請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6154完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林雨德 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chia-Chien Lee | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李佳倩 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-16T16:22:02Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2014-07-31 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-16T16:22:02Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2013-07-31 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2013-07-25 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 吳培傑。1998。合歡山地區台灣高山田鼠 (Microtus kikuchii) 族群生態及活動模式研究。私立東海大學生物學系碩士論文。
梁若華。2012。合歡山地區台灣高山田鼠的社會結構。國立台灣大學生態學與演化生物學研究所碩士論文。 陳佑哲、謝宗宇、林良恭。2006。台灣高山田鼠 (Microtus kikuchii) 的婚配制度：行為學研究的證據。生物科學。49(1): 65-73。 楊怡明。2011。一夫一妻制台灣高山田鼠 (Microtus kikuchii) 父親照顧對子代的成長發育之影響。私立東海大學生命科學系碩士論文。 權遠飛、李艾陵、葉威廷、翁菁羚、林雨德。2010。合歡山冷杉林高山田鼠 (Microtus kikuchii) 的空間利用分析。動物行為、生態暨生物教育研討會。 Back, S. R., Beeler, L. A., Schaefer, R. L. and Solomon, N. G. 2002. Testing functional hypotheses for the behavior of resident pine voles, Microtus pinetorum, toward non-residents. Ethology, 108(11): 1023-1039. Boonstra, R., Gilbert, B. S. and Krebs, C. J. 1993. Mating systems and sexual dimorphism in mass in Microtines. Journal of Mammalogy, 74(1): 224-229. Carter, C. S., Devries, A. C. and Getz, L. L. 1995. Physiological substrates of mammalian monogamy: the prairie vole model. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 19(2): 303-314. Carter, C. S., DeVries, A. C., Taymans, S. E., Roberts, R. L., Williams, J. R. and Getz, L. L. 1997. Peptides, steroids, and pair bonding. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 807: 260-272. Carter, C. S. and Getz, L. L. 1993. Monogamy and the prairie vole. Scientific American, 268(6): 100-106. Cho, M. M., DeVries, A. C., Williams, J. R. and Carter, C. S. 1999. The effects of oxytocin and vasopressin on partner preferences in male and female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Behavioral Neuroscience, 113(5): 1071-1079. Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1989. Mammalian mating systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 236(1285): 339-372. Cushing, B. S., Martin, J. O., Young, L. J. and Carter, C. S. 2001. The effects of peptides on partner preference formation are predicted by habitat in prairie voles. Hormones and Behavior, 39(1): 48-58. DeVries, A. C., Devries, M. B., Taymans, S. and Carter, C. S. 1995. Modulation of pair bonding in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) by corticosterone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 92(17): 7744-7748. DeVries, A. C., DeVries, M. B., Taymans, S. E. and Carter, C. S. 1996. The effects of stress on social preferences are sexually dimorphic in prairie voles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93(21): 11980-11984. DeVries, A. C., Johnson, C. L. and Carter, C. S. 1997. Familiarity and gender influence social preferences in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 75(2): 295-301. Dewsbury, D. A. 1981. An exercise in the prediction of monogamy in the field from laboratory data on 42 species of muroid rodents. The Biologist, 63: 138-162. Dewsbury, D. A., Baumgardner, D. J., Evans, R. L. and Webster, D. G. 1980. Sexual dimorphism for body mass in 13 taxa of muroid rodents under laboratory conditions. Journal of Mammalogy, 61(1): 146-149. Emlen, S. T. and Oring, L. W. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and evolution of mating systems. Science, 197(4300): 215-223. Evans, S. 1983. The pair-bond of the common marmoset, Callithrix jacchus jacchus: an experimental investigation. Animal Behaviour, 31: 651-656. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A. and Lang, A. G. 2009. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4): 1149-1160. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G. and Buchner, A. 2007. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2): 175-191. Ferkin, M. H. 1988. The effect of familiarity on social interactions in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus: a laboratory and field study. Animal Behaviour, 36: 1816-1822. Fitch, H. S. 1957. Aspects of reproduction and development in the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster). University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History, 10: 129-161. Gaines, M. S. and Johnson, M. L. 1984. A multivariate study of the relationship between dispersal and demography in populations of Microtus ochrogaster in eastern Kansas. American Midland Naturalist, 111(2): 223-233. Gaulin, S. J. C. and Fitzgerald, R. W. 1988. Home-range size as a predictor of mating systems in Microtus. Journal of Mammalogy, 69(2): 311-319. Getz, L. L., Carter, C. S. and Gavish, L. 1981. The mating system of the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster: field and laboratory evidence for pair-bonding. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 8(3): 189-194. Getz, L. L. and Hofmann, J. E. 1986. Social organization in free-living prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 18(4): 275-282. Getz, L. L., Hofmann, J. E. and Carter, C. S. 1987. Mating system and population fluctuations of the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster. American Zoologist, 27(3): 909-920. Getz, L. L., McGuire, B., Pizzuto, T., Hofmann, J. E. and Frase, B. 1993. Social organization of the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster). Journal of Mammalogy, 74(1): 44-58. Gruder-Adams, S. and Getz, L. L. 1985. Comparison of the mating system and paternal behavior in Microtus ochrogaster and Microtus pennsylvanicus. Journal of Mammalogy, 66(1): 165-167. Heske, E. J. and Ostfeld, R. S. 1990. Sexual dimorphism in size, relative size of testes, and mating systems in North American voles. Journal of Mammalogy, 71(4): 510-519. Hume, I. D., Morgan, K. R. and Kenagy, G. J. 1993. Digesta retention and digestive performance in sciurid and microtine rodents: effects of hindgut morphology and body-size. Physiological Zoology, 66(3): 396-411. Insel, T. R. and Hulihan, T. J. 1995. A gender-specific mechanism for pair bonding: oxytocin and partner preference formation in monogamous voles. Behavioral Neuroscience, 109(4): 782-789. Insel, T. R., Preston, S. and Winslow, J. T. 1995. Mating in the monogamous male: behavioral consequences. Physiology & Behavior, 57(4): 615-627. Insel, T. R. and Shapiro, L. E. 1992. Oxytocin receptor distribution reflects social organization in monogamous and polygamous voles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 89(13): 5981-5985. Insel, T. R., Wang, Z. X. and Ferris, C. F. 1994. Patterns of brain vasopressin receptor distribution associated with social organization in microtine rodents. Journal of Neuroscience, 14(9): 5381-5392. Insel, T. R., Winslow, J. T., Wang, Z. X. and Young, L. J. 1998. Oxytocin, vasopressin, and the neuroendocrine basis of pair bond formation. Vasopressin and Oxytocin: Molecular, Cellular, and Clinical Advances, 449: 215-224. Jike, L., Batzli, G. O. and Getz, L. L. 1988. Home ranges of prairie voles as determined by radiotracking and by powdertracking. Journal of Mammalogy, 69(1): 183-186. Kleiman, D. G. 1977. Monogamy in mammals. Quarterly Review of Biology, 52(1): 39-69. Lim, M. M., Liu, Y., Ryabinin, A. E., Bai, Y., Wang, Z. and Young, L. J. 2007. CRF receptors in the nucleus accumbens modulate partner preference in prairie voles. Hormones and Behavior, 51(4): 508-515. Lim, M. M., Wang, Z. X., Olazabal, D. E., Ren, X. H., Terwilliger, E. F. and Young, L. J. 2004. Enhanced partner preference in a promiscuous species by manipulating the expression of a single gene. Nature, 429(6993): 754-757. Liu, Y., Curtis, J. T. and Wang, Z. X. 2001. Vasopressin in the lateral septum regulates pair bond formation in male prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Behavioral Neuroscience, 115(4): 910-919. Lott, D. F. 1984. Intraspecific variation in the social systems of wild vertebrates. Behaviour, 88: 266-325. Madison, D. M. 1980. Space use and social structure in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 7(1): 65-71. Madison, D. M., Fitzgerald, R. W. and McShea, W. J. 1984. Dynamics of social nesting in overwintering meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus): possible consequences for population cycling. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 15(1): 9-17. McGuire, B., Getz, L. L., Hofmann, J. E., Pizzuto, T. and Frase, B. 1993. Natal dispersal and philopatry in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) in relation to population density, season, and natal social environment. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 32(5): 293-302. McGuire, B. and Novak, M. 1986. Parental care and its relationship to social organization in the montane vole (Microtus montanus). Journal of Mammalogy, 67(2): 305-311. Oliveras, D. and Novak, M. 1986. A comparison of paternal behavior in the meadow vole Microtus pennsylvanicus, the pine vole Microtus pinetorum and the prairie vole Microtus ochrogaster. Animal Behaviour, 34: 519-526. Orians, G. H. 1969. On evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. American Naturalist, 103(934): 589-603. Ostfeld, R. S. and Heske, E. J. 1993. Sexual dimorphism and mating systems in voles. Journal of Mammalogy, 74(1): 230-233. Parker, K. J., Phillips, K. M. and Lee, T. M. 2001. Development of selective partner preferences in captive male and female meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Animal Behaviour, 61: 1217-1226. Patris, B. and Baudoin, C. 2000. A comparative study of parental care between two rodent species: implications for the mating system of the mound-building mouse Mus spicilegus. Behavioural Processes, 51(1-3): 35-43. Pei, Y. X., Wang, D. H. and Hume, I. D. 2001. Selective digesta retention and coprophagy in Brandt's vole (Microtus brandti). Journal of Comparative Physiology B: Biochemical Systemic and Environmental Physiology, 171(6): 457-464. Pierce, J. D. and Dewsbury, D. A. 1991. Female preferences for unmated versus mated males in 2 species of voles (Microtus ochrogaster and Microtus montanus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 105(2): 165-171. Price, E. C. and McGrew, W. C. 1991. Departures from monogamy in colonies of captive cotton-top tamarins. Folia Primatologica, 57(1): 16-27. Reichard, U. H. 2003. Monogamy: past and present. Cambridge University Press. Solomon, N. G. 1993. Body size and social preferences of male and female prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster. Animal Behaviour, 45(5): 1031-1033. Swihart, R. K. and Slade, N. A. 1989. Differences in home-range size between sexes of Microtus ochrogaster. Journal of Mammalogy, 70(4): 816-820. Taylor, S. A., Salo, A. L. and Dewsbury, D. A. 1992. Estrus induction in 4 species of voles (Microtus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 106(4): 366-373. Thomas, J. A. and Birney, E. C. 1979. Parental care and mating system of the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 5(2): 171-186. Williams, J. R., Carter, C. S. and Insel, T. 1992. Partner preference development in female prairie voles is facilitated by mating or the central infusion of oxytocin. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 652: 487-489. Williams, J. R., Catania, K. C. and Carter, C. S. 1992. Development of partner preferences in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster): the role of social and sexual experience. Hormones and Behavior, 26(3): 339-349. Williams, J. R., Insel, T. R., Harbaugh, C. R. and Carter, C. S. 1994. Oxytocin administered centrally facilitates formation of a partner preference in female prairie votes (Microtus ochrogaster). Journal of Neuroendocrinology, 6(3): 247-250. Winslow, J. T., Hastings, N., Carter, C. S., Harbaugh, C. R. and Insel, T. R. 1993. A role for central vasopressin in pair bonding in monogamous prairie voles. Nature, 365(6446): 545-548. Wittenberger, J. F. 1979. The evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. New York. Wittenberger, J. F. and Tilson, R. L. 1980. The evolution of monogamy: hypotheses and evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 11: 197-232. Wolff, J. O., Edge, W. D. and Bentley, R. 1994. Reproductive and behavioral biology of the gray-tailed vole. Journal of Mammalogy, 75(4): 873-879. Wu, J. S., Chiang, P. J. and Lin, L. K. 2012. Monogamous system in the Taiwan vole Microtus kikuchii inferred from microsatellite DNA and home ranges. Zoological Studies, 51(2): 204-212. Young, L. J. and Wang, Z. X. 2004. The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nature Neuroscience, 7(10): 1048-1054. Young, L. J., Wang, Z. X. and Insel, T. R. 1998. Neuroendocrine bases of monogamy. Trends in Neurosciences, 21(2): 71-75. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6154 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 台灣高山田鼠 (Microtus kikuchii) 的婚配制度極可能是哺乳類中罕見的一夫一妻制。一夫一妻制動物會表現伴侶偏好行為，即行為上偏好同居或配對過的異性個體顯著多於陌生個體，但伴侶偏好可能會受到固醇類賀爾蒙(性賀爾蒙及壓力賀爾蒙) 濃度左右。我們以伴侶偏好行為實驗 (partner preference test) 測試台灣高山田鼠是否表現 [同居過的雌雄個體接觸時間應顯著多於與陌生個體的接觸時間]。實驗個體在實驗前皆無配對經驗，同居時間長度為24小時，配對結束後即進行3小時的伴侶偏好行為實驗，過程以錄影記錄並進行分析。另一方面，在行為實驗的前及後4~5天收集高山田鼠每日的糞便，以酵素免疫分析法 (enzyme-immunoassay method) 獲得實驗雄性田鼠的睾固酮 (testosterone) 、雌性田鼠的孕酮 (progesterone) 和雌二醇 (estradiol) 及每隻田鼠的壓力賀爾蒙 (corticosterone)。伴侶偏好行為實驗結果顯示雌性高山田鼠沒有任何伴侶偏好；但雌性田鼠的伴侶偏好(p = 0.04) 以及與某一個體接觸的時間長度 (p = 0.04) 皆會受到對方是否為熟悉個體的影響。在實驗前後的固醇類賀爾蒙濃度則未顯示對高山田鼠的伴侶偏好有任何顯著性的影響。另一方面，高山田鼠具有較小的體重雌雄二型性，與一夫一妻制的草原田鼠 (M. ochrogaster) 相似。綜合結果顯示只有雌性高山田鼠表現出伴侶偏好行為，且伴侶偏好並未明顯受到固醇類賀爾蒙的影響，本實驗結果並未完全支持台灣高山田鼠為嚴謹的一夫一妻制。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The mating system of the Taiwan field voles (Microtus kikuchii) has been suspected to be monogamous. In monogamous animals, individuals should exhibit a strong social preference for a familiar partner versus a strange one. In this study, we examined the effect of cohabitation (pair-bonding) on the partner preference in Taiwan field voles. In the reciprocal experiments, all individuals were sexually naive and cohabited with a heterosexual vole for 24 hr prior to the 3-hr partner preference trials. We collected the feces of Taiwan field voles before and after the partner preference trials, and used the enzyme-immunoassay (EIA) method to analyze the concentration of steroid hormones, including testosterone of males, progesterone and estradiol of females, and corticosterone of all voles. The results showed that the voles did not spend more time in the partner chamber (male: p = 0.33; female: p = 0.098), but the female voles’ preference (p = 0.04) and time that the female voles spent in each chamber (p = 0.04) were both significantly related to if the preferred vole was the partner. In addition, the EIA results indicated that there was no significant relationship between steroid hormones and partner preference. Also, the sexual dimorphism of the Taiwan field vole in body weight was reduced, and similar to the monogamous prairie vole (M. ochrogaster). The results indicated that only female voles had partner preference, and the steroid hormones did not affect the preferences. This study did not support that mating system of the Taiwan field voles is strictly monogamy. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-16T16:22:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R98b44016-1.pdf: 1707037 bytes, checksum: 889de80c5e88cd6d269ce2fabca6eea6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝誌...............................................................................i
摘要..............................................................................ii Abstract.......................................................................iii Introduction..................................................................1 Hypotheses...................................................................6 Materials & Methods......................................................7 Voles and breeding colony.............................................7 Sexual dimorphism in body weight................................7 Partner preference trials................................................8 Testing apparatus..........................................................8 Partner preference tests.................................................8 Hormonal analyses.......................................................10 Fecal sampling..............................................................10 Hormone extraction and EIA.........................................10 Statistical analyses........................................................11 Results..........................................................................13 Sexual dimorphism in body weight................................13 Partner preference experiments.....................................13 Time in each chamber & Time in physical contact..........13 Prefer or Not prefer.......................................................14 Time in the neutral chamber..........................................14 Effects of hormones on preference.................................14 Discussions...................................................................16 Partner preferences.......................................................16 Steroid hormones..........................................................19 Sexual dimorphism........................................................20 References.....................................................................22 Appendix.......................................................................43 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 從伴侶偏好看台灣高山田鼠的婚配制度—兼論固醇類賀爾蒙之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Partner Preference and Mating System of Taiwan Field Voles (Microtus kikuchii) – A Look at the Effects of Steroid Hormones | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 101-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林良恭,李佩珍,邱智賢 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 台灣高山田鼠,婚配制度,伴侶偏好行為實驗,酵素免疫分析法,固醇類賀爾蒙,雌雄二型性, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Taiwan field vole,mating system,partner preference test,EIA,steroid hormone,sexual dimorphism, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 49 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2013-07-25 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生命科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-102-1.pdf | 1.67 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。