請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66454完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林修葳 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chien-Hao Peng | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 彭健豪 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T00:36:37Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2012-03-19 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2012-03-19 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2012-02-02 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文
[1] 江宏儒,2002,「股票市場從眾行為之探討:新興市場與已開發國家之比較」,高雄第一科技大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。 [2] 杜樹森,1996,「機構投資人交易行為對股票市場之影響:以國內共同基金為例」,政治大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。 [3] 李春安與賴藝文,2005,「股市劇烈變動區間台灣股票市場與本國機構投資人從眾行為之研究」,台灣管理學刊,5(2),231-268。 [4] 吳政樂,1998,「證劵自營商之從眾行為與投資策略分析」,中央大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。 [5] 吳孟君,2000,「共同基金從眾行為與價格發現之研究」,中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文 [6] 林伊玫,1995,「機構投資人從眾行為研究-以封閉型基金為例」,中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 [7] 林雋琦,2001,「國內共同基金從眾現象及原因分析」,雲林科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 [8] 范揚洲,1998,「共同基金擇股偏好與從眾之研究」,中央大學財務管理研究 [9] 柯靜君,1997,「機構投資人從眾行為之研究-以國內共同基金為例」,成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 [10] 徐中琦與林皇端,2008,「法人機構從眾行為之研究-台灣股市外資與自營商之比較),商管科技季刊,第九卷第二期,251 ~ 276頁。 [11] 陳振遠、高蘭芬與劉永仁,2005,「基金經理人群集行為與股價關聯性之探討」,管理科學與統計決策學刊,2(1),51-66 [12] 陳櫻建,2002,「外資持股比率、公司特性與公司價值」,中正大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文。 [13] 郭燕陵,2004,「基金持股受基金家族因素影響之研究」,中正大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文。 [14] 劉坤青,2000,「外國法人、證劵自營商、投信鉅額交易對台灣上櫃市場股價影響」,台北大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 英文 [1] Admati, A. and P. Pfleiderer, 1997, “Does it all add up? Benchmarks and the compensation of active portfolio managers”, Journal of Business 70,323-350. [2] Badrinath, S. G., G. Gay, and J. R. Kale, 1989, “Patterns of Institutional Investment, Prudence and the Managerial Safety-Net Hypothesis”, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 56, 605-629. [3] Banerjee, A., 1992, “A simple model of herd behavior”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 797-817. [4] Bikhchandani, S., and S. Sharma, 2000, “Herd behavior in financial markets: A review”, IMF Working paper wp100108. [5] Bikhchandani, S., D. Hirshleifer, and I. Welch, 1998, “Learning from the Behavior of Others: Conformity, Fads and Informational Cascades”, Journal of Economic Perspective, 12, 151-170. [6] Brandenburger, A., and B. Polak, 1996, “When managers cover their posteriors: Making the decisions the market wants to see”, Rand Journal of Economics 27, 525-541. [7] Brennan, M., 1993, “Agency and asset prices”, Finance working paper 6-93. [8] Choe, H., B. C. Kho, and R. M. Stulz, 1998, “Do foreign investors destabilize stock markets? The Korean experience in 1997”, mimeo, Ohio State University. [9] Del Guercio, D., 1996, “The distorting effect of the prudent-man laws on institutional equity investment”, Journal of Financial Economics 40, 31-62. [10] Dennis, P. J., and Strickland, D., 2002, “Who Blinks in Volatile Markets, Individuals or Institutions?”, Journal of Finance, 57, 1923-1950. [11] Dornbush, R. and Y. E. Park, 1995, “Financial integration in a second-best world: Are we still sure about our classical prejudices”, Finance, Seoul, Korea. [12] Falkenstein, E. G., 1996, “Preferences for stock characteristics as revealed by mutual fund portfolio holdings”, Journal of Finance 51, 111-135. [13] Fama, E., 1969. “Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work”, Journal of Finance 25, 383-417. [14] Fama E. F., and K. R. French, 1992, “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns”, Journal of Finance 47, 427-465. [15] Fama, E. F., and J. D. MacBeth, 1973, “Risk Return and Equilibrium: Empirical test”, Journal of Political Economy 81, 607-636. [16] Fama, E.F., Fisher, L., Jensen, M., and Roll, R., 1969, “The adjustment of stock prices to new information”, International Economic Review , 10, 1-21 [17] Froot, K. A., D. S. Scharfstein, and J. C. Stein, 1992, “Herd on the Street: Informational Inefficiencies in a Market with Short-term Speculation”, Journal of Finance 47, 1461-1484. [18] Grahams, J., 1999, “Herding among Investment Newsletters: Theory and Evidence”, Journal of Finance 54, 237-268. [19] Grinblatt, M., S. Titman, and R. Wermers, 1995, “Momentum Investment Strategies, Portfolio Performance, and Herding: A Study of Mutual Fund Behavior”, American Economic Review 85(5), 1088-1105. [20] Grundy, K., and B. G. Malkiel, 1996, “Reports of Beta’s Death Have Been Greatly Exaggerated”, Journal of Portfolio Management 22, 36-44. [21] Hirshleifer, D., A. Subrahmanyam, and S. Titman, 1994, “Security analysis and trading patterns when some investors receive information before others”, Journal of Finance 49, 1665-1698. [22] Hwang, S., and Salmon, M., 2004, “Market stress and herding,” Journal of Empirical Finance 11(4), 585-616. [23] Kim, W., and S. Wei, 2002, “Foreign Portfolio Investors Before and During a Crisis”, Journal of International Economics 56, 77–96. [24] Lakonishok, J., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny, 1992, “The impact of institutional trading on stock prices”, Journal of Financial Economics 32, 23-43. [25] Lobao, J., and A. P. Serra, 2002, “Herding behavior – evidence from Portuguese mutual funds”, Working Paper, University of Porto. [26] Roll, R., 1992, “A mean/variance analysis of tracking error”, Journal of Portfolio Management(summer) 13-22. [27] Scharfstein, D., and J. Stein, 1990, “Herd behavior and investment,” American Economic Review 80, 465-479. [28] Walter, A., and F. M. Weber, 2006, “Herding in the German Mutual Fund Industry”, European Financial Management 12(3), 375-406. [29] Welch, I., 1992, “Sequential sales, learning, and cascades”, Journal of Finance 47, 695-732. [30] Wermers, R., 1999, “Mutual Fund Herding and the Impact on stock price”, Journal of Finance 54, 581-622. [31] Voronkova, S., and M. T. Bohl, 2005, “Institutional traders’ behavior in an emerging stock market: empirical evidence on Polish pension fund investors”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 32, 1537-60. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/66454 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究使用Grinblatt et al.(1995)提出的動能指標M值與Fama and MacBeth(1973)的模型探討台灣加權指數當日漲跌幅超過2%的事件日下,三大法人與一般個人投資者之選股偏好與從眾行為之關係。結果發現,三大法人由於資訊取得較為迅速,在事件日已反應結束,因此觀察事件日隔日之持股比率變化並無從眾行為存在,反而採取反向策略,且以外資最為明顯,而一般個人投資者則由於資訊取得落後,在觀察事件日三大法人之交易行為後,採取與市場同向之追漲殺跌投資行為,導致明顯的從眾現象產生,且中小型股的從眾行為更為顯著。不同產業下,不論使用何樣本,皆呈現三大法人皆偏好採用反向策略與非三大法人存在與市場同向的從眾行為,其中以外資M的負值最為顯著,其M值在市場上資金流向比率較高產業更為顯著,推論當市場劇烈波動後,外資傾向做出與多數投資者相反的交易決策。而自營商在持股比率較高的產業中M呈現正值,推論其交易行為易受市場行情影響產生從眾現象。進一步觀察事件日上漲或下跌對於M值的影響,顯示在台灣50中,下跌事件日之M值顯著小於0,可推論當市場重挫時,整體投資者偏向加碼買進。
其次,使用逐步回歸分析驗證投資者選股偏好與從眾行為關係,本研究挑選流動性、市場風險、PE及PB ratio四個選股偏好之因子,結果顯示影響從眾行為最為顯著的因素為流動性,但許多公司的從眾行為並非與本研究所挑選之變數相關,推翻過去文獻中認為會影響投資者從眾行為的因素,本研究認為非三大法人之從眾行為大多來自於事件日的交易資訊,散戶觀察市場動向進而在隔日做出與其同向的投資決策,因此造成從眾現象。 本研究經由探討機構投資人與一般個人投資者的行為,希望了解投資人間交易行為的差異,結果顯示,機構投資人因資訊取得較為快速,因此投資決策以快速反應,在隔日則採取反向策略,有穩定市場之效;而一般散戶因資訊取得速度較慢,則需待觀察事件日之交易資訊後,才做出投資決策,因此產生從眾現象。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Based on the M-value of Grinblatt et al.(1995)and the model of Fama and MacBeth(1973), this thesis discusses the herding behavior of Taiwan Stock market and tries to find out the factors that influence the herding behavior. Investors are separated into two parts which are institutional and non-institutional investors. There are three main institutional investors in Taiwan: foreign investors, mutual funds and security dealers. First, I pick the days that TAIEX increased or decreased more than 2% in one day, and investigate the change of stock holding percentage. What I have discovered in this research is that institutional investors have faster and more information than non-institutional investors, so they can respond the market tendency immediately. However, non-institutional investors didn’t respond as soon as institutional investors did, so they just followed institutional investors’ decision. If the market value of company is not so huge, the herding behavior of non-institutional investors will be more apparent.
I also choose four factors which includes liquidity, beta, PE ratio and PB ratio to detect which factor influence the herding behavior of investors more. Finally, I discovered that liquidity was the most important factor influence herding behavior of investors, but there are more evident shows that the herding behavior has no relation with those factors. Non-institutional investors just follow the market trends. This is the reason why institutional investors can do positive feedback, but non-institutional investors usually make the wrong decision, buying stocks in high price and selling them in low price. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T00:36:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-P98746027-1.pdf: 486417 bytes, checksum: f0c4ad1e60603269e73e758b817cc441 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii ABSTRACT iii 目錄 iv 圖目錄 vi 表目錄 vii 第一章 緒論 8 第一節 研究動機 8 第二節 研究目的 11 第三節 研究架構 13 第二章 文獻探討 14 第一節 從眾行為相關理論 14 第二節 國外金融市場的應用 16 第三節 國內金融市場的應用 18 第三章 研究設計 21 第一節 研究樣本與選取期間 21 第二節 研究方法 24 第四章 實證結果與分析 28 第一節 研究樣本與敘述統計 28 第二節 相關分析與實證結果 31 第五章 結論 39 第六章 交易策略 42 參考文獻 46 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 逐步迴歸 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 從眾行為 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 三大法人 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 外資 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 投信 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自營商 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | M值 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Momentum | en |
| dc.subject | Institutional investor | en |
| dc.subject | Non-institutional investor | en |
| dc.subject | Herding behavior | en |
| dc.title | 台灣股市從眾行為研究-三大法人與個人投資者的比較 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Herdin Behavior in Taiwan Stock Exchange-A Comparison of Institutional and Individual Investors | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 100-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 邱顯比 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王耀輝 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 從眾行為,三大法人,外資,投信,自營商,M值,逐步迴歸, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Herding behavior,Institutional investor,Non-institutional investor,Momentum, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 51 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2012-02-02 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業管理組 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業管理組 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-101-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 475.02 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
