Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/67943Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 宋麗梅(Li-May Sung) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aarin Tirza Sirima | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 鄭愛琳 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T01:59:38Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-07-20 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2017-07-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2017-07-19 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Adelaar, K. Alexander. (1984). “Some Proto-Malayic affixes”, in Bijdragen tot de Taal,
Land- en Volkenkunde 140: 402–421. Adelaar, K. Alexander and Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds.) (2005). The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar. London: Routledge. Adriani, N. (1900). “De talen der To Bungku en To Mori” ‘The languages of the To Bungku and To Mori’. Mededeelingen van wege het Nederlandsche Zendelinggenootschap 44: 249–318. ______. (1931). Spraakkunst der Bare’e-taal ‘Grammar of the Bare’e language’. Bandoeng: Nix. Artawa, K. (1994). Ergativity and Balinese Syntax. PhD dissertation: La Trobe University Australia. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (2011). “Causatives which do not cause: non-valencyincreasing effects of a valency-increasing derivation”. In Language at Large. pp. 86-142. Arka, I Wayan. (2002). “Voice systems in the Austronesian languages of Nusantara: Typology, symmetricality and Undergoer orientation”. Paper presented at 10th National Symposium of the Indonesian Linguistics Society. Bali, Indonesia. Barsel, Linda. (1994). The Verb Morphology of Mori Sulawesi. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. Benjamin, Geoffrey. (1993). “Grammar and polity: the cultural and political background to Standard Malay.” In The Role of Theory in Language Description, Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 69, W. A. Foley (ed.) Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 341–392. Blust, Robert A. (2003). “Three notes on early Austronesian morphology”, in Oceanic Linguistics 42.2, pp. 438‐478. Bril, Isabelle. (2005). “Semantic and functional diversification of reciprocal and middle prefixes in New Caledonian and other Austronesian languages”, in Linguistic Typology. Berlin: De Gruyter, 9 (1), pp.25-75. Chelliah, Shobhana and Willem J. de Reuse. (2011). Handbook of Descriptive Linguistics. Springer Online. Cooreman, Ann. (1994). “A functional typology of antipassives”. In Voice: Form and Function, Fox, Barbara and Hopper, Paul (eds.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 49-88. Crouch, Sophie Elizabeth. (2009). Voice and verb morphology in Minangkabau, a language of West Sumatra, Indonesia. MA thesis: The University of Western Australia. Esser, Samuel and David Mead. (2011). Phonology and Morphology of Mori. SIL International. Evans, Bethwyn, and Malcolm Ross. (2001). “The history of Proto-Oceanic *ma-”, in Oceanic Linguistics 40: 269–90. Fagan, Sarah. (1992). The syntax and semantics of middle constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Jiang, Haowen. (2011). Middle Voice in Formosan Languages. Available online: http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~hj3/pub/middle_in_Formosan.pdf Huang, Shuping and Li-May Sung. (2008). “The undegoer focus ma- in Kavalan”, in Oceanic Linguistics Vol. 47 No.1. University of Hawaii. Available online: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/241053/pdf Kardana, I Nyoman. (2011). “Types of middle voice in Indonesian language”, in Jurnal Melayu Vol.7. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Available online: http://ejournal.ukm.my/jmelayu/article/view/5004 Karhunen, Marjo. (1994). “The noun phrase in Padoe”, in NUSA: Linguistic Studies of Indonesian and Other Languages in Indonesia, van den Berg (ed.) Jakarta: UNIKA Atma Jaya, pp. 17-47. Kaufman, Daniel. (2009). “On *pa‐, *pa<R>‐ and *pa<ŋ>‐”. ICAL 11 conference paper. Aussois, France. Kemmer, Suzanne. (1993). The Middle Voice. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ______. (1994). “Middle voice, transitivity, and the elaboration of events”. In Voice: Form and Function, Barbara A. Fox and Paul J. Hopper, (eds.) Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Liao, Hsiu-chuan. (2013). “Functions of Reflexes of PAn/PMP *maR- in Philippine Languages”, paper at the 23rd Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society (SEALS 23), Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. Handout available online:http://www.ling.nthu.edu.tw/faculty/hcliao/presentations/HD_HCLiao_reflexes%20of%20maR-%20in%20Phil%20lgs_05272013.pdf Maree, Rundell D. (2007). Ibatan: A grammatical sketch of the language of Babuyan Claro Island. Linguistic Society of the Philippines Special Monograph Issue, Number 53. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines. Mead, David. (1998). Proto-Bungku-Tolaki: reconstruction of its phonology and aspects of its morphosyntax. Ph.D dissertation: Rice University. ______. (1999). “Active, passive, and antipassive in Bungku-Tolaki Languages”. NUSA: Linguistic Studies of Indonesian and other Languages in Indonesia Vol. 45. Jakarta: UNIKA Atmajaya. ______. (2002). “Proto Celebic Focus Revisited” in The History and Typology of Western Austronesian Voice System, Wouk and Ross (eds.) Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. ______. (2003). “The Saluan-Banggai micro group of eastern Sulawesi” in Issues in Austronesian historical phonology, John Lynch (ed.) Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. ______. (2005). “Mori Bawah” (Grammar Sketch), in The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar, Adelaar and Himmelmann (eds.) NY: Routledge. ______. (2008). “When to use a genitive pronoun in Mori Bawah (Sulawesi, Indonesia)?” In Studies in Philippine Languages and Cultures 10-ICAL Pronoun Papers 2006. Muthalib, Abdul, Alimuddin, D.P, J.F Pattiasina. (1985). Kata tugas dalam Bahasa Tolaki ‘Function words in the Tolaki language’. Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa. Nagaya, Naonori. (2007). “The middle voice in Tagalog”, SEALS 17 conference paper. Maryland, College Park. Nurhayani, Ika. (2015). “Javanese and problems in the analysis of adversative passive” in Linguistik Indonesia Vol.33 No.2, Jakarta: Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia (Linguistics Society of Indonesia). Rau, D. Victoria and Maa-Neu Dong. (2006). Yami Texts with Reference Grammar and Dictionary. Language and Linguistics Monograph Series A-10. Taipei: Academia Sinica. Shibatani, Masayoshi. (2006). “On the conceptual framework for voice phenomena”, in Linguistics 44: 217-269. Shibatani, Masayoshi and Ketut Artawa. (2007). “The middle voice in Balinese”, in SEALS XIII: Papers from the 13th meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society Pacific Linguistics, S. Iwasaki, A. Simpson, P. Sidwell. Canberra: Australian National University. Shibatani, Masayoshi and Prashant Pardeshi. (2002). “The causative continuum”, in The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.) Typological studies in Language 48. Sneddon, James Neil. (2010). Indonesian: a comprehensive grammar second edition. London: Routledge. Sung, Li-May. (2006). “Verbal reflexives/reciprocals in (some) Formosan languages”. ICAL 10 conference paper. Palawan Philippines. Sung, Li-May and Chia-chi Shen. (2006) “Reciprocals in Kavalan and a Typological Comparison”. In Streams Converging into an Ocean: Festschrift in Honor of Professor Paul Jen-kuei Li on His 70th Birthday, Henry Y. Chang, Lillian M. Huang, and Dah-an Ho (eds.) Language and Linguistics Monograph Series. Taipei: Academia Sinica, pp. 239-277. Teng, Stacy Fang-ching. (2008). A Grammar of Puyuma, an Austronesian language of Taiwan. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. Udayana, I Nyoman. (2013). Voice and reflexives in Balinese. Ph.D dissertation: University of Texas, Austin. Vuorinen, Paula. (1995). “Person marking in Padoe”, in NUSA: Linguistic Studies of Indonesian and Other Languages in Indonesia, van den Berg (ed.) Jakarta: UNIKA Atma Jaya, pp. 97-121. Wouk, Fay and Malcolm Ross, eds. (2002). The history and typology of Western Austronesian voice systems. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. Zorc, David. (2005). “Aklanon tag‐ and Extra‐systemic Linguistic Phenomena”, in Current Issues in Philippine Linguistics and Anthropology: Parangal kay Lawrence A. Reid. Liao, Hsiu‐Chuan and Rubino, Carl Galvez (eds.) Manila: SIL. Zeitoun, Elizabeth. (2002). “Reciprocals in the Formosan languages: A preliminary study”. ICAL 9 conference paper. Canberra, Australia. Zeitoun, Elizabeth. (2007). A Grammar of Mantauran (Rukai). Language and Linguistics Monograph Series, No. A4‐ 2. Taipei: Academia Sinica. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/67943 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本論文探討上莫利語(Mori Atas)的語態系統，其焦點為中間語態、中間語態的標記以及其他南島語的中間語態標記之類型比較。根據Shibatani（2006）所提出的「語態現象之理論框架」(conceptual framework for voice phenomena)，筆者發現上莫利語語態系統共有三種表現形式：主動語態(active)、反被動語態(antipassive)以及中間語態(middle)。此外，針對其他相關的結構，如：使役結構(causative construction)和施用結構(applicative construction)也將進行討論。
除了Shibatani（2006）之外，本研究亦以Kemmer（1993）中間語態的語意分類為依據，發現上莫利語具有兩種可以用來表達中間語態情形的方式，即形態方式(morphological strategy)和迂說方式(periphrastic strategy)。在形態方式上，上莫利語主要是利用(i) pe-/me- (PAn/PMP *paR-/*maR-演變的形式) 和 (ii) ter- (PAN/PMP *taR-的演變形式) 二種前綴來表達中間語態。 從較宏觀的角度來看，西部馬來-玻里尼西亞語族中的其他語言亦利用相同的方式來表現中間語態情形，即以(i) PAn/PMP *paR-/*maR- 和 (ii) *taR- 二種前綴的演變形式來表達。甚至在印尼語(Indonesian)/馬來語(Malay)，巴厘語(Balinese)和米南佳保語(Minangkabau)這四個西部馬來-玻利尼西亞語言中，PAn/PMP *paR-/*maR- 進一步經歷多樣化的形式演變，造成兩種不同中間語態標記的分裂。 本研究之結果削弱了Bril（2005）提出的西部馬來-玻里尼西亞語中的中間語態標記的類型模式。Bril認為，PAn/PMP原始交互前綴*paR-/*maR- 在現今的馬來-玻里尼西亞語言中已發展成了具有多義性的前綴。Bril以他加祿語(Tagalog)的mag- 和印尼語/馬來語的ber-為依據而提出該見解。儘管該見解能在他加祿語或其他菲律賓語得到證實，但在印尼語/馬來語和其他西部馬來-玻利尼西亞語中並非總是如此。事實上，PAn/PMP *paR-/*maR- 不僅演變為多義前綴，而且進一步多樣化，造成兩種不同中間語態標記的分裂。從此可見，PAn/PMP *paR-/*maR-顯然不是西部馬來-玻里尼西亞語中唯一的中間語態標記的來源。除了PAn/PMP *paR-/*maR-之外，在西部馬來-玻里尼西亞語中PAn/PMP *taR- 的演變形式也可以用來表達中間語態情形，特別是自發性事件。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This thesis aims to explore voice system in Mori Atas, with particular attention to middle constructions and the typological comparison of the middle markers with those of other Austronesian languages. Using Shibatani (2006) “conceptual framework for voice phenomena” as the theoretical basis, it is found that Mori Atas voice system consists of active, antipassive, and middle constructions. In addition, other related constructions such as causatives and applicatives are also available.
Aside from Shibatani (2006), this study also utilizes Kemmer (1993) typological framework to approach middles in Mori Atas. It is found that Mori Atas employs two main strategies of expressing middle semantic domains, namely morphological and periphrastic strategies. In the morphological means, there are two kinds of prefixes, pe-/me- and te- which can be used to encode middle meanings. Each of them is reflexes of PAn/PMP *paR-/*maR- and *taR- respectively. From a broader perspective, the same pattern is also noticed in other languages of the Western Malayo-Polynesian sub-group, in that, middle semantic domains are always encoded by two morphological means: reflexes of PAn/PMP *paR-/*maR- and *taR-. Even in some Western Malayo-Polynesian languages, such as Indonesian/Malay, Balinese, and Minangkabau, the reflexes of PAn/PMP *paR-/*maR- undergo further diversification in their formal representations, resulting in the split of two distinct markers. This finding weakens the previous typological pattern of middle markers in Malayo-Polynesian languages postulated by Bril (2005). Bril argues that the originally reciprocal prefix *paR-/*maR- in PAn/PMP evolves into more polysemous morphemes in the present-day of Malayo-Polynesian languages. Bril establishes this argument based on the observation of Tagalog mag- and Indonesian/Malay ber-. While this justification may be attested in Tagalog mag- and other Philippine languages, it is not always the case in Indonesian/Malay, including Mori Atas and other Western Malayo-Polynesian languages examined in this thesis. In fact, PAn/PMP *paR-/*maR- does not only evolve to be polysemous, but also undergoes diversification in its formal representation. In addition, PAn/PMP *paR-/*maR- is apparently not the only source of middle marker in WMP languages, because reflexes of PAn/PMP unintentional *taR- are also observable to encode middle meanings, particularly spontaneous event in all Western Malayo-Polynesian languages. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T01:59:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R04142012-1.pdf: 6700816 bytes, checksum: 083f64cef612e832d7a252cf32de70b7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgements ………………………………………………………………….. i
Chinese abstract ……………………………………………………………………. iii Abstract ……………………………………………………………………………… iv Table of contents ……………………………………………………………………... v List of Maps, Figures, and Tables ………………………………………………….. vii List of abbreviations ………………………………………………………………... viii Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Preliminary………………………………………………………………. 1 1.2 Geography and genetic grouping……………………………………....... 3 1.3 Method, data, and informants……………………………………………. 5 1.4 Organization of the thesis………………………………………………... 6 Chapter 2 Literature Review 2.1 Literature on Mori Atas………………………………………………….. 8 2.1.1 Esser and Mead (1927, 2011)……………………………………… 9 2.1.2 Barsel (1994)…………………………………………………......... 9 2.1.3 Mead (1998, 1999, 2005)………………………………………….. 10 2.2 Typology of voice system in Austronesian languages of Indonesia…….. 14 2.3 Interim summary…………………………………………………………17 Chapter 3 Voice system in Mori Atas 3.1 Preliminary………………………………………………………………. 18 3.2 Arguments structure: Subject–Object indexing…………………………. 18 3.3 Conceptual framework for voice phenomena…………………………… 23 3.3.1 Origin of action: causative vs non-causative…………………......... 26 3.3.2 Development of action: active, antipassive, and middle…………... 34 3.3.3 Termination of action: applicative………………………………… 39 Chapter 4 Middle in Mori Atas 4.1 Introduction……………………………………………………………… 43 4.2 Middle notion by definition…………………………………………........ 44 4.3 Strategies of expressing middle in Mori Atas…………………………… 46 4.3.1 Morphological strategy: prefixes pe-/me- and te-........................ 47 4.3.2 Periphrastic strategy……………………………………………….. 62 4.3.3 Typological comparison of middle markers in AN languages.……. 63 4.3.3.1 Middle markers in Western Malayo-Polynesian languages……………………………………………........... 63 4.3.3.2 Middle markers in Formosan and Philippine languages……………………………………………........... 72 4.4 Tentative summary and typological implication……………………........ 76 Chapter 5 Conclusion and direction for future research …………………………. 78 References ………………………………………………………………………….. 83 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 上莫利語的語態系統: 以中間語態為主 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Voice System in Mori Atas with Special Reference to Middle | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃舒屏(Shuping Huang),洪媽益(Michael Tanangkingsing) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 語態系統,中間語態,中間語態標記,類型比較,上莫利語,西部馬來-玻里尼西亞語, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | voice system,middle,middle markers,typological comparison,Mori Atas,Western Malayo-Polynesian languages, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 86 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201701708 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2017-07-20 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 語言學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2300-01-01 | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 語言學研究所 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-106-1.pdf Restricted Access | 6.54 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.