論非訟裁定之確定力

Abstract

本文主要是針對非訟裁定之確定力加以探討，其中非訟裁定之效力，分別以形式確定力、實質確定力兩大部份加以說明。首先，在形式確定力一章，除探討非訟裁定生效時點、非訟裁定之可變性與抗告及再審相關問題加以探討。 再者，有關非訟裁定之實質確定力部份，從現行非訟事件分類觀察，其中最為重要類型為具有訟爭性之非訟事件，可知部份非訟事件某程度上亦如同訴訟事件具有確定私人間權利義務關係之情形。又在非訟事件審理原則上，除向來學說所探討之非訟審理原則，進而介紹學者所倡導之「程序法理交錯適用論」。在肯認非訟事件審理原則應適用「程序法理交錯適用論」之前提，且以「程序保障」作為實質確定力之根據，進而檢討實務見解發展及觀察現行法之趨勢，最後本文試圖提出肯認非訟裁定實質確定力之要件。有關上述研究希冀有助於將來非訟事件法修法之參考。

The thesis mainly focuses on the nature of non-contentious ruling, especially the aspect on the effect of non-contentious ruling. As we know, there are two parts of the effect, one is indisputable deterministic effect, and the other is binding force. Both of them will be tackled substantially and separately. First, in addition to discussion with the time of valid ruling in Chapter One, changeable character of the ruling, the appealing and rehearing procedure are included as well. Besides, through the observation on the classification of non-contentious cases, some of them contain contentious character, which is akin to that of civil procedure that puts more efforts on determine the civil rights among people. Originally, non-contentious trial theory dominates the whole non-contentious case law; however, some scholars propose the theory of alteration between procedural principles to renew the life of non-contentious case law. With this fresh theory accompanied with the notion of procedural protection used to legitimatize binding force, the thesis goes deep into scrutiny of practice and current law development. Eventually, the thesis endeavors to form some conditions on recognition of binding force of non-contentious ruling.