請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/57249
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 李玲玲(Ling-Ling Lee) | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsi-Cheng Ho | en |
dc.contributor.author | 何熙誠 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T06:39:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-08-01 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2014-08-01 | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2014-07-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Archer, J. 1988. The behavioural biology of aggression.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bartlett, M. S. 1947. The use of transformations. Biometrics, 3, 29-52. Bolger, D. T. & Case, T. J. 1992. Intra- and interspecific interference behaviour among sexual and asexual geckos. Animal Behaviour, 44, 21-30. Brown, J. L. 1964. The evolution of diversity in avian territorial systems. The Wilson Bulletin, 76, 160-169. Bustard, H. R. 1970. Activity cycle of the tropical house gecko, Hemidactylus frenatus. Copeia, 1970 - No. 1, 173-176. Carpenter, F. L. 1987. Food abundance and territoriality: to defend or not to defend? American Zoologist, 27, 387-399. Case, T. J., Bolger, D. T., & Petren, K. 1994. Invasions and competitive displacement among house geckos in the tropical Pacific. Ecology, 75(2), 464-477. Chapman, M. R. & Kramer, D. L. 1996. Guarded resources: the effect of intruder number on the tactics and success of defenders and intruders. Animal Behaviour, 52, 83-94. Craig, R. B., DeAngelis, D. L., & Dixon, K. R. 1979. Long- and short-term dynamic optimization models with application to the feeding strategy of the loggerhead shrike. The American Naturalist, 113(1), 31-51. Dame, E. A. & Petren, K. 2006. Behavioural mechanisms of invasion and displacement in Pacific island geckos (Hemidactylus). Animal Behaviour, 71, 1165-1173. Davies, N. B. & Houston, A. I. 1981. Owners and satellites: the economics of territory defence in the pied wagtail, Motacilla alba. Journal of Animal Ecology, 50, 157-180. Emlen, S. T. & Oring, L. W. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197, 215-223. Goldberg, J. L., Grant, J. W. A., & Lefebvre, L. 2001. Effects of the temporal predictability and spatial clumping of food on the intensity of competitive aggression in the Zenaida dove. Behavioral Ecology, 12, 490-495. Grant, J. W. A. 1993. Whether or not to defend? The influence of resource distribution. Marine Behaviour and Physiology, 23, 137-153. Grant, J. W. A., Gaboury, C. L., & Levitt, H. L. 2000. Competitor-to-resource ratio, a general formulation of operational sex ratio, as a predictor of competitive aggression in Japanese medaka (Pisces: Oryziidae). Behavioral Ecology, 11, 670-675. Grant, J. W. A. & Guha, R. T. 1993. Spatial clumping of food increases its monopolization and defense by convict cichlids, Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum. Behavioral Ecology, 4, 293-296. Grant, J. W. A. & Noakes, D. L. G. 1988. Aggressiveness and foraging mode of young-of-the-year brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis (Pisces, Salmonidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 22, 435-445. Grant, J. W. A., Girard, I. L., Breau, C., & Weir, L. K. 2002. Influence of food abundance on competitive aggression in juvenile convict cichlids. Animal Behaviour, 63, 323-330. Hodge, M. A. & Uetz, G. W. 1995. A comparison of agonistic behaviour of colonial web-building spiders from desert and tropical habitats. Animal Behaviour, 50, 963-972. Howerton, C. L. & Mench, J. A. 2014. Running around the clock: competition, aggression and temporal partitioning of running wheel use in male mice. Animal Behaviour, 90, 221-227. Huang, W. S. 2004. Reptile ecology and the evolution of parental care on a tropical Asian island. Ph.D. Thesis. Cornell University. Hurd, P. L. 2006. Resource holding potential, subjective resource value, and game theoretical models of aggressiveness signalling. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 241, 639-648. Jones, G. P. 1983. Relationship between density and behaviour in juvenile Pseudolabrus celidotus (Pisces: Labridae). Animal Behaviour, 31, 729-735. Jonestone, R. A. 2001. Eavesdropping and animal conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 9177-9180. Kotrschal, K., Hemetsberger, J., & Dittami, J. 1993. Food exploitation by a winter flock of graylag geese: behavioral dynamics, competition and social status. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 33, 289-295. Marcellini, D. L. 1971. Activity patterns of the gecko Hemidactylus frenatus. Copeia, 1971 – No.4, 631-635. Matos, R. J. & Schlupp, I. 2005. Animal Communication Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. McGregor, P. K. 1993. Signalling in territorial systems: a context for individual identification, ranging, and eavesdropping. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 340, 237-244. Mitchell, M. A. & Tully, T. N. Jr. 2009. Manual of Exotic Pet Practice. Saunders Elsevier Press. Monaghan, P. & Metcalfe, N. B. 1985. Group foraging in wild brown hares: effects of resource distribution and social status. Animal Behaviour, 33, 993-999. Moore, J. C. & Greeff, J. M. 2003. Resource defence in female pollinating fig wasps: two’s a contest, three’s a crowd. Animal Behaviour, 66, 1101-1107. Morrison, D. W. 1979. Apparent male defense of tree hollows in the fruit bat, Artibeus jamaicensis. Journal of Mammalogy, 60, 11-15. Noel, M. V., Grant, J. W. A., & Carrigan, J. G. 2005. Effects of competitor-to-resource ratio on aggression and size variation within groups of convict cichlids. Animal Behaviour, 69, 1157-1163. Oliveira, R. F., McGregor, P. K., & Latuffe, C. 1998. Know thine enemy: fighting fish gather information from observing conspecific interactions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 265, 1045-1049. Petren, K. & Case, T. J. 1996. An experimental demonstration of exploitation competition in an ongoing invasion. Ecology, 77, 118-132. Petren, K. & Case, T. J. 1998. Habitat structure determines competition intensity and invasion success in gecko lizards. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 11739-11744. Petren, K., Bolger, D. T., & Case, T. J. 1993. Mechanisms in the competitive success of an invading sexual gecko over an asexual native. Science, 259, 354-357. Scott, J. P. & Fredericson, E. 1951. The causes of fighting in mice and rats. Physiological Zoology, 24, 273-309. Toobaie, A. & Grant, J. W. A. 2013. Effect of food abundance on aggressiveness and territory size of juvenile rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Animal Behaviour, 85, 241-246. Tricas, T. C. 1989. Determinants of feeding territory size in the corallivorous butterflyfish, Chaetodon multicinctus. Animal Behaviour, 37, 830-841. Vahl, W. K., Van Der Meer, J., Meijer, K., Piersma, T., & Weissing, F. J. 2007. Interference competition, the spatial distribution of food and free-living foragers. Animal Behaviour, 74, 1493-1503. Warner, R. R. & Hoffman, S. G. 1980. Population density and the economics of territorial defense in a coral reef fish. Ecology, 61, 772-780. Wheeler, B. C., Scarry, C. J., & Koenig, A. 2013. Rates of agonism among female primates: a cross-taxon perspective. Behavioral Ecology, 24, 1369-1380. Wilcox, R. S. & Ruckdeschel, T. 1982. Food threshold territoriality in a water strider (Gerris remigis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 11, 85-90. Wyman, R. L. & Hotaling, L. 1988. A test of the model of the economic defendability of a resource and territoriality using young Etroplus maculatus and Pelmatochromis subocellatus kribensis. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 21, 69-76. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/57249 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 敵對行為(Agonistic behavior)是動物常用於競爭資源的手段,資源防禦理論(Resource defense theory)指出動物展現的攻擊性(Aggressiveness)可能會隨著競爭者數量及資源量的增加而上升、下降或呈現先升後降的變化。疣尾蝎虎(Hemidactylus frenatus)常於夜間聚集捕食牆上趨光的昆蟲,個體之間偶有敵對互動。牠們的種內攻擊性在過往文獻陳述中多有分歧,其是否受競爭者、食物量等因子影響也仍待釐清。本研究透過室內操弄實驗檢視兩個變級的競爭者數量及三個變級的食物量相互組合下疣尾蝎虎展現的敵對行為。結果顯示,疣尾蝎虎在競爭者較多的情況下展現的攻擊性大致較低,包括長距離敵對互動比例較低、碰面發生敵對的比例較低、達中強度敵對行為的比例較低,以及互動時間較短;但同時優勢個體卻會展現更高比例的高強度敵對行為。優勢個體展現高強度敵對行為的比例同時受食物量影響,隨食物增加略呈先升後降的變化;而當非優勢個體碰面時,互動時間亦隨食物量呈先升後降的變化。本研究證實了競爭者數量及食物量皆對疣尾蝎虎覓食時的種內敵對行為有多層面的影響,也進一步發現群內的社會地位會影響這些行為反應,提供了資源防禦理論應用於在爬蟲類行為研究的罕例。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Agonistic behavior is commonly adopted by animals for competing resources. Resource defense theory points out that the aggressiveness of animals is affected by competitor numbers and resource value. As these factors increase, the aggressiveness might increases, decreases, or has a quadratic change. Individuals of Hemidactylus frenatus often aggregate around the lights and compete on insect prey. Results of previous studies on the intraspecific aggressiveness of this species were contradictory, and whether its aggressiveness is affected by abovementioned factors is also unknown. An indoor experiment, manipulating 2 levels of competitor numbers and 3 levels of food abundance, were thus conducted to clarify their effects on the aggressiveness of foraging H. frenatus. The results indicated that the aggressiveness was generally lower when there were more competitors, i.e., lower long-distance agonistic ratio, overall hostility ratio, median intensity ratio, and interaction time. However, dominant geckos tended to show a higher ratio of high intensity behavior at the same time. This ratio was also affected by food abundance and showed a quadratic response along with the increasing food abundance. A quadratic response was also found in the interaction time of encounters between subordinates. The study confirmed that both competitor numbers and food abundance have effects but may act differently on intraspecific agonistic behavior of H. frenatus, and the importance of social status was also revealed. This study provides a rare example of applying resource defense theory on agonistic interaction of reptiles. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T06:39:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R99b44008-1.pdf: 1093968 bytes, checksum: 16f2e34fa8efbdb3f2435a798ac9529a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Verification from the committee…………………………i
Acknowledgement…………………………………………………………………ii Chinese abstract……………………………………………………………iii English abstract………………………………………………………………iv Introduction……………………………………………………………………………1 Material and methods………………………………………………………5 Study animal……………………………………………………………………………5 Experimental setup……………………………………………………………5 Experimental design…………………………………………………………7 Experimental procedure…………………………………………………7 Data collection……………………………………………………………………9 Data analysis………………………………………………………………………10 Results………………………………………………………………………………………14 Encounter outcomes and social status…………14 Main effects and the interaction effect of the factors………………………………………………………………………………………15 Food abundance effects in “dominant-involved dyadic” and “subordinate-only dyadic” encounters………………………………………………………………………………16 Discussion………………………………………………………………………………18 References………………………………………………………………………………24 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 以資源防禦理論探討疣尾蝎虎覓食時的種內敵對行為 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Agonistic Behavior of Foraging Hemidactylus frenatus: An Analysis Based on Resource Defense Theory | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林雨德(Yu-Teh Kirk Lin),劉力瑜(Li-Yu Daisy Liu),許鈺鸚(Yu-Ying Hsu),黃文山(Wen-San Huang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 敵對行為,資源防禦理論,疣尾蝎虎,競爭者數量,食物量, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Agonistic behavior,Resource defense theory,Hemidactylus frenatus,Competitor numbers,Food abundance, | en |
dc.relation.page | 51 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2014-07-30 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生命科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-103-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.07 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。