander, Shery. 1988. “The OECS: The Grenada Experience and Beyond.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 2(2): 34-44. Anderson, James Herbert. 1993. National Decisionmaking and Quick-Strike Interventions during the 1980s: A Comparative Analysis of Operation Urgent Fury, El Dorado Canyon and Just Cause. Ph.D. dissertation, Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University. Archer, Ewart. 1985. “Gairyism, Revolution and Reorganization: Three Decades of Turbulence in Grenada.” Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 23(2) (1985): 91-111. Ayres, B. Drummond, Jr. 1983. “Grenada Invasion: A Series of Surprises”, New York Times, November 14, 1983. Bartilow, Horace. 1997. The Debt Dilemma: IMF Negotiations in Jamaica, Grenada, and Guyana. London: Macmillan. Beinart, Peter. 2010. “Think Again: Ronald Reagan.” Foreign Policy. http://foreignpolicy.com/2010/06/07/think-again-ronald-reagan. Brizan, George. 1998. Grenada: Island of Conflict. London: Macmillan. Carothers, Thomas. 1991. In the Name of Democracy: U.S. Policy toward Latin America in the Reagan Years. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Cole, Ronald H. 1997. Operation Urgent Fury: The Planning and Execution of Joint Operations in Grenada. Washington, DC: Joint History Office, Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Cotman, John Walton. 1992. Cuba and the Grenada Revolution: The Impact and Limits of Cuban International Aid Programs. Ph.D. dissertation, Boston University. Crandall, Russell. 2006. Gunboat Democracy: U.S. Interventions in the Dominican Republic, Grenada, and Panama. Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Dam, Challis. 1992. Urgent Fury: Rational Action or Bureaucratic Politics Run Amok? Washington, DC: National War College. Dam, Kenneth. 1983. Confidential Memorandum to President Ronald Reagan, The White House, “Meeting with Prime Minister Maurice Bishop of Grenada,” June 7, 1983, Department of State 8317648. Davidson, Scott. 1987. Grenada: A Study in Politics and the Limits of International Law. Aldershot, Surry: Avebury. Davis, Anne Marie. 1994. “United States Foreign Policy Objectives and Grenada’s Territorial Integrity.” The Journal of Negro History 79(1): 94-99. Deibel, Terry L. 1986. “Why Reagan Is Strong.” Foreign Policy 62: 108-125. Department of Defense Appropriations: Hearing before the Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Ninety-Eighth Congress, first session, Nov. 8, 1983. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Desjeans, Mary and Peter Clement. 1987. “Soviet Policy toward Central America.” Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science 36(4): 223-234. Dougherty, James E. and Robert L. Pfaltzgraff, Jr. 2000. Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey, Fifth Edition. New York: Longman. Gilmore, William. 1984. The Grenada Intervention: Analysis and Documentation. London: Mansell. Grenada documents: an overview and selection. Washington: Departments of State and Defense, 1984. Grenada War Powers: Full Compliance Reporting and Implementation, markup before the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, first session, Oct 27, 1983. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Griffith, Ivelaw L. 1996. Caribbean Security on the Eve of the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University. Harper, Gilbert S. 1990. Logistics in Grenada: Supporting No-Plan Wars. Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College. Hill, Charles. Secret memorandum for Mr. William P. Clark, The White House, ‘Subject: Visa for Prime Minister Maurice Bishop of Grenada.’ 18 May 1983, Department of State 8315359. P. 1. Hooker, Richard. 1991. “Presidential Decisionmaking and the Use of Force: Case Study Grenada”. Parameters 16(2): 61-72. Houghton, David Patrick. 2001. US Foreign Policy and the Iran Hostage Crisis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. James, Liam. “Report on Visit of Prime Minister to the USA,” The Grenada Documents Collection, Georgetown University Library, Special Collections, Box 3 Folder 43, “International Relations-United States of America,” 1. http://www.library.georgetown.edu/dept/speccoll/grenada.htp Karas, John M. and Jerald M. Goodman. 1984. The United States Action in Grenada: An Exercise in Realpolitik. The University of Miami Inter-American Law Review 16(1): 53-108. Kenworthy, Eldon. 1984. “Grenada as Theater.” World Policy Journal 1(3): 635-651. Kinzer, Stephen. 2013. “30 Years on: The Legacy of Reagan’s Invasion of Grenada.” Aljazeera, October 25, 2013. http://america.aljazeera.com/article/2013/10/25. Lessons Learned As A Result of the U. S. Military Operations in Grenada: Hearing before the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, Ninety Eighth Congress, Second Session, Jan 24, 1984. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Lewis, Patsy. 1999. “Revisiting The Grenada Invasion: The OECS’ Role, and Its Impact on Regional and International Politics.” Social and Economic Studies 48(3): 85-120. Lewis, Patsy. 2002. Surviving Small Size: Regional Integration in Caribbean Ministates. Kingston, Jamaica: University of West Indies Press. Loeber, Dietrich Andre. 1987. “Insights into Soviet Treaty Practice: The Secret Soviet-Grenadian Military Agreements of 1980-1982.” New York Law School Journal of International and Cooperative Law 8(2): 297-316. Marcus, Bruce and Michael Taber (eds.). 1983. Maurice Bishop Speaks: The Grenada Revolution and Its Overthrow, 1978-83. New York: Pathfinder Press. Meeks, Brian. 1993. Caribbean Revolutions and Revolutionary Theory: An Assessment of Cuba, Nicaragua and Grenada. London: Verso. Miller, Nicola. 1989. Soviet Relations with Latin America, 1959-1987. London: Cambridge University Press. Neumann, Iver B. and Sieglinde Gstohl. 2006. “Lilliputians in Gulliver’s World? Small States in International Relations,” in Christine Ingebritsen, Iver Neumann, Sieglinde Gstohl, and Jessica Beyer (eds.), Small States in International Relations. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, pp. 3-36. Nossiter, Bernard. 1983. “Grenada Premier Establishes ‘Some Sort’ of U.S. Rapport.” New York Times, June 10, 1983, A8. Organization of Easter Caribbean States Request for U.S. Assistance in Grenada. 1983. American Foreign Policy Current Documents, Document 656, 1397-98. Ortiz, Frank. 1979. Confidential telegram to secretary of state, “Subject: Grenada: Situation Report Twelve Forty-Five Local,” 131954Z, March 13, 1979, 1. Ortiz, Frank. 1979. Confidential telegram to secretary of state, “Subject: Grenada Coup,” 141945Z, March 14, 1979, 1. Pastor, Robert A. 1986. Does the United States Push Revolution to Cuba? The Case of Grenada. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 28(1): 1-34. Payne, Anthony. 1990. “The Foreign Policy of the People’s Revolutionary Government,” in Jorge Heine (ed.). A Revolution Aborted: The Lessons of Grenada. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Perkins, Willaim Eric. 1985. ‘Requiem for Revolution: Perspective in the U.S./OECS Intervention in Grenada’, Contributions in Black Studies 7(2): 3-21. Reagan. Ronald, 2007. The Reagan Diaries, edited by Douglas Brinkley. New York: HarperCollins Publishers. Rosenfeld, Stephen S. 1986. “The Reagan Doctrine: The Guns of July,” Foreign Affairs 64(4): 698-714. Russell, Lee and Albert Mendez. 1985. Grenada 1983. London: Osprey Publishing Ltd. Sandford, Gregory and Richard Vigilante. 1984. Grenada: The Untold Story. New York: Madison Books. Scott, James. 1996. Deciding to Intervene: The Reagan Doctrine and American Foreign Policy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Shearman, Peter. 1985. “The Soviet Union and Grenada under the New Jewel Movement.” International Affairs 61(4): 661-673. Sim, Richard and James Anderson. 1980. “The Strategic Vacuum.” Conflict Studies 121: 1-24. Sunshine, Catherine A. 1996. The Caribbean: Survival, Struggle and Sovereignty. Washington, DC: EPICA. Sutton, Paul. 1983. “Black Power in Trinidad and Tobago: The Crisis of 1970. “Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 21(2): 115-132. The Situation in Grenada: Hearing before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate. Ninety Eighth Congress, first session, Oct. 27, 1983. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Thorndike, Tony. 1985. Grenada: Politics, Economics and Society. London: Pinter Publisher. Thornton, Richard C. 2008. “Grenada Preemptive Strike.” Journal of Military and Strategic Studies 11(1 and 2): 1-42. Tonelson, Alan. 1985. “The Real National Interest.” Foreign Policy 61: 49-72. U.S. Military Actions in Grenada: Implications for U.S. Policy in the Eastern Caribbean, Hearing before the Subcommittee on International Security and Scientific Affairs and on Western Hemisphere Affairs of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives, Ninety-Eighth Congress, first session, Nov. 2, 3, and 16, 1983. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. United States Policy Toward Grenada: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Inter-American Affairs of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives. Ninety Seventh Congress, second session. June 15, 1982. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Valenta, Jiri and Herbert J. Ellison (eds.). 1986. Grenada and Soviet/Cuban Policy: Internal Crisis and U.S./OECS Intervention. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Williams, Gary, 2002. “Brief Encounter: Grenadian Prime Minister Maurice Bishop’s Visit to Washington.” Journal of Latin American Studies 34(3): 659-685. Williams, Gary, 2007. US-Grenada Relations: Revolution and Intervention in the Backyard. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Zunes, Stephen. 2003. “The US Invasion of Grenada,” Foreign Policy In Focus, https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/155-history /25966.html?tmpl | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70198 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 美國於1983年對格瑞那達發動「緊急狂暴行動」(Operation Urgent Fury),美國當時為世界兩強之一,卻去攻打格瑞那達這樣的蕞爾小國,彷彿大人打小嬰兒般,此實相當特殊。
回顧過去探討美國「緊急狂暴行動」的文獻,多數將重點放在美國為何軍事打擊格瑞那達,並以美國的行為作為研究主軸,而非將重點放在格瑞那達為何被美國軍事打擊,且現有文獻亦多忽略格瑞那達的內在因素,且未就格瑞那達的內、外在因素如何交錯影響去做研析。 本文以格瑞那達作為個案研究,分析格瑞那達在1983年為何遭受美國軍事打擊。以格瑞那達自1974年獨立至1983年10月遭美國軍事打擊這段期間作為研究範圍,依格瑞那達在這期間所發生的五個重大事件作為分水嶺,並分別探討各階段其「內在因素」與「外在因素」兩個面向互動之情形,分析格瑞那達為何遭到美國的軍事打擊。 本研究分析認為格瑞那達因內部無法團結合作,導致外國勢力容易介入,並在美蘇博弈遊戲中,被迫扮演棋子角色;另外,格瑞那達左派政府視美國為主要的威脅,加強武裝防衛卻造成區域軍事失衡,而緊急狂暴行動是格瑞那達內、外在因素交錯影響的結果。 小國面對大國,大國永遠以自身利益優先,小國只是大國的棋子,格瑞那達當時的遭遇殊值其他小國借鏡。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The United States of America launched “Operation Urgent Fury” against Grenada in 1983. As one of the two super powers at that time, the U.S. attacked the very tiny state. It was very bizarre for the U.S. to do so, like a grown man beating a baby.
Upon reviewing the literature relating to “Operation Urgent Fury”, most literature focused on the attacker, the U.S., analyzing why the U.S. launched the attack, rather than on Grenada. Moreover, others ignored the internal factors of Grenada as well as the interaction of the internal and external factors of Grenada. This thesis is a case study on Grenada between 1973 and 1983, analyzing why Grenada was attacked by the U.S. in 1983 through understanding the interaction of the internal and external factors of Grenada. That period of time is broken down into five phrases for the convenience of study. The thesis concludes that due to lack of cohesion in Grenada, the external factors can have easy access to interact with the internal factor. Grenada is played as a chess piece by both the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. The left-wing government of Grenada considers the U.S. as a threat, acquiring weapon for self-defense, which creates military imbalance in the region. The Operation Urgent Fury is the result of the interaction of the internal and external factors of Grenada. Small states are played as pawns in big states' games. Big states are always ready to sacrifice the pawns to put their interest ahead. That is an unfortunate reality, but all the small states need to be cautiously aware. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T03:48:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-P02322002-1.pdf: 2396513 bytes, checksum: 384a38f385bcd00599023b520c9a27bd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書……………………………………………………. I
謝辭…………………………………………………………………. II 中文摘要……………………………………………………………. III 英文摘要……………………………………………………………. IV 第一章 緒論…………………………………………………. 1 第一節 研究動機與問題意識………………………………. 1 第二節 相關文獻分析………………………………………. 5 第三節 研究範圍與限制……………………………………. 19 第四節 研究途徑、方法與架構…………………………….. 20 第二章 格瑞那達第一次左傾(1979年3月)……………… 25 第一節 格瑞那達脫離英國獨立……………………………. 25 第二節 格瑞那達第一次左傾………………………………. 33 第三節 小結…………………………………………………. 43 第三章 格瑞那達的政治立場逐漸向極左移動(1979年3月 -1983年5月)….…………………………………...45 第一節 格瑞那達的政治立場逐漸向極左移動…………45 第二節 蘇古集團及美國對格瑞那達的算計………………50 第三節 格瑞那達興建薩利內斯角機場……………………61 第四節 格瑞那達的政治立場為何逐漸向極左移動……68 第五節 小結…………………………………………………. 71 第四章 格瑞那達試圖右轉(1983年5月)…...……………… 73 第一節 格瑞那達右轉之嘗試………………………………. 73 第二節 畢夏普嘗試右轉之原因……………………………. 78 第三節 畢夏普美國行的影響………………………………. 87 第四節 小結…………………………………………………. 91 第五章 探討格瑞那達第二次左傾(1983年10月)….…….. 93 第一節 格瑞那達內部發生危機……………………………. 93 第二節 格瑞那達內部發生危機的原因…………………….101 第三節 格瑞那達第二次左傾的影響……………………...107 第四節 小結…………………………………………………. 114 第六章 格瑞那達被美國軍事打擊(1983年10月25日)…… 115 第一節 美國「緊急狂暴行動」…………………………… 115 第二節 蘇古集團為何未出兵相援格瑞那達……………125 第三節 美國為何軍事打擊格瑞那達……………………… 127 第四節 格瑞那達被美國軍事打擊的影響…………………135 第五節 小結…………………………………………………. 141 第七章 結論…………………………………………………. 143 第一節 研究發現……………………………………………. 143 第二節 結論及其他小國可借鏡之處……………………… 151 第三節 後續研究建議………………………………………. 156 參考文獻……………………………………………………………. 157 附錄一 畢夏普「不在別人的後院」演講稿………………… 165 附錄二 OECS請美國出兵協助之英文信函……………….. 171 附錄三 格瑞那達總督致巴貝多總理之英文信函…………. 174 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 格瑞那達為何遭到美國軍事打擊:內外因素之互動,1974-1983 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Why Grenada Was Attacked by the United States of America: The Interaction of Its Internal And External Factors, 1974-1983 | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 包宗和(Tzong-ho Bau),王政(Cheng Wang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 大國,小國,緊急狂暴行動,冷戰,蘇聯,古巴,格瑞那達, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | big state,small state,Operation Urgent Fury,cold war,U.S.S.R.,Cuba,Grenada, | en |
dc.relation.page | 174 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201800125 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-01-23 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 政治學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.34 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。