請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64568完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林雨德(Yu-Teh K. Lin) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jo-Hua Liang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 梁若華 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T17:55:05Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2014-08-15 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2012-08-15 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2012-08-13 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 賀菡芝 2009 合歡山地區台灣高山田鼠與台灣草原植物的交互作用: 從優勢草本植物的營養與豐富度來探討. 國立台灣大學生態學與演化生物學研究所碩士論文
葉素含 2010 合歡山地區台灣高山田鼠啃食作用對玉山箭竹生長之影響. 國立台灣大學生態學與演化生物學研究所碩士論文 Adrian, O. and N. Sachser (2011). 'Diversity of social and mating systems in cavies: a review.' Journal of Mammalogy 92(1): 39-53. Alexander, R. D. (1974). “The evolution of social behavior.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 5:325–383. Balshine, S., B. Leach, et al. (2001). 'Correlates of group size in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish (Neolamprologus pulcher).' Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 50(2): 134-140. Bertram, B. C. R. (1978). “Living in groups: predators and prey.” In: Krebs, J. R. and Davies, N. B. (Eds.), Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 64–96. Boellstorff, D. E. and D. H. Owings (1995). 'Home-Range, Population-Structure, and Spatial- Organization of California Ground-Squirrels.' Journal of Mammalogy 76(2): 551-561. Boonstra, R., C. J. Krebs, et al. (1987). 'Natal Philopatry and Breeding Systems in Voles (Microtus Spp).' Journal of Animal Ecology 56(2): 655-673. Brown, C.R. and M. B. Brown (2004). “Group size and ectoparasitism affect daily survival: probability in a colonial bird.” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 56: 498–511. Busch, C., A. I. Malizia, et al. (1989). 'Spatial-Distribution and Attributes of a Population of Ctenomys-Talarum (Rodentia, Octodontidae).' Journal of Mammalogy 70(1): 204-208. Castleberry, S. B., T. L. King, et al. (2002). 'Microsatellite DNA analysis of population structure in allegheny woodrats (Neotoma magister).' Journal of Mammalogy 83(4): 1058-1070. Chesser, R. K. (1998). 'Relativity of behavioral interactions in socially structured populations.' Journal of Mammalogy 79(3): 713-724. 40 Clutton, T.H., A. F. Russell, et al (2001). “Effects of helpers on juvenile development and survival in meerkats.” Science 293: 2446–2449. Cochran, G. R. and N. G. Solomon (2000). 'Effects of food supplementation on the social organization of prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster).' Journal of Mammalogy 81(3): 746- 757. Cooper, L. D. and J. A. Randall (2007). 'Seasonal changes in home ranges of the giant kangaroo rat (Dipodomys Ingens): A study of flexible social structure.' Journal of Mammalogy 88(4): 1000-1008. Cutrera, A. P., E. A. Lacey, et al. (2005). 'Genetic structure in a solitary rodent (Ctenomys talarum): implications for kinship and dispersal.' Molecular Ecology 14(8): 2511-2523. Dmitry A. K. and D. Heg (2007). “A maximum-likelihood relatedness estimator allowing for negative relatedness values” Molecular Ecology Notes 14(8): 256-263 Dobson, F. S. (1998). 'Social structure and gene dynamics in mammals.' Journal of Mammalogy 79(3): 667-670. Dobson, F. S., R. K. Chesser, et al. (1998). 'Breeding groups and gene dynamics in a socially structured population of prairie dogs.' Journal of Mammalogy 79(3): 671-680. Dobson, F. S., B. M. Way, et al. (2010). 'Spatial dynamics and the evolution of social monogamy in mammals.' Behavioral Ecology 21(4): 747-752. Ebensperger, L. A. (2001). 'A review of the evolutionary causes of rodent group-living.' Acta Theriologica 46(2): 115-144. Ebensperger, L. A. and L. D. Hayes (2008). 'On the dynamics of rodent social groups.' Behavioural Processes 79(2): 85-92. Ebensperger, L. A., J. Ramirez-Estrada, et al. (2011). 'Sociality, glucocorticoids and direct fitness in the communally rearing rodent, Octodon degus.' Hormones and Behavior 60(4): 346- 352. Ebensperger, L. A., R. Sobrero, et al. (2012). 'Ecological drivers of group living in two populations of the communally rearing rodent, Octodon degus.' Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 66(2): 261-274. 41 Emlen, S. T. (1995). 'An Evolutionary-Theory of the Family.' Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92(18): 8092-8099. FitzGerald, R. W. and D. M. Madison. (1983). “Social organization of a free-ranging population of pine voles, Microtus pinetorum.” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 13: 183–187. Fortier, G. M., M. A. Osmon, et al. (2001). 'Are female voles food limited? Effects of endophyteinfected tall fescue on home range size in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster).' American Midland Naturalist 146(1): 63-71. Getz, L. L. (1997). 'Natal philopatry in the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster, in a low food habitat.' American Midland Naturalist 138(2): 412-413. Getz, L. L., D. F. Gudermuth, et al. (1992). 'Pattern of Nest Occupancy of the Prairie Vole Microtus-Ochrogaster in Different Habitats.' American Midland Naturalist 128(1): 197- 202. Getz, L. L., B. Mcguire, et al. (1993). 'Social-Organization of the Prairie Vole (Microtus- Ochrogaster).' Journal of Mammalogy 74(1): 44-58. Hayes, L. D. and L. A. Ebensperger (2011). 'Caviomorph rodent social systems: an introduction.' Journal of Mammalogy 92(1): 1-2. Innes, R. J., D. H. Van Vuren, et al. (2007). 'Habitat associations of dusky-footed woodrats (Neotonia fuscipes) in mixed-conifer forest of the northern Sierra Nevada.' Journal of Mammalogy 88(6): 1523-1531. Jacquot, J. J. and N. G. Solomon (2004). 'Experimental manipulation of territory occupancy: Effects on immigration of female prairie voles.' Journal of Mammalogy 85(5): 1009-1014. Jannett, F. J. (1980). 'Variations in the Bond between Sexes in the Montane Vole, Microtus- Montanus, in Field Populations.' American Zoologist 20(4): 827-827. Krebs, J.R. and N.B. Davies (1993). “An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology.” Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. Lacey, E. A. (2001). 'Microsatellite variation in solitary and social tuco-tucos: molecular properties and population dynamics.' Heredity 86: 628-637. 42 Lacey, E. A. (2004). 'Sociality reduces individual direct fitness in a communally breeding rodent, the colonial tuco-tuco (Ctenomys sociabilis).' Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 56(5): 449-457. Lacey, E. A., S. H. Braude, et al. (1997). 'Burrow sharing by colonial tuco-tucos (Ctenomys sociabilis).' Journal of Mammalogy 78(2): 556-562. Lacey, E. A., S. H. Braude, et al. (1998). 'Solitary burrow use by adult Patagonian tuco-tucos (Ctenomys haigi).' Journal of Mammalogy 79(3): 986-991. Lacey, E. A. and J. R. Wieczorek (2004). 'Kinship in colonial tuco-tucos: evidence from group composition and population structure.' Behavioral Ecology 15(6): 988-996. Lacey, E. A. and P. W. Sherman (2007). “The ecology of sociality in rodents.” In: Wolff, J. O. and Sherman, P. W. (Eds.), Rodent Societies: An Ecological and Evolutionary Perspective. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA, pp. 243–254. Lambin, X. and Krebs, C. J. (1991). “Spatial organization and mating system of Microtus townsendii.” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 28: 353–363. Lin C. Y. and L. K. Lin (1989). “The survey of alpine meadow ecosystem in Taroko National Park.” Taroko National Park, HuaLien, Taiwan Lin, Y. K. and G. O. Batzli (2001). 'The effect of interspecific competition on habitat selection by voles: an experimental approach.' Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie 79(1): 110-120. Lin, Y. K. and G. O. Batzli (2004). 'Movement of voles across habitat boundaries: Effects of food and cover.' Journal of Mammalogy 85(2): 216-224. Lin, Y. K., B. Keane, et al. (2006). 'Effects of patch quality on dispersal and social organization of prairie voles: An experimental approach.' Journal of Mammalogy 87(3): 446-453. Lowe, W. H. and F. W. Allendorf (2010). 'What can genetics tell us about population connectivity? (vol 19, pg 3038, 2010).' Molecular Ecology 19(23): 5320-5320. Madison, D. M., R.W. Fitzgerald, et al. (1984). “Dynamics of social nesting in overwintering meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus): possible consequences for population cycling.” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 15: 9–17. 43 Mora, M. S., F. J. Mapelli, et al. (2010). 'Dispersal and population structure at different spatial scales in the subterranean rodent Ctenomys australis.' Bmc Genetics 11. Quirici, V., S. Faugeron, et al. (2011). 'Absence of kin structure in a population of the groupliving rodent Octodon degus.' Behavioral Ecology 22(2): 248-254. Solomon, N. G., A. M. Christiansen, et al. (2005). 'Factors affecting nest location of prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster).' Journal of Mammalogy 86(3): 555-560. Storz, J. F. (1999). 'Genetic consequences of mammalian social structure.' Journal of Mammalogy 80(2): 553-569. Sugg, D. W., R. K. Chesser, et al. (1996). 'Population genetics meets behavioral ecology.' Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11(8): 338-342. Wright, S. (1965). “The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating.” Evolution 19: 395-420. Wu, J. S., P. J. Chiang, et al. (2012). 'Monogamous System in the Taiwan Vole Microtus kikuchii Inferred from Microsatellite DNA and Home Ranges.' Zoological Studies 51(2): 204-212. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/64568 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 囓齒目的社會結構在不同的物種之間有廣泛的分布:從單一個體、雌雄成對個體、以及群聚的社會結構。社會結構的變化不只是在不同的物種之間發生,也有可能在同樣的物種之間產生。研究群聚社會結構的主要原因是他們有可能現在社會的雛形,因此了解群集以及影響群集的因素幫助我們更了解社會系統的演化。在合歡山草原地區,主要的優勢小型哺乳動物爲台灣高山田鼠(Microtus kikuchii)是一個台灣的特有種,過去研究顯示高山田鼠表現空間上活動範圍的重疊。本實驗主要希望檢驗以下假說:(1)高山田鼠在空間上會有群聚的社會結構(2)高山田鼠的社會結構在不同的季節會有不同(3)高山田鼠的社會結構跟一或多個環境因子有相關(4)巢階層對於高山田鼠基因遺傳結構的貢獻度最高。在此研究中,希望透過野外調查以及分子技術以了解高山田鼠的社會結構。本研究定義在不同巢內所補捉的個體數和結構爲該巢的社會結構。採用了螢光粉追蹤法尋找到巢,在各個巢的周圍進行重複捕捉,以了解巢內組成。主要分成三個季節:繁殖季晚期、非繁殖季、和繁殖季前期。同時我們也測量巢周圍的環境因子,如同植被覆蓋度、土壤硬度、落葉層量、族群密度、雌雄比和植被高度。並且利用逐步回歸分析檢驗環境因子和個體數目之間是否有相關。同時也利用分子微隨體技術,了解高山田鼠的族群遺傳結構是否受到社會結構的影響。實驗結果顯示,高山田鼠的社會結構在不同的季節間呈現顯著性的差異,並在繁殖季前期的以群聚爲主要的社會結構。三個季節均有不同的環境因子和該季節社會結構有顯著相關。落葉層的量或深度在三個季節均顯著相關。巢階層對於基因遺傳結構的貢獻度並不顯著,反而是樣區階層的貢獻較為顯著。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The social organization of the Microtus genus exists in a wide spectrum, from solitary male or female units, to male-female pairs, to communal group formation. Social organization shows great inter-and intra-specific variations. The forming of communal groups may be the preliminary forms of society. Therefore the importance of studies in this field has been of much interest in recent years. The Taiwan vole (Microtus kikuchii), an endemic species of Taiwan, is the dominant small mammal at the Hehuan Mt.. Past research shows overlap in the home range of individuals of the Taiwan vole. This thesis hopes to investigate the following hypotheses: 1. The social organization of the Taiwan voles portrays group formation. 2. The social organization of the Taiwan voles varies with the different seasons. 3. The social organization of the Taiwan voles is correlated to one or more environmental factors. 4. The nest scale contributes most to the population genetic structure of the Taiwan voles. The purpose of this study is to examine the social organization of the Taiwan voles through field studies and molecular tools. Defining the number of individuals and composition captured at the same nest as the social organization, using florescent powder tracking and capture-recapture method, the behavior of the Microtus is investigated in three separate seasons: late-breeding season, non-breeding season, and early-breeding season. The environmental factors are also measured at each nest, hoping to examine the relationship between the social organization and the environmental factors and demographic parameters. Using 10 microsatellite loci, this study also addresses the genetic structure of this species, hoping to investigate the genetic diversity at various scales of population structure. The results show that the social organization shows significantly different patterns between seasons, and that group formation is the main social organization of the early breeding season. The social organizations of the three seasons each correlate to different factors, with litter amount or depth a significant factor in all three seasons. The nest scale does not contribute significantly to the population genetic structure, while the site scale shows higher contribution. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T17:55:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-101-R97B44005-1.pdf: 5031052 bytes, checksum: fa3188217126a329c79ee537a93c74da (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要…………………………………………………………………………….….……..i
Abstract………...………………………………………………………………...……...ii Tables………...………………………………………………………………...……….iii Introduction…..………………………………………..……………………....……….1 Research questions…………...……………………………………………...…….4 Materials and Methods..……..……………..………………………………..….……6 Study area...…….…………………………………………………………..….……6 Vole trapping……………………..…………………………………….…….……..7 Nest tracking……...…………………………………………….……………….…..7 Measuring environmental factors….……………………………………….……….8 Genotyping using microsatellites.…………………………………….…………….8 Statistical analyses………………………………………………………………....13 Results……...…………………………………….…………………………………….15 Social organization………………….……………...………………...……………15 Nest locating and trapping…………..…….………………………….………...15 Types of social organization....…………….……………………….…………..15 Relatedness of individuals at each nest showing group formation....…………..16 Environmental factors and demographic parameters..............................................19 Late breeding season…..…………………..………………………..………….19 Non breeding season………………………..…………………….…………….21 Early breeding season……………………….……………………….…………22 Population genetic structure analyses….…………………………….……………25 Late breeding season…..…………………..………………………..………….25 Non breeding season………………………..…………………….…………….26 Early breeding season……………………….……………………….…………28 All seasons………….……………………….……………………….…………29 Discussions...……………………………………….…………………………..…........32 References.......................................................................................................................37 Appendix...…………………………………………………………….……..………...42 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 社會結構 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 台灣高山田鼠 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 族群基因結構 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Taiwan vole | en |
| dc.subject | social organization | en |
| dc.subject | population genetic structure | en |
| dc.title | 合歡山地區台灣高山田鼠的社會結構 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Social Organization of Taiwan Voles (Microtus kikuchii) in Hehuan Mountains | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 100-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 于宏燦(Hon-Tsen Yu),林良恭(Liang-Kong Lin),靖永皓(Yung-Hao Ching) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 台灣高山田鼠,社會結構,族群基因結構, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Taiwan vole,social organization,population genetic structure, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 62 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2012-08-13 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生命科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-101-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 4.91 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
