請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/68929完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳彥元(Yen-Yuan Chen) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pei-Zu Wu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 吳沛儒 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T02:42:38Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-09-12 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2017-09-12 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2017-08-16 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Harden RM, Stevenson M, Downie WW, Wilson GM (1975). Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination. Br Med J, 1(5955): 447–451.
2. 張上淳, 賴鴻緒 (2009): 高階OSCE的使用價值與改進. 台灣醫學會教育演講. 3. Huddle TS and Heudebert, GR (2007). Viewpoint: Taking Apart the Art: The Risk of Anatomizing Clinical Competence; Academic Medicine, Vol. 82, No. 6. 4. ACGME competencies: suggested best methods for evaluation; ACGME/ABMS Joint Initiative, Attachment/Toolbox of Assessment Methods, Version 1.1 September 2000. Retrieved from https://www.partners.org/Assets/Documents/Graduate-Medical-Education/ToolTable.pdf [Accessed: July 25, 2017] 5. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Outcome project, toolbox of assessment methods; ACGME/ABMS Joint Initiative Toolbox of Assessment Methods; Version 1.1 September 2000. Retrieved from http://njms.rutgers.edu/culweb/medical/documents/ToolboxofAssessmentMethods.pdf [Accessed: July 25, 2017] 6. 蕭政廷 (2014): 台灣擬真醫學教育之發展與現況 The Development and Current Status of Simulation-based Medical Education in Taiwan. J-TSSH Vol. 1 No. 1 Pg.19. 7. 台灣麻醉醫學會: 擬真情境考試. Retrieved from http://www.anesth.org.tw/news/content.asp?ID=215 [Accessed: July 25, 2017] 8. 台灣安寧緩和醫學學會:安寧緩和醫學專科醫師甄審辦. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/M113-%E5%B0%88%E7%A7%91%E9%86%AB%E5%B8%AB%E7%94%84%E5%AF%A9%E8%BE%A6%E6%B3%951041121.pdf [Accessed: July 25, 2017] 9. 台灣安寧緩和醫學學會 106 年度安寧緩和醫學專科醫師甄審簡章. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/106%E5%B9%B4%E5%B0%88%E7%A7%91%E9%86%AB%E5%B8%AB%E7%94%84%E5%AF%A9%E7%B0%A1%E7%AB%A0%20(2).pdf [Accessed: July 25, 2017] 10. Huang YS, Liu M, Huang CH, Liu KM (2007). Implementation of an OSCE at Kaohsiung Medical University. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, Vol 23,No 4. 11. Chu TS, Weed HG, Yang PC (2009). Recommendations for Medical Education in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc, Vol 108, No 11. 12. Miller GE (1990). The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med, 65 (9):63–7. 13. Wass V, Van der Vleuten C, Shatzer J, Jones R (2001). Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet, 357 (9260), pp. 945–949. 14. Adamo G (2003). Simulated and standardized patients in OSCEs: achievements and challenges 1992-2003. Medical Teacher, 25:3, 262-270. 15. Van der Vleuten CPM, Swanson DB (1990). Assessment of clinical skills with standardized patients: State of the art. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 2:2, 58-76. 16. Medical Council of Canada: The National Assessment Collaboration Examination – Scoring. Retrieved from http://mcc.ca/examinations/nac-overview/scoring/ [Accessed: July 25, 2017] 17. United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 Clinical Skills. Retrieved from http://www.usmle.org/step-2-cs/#scoring [Accessed: July 25, 2017] 18. Fowell SL, Maudsley G, Maguire P, et al. (2000). Student assessment in undergraduate medical education in the United Kingdom, 1998. Med Educ, 34 (Suppl 1): 1–49. 19. Onishi H, Yoshida I (2004). Rapid change in Japanese medical education. Med Teach, 26:403–8. 20. Vu N, Baroffio A, Huber P, et al. (2006). Assessing clinical competence: a pilot project to evaluate the feasibility of a standardized patient-based practical examination as a component of the Swiss certification process. Swiss Med Wkly, 136:392–9. 21. Omu A , Al-Azemi M, Omu F, Al-Harmi J, Diejomaoh M. (2016). Attitudes of Academic Staff and Students towards the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Creative Education, 7, 886-897. 22. Idris SA, et al. (2014). Students’ Perception of Surgical Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) at Final Year MBBS, University of Khartoum, Sudan. Medicine Journal, 1(1): 17-20. 23. Smith LJ, Price DA, Houston IB (1984). Objective structured clinical examination compared with other forms of student assessment. Arch Dis Child, 59:1173–1176. 24. Raheel H, Naeem N (2013). Assessing the objective structured clinical examination: Saudi family medicine undergraduate medical students’ perceptions of the tool. J Pak Med Assoc. 63:1281–zyr4. 25. Siddiqui FG (2001). Final year MBBS students’ perception for observed structured clinical examination. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 23(1):20–4. 26. Wolff MJ, et al. (2015). Objective Structured Clinical Examination as a Novel Tool in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Fellowship Education. Inflamm Bowel Dis, 21 (4), 759-765. 27. Nasir AA, et al. (2014). Medical Students' perception of objective structured clinical examination: a feedback for process improvement. J Surg Educ. 71(5):701-6. 28. Khairy GA (2004). Feasibility and acceptability of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for a large number of candidates: experiences at a university hospital. J Family Community Med. 11(2): 75–78. 29. Pierre RB, et al. (2004). Student evaluation of an OSCE in paediatrics at the University of the West Indies, Jamaica. BMC Medical Education, 4:22. 30. Ismail HM (2001). Views of undergraduate students on objective structured clinical examination in neurology: A preliminary report. J Family Community Med, 8(3): 79–82. 31. Critchley LAH, et al. (1995). An adaptation of the objective structured clinical examination to a final year medical student course in anaesthesia and intensive care. Anaesthesia, Volume 50, pages 354-358. 32. Bagri AS, et al. (2009). Geriatric Medicine Fellows' Experiences and Attitudes Toward an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Educational Gerontology, Vol. 35 , Iss. 4. 33. Labaf A, et al. (2014). Students' concerns about the pre-internship objective structured clinical examination in medical education. Education for Health, Vol. 27, Issue Number 2, pages 188-192. 34. Zyromnski NJ, et al. (2003). Surgery Residents' Perception of the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Current Surgery, 60 (5), 533-537. 35. Rees C, et al. (2002). Communication skills assessment: the perceptions of medical students at the University of Nottingham. Med Educ, 36(9):868-78. 36. National Taiwan University Hospital: Family Medicine Department Preface. Retrieved from https://www.ntuh.gov.tw/en/FM/Introduction/Preface.aspcx [Accessed: July 25, 2017] 37. National Taiwan University Hospital: Family Medicine Department Training Program. Retrieved from https://www.ntuh.gov.tw/en/FM/Introduction/Programs.aspx?PageView=Shared [Accessed: July 25, 2017] 38. 家庭醫學科專科醫師訓練計畫認定基準: 家庭醫學科專科醫師訓練課程基準 衛生福利部 104 年 3 月 27 日衛部醫字第 1041661972 號公告修正. Retrieved from https://www.tafm.org.tw/ehc-tafm/s/w/org/ruler_hospital [Accessed: July 25, 2017] 39. National Taiwan University Hospital: Family Medicine Department: Faculty. 呂碧鴻 Bee-Horng Lue, MD. Retrieved from https://www.ntuh.gov.tw/en/FM/FACULTY/Bee-Horng%20Lue.aspx [Accessed: July 25, 2017] 40. National Taiwan University Hospital: Family Medicine Department: Faculty. 王維典 Wei-Dean Wang, M.D. Ph.D.. Retrieved from https://www.ntuh.gov.tw/en/FM/FACULTY/Wei-Dean%20Wang.aspx [Accessed: July 25, 2017] 41. Wang WD, Yang PC, Chen CY, et al. (2004). Using senior residents as standardized patients for evaluating basic clinical skills of medical students. J Formos Med Assoc, 103:519–25. 42. Abdelkhalek N, Hussein A, Sulaiman N, Hamdy H (2009). Faculty as simulated patients (FSPs) in assessing medical students’ clinical reasoning skills. Educ Health J, 22(3):323. 43. Sibbald D (2001). Using First-Year Students as Standardized Patients for an Objective Structured Clinical Exam for Third-Year Pharmacy students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 65, 404-412. 44. Barman A (2005). Critiques on the Objective Structured Clinical Examination. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 34(8):478-482. 45. Ende J (1983). Feedback in clinical medical education. Journal of the American Medical Association, 250, 777-781. 46. Boehler ML, et al. (2006). An investigation of medical student reactions to feedback: A randomised controlled trial. Medical Education, 40, 746-749. 47. Quirk M, Letendre A (1986). Teaching communication skills to first year medical students. J Med Educ, 61:603–5. 48. 台灣醫學教育學會 (2017). 106 年第一次醫學臨床技能測驗（OSCE）應試簡章. Retrieved from https://www.cgh.org.tw/tw/content/depart/EDU/DL/edu_doc_16.pdf [Accessed: July 25, 2017] 49. Raupach T, et al. (2013). Summative assessments are powerful drivers of student learning than resource intensive teaching formats. BMC Medicine, 11:61. 50. Cioffi J (2001). Clinical simulations: development and validation. Nurse Education Today, 21, 477–486. 51. Huang YS, Liu M, Huang CH, Liu KM (2007). Implemenation of an OSCE at Kaohsiung Medical University. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, Vol 23, No 4. 52. Taiwan Medical Accreditation Council. Retrieved from http://www.heeact.edu.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=2139&CtUnit=1310&BaseDSD=7&mp=3 [Accessed: July 25, 2017] | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/68929 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 客觀結構式臨床測驗(OSCE)在各國家都被許多醫學教育學者所廣泛採用，作為評估醫學生臨床能力的方法。台灣考選部於2013年開始正式納入OSCE於醫師國家考試，醫學院畢業生必須先通過OSCE才能報考第二階段的國家醫師執照考試。此研究的目的是探討考生們對於OSCE作為臨床培訓和高階執照考試評估的態度。研究分析了88位家庭醫學科第一年住院醫師，在考完家醫科舉辦的OSCE後所填的回饋問卷。我們將問卷答案與考試成績進行了比較，計算Pearson相關係數和Spearman相關係數，以確定數據的線性關係，並應用多變數回歸分析。大多數的住院醫師都認同OSCE納入高階國家考試及專科醫師考試。他們對這種形式的考試方式也有正面的回應。然而，住院醫師的考試成績和他們對OSCE的接受度並沒有顯著關係。此研究結果為臨床醫學教育學者提供了有價值的資訊，旨在了解考生對OSCE的接受程度和意見。未來的研究可以進一步調查其他部門的住院醫師和已接受過國家考試舉辦的OSCE之住院醫師的態度。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) has been widely adopted by many medical educators as a method of evaluating clinical competence. Due to its comprehensive nature, it has been used as formative and summative examinations in medical curricula and sometimes as part of high-stakes license exams by many medical educators. In 2013, the OSCE was officially incorporated into Taiwan’s National Medical License Examination (NMLE). All medical students must pass the exam to obtain their medical license. The aim of this study is to explore the attitudes that medical learners have towards the OSCE as a choice of evaluation in their clinical training and licensure exams. Eighty-eight first year family medicine residents who underwent an OSCE in their clinical training answered a survey regarding their views towards this type of exam. Their answers were compared to their examination scores. Pearson correlation coefficient and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was calculated to determine the linear relationships of the data and multivariate regression analysis was applied. Most residents accept the inclusion of the OSCE in their license exam and subspecialty license exam. The residents also reflected positively on this form of examination. However, no significance was found between their exam scores and acceptance of the OSCE. In conclusion, OSCE is seen as a favorable method of examination by medical learners. These results provide valuable information for medical educators and researchers seeking to understand learners’ acceptance and views on the OSCE. Further investigation is needed to determine the attitudes of residents from other departments and those who have underwent the NMLE’s OSCE. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T02:42:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R03457011-1.pdf: 1162443 bytes, checksum: 3cab69d58540255e3815e5dc25b83f68 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Verification letter from the Oral Examination Committee ……………………..…...…..i
Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………….…..…….….ii Abstract in Chinese ……………………………………………………….……..….… iii Abstract in English ………………………………………………………..……..….….iv Chapter 1. Introduction ..…………………………………….…………….……...…..…1 1.1 Background ………………………………………….………................1 1.2 Problem Statement ………………………………….…….….…...........3 1.3 Purpose ………………………………………………………………...3 Chapter 2. Review of Literature and Conceptual Framework ……....………....….…….4 2.1 Definition of the Objective Structured Clinical Examination ……........5 2.2 Literature Review ……………………………….………………..........6 2.3 Implications for this Study …………………….…………….…..…….9 2.4 Research Question and Hypothesis ……………………….…………...9 Chapter 3. Methods …………………………………………….…………..…………..13 3.1 Study Setting and Subjects ………………………………..………….13 3.2 Study OSCE Design ………………………………………..………...14 3.3 Study Questionnaire Design ……………………………………….....15 3.4 Statistical Analysis ……………………………………………….…..16 Chapter 4. Results ……………………………..………………….……….……..…....18 Chapter 5. Discussion and Implications ………………………………….…….....…...23 5.1 Strengths and Limitations ………………………………….…….…...29 5.2 Conclusion and Suggestion for Further Research ………….….……..29 References ………………………………………………………......………..….….....30 Appendix A: Study Tables………………………………………………….…………..36 Appendix B: Study Questionnaire………………………………….………..…………44 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 家庭醫學科住院醫師對客觀結構式臨床測驗的態度 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Attitudes of Family Medicine Residents Toward the Objective Structured Clinical Examination | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 王維典(Wei-Dean Wang) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蔡詩力(Shih-Li Tsai) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 客觀結構式臨床測驗 (OSCE),國家考試,學習態度,住院醫師,家庭醫學科, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | objective structured clinical examination (OSCE),licensure exam,attitude,resident,family medicine, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 47 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201703710 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2017-08-16 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 醫學教育暨生醫倫理研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 醫學教育暨生醫倫理學科所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-106-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.14 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。