請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/58785
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陸洛(Luo Lu) | |
dc.contributor.author | Hui Yen Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林惠彥 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T08:30:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-01-27 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2014-01-27 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2013-12-25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 行政院研究發展考核委員會(2013)。委託報告書:防範職場過勞並促進產業競爭力之研究。
行政院勞工委員會(2013)。勞動統計:薪資與生產力統計結果。 洪贊凱、陳維倫(2011)。社會工作領域中訓練發展程序公平、專業承諾與積極出勤之研究--調節焦點的中介型干擾角色。商略學報,4(2),115-134。 高旭繁、陸洛(2011)。工作壓力及其後果的組群差異:以OSI模式為理論基礎之大樣本分析。台大管理論叢,22(1),239-272。 陸洛(1997)。工作壓力之歷程:理論與研究的對話。中華心理衛生學刊,10(4),19-51. 陸洛(2006)。職場健康管理。見李誠(主編):人力資源管理的12堂課。臺北:天下遠見。 林惠彥、陸洛(2013)。躹躬盡瘁?勉強出勤之跨文化理論模式建構。人力資源管理學報,13(3), 29-55。 彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質,影響,測試和補救。管理學報,23,77-98。 Aronsson, G. & Gustafsson, K. (2005). Sickness presenteeism: prevalence, attendance-pressure factors, and an outline of a model for research, Journal of Occupational Environment Medicine, 47, 958-966. Aronsson, G., Gustafsson, K. & Dallner, M. (2000). Sick but yet at work. An empirical study of sickness presenteeism, Journal of Epidemiological Community Health, 54, 502-509. Baker-McClearn, D., Greasley, K., Dale, J, & Griffith. F. (2010). Absence management and presenteeism: The pressures on employees to attend work and the impact of attendance on performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 20(3), 311-328 Bandura, A. (1989). Self-regulation of motivation and action through internal standards and goal systems. In L.A. Pervin (eds.). Goal Concepts in Personality and Social Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 19-85. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. Bergstrom, G., Bodin, L., Hagberg, J., Aronnson, G., & Josephson, M. (2009). Sickness presenteeism today, sickness absenteeism tomorrow? A prospective study on sickness presenteeism and future sickness absenteeism. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 51, 629-638. Biron, C., & Saksvik, P. O. (2009). Sickness Presenteeism and Attendance Pressure Factors: Implications for Practice, in International Handbook of Work and Health Psychology, Third Edition (Eds.). C. L. Cooper, J. C. Quick and M. J. Schabracq), Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK. Burton, W. N., Chen, C. Y., Conti, D. J., Schultz, A. B., & Edington, D. W. (2006). The association between health risk change and presenteeism change. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 48, 252–263. Bycio, P. (1992). Job performance and absenteeism: A review and meta-analysis. Human Relations, 45, 193-220. Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. (1979). The Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan Press. Caverley, N., Barton, C., & MacGregor, J. (2007). Sickness absenteeism, and health following restructuring in a public service organization. Journal of Management Studies, 44(2), 304-319. Contrada, R. J. & Krantz, D. S. (1988). Stress, reactivity, and type A behavior: current status and future directions. Annuals of behavioral Medicine, 10, 64-70. Cooper, C. L.(1996). Hot under the collar. Times Higher Education Supplement, 21 June. Cooper, C. L., & Smith, M. J. (1985). Job Stress and Blue Collar Work. New York : John Wiley. Costa, P. T., Jr, McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO-PI-R: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Crawford, E. R., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 834-848. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., & Bulters, A. J. (2004). The loss spiral of work pressure, work-home interference and exhaustion: Reciprocal relations in a three-wave study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 131–149. Demerouti, E., Blanc, P. M. le, Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., & Hox, J. (2009). Present but sick: A three-wave study on job demands, presenteeism and burnout. Career Development International, 14, 50-68. Dew, K., Keefe, V., & Small, K. (2005). Choosing to work when sick: workplace presenteeism. Social Science and Medicine, 60, 2273-2282. Eysenck, H. J. (1970). The structure of personality. (3rd ed.). London: Methuen. Eysenck, H. J. (1990). Biological dimensions of personality. In L. A. Pervin (ed.). Handbook of personality: Theory and research. NY: Guilford Press, 244-276. Farrell, D. & Stamm, C. L. (1998). Meta-analysis of the correlates of employee absence. Human Relations, 41, 211-272. Folkman, S. (1997). Positive psychological states and coping with server stress. Social Science and Medicine, 45, 1207-1221. Fox, J. B. & Scott, J. F. (1943). Absenteeism: Management’s Problem. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School. Fritz, C. & Sonnentag, S. (2005). Recovery, health, and job performance: effects of weekend experiences, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 187-199. Gray, J. A. (1987). The psychology of fear and stree. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Gray, J. A. (1991). Neural system, emotion and personality. In H. J. Eysenck (ed.). A model for personality, (2nd). Berlin: Springer-Verlage. Ghiselli, R., La Lopa, J., & Bai, B. (2001). Job satisfaction, life satisfaction, and turnover intent: Among food-service managers. Cornell hotel and restaurant administration quarterly, 42(2), 28-37. Goetzel, R. Z., Long, S. R., Ozminkowski, R. J., Hawkins, K., Wang, S., & Lynch, W. (2004). Health, absence, disability, and presenteeism cost estimates of certain physical and mental health conditions affecting US employers. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46, 398–412. Hemp, P. (2004). Presenteeism: At work—but out of it. Harvard Business Review, 82, 49–58. Hill, J. M. M. & Trist, E. L. (1995). Changes in accidents and other absences with length of service, Human Relations, 8, 121-152. Hobfoll, S. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513-524. Hobfoll, S. E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of general psychology, 6(4), 307-324. Hoyle, R. H. (1995). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Hoppock, R. (1935). Job Satisfaction, New York : Harper. Koopman, C., Pelletier, K. R., Murray, J. F., Sharda, C. E., Berger, M. L., Turpin, R. S., & Bendel, T. (2002). Stanford Presenteeism Scale: Health status and employee productivity. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 44, 14-20. Jersalem, M. & Schwarzer, R. (1992). Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal. In R. Schwarzer (ed.). Self-Efficacy: Thought Conyrol of Action. Washington, DC: Hemisphere. 195-213. Jex, S. M. & Bliese, P. D. (1999). Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of work-related stressors: a multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 349-361. Johns, G. (1997). Contemporary research on absence from work: Correlates, causes, and consequences. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12: 115-174. Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31, 386-408. Johns, G. (2008). Absenteeism and presenteeism: Not at work or not working well. In C. L. Cooper, & J. Barling (eds.). The Sage Handbook of Organizational Behavior: Vol. 1: 160-177. London: Sage. Johns, G. (2010). Presenteeism in the workplace: A review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 519-542. Johns, G. (2011). Attendance dynamics at work: The antecedents and correlates of presenteeism, absenteeism, and productivity loss. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 483-500. Johns, G. (2012). Presenteeism: A short history and a cautionary tale. In J. Houdmont, S. Leka & R. Sinclair (eds.). Contemporary occupational health psychology: Global perspectives on research and practice: vol. 2: 204-220. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons. Judge, T. A. & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits - self-esteem, generalized self efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability - with job satisfaction and job performance: a meta analysis. Journal of Applied Pshchology, 86, 80-92. Lazarus, R. S. & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company. LePine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & LePine, M. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor-hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 764-775. Lu, L., Cooper, C. L., & Lin, H. Y. (2013). A cross-cultural examination of presenteeism and supervisory support. Career Development International, 18(5), 440-456. Lu, L., Lin, H. Y., & Cooper, C. L. (2013). Unhealthy and present: Motives and consequences of the act of presenteeism among Taiwanese employees. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(4), 406-416. Lu, L., Tseng, H. J., & Cooper, C. L. (1999). Managerial stress, job satisfaction and health in Taiwan. Stress Medicine, 15, 53-64. Lu, L., Peng, S. Q., Lin, H. Y., & Cooper, C. L. (In press). Presenteeism and Strain among Chinese Employees: The Moderating Role of Self-efficacy. Work & Stress. Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. (1986). Maslach Burnout Inventory manual (2nd Ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Meijman, T. F., & Mulder, G. (1998). Psychological aspects of workload. In P. J. D. Drenth & H. Thierry (eds.). Handbook of work and organizational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 5-33). Hove: Psychology Press. Middaugh, D. J. (2006). Presenteeism: Sick and tired at work. Medsurg Nursing, 15, 103–105. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-Reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531-544. Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903. Robbins, S. P. (1996). Organizational behavior: concepts, controversies, and applications. (7th). Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-Markers: A Brief Version of Goldberg’s Unipolar Big-Five Markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63(3), 506-516. Schaufeli, W. B. & Enzmann, D. (1998). The Burnout Companion to Research and Practice: A Critical Analysis. Taylor & Francis, London. Schenet, N. G. (1945). An analysis of absenteeism in one war plant. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19, 136-155. Schwarzer, R., Babler, J., Kwiatek, P., Schroder, K., & Zhang, J. X. (1997). The assessment of optimistic self-beliefs: Comparison of the German, Spanish, and Chinese versions of the General Self-efficacy Scale. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46(1), 69-88. Smith, P. C., Kendall, L. M., & Hulin, C. l. (1996). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago: Rand Mcnally. Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1998). Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal Conflict at Work Scale, Organizational Constraints Scale, Quantitative Worklaod Inventory, and Physical Symptoms Inventory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3,356-367. Stein, N., Folkman, S., Traabasso, T., & Chriatopher-Richards, T. A. (1997). Appraisal and goal processes as predicators of psychological well-being in bereaved caregivers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 872-884. Turpin, R. S., Ozminkowski, R. J., Sharda, C. E., Collins, J. J., Berger, M. L., Billotti, G. M., & Nicholson, S. (2004). Reliability and validity of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46, 1123-1133. Van Yperen, N. W. & Snijders, T. A. (2000). A multilevel analysis of demands-control model: is stress at work determined by factors at the group level or individual level? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 182-190. Whitehouse, D. (2005). Workplace presenteeism: How behavioral professionals can make a difference. Behavioral Healthcare Tomorrow, 14, 32-35. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/58785 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 「勉強出勤」(presenteeism)係描述儘管身體疾病造成不適,或長時間工作造成疲倦,工作者仍出勤或持續工作的行為。勉強出勤的相關研究數量少且零散分布於不同領域,主要為醫療、護理與職業健康等。西方學者對勉強出勤議題的相關研究仍屬起步萌芽階段,無論國內外,現有的勉強出勤研究均缺乏完整概念探討,且測量方式尚存在諸多限制,更缺乏對其行為動機的探究。有鑑於此,本研究旨在:1.以質化與量化的方式確認台灣工作者的勉強出勤行為動機;2.以壓力理論為基礎,探究個人特質與勉強出勤行為動機之關聯;3.探究勉強出勤與身心健康、工作後果之關聯。
本研究採用兩波的追蹤樣本研究,以台灣工作者為研究對象,總計回收245份有效問卷。就多元迴歸分析與結構方程模式的結果發現:在行為動機方面,自我效能與積極動機有顯著關聯;神經質與消極動機有顯著關聯。在適應後果方面,勉強出勤與生理健康、心理健康、工作滿意有顯著負向關聯,而與工作耗竭有顯著正向關聯。再者,勉強出勤與工作耗竭間具有時差遞延效果,亦即兩者互為因果。本研究補足了勉強出勤既有文獻的缺口,並以台灣工作者為研究對象,延伸了西方文獻的實徵證據。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In the current climate of global economic depression, presenteeism, the opposite of absenteeism, is becoming more prevalent in the workplace. Although some definitional confusion persists, the most recent scholarly conception of presenteeism involves showing up for work when one is ill. There are thus far very few studies exploring why it occurs and how it affects employees. There is not even consensus on the definition and measure of presenteeism among organizational behavior researchers. The purpose of this study is: 1. to delineate the underlying motives of the act of presenteeism and develop suitable measures for both the motives and the behavioral manifestation of the act; 2. to systematically examine the correlations between the individual characteristics and motives of presenteeism; 3. work and health consequences of the act of presenteeism in a Chinese work context.
Using structured questionnaires, we employed a 2-wave panel study design in which antecedents, motives, and consequences of the act of presenteeism were measured in a diverse sample of 245 full-time Chinese employees in Taiwan. Hierarchical regression analyses showed that self-efficacy and neuroticism were significantly associated with approach and avoidance motives for the act of presenteeism, respectively. Moreover, we found that the act of presenteeism was negatively associated with employees’ physical health, mental health, and job satisfaction, whereas it was positively associated with exhaustion. With cross-laggedpanel modeling, we also found presenteeism and exhaustion had reciprocal relationships over time. In conclusion, the present study shed some light on motives, behavioral manifestations, antecedents, and consequences of the act of presenteeism to extend the existing literature. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T08:30:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-D98741011-1.pdf: 891732 bytes, checksum: feb585970a83ba485bb49321174e0c4a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 II
ABSTRACT III 圖目錄 VI 表目錄 VII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機與目的 4 第二章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 勉強出勤的概念發展 6 第二節 勉強出勤的操作化 12 第三節 勉強出勤的後果 23 第三章 研究方法 28 第一節 研究一:初探勉強出勤之概念 28 第二節 研究二:初探勉強出勤之相關因素 34 第三節 驗證性因素分析與共同方法變異檢定 38 第四章 研究結果 40 第一節 樣本特性 40 第二節 研究變項描述性統計 42 第三節 研究變項相關分析 43 第四節 階層式迴歸分析 47 第五節 交叉延宕模式 53 第五章 討論 56 第一節 研究結果概述 56 第二節 研究限制與未來研究建議 60 第三節 管理意涵與結論 63 參考文獻 65 附件一 研究一:訪談大綱 73 附件二 研究一:問卷 74 附件三 研究二:問卷 76 圖目錄 圖2 1 Johns(2010)出勤-缺勤決策動態模型 16 圖2 2研究架構 27 圖4 1穩定模式(stablility model) 54 圖4 2勉強出勤與工作耗竭互為因果模式 55 表目錄 表3-1訪談對象表格 30 表3-2勉強出勤行為動機 33 表4-1個人樣本描述性統計(n = 245) 41 表4-2研究變項描述性統計 42 表4-3個人背景變項與主要變項之相關 44 表4-4研究變項之間相關 (n = 245; 對角線為Cronbach α) 46 表4-5預測勉強出勤行為動機之迴歸分析 48 表4-6預測勉強出勤之迴歸分析 49 表4-7預測勉強出勤行為後果之迴歸分析 (T1) 51 表4-8測勉強出勤行為後果之迴歸分析 (T2) 52 表4-9交叉延宕模式比較 54 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 初探勉強出勤之相關因素 | zh_TW |
dc.title | An Exploratory Study of Presenteeism | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 102-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃國隆(Kuo-Long Huang),林文政(Wen-Jeng Lin),葉穎蓉(Ying-Jung Yeh),吳玲玲(Ling-Ling Wu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 勉強出勤,自我效能,神經質,身心健康,工作滿意, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | presenteeism,self-efficacy,neuroticism,health consequences,job satisfaction, | en |
dc.relation.page | 81 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-12-27 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 商學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 870.83 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。